chunks or complete chromosome 8..
sections or full sequence..
either way. positive for it=covid negative by default(test is void/classed as fail)

again.. positive for small sequence of chromosome8 = test result never being covid positive

covid positive is not the measure of the 'chunk' of chromosome8.. its the measure of E S N proteins of the virus.
E S and N protein sequences are not chromosome8(or chunks of chromosome8)

chromosome8 chunk sequence as you refer to it. is a separate thing. used as a counter-test to void a test if it shows as positive for the chromosome8 chunk

.. i would explain more but you cant even grasp the basics.

showing positive for a section of chromosome8 means something went wrong.

lets word it another way..
a straight man making love wants to make sure he is making love with a woman. if he finds a scrotum sack(Chromosone8) then he stops and leaves and doesnt complete the sexual act. he classes it as a failed test and does not say its positive 'for woman'
if he doesnt find a scrotum sack. he then continues to look and checks for breasts(e) clitorus(s) and a vagina(n)..
and then he amplifies his exploration
if it takes him 35 attempts to recognised breasts/clit/vagina. then he give up
if he can recognise breasts clit and vagina without many attempts then he is positive that its a woman

a amplification to test for covid will never occur if sections of chromosome8 are there. thus it will not find covid.

get it yet?

first its Emer Cooke
secondly she was appointed in june 2020
thirdly she was appointed as executive director of EMA not chairman
fourthly she is also chairman of ICMRA

AstraZeneca didnt exist in 1991-1998

she is a regulator. and has been for 20 years+. if a medical product doesnt meet certain standards she is the one that punishes the pharma company.

yep she never worked for the pharmaceutical companies. she has always been sitting on the side of government regulators

and now for the most funny part
the EC (european commission) does the 'money and control' stuff not the ema
yep the EMA does not do any money negotiations or any price fixing or any thing of the sort
their role is in the science and monitoring of safety and effectiveness

like i said she can say stop to any release of any treatment and take the pharma to court/sanction them. but she doesnt tell EU countries how much the EU should pay for treatments. the EU use the EC for that

she is a regulatory not a treasurer

when the gameplay plays out. it will be a institutional coin

look at the messages the main bitcoin devs say
"bitcoin is not a cash system its a reserve asset"
"to use crypto daily you have to lock-up bitcoin into counterparty contracts and play on other networks with other mediums of exchange"
"exiting the counterparty contracts/networks will be costly. so atomic swap value to an alt"

in the future most 'users'(average joe) wont hoard bitcoin. they will put it into custodian services and lock it to use other networks and at the other network exit.. hand bitcoin to the counterparty while average joe gets handed altcoins

its like the gold reserve era
lock up gold. play around with bankers cheques. and if you want to escape the bank they will give you other currency forms like nickel and brass coins. because getting gold back comes with a fee
bitcoin will become too expensive to use as its own barter currency(like gold became) and other mediums of exchange would be used for the average joe. while the big players hoard the real assets

no its not..
the PCR test looks for different things.
maybe you should try to learn first and post seconds

the E S N proteins are not chromosome 8
chromosome 8 is used as the opposite of a covid positive test
if chromosome 8 shows up the test will never be covid positive

observations of decentralised practices:
"wait for someone to do the hard work. look at it and if its good copy it"

yep. this method is seen in many places
-miners do hard work. nodes just validate and copy
-bitcoin creator does hard work piecing code together. altcoiners just copy and fork
-wall street apply for ETFs. when one is finally accepted every wallstretter will copy the template and get theirs accepted by default
....
its a form of precedent. once something is set as default. everything after can just use that reference
..
big automotive businesses are smart. they dont have to rush to EV for a decade. so why waste time/money on their own R&D when they can wait around for others to develop the tech and work out the bugs and do the hard R&D .. and then later big automotive can just open a factory and start at step 50. which took elon a decade of R&D to get to

innovate does not mean invent..
it means make changes in something established

so why go through the expense of invention and then R&D when you can let elon do that. and then you wait until all the bugs are worked out and then just copy from his template

why invent the battery. when they can just let elon pay panasonic to invent the battery. and other manufacturers just buy the end product. much cheaper

the "perfectly valid reasons to disconnect those users if they wish to run incompatible software".. those people you speak of were running software that was perfectly compatible with consensus 2009-(july)2017

the rule was to ignore blocks without bit4/1. it was not to ignore blocks with bit6-8... now your getting really flip flopy and not understanding what occured.

bit1 and bit4 were not part of active consensus in 2009-(july)2017
yep you got things wrong again
those without bit1/4 were not incompatible with consensus2009-2017


the disconnect was of those not flagging a NEW temporary thing(flags bit4 and bit1)
it was not to disconnect people running new features consensus has never recognised.. quite the opposite

the disconnect was of those NOT SHOWING new bits
and that disconnecting of nodes relaying non flag 4/1 blocks was done before segwit activation occured

any consensus update if there is going to be a clash of incompatibility means. you cant go back in time and change the network magic of old nodes.. so its the new software that has to change its magic if there was a  fork

or better yet. dont cause a fork before a consensus change. so that there is no fork to cause a clash
........

you would have had a better argument if you didnt flip flop.. and said something like
bit 4 was a mini consensus of july that at 80% for 269+366 blocks would enforce new rules.. not of new transaction formats(segwit) but a new consensus of ignoring oldtimers blocks.
(immoral but consensus defined under the new rule)
and then expressing how your adore consensus because although immoral..  a mini july consensus did activate(but under false pretense)... then allowed august consensus of 2016 blocks for segwit to activate due to lack of opposition blocks being counted

atleast you could then claim something resembling consensus actions
(even when the 'july bit4 consensus' was not segwit but was mandatory fork.. and was not to remove blocks that were incompatible with 2009-17 formats.. but to remove blocks that were compatible with 2009-17)

but hey. instead you flip flop through lots of different versions of events and pretend old timers using code that had not changed were somehow the enemy and they somehow attacked the network.. (weird mindset)

edit to address the comment below
the blockchain data shows the events. as i describe
the bip info shows what the bits actually flag for. as i describe
(heck you couldnt even get the bit4 threshold percentage right let alone the order of events let alone which one activated segwit let alone what the percentages were in july in the leadup to the mandatory fork)

maybe you should read them first

anger is their happy
they love causing chaos and damage. thats their happy place.

they dont want new things to change. they dont want liberty. they want to have their small cabin fever clubhouse with big walls bordering them.. thats their happy place

they act like automatons blissfully ignorant about reality and consequence. this blissful empty mindset is their happy. they hate change but are happy to show their hatred for all things they hate

conservatives want to not progress but just live in a status quo. they want to undo laws that hinder the conservative minds.

liberals want things to change dramatically. and will never get the results they want because the changes they seek are too large and take to much time/effort

so yea conservatives will ultimately be 'happy' in times when things are not changing.. the hint is in their name
(conserve)

the issue is that conservatives hold back liberals. thus causing liberals to be unhappy.

..
take the constitution
conservatives want to live life as if its the 1800's
liberals want to use and amend the old laws to allow more freedoms and changes

its not about looking 'pretty' for other people

majority of woman feel insecure about their own looks. and they want to make the most of their own looks for their own anxiety control.

much like why guys wear trousers instead of walking around town in boxers.
they want to cover up their own insecurities and present themselves in the best way possible.

i know some guys think its a silent advert suggesting the woman is looking for a sexual partner. but no its not like that.

so dont think that if a woman is wearing makeup she is automatically going to accept a guys sexual advances

RNA treatments is not new to 2020
they know RNA does not survive like DNA does. so RNA is better at treatments where no long term adverse affects occur

also by removing things like t-rna and r-rna ensures that it cant replicate or repeat. meaning more resistance to long term effects
so m-rna is even safer then broad RNA and even more safer than DNA

so when a vaccine uses just m-rna. and also uses little to no preservatives. its far far safer by default.
this stuff has been known for the many years before 2020..  long before you think you still need to wait for. because rna research has been done for many years already

i am not dismissing that racism exists.
but i find that talking the 1% of racist idiots and trying to brand an entire country as that 1%. actually becomes racism too

try narrowing it down to for instance trump fangirls. and point out that majority of idiots belong to a political group of idiots. or some social group.

atleast have a better understanding of who you are fighting instead of advertising the fight needs to be against everyone

if you can target your enemy better. you can win the fight easier
find the main idiot. and when he loses. his like minded friends may realise they cant win. and stop being like minded idiots

funny part is i was making posts on a topic specifically about the consensus being broke. i explained how blockchain data shows how consensus broke in the past and that tactic should never be used again..(OBVIOUSLY)
it was very much on topic and mentioned technical details about bit flags.

it was other individuals that began the backlash and adhoms (doomad) who's only rebuttalled using social techniques and lies about changing how events occured
no technical data to explain his opinion of his version of events

i even asked him to back up his claims using blockchain data.
so reasonable requests were made about the technicals..
doomad rebuttal's with more social adhoms but no technicals

my claim bit4 contentious hardfork to remove opposition to achieve 100% bit1 consensus activation of new feature
his claim:(over the years and recently)
   flip: bit1 then bit4..  (soft)
   flop: bit4 had nothing to do with anything and only bit1 occurred
   flipflop: those not wanting activation done the bit4 fork
   flopflip: bit4 had no effect

also to note it was doomad that was slinging around the most insults and lies

strangely gmax agreed with doomad to remove me. simply because i bit at doomads pokes.. even though it was doomad that was doing the adhom trolling.

seems doomad/gmax want to pretend they dislike ad-hom stuff. even when they trigger adhom stuff when technical details on the immutable blockchain prove they are wrong about their versions of events

THEY should try to be mature next time and maybe stop trying to delete posts just because it makes them look bad.. WHY?
well its simple. some people actually want to know facts and details even if it makes some individuals look bad.

devs should learn from their mistakes. not hide and repeat their mistakes
devs should not pull favour towards loyal fans. and instead be mature and pull favour to facts and learning oppertunities when mistakes are highlighted

so please learn from your mistakes. otherwise you will always have people reminding you of your mistakes

as for loyceV.
his selection of a particular chart that makes it look like bitcoin is going blow up to 700% of 'early adopters' and then crash down to 60% of early adopters

sory but bitcoin does not follow that chart.
infact that chart is known to be used in many economic circles not to prove longevity/trust/admiration. but to sugdest implosion/near death and to not use an asset as a store of wealth

hense why i called him out.. there are many economic charts and many different models he could have chosen. but that particular selection. while not actually showing bitcoin progress so far. suggests a bitcoin near death and a presumption to not trust bitcoin as a store of value

alot of people think 'natural eating' is a confusion of 3 paths

1. herbal remedy/supplements
2. veganism/organic
3. fresh not frozen

the reality is simple. not ready-meals that come in a container with an extended lifespan
(processed and many additives)

frozen veg is fine. infact it locks in more nutrients. just heat it and eat it before you give it freezer burn(crystalize after too long in the freezer)

fluids. yes water is purer than soda or caffeine so have adequate supply of fresh water. but dont over do it. your bladder and kidneys can only cope with soo much.
an average person urinates 1pint/halflitre per full bladder. so if your drinking far more then you are excreting you are going to retain fluids which stresses your heart and arteries.
yes too much fluids can cause high blood pressure

its better to have half a pint(a glass) per hour over 8 hours. than to consume 2litres in just the evening
alcoholism can damage the liver but consuming 2 pints an hour of any fluid can damage your heart/arteries over time whether its alcoholic or not.

in essence its about balance
a meat and 2 veg diet has all the basic needs.

going vegan has its drawbacks it requires you to supplement your meals with certain things. so if your going vegan purely because you heard its a great diet on instagram..think again
make sure you know what nutrients each veg contains and do some calculations to get the right proportions. yes it might limit your meal choices and become more laborious.
but dont just think tofu and 2 veg is enough due to some instagram influencers say so

i accept that my posts will be deleted in that category.

but some seem to hate that i talk at all about topics they dont want me to talk about

oh well their actions say more about them than it says about me

but it does make a good read once my posts are removed and only show the social drama queens back up each other with friendships and not facts

atleast i have blockdata on my side. i dont need loyalists and social drama queens as my defence

just a shame that certain categories only want certain people to talk. it makes a certain categories become centrally one sided

a movie about satoshi should not involve Dave Kleiman..

DK and CSW had nothing to do with bitcoin during satoshi era

if you want a movie about DK and CSW.. then you should put it into the fiction category

if you still believe CSW/DK had something to do with satoshi. then you are definitely not the right person/expert on what the movie should contain/be about


now go do your research and realise CSW and DK only got involved in 2013 when CSW made a scam about owning lots of bitcoin.. a scam created by grabbing public addresses and pretending that public addresses is proof of ownership

CSW/DK had no involvement in 2008-2011
go research

..
as for a true satoshi plot
have it as a over-the-shoulder(no face) view of a guy piecing together different cypherpunk idea's and then releasing his masterpiece.
maybe the scene is him doodling on a whiteboard piecing it together (beautiful mind style)
skip to the rease and then the week later where the first transaction is made. have 2 characters getting excited that the idea actually works.
move forward to the lazlo pizza
move forward to alpaca socks
maybe feature it as a farmer that is struggling to sell his alpaca socks so comes across bitcoin and implements it. and suddenly his business gets busier
then bitcoin cupcakes.
then wallstreet
and so on

..
ofcourse stretching it out for 90 minutes would mean many social scenes explaining how different events changed things for people in a dramatic way.
so it can play out how it follows the bitcoin alpaca guy over time. evolving the storyline. could involve hal finneys slow progression of his ALS

..
but anyway the topic creator doesnt appear to know much about satoshi era facts. so i would not deem him worthy of being a project manager about satoshi era

doomad.

i know you lost the technical debate and got angry. as you cannot use blockchain data to back up your assertions. yet i can and have.
i know you didnt accept defeat or reality of events.
i know you reverted to social drama trolling and wanting a ban to avoid accepting defeat.
but the funny part is now my posts were removed. all thats left is your social drama. and it is making your reputation look even worse

next time you want a real technical debate. please reply with blockchain data and not insults.
and yea be man enough to accept reality and not ignorant enough to want to delete posts that explain reality to you in ways you dont like

blockchain data shows before the august 24th activation. there was a august 1st event where a certain group ignored normal 2009-2017 consensus blocks(that did not have temporary bit1 or bit4)
the group only accepted blocks with a temporary flag. thus the fork occured by the certain group wanting a biased blockchain set approving a new rule activation

the blocks with bit4 also had the bit1 flag that was the requirement of consensus activation.
meaning. the bit1 flat moved from 45% to 100% simply by removing any blocks that used the standard 2009-2017(no flag) format and only accepted blocks that had the certain flags that agree to a consensus change

the blockchain data is very clear. its immutable data cannot lie. and its data shows what i said to be true

and i dare you to try using blockchain data and not insults as your rebuttal

if you cannot use blockchain data. then be a man and accept defeat. and stop crying about how you want people banned for proving you wrong.

saying your ignorance and lies about how PCR tests work in different topics does not make it true
chromosome 8 positive = test failure=covid negative



based on your numbers.. which i doubt are accurate or hold weight to context.. but anyway

out of 50million
=6.5 per million bells palsy = 0.000648%
=34 per million death=0.0034%
=740 per million overal reports=0.074% complaints filed

however
covid has more then 3% death. 10% severe 40% mild

making the vaccine atleast 1000x more beneficial than catching covid

you said the CC instructed all doctors to write all causes of death as being covid..

i said you are a lying idiot because the CDC did not say that..

a "segment/short-sequence of DNA that is the same as a segment/short-sequence that is in Chromosome 8" being positive in the test .. would result in being declared as a test failure in regards to covid.

it will never be used to show a covid positive result

the covid positive result is based on finding the E S and N protein sequence of sars-cov-2. not the human stuff

emphasis: the human chromosome 8 is not any of those

try to learn how the covid tests work. not how your conspiracy sites say
..
as for you and jetcash's illogic of  'dead one'.. viruses have no heartbeat or pulse or moving parts..
thats not how viruses work
viruses are not bacteria

try to learn some basic biology

no they did not
there has never been any cdc instruction to list all deaths as covid
the stuff you read from your conspiracy site last march or april. was your conspiracy sites stupid thoughts. not what the cdc actually said

the cdc said to list all symptoms as standard. and fill in the symptoms that lead to death on the death certificate as normal. and to then use a certain code if its deemed caused by covid via diagnostics of symptom onset. by tests, scans.

death certificates do not just have a single code listed

cdc never said list all deaths as covid
cdc never said list as covid without tests/diagnosis

try to seek the source data and not your conspiracy sites thoughts

you have become too obsessed with blindly trusting bigtree and your other conspiracy sites. that you have become delusional.
by this i mean even when its been debunked you seem to forget/ignore its been debunked just to keep pushing the lies

you have been told this many times. so now its your turn to actually read the cdc stuff and find out for yourself