ok so 7.8bill people =3.9bll females with the age range from 1-100 if you broke it down as 390m per 10year age bracket you can discount off 6 age brackets of 0-10 and 50-100. meaning =1.56bill woman of 'conception possible age'
so badecker wants to think 2% of woman able to conceive are murderers each year. meaning 2% kill in year 1 (37m of 1.56b) 2% kill in year 2(another 37m of 1.56b) 2% kill in year 3(another 37m of 1.56b) and so on for 35 years of 15-50 well add that up for all the woman from 15-50. would mean that 70% of all conceptionable age women have killed atleast once in 35 years,
70%.. um. no just no. us figures are more like 24%. uk figures are under 20%. so if the 70% math based on badecker sources was correct some other countries must be in the high 90% just to balance out to 70% ..in my opinion the 37m(70%) is just too high a number to even be accurate .. i must bring back the argument that badecker does not understand: the definition of murder. what gestational state 'life' is determined as. the legal rights a woman has over her body. .. also to note also a high majority of 'abortions' occured in the first 12 weeks. involving swallowing a pill and having a heavy period to clearout. so not exactly a story that sounds like murder
|
|
|
it has been said long ago stop circling your debunked scripts check your post history
the issue with this topic is that the woman purposefully asked the wrong department,purposefully to get a non answer.
its like you going to a vegan store and asking for meat. when they say they dont have any. you then want to declare that meat doesnt exist.
such a lame game plan. move on and try finding something of actual merit to talk about. stop circling your debunked myths.
if you want to have a discussion about real issues. heres some subjects hospitals only having 0.2% beds per populous meaning they can become over run easily US health insurance inflate the medical costs for uninsured to promote their 'valued' service. US health insurance don't do the treatment. but can force patients to not get treatment by pricing strategy
if US hospitals had capacity of 5% then you could have had your fantasy 'herd spread' scenario if US health insurance just paid for whatever treatment a person needed. then US treasury wouldnt have to cover the bill if us health insurance actually did pay out properly. 32% of american workers would not be in medical debt
|
|
|
what badecker does not realise. is that these investigations are not to prove anything. but to have an excuse to trigger some fund spending for trumps pals. trump has raided his $150m share of the $200m RNC fund. and now by getting republican senators to sign on an order for an investigation. trump and pence can raid the remaining $50m on the RNC side.
will true republicans realise thats whats left in the RNC fund after trump leaves on the 20th will not be enough to help republicans over the next few years
|
|
|
but the average hospital admission is ~20m.
this year so far has had a surge of ~36mill+ admissions
but hey. you seem to want to avoid research. so no point explaining all the details if your just too ignorant to even care about details
People are scared to death and local clinics are refusing people that answer yes to any of their 20 vague-ass questions... Of course, hospital visits are up. Just because I think COVID-19 is mostly bullshit... doesn't make me anti hospital. I'm just saying they aren't always right (social distancing blacks from whites for example). there is a wild difference between going to hospital for a 30minute consult. vs being admitted to hospital and put on a bed and given treatment. the numbers of 'consults' (visits) is hundreds of millions. the numbers are accurate as they come from hospitals themselves. just seems some idiots make up so many fake numbers on conspiracy sites. that conspiracy sheep then dont trust any number. maybe they should atleast stop looking at conspiracy sites. atleast try to look for the source data to verify. atleast stop crying about 'its a number, it must be wrong because its a number' in short stop fearing/dismissing numbers unless you verified them.. by doing some research from source data
|
|
|
buffet has a methodology to his investments
if he invests in a farm. he can get gains from the harvest. and if there is a bad harvest that kills the fields. he can still sell the land and buildings to real estate. thus never lose because the land value is worth more than a single harvest
if he invests in coca-cola. he gains from the sells of black liquid. if they stop production he can still sell the factories because the factory value is more then a years liquid sales
if bitcoin flops due to being to expensive to buy/sell/transaction fee and everyone jumped ship to another coin with cheaper fees overnight.. then bitcoin units of measure have no secondary asset value.
yes bitcoin has real underlying value due to the cost of mining. much like gold does due to expensive gold mining keeping gold above $900 underlying cost compared to $1 if everyone could mine it in their backyard with a spoon.
but if the desire to produce and the desire to buy dies. then theres nothing else that can keep bitcoin desirable. gold for instance has multiple utility. industrial, technological and fashionable bitcoins sole asset value is on the cost of the previous holder/creator
its like not investing in cocacola infrastructure but just buying the cans of coke. if no one wants coke. whats left to sell(scrap metal tin can value) when you look at bitcoin investors they mainly invest in the development and the companies using bitcoin more so than btc's.
all im saying is buffet likes to invest in things that have value even if the internal production fails if anyone was to talk to buffet. you will never win him over on the merits of the coin, and he wont then want to buy the coin. instead convince him of the merits of the businesses that help support the coin and show how the businesses can survive even if the coin fails. and he may then invest in the businesses surrounding the coin. and then promote he coin as a sidestep of supporting the business (he owns % of coca-cola infrastructure, but also buys cans of coke to promote the company making it) if you just told him to just buy cans of coke based on taste and bubbles. he would not
|
|
|
It all goes to conspiracy theory still. Whether Covid19 is true or not, they have successfully locked cities what else is needed to be undone when proven covid is not real?
People are dying in millions is probably because the population is also billions now compare to the numbers back when the population all over the world is lesser. Nothing still can be done whether they all conspire including the media, the fear is there.
the conspiracy nutters 'fear' is them fearing government. and yet they are doing actions that are themselves the cause of extra restrictions. their antimask protest mingling is in of itself a show that people want to spread the virus and so actions then need to be taken to reduce the spread. the nutters on this site were proclaiming the need to spread the virus. so they know deep down it exists. they simply dont like government telling them what to do. if the government said spread the virus. they would do the opposite and try avoiding spreading it if the government said dont spread it. they would do the opposite and try spreading it their insanity has nothing to do with the facts of the virus. they just want to be opposite to government advice because their real fear is the psychotic and paranoid fear of swat teams knocking at their door. the reality is hospitals are filling up with people with a particular set of symptoms. and no its not kitchen fire burns or car accidents. its respiratory infections the excess deaths linked to this pattern of illness is clear. the virus is real but conspiracy nutters will denie it and try to twist the narrative to their paranoid fantasy that governments want to visit their house. the nutters think if they can pretend the virus doesnt exist then it will quash their paranoia of swat teams knocking down their door. but the truth is that government/swat team didnt even care about these nutters and would have never visited them in the first place. there is an insane subgroup of nutters that want to prove their paranoia by making noise and trying to get government /swat attention. trying to force government/swat to react just to say 'i told you so' those idiots are just asking for trouble and not realising that if they just calm down their delusions their ultimate fear wont happen and so they can get on with life. its like driving a car. but a paranoid idiot will fear being stopped by the police. but instead of just driving normally. he will swerve around, go through red lights and speed to get the cops attention. just to prove his paranoia has merit
|
|
|
ok. lets handle this ditty initially they were trialing people at different doses from say 100, 60,30 the 100 group had a big antibody response and the 30 had very small response so they gave the 30 group a second dose because the response was low. and after time they found out the double dose out performed the other groups. its that simple
the benefits of double dosing of small amounts is less adverse affect compared to the megadose. so it has that benefit too
.. lets explain the antibody count difference lets say a single mega dose of say 100ul gives a response antibody production that peaks at say 100 on day 14 and then declines by 1% a day
now lets say you have one dose of 30ul that by itself peaks at 30 on day 14 and is at say 27.9 at day 21 and 25.8 on day 28 having a second dose of 30ul on day 28 then multiplies the number of antibodies already there. thus more then a 100 antibody peak (multiplying the 25.8 already in system) and also the doses done per session are only 30ul each so 3x less of the immediate adverse effects compared to 100ul single dose
imagine it another way if a 100ul can raise temperature by 1.5oc as your body makes antibodies. then a 30ul dose only raises your temperature by 0.5oc first time. yes the second dose due to the amplification effect may raise temperature more than 0.5oc but not as much as the 100ul. because the body has already had 2-3 weeks to train itself to not go out of control
my numbers are not exact and used only for lame brain demo explanation but the context/theory is right
|
|
|
so tash is telling people to start basement dwelling to avoid all radio. sound, and light waves.
i think his post speaks more about him trying to find excuses to explain his basement dwelling lifestyle
EG he wont get on a plane and have a vacation abroad due to xrays he doesnt speak to people on a cell phone or mobile wifi device due to radio waves he doesnt go out in the sun due to light waves.
but he is just fooling himself if he thinks viruses only enter via the skin
|
|
|
she had an allergy issue. and still went through with the vaccine.. seems simple to me. should have looked at the allergy advice and not proceeded with the vaccine if she didnt want risks. heck even she is telling people if they have allergy issues. to be aware. funny thing is the vaccine companies and the hospitals are already aware of it. but the % of people that have mild or even severe reactions to the vaccine is far less than those that have mild/severe reactions to the virus but yes the message is very simply. if you have allergies take precautions
|
|
|
what you got to realise is the first groups of people getting the vaccine are majority people with pre-existing conditions. like heart issues. and tiffany fainted due to all the stress of being on stage after having a vaccine. it was a stress induced faint. she already had mentioned her heart issues. and so case closed. no more info needed. the reason she telling people to stop harrassing her and family is because she has already explained the cause and so people need to just move on with their lives her avoiding re-explaining to every 'karen' 'schitzo' 'conspiracy nut' is because them people wont listen even if being told 50 times. so they need to just move on her disapearing is not a new conspiracy mystery that requires more investigating. its that she is getting on with her normal life and so should the nutters
|
|
|
sorry but this was debunked the actual news was for those doing the vaccine organising. should make every effort to give people the same vaccine as second dose. the exception of only giving different vaccine as last resort of the same was is unavailable is just that a last resort. its an exception to the rule. not a change of rule. the protocol remains the same. stick to the same vaccine UK is adjusting their strategy on the 2nd doses. The original protocol was something like a few weeks from the first dose to the second -- UK is now extending that period and allowing different vaccines to be mixed in.
no. actually try to check the source Previous incomplete vaccination If the course is interrupted or delayed, it should be resumed using the same vaccine but the first dose should not be repeated. There is no evidence on the interchangeability of the COVID-19 vaccines although studies are underway. Therefore, every effort should be made to determine which vaccine the individual received and to complete with the same vaccine. For individuals who started the schedule and who attend for vaccination at a site where the same vaccine is not available, or if the first product received is unknown, it is reasonable to offer one dose of the locally available product to complete the schedule
its saying try every effort to stick to the same vaccine. and then shows an example of an extreme exception to that advice. its not saying new protocol is to mix it up
|
|
|
seems tvbcof is taking too many drugs. his thoughts and rambles have no merit of truth. all he does is ramble about stuff he was told on conspiracy sites where he cant even have the mindset to even check for facts.
it might be much simpler if tvbcof just asked his conspiracy cult to just write their own opinions on this site. and give tvbcof a break. because all tvbcof does is just repeat their scripts like a puppet middleman.
maybe if tvbcof bothered to spend 2 minutes fact checking the nonsense he reads before reiterating it here. he might have a more productive amount of comments. but so far its just nonsense.
anyway. with covid killing a minimum of 3 out of 1000 within 4 weeks of getting infected.(average numbers are 2-6 out of 100 in places that dont social distance) if the vaccine was so bad we should see out of the 600,000 that had the vaccine last month. atleast 1800 death due to vaccines by next week.or even 36000 extremes.
so if tvbcof sees 1800-36k deaths by next week. then he has a point that vaccines are as bad/worse than the virus.. however i guarantee you that there wont be more deaths than covids minimum death rate. so tvbcof should prepare himself to be debunked
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/YoureAllDunces/status/1345407916409561090The Wall Street Journal @WSJ More nursing homes are getting the Covid-19 vaccine, but a recent survey found nearly 72% of certified nursing assistants don’t want to be vaccinated. One Georgia company is offering staffers who take the shot a free breakfast at Waffle House. https://on.wsj.com/3pxsdyuIgnatius J. Reilly @YoureAllDunces “ We know you’re starving, and we just gave you basically nothing, so here’s a junk food breakfast (only one per starving family) as long as you take our intentionally rushed experimental injection that even our own medical personnel are refusing.” This is what they think of us. the staff want it. but they are witnessing that they are offered appointments before the vulnerable people they care for are offered. so their mindset is that the vaccine should go to those that need it most first. and they will (hope) to have an oppertunity to rejoin the list later. whats being said is that those that dont take it may not be offered a vaccine later so they should take it now the reasoning of putting care home staff higher then care home residents is because government know if staff get sick. then no one will be left to care fr residents. so best to vaccinate the staff and then the residents. but the staff prefer it the other way. residents first then staff, so this is their little protest hoping it gets officials to change is priority list
|
|
|
funnily enough there was actually more cases of flu(non covid) in 2019-2020 than there were in 2018-2019 funnily enough theres been 170 flu(non covid) in just the last week.
funnily enough in the latest 'season' of 2020-2021 there have been more cases than in 2011-2012 and 2015-2016 seasons. and the current season is only halfway through
im thinking the guy is confusing 'cases' with other metrics like deaths. or trying to take 1 weeks results and pretending its yearly results.
but it only took me 46 seconds to see the source data that shows far far more then the proclaimed '36 cases'
|
|
|
meanwhile the RNC had a budget of $200m last year. but trump is heavily spending $150m of it on his personal luxuries republicans are left with just $50m (less than $1m per state) to fund their campaigns
still love trump? if so then you obviously are not republican because he is raiding them dry as he exits being a republican in 3 weeks
|
|
|
The stuff about anti vaxxers starving to death and the Canadian Government forcing Grocery Stores to not let anyone in the door without the vaccine...it's not real.
We are really only a couple of relatively small steps away from it Impressive level of ambiguity. im still laughing at tvbcofs tinfoil hat moment there.. a 'vaccine pass' wont be used to allow entry into a grocery store. because 99.5% would be banned as not even 0.5% had a vaccine so far, in tvbcos brainless scenario if anything it a 'vaccine pass' would just be a pass to not wear a mask. much like some already have a autism/copd pass to not wear a mask.
|
|
|
Where do you get that statistic of 20 million people visiting hospitals, 20 million who are going to die? If you get it from the hospitals, hospitals have to cover their rear ends. So, even if the 20 million statistic is out there somewhere, nobody knows that it could even be close to accurate.
So, as usual, you simply blab. Kinda fun to watch, however.
well you could always use google. but lets be more specific. if you want to get anal about the word "visit" then its hundreds of million that visit a hospital. but the average hospital admission is ~20m. this year so far has had a surge of ~36mill+ admissions but hey. you seem to want to avoid research. so no point explaining all the details if your just too ignorant to even care about details
|
|
|
^^^ Thanks, franky1. If what I say was unimportant, you wouldn't feel the need to respond. So, what I say must be important since you talk against it. I appreciate you, brother.
when you get something wrong but then repeat it even after being correct then i make a point to emphasise how wrong you are Wow! I didn't know I was so much like you. After all, I do the same with you, right? However, when you get something wrong, but then repeat it even after being correct... you don't even make sense. Thanks. you have not been correct. you have been correct ed. debunked. pointed out where you are wrong
|
|
|
UK is adjusting their strategy on the 2nd doses. The original protocol was something like a few weeks from the first dose to the second -- UK is now extending that period and allowing different vaccines to be mixed in. Meaning, you take the Pfizer vaccine as the first dose, then take the Moderna dose. Health experts are saying this makes no fucking sense, because it doesn't. Vaccines are based on the spike proteins, but is it a good idea to then begin mixing vaccines that have not passed basic scrutiny through clinical trials together? https://nypost.com/2021/01/01/uk-allows-mixing-covid-19-vaccines-as-experts-warn-of-risks/no. actually try to check the source Previous incomplete vaccination If the course is interrupted or delayed, it should be resumed using the same vaccine but the first dose should not be repeated. There is no evidence on the interchangeability of the COVID-19 vaccines although studies are underway. Therefore, every effort should be made to determine which vaccine the individual received and to complete with the same vaccine. For individuals who started the schedule and who attend for vaccination at a site where the same vaccine is not available, or if the first product received is unknown, it is reasonable to offer one dose of the locally available product to complete the schedule
its saying try every effort to stick to the same vaccine. and then shows an example of an extreme exception to that advice. its not saying new protocol is to mix it up
|
|
|
^^^ Thanks, franky1. If what I say was unimportant, you wouldn't feel the need to respond. So, what I say must be important since you talk against it. I appreciate you, brother.
when you get something wrong but then repeat it even after being corrected then i make a point to emphasise how wrong you are
|
|
|
|