tash is pretending that there are 100k+ cases of seizures brain damage strokes

funny part is only ~40,000 reports are made. whereby those reports include one OR MORE symptom
total symptoms were ~116k. not the 116k+337k 'symptoms' tash is suggesting


also they are not 100K in the category of nervous system reactions

infact only 30 cases of bloodclots have been found. meaning strokes is under 30
(22 reports of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST))

30 or less.. not 100k.. not 10k not 100... just 30
..
so here is some facts on fatality rate
covid: there are 4.3mill cases and 126800 deaths within 28 days of getting covid(2.9%)
vaccine: there are 37mill vaccines and 704 deaths within 28 days of getting vaccine(0.0019%)

so here is some facts on severe symptom
covid: there are 4.3mill cases and 457000 hospitalisations with covid (10.5%)
vaccine: there are 37mill vaccines and 11600 adverse reaction symptoms (0.31%)

so ask yourself. do you want a 10% chance of needing medical help. or 0.31%
do you want a 2.9% risk of death or a 0.0019%

what tash is misunderstanding or blatantly lying about. is there maybe hundreds of thousands of reports of cry baby stuff like those that feel the needle going in. or a rash/warmth/pain at the needle mark

but the actual rate of people having harmful/unfavourable level of symptoms(adverse) is far lower

the facts are that there is a 1500x benefit of having a vaccine compared to licking sick people to get covid.. based on fatality rates

the facts are that there is a 33x benefit of having a vaccine compared to licking sick people to get covid.. based on mild/severe symptom risk


..
take 2 populations of 100,000 each
                      covid pop                      vaccine pop
seek a doctor   10,500                          310
die                    2,900                          <2

which population group would you rather be in

maybe you dont reaiise this but nano tech can mean many things.. but those many things are limited
and robots/radio signals and stuff isnt it

so you pulling up a video talking about nanotech 5G robots changing human dna.. is you showing you cant use common sense and cant do research on facts

maybe try quoting science and not 'amateurs'

then once you know what is factually possible vs impossible.. you will then 'know if these things are hoaxes'

you have no clue.. i guess you did not research realized cap.. typical

people dont sell at a loss.. and when those at break-even/profit do sell, the new buyer values the coin at the price they bought it at
todays $59k wont remain at $59k if everyone was to sell their coin.. the 18mill coins are not all worth $59k

ill try to emphasise this three times to avoid your misunderstandings requiring me to repeat basics again
emphasis: not all coins will get the todays price of $59k
emphasis: coins are not all equally at a price of $59k
emphasis: those selling will only sell if they can atleast break even/profit


what you realise is as the price goes down people stop selling if its less than the price they paid for it.
^i wont repeat it but read the above line in your head three times

so if the price went to below $10. only the people buying 2012-2009 would still sell
everyone else will hold

these basic facts of trading. lean into things like 'support lines' and valuations

i hold btc from 2012 when coins were $6.. and i dont actually care bout todays price as i automatically know that i could profit even if the price tanks down by 99.98%
the value of btc is always the value when it has sold. .. i have not sold. so i have not valued btc at $59k

someone buying in February at $60k wont be selling while bitcoin is below $60k.
they hoard and keep a $60k value in their mind even when the price went down to $55k last month

i think you may need to spend some time on a term called 'realized value'..
learn the psychology of things like 'buy low sell high'. 'never sell at a loss'.'hoard'. 'hodl'

i mean i did give a little hint in the end of my message about researching realized value

you have a kid. meaning you are going to be involved in some way with that kid for atleast the next 18 years.
no if's or but's about it.

so once you accept your next 18+ years are going to involve communicating with the mother and grandmother of the child. you can then collect your thoughts on a new strategy to communicate without stress or insults

.. in short. man up and stop acting like a tantrum kid. because in your new family you cannot be the tantrum kid. your baby has taken on that role. its now time you take on the role of a parent

..
dealing with 'the mother in-law'has to come with compromises. remind her that the baby means both you and her are going to be involved in that kids life for many many years(atleast till kid is college age) so for the benefit of the kid you both need to find common ground

so because its not a cotton Q0tip an idiot thinks the swab is a nanotech 5G antenna..
..
ok tvbcof has officially jumped off the cliff of reality and fell into the sea of insanity

common sense and intelligence can see that its hoax/conspiracy/fantasy. but thank you tvbcof for admitting that you have no common sense or intelligence when you say you "have no to know if these things are hoaxes"

i already said they 'search for' E S and N protein sequences

the human sequence if found would nullify the test.
finding human sequence would never result in a covid positive test.

what you dont realise is:
DNA has 4 'chemicals'
adenine, cytosine, guanine, thymine

RNA has 4 'chemicals'
adenine, cytosine, guanine, uracil

the thing is.. to amplify human DNA they need to first split dna into single stranded dna (ssdna)
this is a process in of itself thats different to DSrna splitting
 and then add the 4 chemicals of dna to then  to bind to the sing strands to then create 2 pairs of dna

if they put in the RNA chemicals into DNA mix. the ssDNA wont do anything as there is no thymine in it to create a complete DNA.. thus amplification does not happen

..
same goes for RNA. to amplify RNA they need to put RNA chemicals into the mix which creates double stranded RNA(dsRNA)
which they then split into 2 RNA of opposites. this is a process in of itself thats different to DNA splitting
and then add more RNA chemicals to create 2 pairs of dsrna.

putting DNA chemicals into an RNA sample wont amplify RNA as its missing the uracil

..
please do try to learn how things are done and the processes involved. heck even try to learn the common sense differences between RNA and DNA


maybe ill make it simple.. adding RNA reagents to a DNA sample
                                       G T A C G T A C  add chemical  G T A C G T A C
G T A C G T A C              /                                               |  |    |  |  |    |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |   <split >                                            C A    G C A    G    
C A T G C A T G              \                                                  
                                       C A T G C A T G   add chemical  C A T G C A T G
                                                                                      |     |  |  |    |  |
                                                                                      G    A C G   A  C

as you can see the amplification fails as it did not create 2 strands of dna. as pieces are missing

maybe ill make it simple.. adding DNA reagents to a RNA sample
                                                                          G U A C G U A C  add chemical  G T A C G T A C
                                            G U A C G U A C          /                                          |  |    |  |  |    |
G U A C G U A C add chemical |  |  | |  |  | |  | <split>                                          C A    G C A    G    
                                            C A    G C A    G          \                                                  
                                                                                 fail
..
so as you can see. trying to amplify human DNA wont amplify viral RNA..
                            trying to amplify viral RNA wont amplify human DNA
using DNA amplification on RNA causes more issues.

..
there are other processes in place that separate RNA from DNA before amplification. as a double check .. things like chloroform and RNase agents. which bind and clump to DNA but dont bind to RNA. using things like rnase laced magnetic particles they can extract the DNA clump without removing the RNA stuff

..
then they look at the RNA left over and amplify it using the RNA agents. and then look for the E S  N proteins identified as sars-cov-2

..i think this is as basic lay-man as i can make it. if you still dont understand or unwilling to learn. then stop wasting another year in ignorance and find another subject to talk about

says the ignorant badecker.
he would rather explain his thoughts as random causes than find out the actual cause.

yep when badecker cant understand anything. he always blames it on governments or god

brew master is right

a kind of more fair valuation would be to take all the UTXO and to 'price' each coin based on when it last moved as most people 'value' coin when then send/receive it

at the moment the 18,673,250 coins in circulation has a utxo movement value total of about $328bill

(research: realized cap)

movies dont need crowd funding.. and if they did. they would end up in the 'indie' category and not become a blockbuster hit.

if you want a movie worthy of viewing. get a CORRECT and accurate script that has enough content to be entertaining and informative. then hand it to movie studios.

there has already been movies released about crypto with big names in it.. there have been many tv shows too
https://www.imdb.com/search/keyword/?keywords=cryptocurrency
its even had many features in individual episodes and movies where crypto was mentioned but was not the main plot
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_references_in_TV_Shows

there are videos.. but i know you want to see some strange video that shows not the equipment being used but humans with tiny nanoscopic hands touching the virus and dry humping it as 'your proof'

i know any and all videos that show lab-techs using equipment and showing an end result you will ignore and then ask for one of your other spiralling repeats

maybe start by reading the reports and looking at the equipment listed in the reports and then researching what the equipment does..
and then when you finally are ready you can then see there are loads of videos showing the labtechs using the equipment

i know that your conspiracy sites dont show the reports/summaries/videos and thats why you think they dont exist. but please do try to do your research

if your still unsure you can always contact the doctors that made the reports. after all you will always revert to saying you require first hand witness testimony straight from the mouths of those involved.

so instead of wasting a year explaining all the excuses why you wont do the research/ignore the stuff spoonfed to you. how about not wasting another year and instead just do the research


edit to reply to below
there are loads of reports and stuff. your decision to not look for them is your flaw
you speaking with ignorant people like yourself who also dont bother looking is your other flaw

try to actually look instead of pleading ignorance as your proof of no proof

i still find it funny out of all the people in this discussion.. its only badecker that i advertising pharma products in his footer

those now getting sick causing new waves in 2021 are those not vaccinated and ignoring social distancing guidance..

guess they are learning the hard way

you did not even make a post in this topic..
heck i was talking to badecker, which is clear by me mentioning his name..

seems your saying sorry for no reason. .. unless you are badeckers alt account

badecker does not realise how big the sun is and how it would require something bigger than the moon to dim the sun enough to create a shadow dark enough to be true nighttime (even a full eclipse doesnt make it full night time to kill all plants)

maybe you dont know how shadows work
but to block out something the size of sweden. the object needs to be way bigger then sweden

for instance something the size of a 747plane at 32000 feet wont even block out a square inch at sea level

..
moon diameter:384,400 km
distance: 3473km
umbra(shadow) diameter 160km

as you can see.. the moon is over 2400x bigger then the shadow it casts on earth

there is no video that shows how blockchain data is stored on hard drives.. so in badeckers ignorance he wil say blockchains are a fantasy thats not been proven.

thats how silly badecker is
he asks for reports that explain the process.. people link him the reports.. badecker ignores them and say wheres the lay-man summaries
he has for lay-man summaries that explain the process. people show him summaries. badecker ignores them and says these are not the reports/notes

flip flop back and forth

his latest dribble is there is no video.. even though his attempt to ask for a video is just to say 'its not the notes'

maybe he should set his browser to block conspiracy websites to make him less addictively look at conspiracy sites via prevention.. and then search out the real information

maybe if badecker for once read the reports. seen the equipment used. research how the equipment works. then he can finally learn something

as for him pretending he has seen videos of it being done. but nothing showing them using the actual equipment.. that is a lie. i just youtubed and in the first few videos i can clearly see they use equipment like the QIAcube and the illumina equipment

even in a video from australia in january 2020..
so thus debunking badecker and showing he is 15 months out of date

they done the isolation
they done the notes.. contact them if still unsure

maybe if you fear contacting them. then instead learn to read the reports..

and again as a re-reminder the notes do explain all the equipment used and even include your required centrifuge.. and there are test results and pictures

seems you keep forgetting that.

i know you want to reply that the notes are not in dumb arizonian basement dweller language.. or if there was a summary that was in dumb basement dwelling arizonian language you will say the summary is not the report..
so just take the hint you dont need replay your flip flops anymore to avoid reading/accepting the reports exist.. or flip flop about if isolation has or has not been done.
if you are unsure contact the doctors that done it. their names can be found in the reports

the fact that lots of lab in lots of countries have done it. should wake you up to the facts.
we are not living in january 2020 anymore.. alot has happened since then

if your wearing a mask allday. even when alone in a car or your own home. then you have gone too extreme and lack common sense. its only ever been needed when in indoor spaces where close proximity to strangers is an issue. (shops and non-social distance workplaces)

if your wearing the same mask (not replacing surgical masks regularly/not washing reusable ones regularly) then you have gone too extreme and lack common sense
its not the mask thats giving you acne. its the fact that you wore the same mask too long/often.(its the same hygiene common sense as underwear) dont blame your underwear if you get itchy scrotum. blame your hygiene

vaccinations have not caused more problems than covid.
its about 1000x+ safer than getting covid

some idiotic people have always rejected the government advice. but then those idiots deserve the consequences of their actions

for the other idiots thinking the pandemic is just a government social control. and not a disease. those idiots pretend they are now this week 'starting to reject' the advice. when reality is the restrictions are starting to relax

yep jetcash is outing himself as someone that has worn a mask and has followed the advice and is now just starting to do less of last years advice.. because the government advice is relaxing
just a shame he thought that masks had to be worn non-stop for months without changing/washing them

as others have mentioned
sybil attacks(IP spoofing/proxy ips to get more attempts)

also each block ends up only being secured by the difficulty of one system speed if we play into your idea

meaning a corrupt/nafarious person could pool many systems and when they make a block in seconds and sybil attack to get many blocks in a 2 week period.. suddenly the difficulty jumps.. and so the solo miners are no longer able to make a block as fast as the attacker and suddenly the attacker is making all the blocks

oh wait. this is the paradigm shift that occured in 2010. when CPU solo miners took too long because people were using GPU's per attempt compared to the solomining CPU crowd

oh wait. this is the paradigm shift that occured in 2011. when solo GPU miners took too long because people were using multiple GPU's per attempt compared to the solomining GPU crowd

oh wait this is the paradigm shift of 2012 when people pooled together as groups per attempt. out powering the solo miners of gpu
oh wait this is the paradigm shift of 2013 when ASICS pooled together as groups per attempt to out power the GPU pools

these paradigm shifts actually helped make bitcoin stronger by making it impossible for a single individual with a desktop pc to over power the network

the coin reward kept people honest as they would find the value of their efforts become zero if they were to break bitcoin

take any transaction in the blockchain and look at the raw data
this link i just found in a 3 second google search explains the transaction format.. though there are many explanations.. all saying the value is measured in satoshis
https://miro.medium.com/max/1560/1*BMwZ3vTqo6lZffflf94cow.png
https://klmoney.wordpress.com/bitcoin-dissecting-transactions-part-2-building-a-transaction-by-hand/

find a transaction
type it into here
https://nioctib.tech/
in the </> tab it shows GUI translation (human readable format).. click the raw tab to see the real data
find the green highlights halfway down.. thats the raw hex format of the output values

it requires unpadding them into int32 little endian
so.. save time simply put that hex into
https://www.scadacore.com/tools/programming-calculators/online-hex-converter/
and then look for the int32 little endian and you will not see bitcoins with 8 decimals but satoshi amounts

the hex format of output value is hex measured in satoshis

you can do it the manual way too. but hope i saved you some time by showing you tools to get the raw data and convert is easily

blockchain data. raw tx data, utxo data contains no btc
its all satoshi's

its the users GUI (graphic user interface) that converts the hard data of many sats into bucket terms like:
btc, mbtc ubts bits (depending on the user interface setting)

there is no melting down into smaller coin or atoms of coin.
sats are the unit of measure. and btc is just a graphic interpretation not a data unit