lesson one:
a market cap is not actually a bank account that holds $1trill to be collteral for the market cap
a market cap is the price of a single bitcoin multiplied by how many bitcoins exist.

meaning. i can make a altcoin with 20trillion premine coin. and sell just 1 coin to a friend for just $1.
and by that single $1 purchase id get a market cap of $20trillion.
yep even with just $1 involved in all trades. it creates a $20 trillion market cap

lesson 2
if we changed the markets to not have order lines of
$50,000.0001
$50,000.0002
meaning it takes 1000 people to out bid each other just to raise the price by $1
and instead have orderlines that spread by
$50.000
$50,001
then it only takes one person to outbid another person to raise the price by $1
and guess what

lesson 3
those orderlines do not need to be filled with whole bitcoins
there can be orderlines of
$50,000: 0.00001btc ($0.50c)
$50,001:0.00001btc($0.50c)

meaning just 50cents can move the price by $1
meaning it only takes $25k to move the price from $50k to $100k
meaning if all the idea's i just said are implemented the market cap can move to $2trill for just $25k

.
i hope these lessons make you realise the emptiness of the 'market caps' value

in which case the anti-vax homeopath/herbal/suppliment salesmen are the scammers

citizen-antivaxxers. are just idiots that dont know better. easily influenced

influencer antivaxxers. are not actually anti vax or anti-pharma. they are opportunists that are profiting from events by not being able to offer a vaccine due to them not having the training/access. so instead try selling homeopathic/herbal crap for more than its worth in more dosage than needed just to get more repeat sales faster.

citizen-antivaxxers cant understand the lies told to them by their influencers and dont care/know the reason they are told lies. even if they know its for their influencers greed/profit. they dont care, they actually think its fine their influencers make money through lies. because their influencers have told them that everyone lies for money. these idiots will then actually spread the lies just to make their influencers more money even if it doesnt make the idiots money

the idea is simple.
if they cant control it themselves. then they have to control who accesses it
stage one is to ban the access. then they hold the control for stage 2
stage 2 is to then allow licenced usage if particular things are met.

yep thats how the NYbitcoin licence done it. first ban. then need the licence to use.

its not about stopping people forever. its to make a wall. then make a door
you cant have a door without a wall

let me make this simple.
the most easiest way to make a price less or more volatile. is to change in the number of decimals of orderline pricepoints gap
$51,500.12564  requires 87436 orderlines to fill just to get the price to 51501(87k people outbidding each other)
$51,500.16        requires 84 orderlines to fill just to get to the price of 51501(84 people outbidding each other)
$51,500            requires just 1 orderline to fill just to get the price of 51501(1person outbidding another)

..
bitcoins orderbooks of exchanges were like
2012: $100: 10btc   (~$1k to fill an order)
2016: $1000: 1btc   (~$1k to fill an order)
2021: $50k: 0.02btc(~$1k to fill an order)

so as you can see if an average investor had $1k in 2012,2016 or 2021 they could move the price by a pricepoint

so the solution is to have more order pricepoints in more decimal figures to require more order fills to move the price by any significant amount

so petition/demand exchanges use more than 2 decimals per order price and you will see the volatility change
as it allows people to outbid each other multiple opportunities without pushing the price up fast

or if you want the price to go up fast. less decimal opportunities to place a bid

maybe. just maybe.. the reddit post is just PDAX pretending one of their customers schemed them. by pretending to be a schemed customer. purely to advertise themselves.

you know hint that a exchange can give away free money now and again to get more people to sign up.

maybe its next gen social media advertising. like the last generation stuff that had facebook posts mentioning a celebrity and said 'find out how X got to retire early by gaining 1,500x income in 6 weeks'

if its already defined as an ASSAULT rifle. then its not defence by its own existing definition

anyway a 10 clip handgun that needs to be manually 'cocked' per shot. is defence as that half second re-arming the gun is just enough time to decide if the offender has been subdued. rather than a spray 'n' pray mentality

personally id prefer people to use tazers

idiot woke: question everything. make up an answer that fits your dreams.
smart woke: find the truth/facts/real info

tvbcof is the first definition

what you dont realise is the NRA sell to both the cops and citizens
they sell a handgun in the 1950's to cops. then advertise citizens need hand guns too in the 60's
they advertise because citizens have handguns. cops need shotguns in the 70's
they then advertise citizens need shotguns too in the 80s
they then advertise cops need rifles in the 90's
they then advertise citizens need rifles in 00's
they then advertise cops need fully automatics in 10's
they then advertise citizens need fully automatics in 20's
they then advertise cops need tanks
and so on and so on

yep next move is citizens need armour plated vehicles with projectile weaponry

...
but addressing just your point. yes in law if someone waves a gun around or warns you that they are armed. you then have the right to defend yourself because suddenly there is a potential risk to life.
that defence works both ways. and in of itself a reason why so many deaths occur.. just having a gun

the NRA tries to advertise that citizens should walk around with guns. knowing it will cause issues by suggesting such
if your going to open carry. expect some people to look at you in shock and have the police check you out
the NRA wont come save you when your stopped and questioned. all they care about is getting more gun sales. they will not pay your bail

the way i see climate change

the water cycle is the cause-effect. not carbon

however industries like fossil fuel electric companies knew in 1990 that supplies are depleting fast and all coal will be gone by 2050. they needed to diversify but they dont want to pay the re-fit bill to do it.

same with real estate. running out of brownfield sites and not able to expand to greenbelt site. so although they can buy up area's of known floodland they dont want the responsibility and costs related to repairing houses that get flooded. so they dont want to pay the bill
theyll buy up subsidised land no problem but they wont buid unless they can get someone to pay for the upkeep
yep imagine it if when a new estate floods the company that bought the pre-build land had to then pay for all flood repairs for life.(never gonna happen)
yet many 'climate grants' go towards flood defenses for this cheap flooland

these things lead to shifting costs to governments/tax/insurance/grants under schemes that need to sound like its helping the wider populaton. and done so without implying blame for the initial cause

in africa and australia they are actually making their causes of problems known
africn starvation due to privatisation of wetlands and forcing people to live on drylands
australia showing how fertiliser and pesticide run off from land to ocean causing algae and also reef bleaching
but you wont hear much about it on Uk/US media. especially when its uk/US funding most 'climate' grants

so while BG is fund grabbing donatations from the north and then giving out 5% grants to the southern big industry projects like big agri and renewable energy. he is not dealing with the underlying initial cause.

yes electrical companies need to shift to 100% renewables by 2050... but not for reason you think
yep if you can fool idiots into only thinking about chemtrails and mutating humans into eugenic lizards then they wil be too busy to not realise the elites involved in these projects are getting richer whilst only alotting 5% to schemes that pretend to be making positive change.
there is no chemtrail or lizard people in reality. but its a good fantasy to keep the idiots distracted from the economic/resource syphoning

alot of people thought that pre-WW2 the global controls were decentralised

  US   UK france  belgium   spain  berlin norway. etc etc all separate and independant
where each had their own departments in control of
defense, industry, law, economy, health
where each countries systems had different methodologies and ethics and principals compared to other countries
EG
US concentrated their departments on industry and defence.
Uk concentrated on economy and law
france concentrated on economy and industry
berlin concentrated on law and defence
spain concentrated on health and industry


many conspiracy theorists are now proclaiming that there is 1 head state. known as UN and it has the 5 departments
defense(nato)
industry(WorldTradeOrganisation)
law(InternationalCourtJustice)
economy(World Bank:InternationalMonetaryFund)

where by all countries below the UN have to obide by the laws and principles of the UN laws.

what they dont realise is the UN is not the daddy. its instead the 'uncle' that gets to visit now and again and can babysit if the daddy(country) cant handle the kids(citizens/departments).

the UN is not there to set all rules/laws. its there to set the minimum expected standard all nations citizens should expect

even the UNs minimal human rights standard are basic and limited, which all countries should atleast do by default. then the countries themselves can set their own standards and principals above that.

..
i think jet cash seen how the EU was suppose to be the uncle of the UK but then the EU started wanting to do more then babysit in not so tough times when uncle was needed. and so brexit was done to tell uncle EU to back off. and he fears the UN is going to over reach and want to parent all countries.

i feel the reset is not going to be uncle UN wanting to kidnap and adopt countries and be a parent. but instead be a counseller giving advice to parents(countries) on whats best for humans as a minimal standard for the countries to then have a baseline.

i can understand jetcashes fear that a counseller(UN) can intrude too much and start directly parenting(state head control) the kids(everyone). but just like there is adoption processes(joining EU/UN).. there is also a emancipation process(brexit)..yes although there is no stipulations in the UN charter to allow for leaving the UN. i can understand jetcashes fear. but there is a way out even if its not in print

just for some numbers
BGhas put in $36b of his own money in over time and has been granting out about $1.8b-$2.6b(5%) a year over the last 2 decades. .. but guess what. as of this year BG foundation still holds assets of $40b

so think about it.
if he had $36b and was spending say $1.8b then 2 decades later he would be at $0
but he is not. he is at more now than he, both had and spent over the last 2 decades

so yes. he has been getting money since creating the foundation. and not paid tax on that money

i too could have savings of $36 and say i pledge to spend $34 over 20 years.. knowing during that 20 years many people will give me another $50 in that time.

when someone pledges to give away 95% of their earnings.. their wealth is suppose to go DOWN right. not up

cnut wasnt actually conspiracy theoring. he was satirising the conspiracy.

his point was that governments have long been warned of their unpreparedness

..
my view of bill gates is out of his $40bill foundation to be tax exempt has to donate 5% of his assets to remain tax exempt.
he does not own these 'patents' conspiracy people think of. nor does he invent them. he just throws out grants to any business that can form their own foundation to receive tax free money to aid in their own research.

bill gates likes to list problems and partial-fund projects with aims to fix the problems. but most of the problems and thus fixes are not actually solving the underlying cause

take the starvation and drought in africa..
the actual cause is big forign agriculture industry moving into africa and taking over the fertile land via 'hostile takeover' which firstly displaces the natives off the land and only letting them settle on unwanted infertile unirrigated land. secondly they dam up the rivers within the land and thirdly export the produce.
yes gates funded research papers that revealed whilst the agri business increased. the GDP domestically decreased. whilst more farm land appeared less natives owned land
however gates solution is not to help africa ban foreign land ownership. instead its to research better more effective methods of farming in africa(for big agri) while funding other organisations like unicef to handle the displaced natives.
like covid. BG didnt fund new hospitals or more intubation equipment. nor PPE. but did fund the aftermath stuff like vaccine grants

but then again BG did try harder then lets say trump
last years g20 had BG asking world leaders to unite and deal with the problem together in regards to solutions. but trump used the g20 just to insist world leaders call it 'the wuhan virus' in all communications

in my view BG appears to want to help. but its more like if he had to pay 40% tax. or pay 5% donations. he chose 5% donations. where by the donations were not utilised to the best way they could have been.
the 5% appears philanthropic, but its not its best example

and in the very first 20 seconds it says
"wearing the mask for to long. like driving a car by themselves, wearing a mask"

hmm.
let me translate
idiots

yep masks have been advised to be worn when in locations where you are in public with strangers where social distancing is difficult.
its not wear a mask 24/7 even when your home alone

so get some common sense folks wear it when on the pubic bus or in retail/grocery stores. but dont be stupid wearing it 24/7 even when alone..

so lets not call it acne. lets call it stupidcne

thinking that investing is just putting money in.. its not
because you can just put money into gambling

thinking investment needs guts to make a decision.. its not
a gut decision is a decision without logic/precaution.

when i got a hoard in 2012 it was not guts. it was planning. it was observing. it was maths. it was calculated. it was seeing the pattern and using numbers.
a gut decision is more about a guess and willing to accept loss.

a gut decision is "oh well if i lose i lose. its my choice ill live with the consequence"
a logic decision is evaluating the risk and calculating a lower % of value to risk based on it.
its also evaluating the chance of a 0.1x increase or a 10x increase. and assessing how much value to put in based on how much gain you can get out based on the time

EG if a bank usually offers (premillenium) 5% savings account interest. if inflation is 4%. then anything above 10% a year is considered a good investment.
so if you can make 0.1x(10%) a year based on monthly 0.01%. then great.

but having a gut decision HOPING for 10x(1000%) within 3 years. not a good 'bet'
having a one time punt/gamble. and willing to lose it.. not a good 'gamble'

there is a massive difference between not knowing the future. vs not knowing the risks vs not evaluating a plan of action

gut feeling means not using your head, meaning you didnt think

thats the game.
there is never 'enough'

governments say their social security benefits for the poor are 'enough' for them to live/survive on.
but anyone getting a minimum wage which is usually double governments minimum 'enough' social benefit know the social benefit is not enough purely because minimum wage(2x) is still not enough

there's the ex president that got paid $200k a year. and that was not enough. he had to syphon funds from the RNC donations.
..
the game is simple. once you attain a certain level of income and thus a level of lifestyle. the world is so vast that there is always more things/experiences that you want to achieve. thus always needing more money to attain the next level.
EG you initially plan on a hobby of hiking a mountain... then you spot people base jumping off the peak and suddenly you want to try that too.
..

alot of people try to break the game, by thinking that if they can calculate how much is left of their mortgage and then calculate how many years they may live for. and put a salary amount to those years left. and total it all up. then they can say XX is enough
but dare they ever get to a position of attaining that amount. suddenly their new lifestyle of not needing to work for it. allows them more free time to want to try new things.. which cost more money.

its like working minimum wage $300/w ($7.50x40h) thinking.. if you can get paid $300/w just to stay home you then have more free time for hobbies or more vacations.
but a vacation ends up costing $1500 a week all inclusive. and suddenly you feel the need for a 5x of your initial plan just to have a vacation lifestyle

in my view (from last decade before bitcoin when i did work) i thought a $50k a year income for the next 40 years would be 'enough' ($2m)
but now im hoarding a nice hoard of bitcoin. $2m doesnt seem enough

cngressman know better..
..but badecker knows less than that.
..

yes congressman know about the entity game. they utilise it for their loopholes and shifting responsibility/blame off them personally... they know the game better than anyone.. but you on the other hand dont even realise when the opposite of the game is being played against you.

so while smart people are filing petitions and lobbying congressmen. your being taught by your silly influencers to stand on street corners and get angry.

getting angry on a street corner will get you arrested if you go extreme
getting angry in a basement and screaming for a god to save you or a government to change.. gets you nothing but looking like a idiot talking to himself

i am british. as english as anyone can get. as many generations back as records can go.
definitely more than tvbcof and badecker, who are not english. but american

just because i say tom@o and they say tom8o does not mean that im not english/ because in english its actually tom@o. which means that they are american and cant actually get the concepts of the differences.

they love to scratch the bottom of the barrel by being grammar nazi's when all other rebuttals fail them. yes i dont put comma's in the right place. or capitalise first letters of sentances, but thats got nothing to do with speaking or being english.

i do find it funny how tvbcof and badecker feel their only argument left has to end with pretending someone isnt speaking english for them to ignore the context. but what they dont realise about the greatness of the english language is that there are many aspects to english. yep cockney rhyming slang is part of being english. but tvbcof and badecker would never understand that. they only understand american, which they THINK is english. but isnt

this forum is not a place for legal documents requiring high level grammar perfection.
so what if i dont capitalise the first letter of a sentance. so what if i dont capitalise English
if all you can moan about is my grammar. then its you that has a problem

if badecker/vod/tvbcof ever dared to coeme to england and speak to real english people. they would know the difference. people speak with a common relaxed tongue. they dont all pronunciate with the oxford grammar/linguistics

and just for fun ill be a grammar nazi
Sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the Pol'&Soc' board are for losers.

kind of funny for a grammar nazi to call something out he is himself guilty of. hypocrite.
last note: the truth is the truth no matter the language.
thinking the truth is only spoken in times of perfect grammar is the game of idiots

its not about removing all guns.
its about removing all high capacity weapons.
EG the automatic rifles, drum magazines
its also about actually having regulation.. (well regulated militia)

no one needs a machine gun for hunting or self defence.
if you think you need to rattle off a drum of 50-100 bullets in quick succession so fast that you dont even have time to think or aim or even reload. then what you are seeking is not defence but offence

its not about removing all guns its about removing the access to idiots having guns.
you know.. the 17yo idiots that think its cool to walk down a mainstreet with a semi auto gun and see how many people will react, just to get some youtube fame and then say 'it coz constitution'

the constitution says 'a well regulated militia'. it does not say 'random idiots wield a gun'
it says bare arms it does not say fully automatic rifle with a drum magazine

..
to actually get results all they have to do is legally define handguns with a 10round clip as 'arms' and semi/fully auto rifles as 'firearms' or another term.
thus then forming rifles into a separate category not mentioned in the constitution
or more jokingly.. legally define 'bear arms' as freedom to wear a costume sleeve that mimics a bears paws and arm. (freedom to furry sleeve)

emphasis the constitution does say "a well regulated".. something most idiots ignore

using badeckers own words against him
the bible is hearsay

it was wrote by priests whom heard stories from other people passed on for like 200+years. (if they were true)
it was wrote by priests whom made up new stories about a fake history 200+years prior(if untrue)

none of the bible is direct quotes or first person witness testimony

representatives of 'god' are like representatives of 'government'

if god was actually in power he would personally have smitted whomever your crowd hate due to all your prayers..
.. but reality is humans had to actually do something. like vote. petition.to get things to happen.

did you also notice that to get congress to discuss anything, such as impeachment and recalls did not require mass protest gatherings. prayers..  it did not require invading/insurecting mar-a-lago to trigger a impeachment.

so while your crowd are being told to do protests/riots/mass gatherings/pray because an influencer told you. nothing actually changes due to those forms of begs

when you wake up and realise your crowd are giving bad advice. you will soon learn that its not good advice simply because 'they spoke'

when you read stuff from your cultish sites. dont auto-believe them because they said it. instead research beyond their words. think of the content and context and actually think about how things actually work in the real world compared to their words.

if you really thought trump could stay as president by doing what your crowd done. then you havnt thought at all. you were on auto-belief mode.

so lets put this simply:
knowing you can recall. and just being angry .. does not equal a recall.
being angry and just protesting/rioting/insurrecting.. does not equal a recall

you really have to learn how to recall. and then.. do it.
EG a 1million march protest gets you nowhere. but a 1million petition does
so learn the right way to do things. not the influencer advised way.

lf your influencer is telling you to protest/pray/get angry, they are not giving you good advice.
the better advice is not to go crying that you cant meet 'government' entity face to face. the better advice to to face the representatives of government and plead your case to them via petition

when you realise your blame/anger/anger/protest should not be aimed at the faceless empty entity of 'god'.'government','congress'. and instead you aim your ACTIONS at pastors, politicians, congressman
then you will see things change

this is where you get your freeman nonsense soo wrong. when official representatives accuse you personally., your influencers are wrongly telling you to be angry at some faceless entity. the result being your counter claim gets dismissed while officials claim against you continue.
your getting kicked by a gang of thugs. but your curled up in a ball trying to fight some stranger that you never seen. you want to tell the world you got kicked by some meaningless faceless stranger called 'gang'. and let the thugs representing the 'gang' get away with kicking you.

so wake up to reality and realise your influencers are leading you down the wrong path