I think as the token is utilized in the network its price most likely will stabilize or increase. Now it is only backed by the traded volume and many are holding waiting for the price to raise. Basically not much that will drive the price up.

I second that too; However I think they could use some updates. They have been doing a good job I am sure they have a set of announcement under their sleeves. As long as the community is engaged I think the sale would do just fine.

Basically the paper is saying the gas resulting from the handling waste is not harmful to environment given the set of regulation are properly applied. I think 4New can detail on this more; I mean as to which approach they are utilizing.

I honestly think that these number are very likely to change especially when they roll out; They will have to test the market and see which price makes more sense; take udemy for example; when they started most courses used to cost 100+ now you can get them at 10 $; may point is pricing is never fixed attribute.

They also provide hardware wallets; I am curious if fortysevern will use them or the other way round. Any details on the deal mentioned? It is pretty cool to hear they are active on that.

Alot can happen in 10 days; I think it is early to say but the progress so far is not really bad. see you when it is all sold

If the cost is high it will be a tricky business; think electric cars now and normal gasoline cars; electric cars in most cases are expensive to get and in many parts of the world charging them is just as costly as fuel. Other approached to gasoline would sure yield better results on the environment but people to accept it; it has to make sense to them financially. I think the same applies for 4NEW. I am sure that is something they considered but just putting out.

The release of the API was a really important bit and I think they were successful in delivering whithin the time frame. I was a bit wary at first but when i saw that happening; I think the team did a good job setting that timeline. in many cases with icos; at least with what I have seen fall way behind schedule.

It really depends on the country; there are countries where that is a really huge sum of money. If the bootcamp is done online or on a spot that would also matter; for the later it would make sense given you will be booking for a physical location and for a period of time. Of course if we are to compare to some bootcamps that is a quite reasonable. The point I am trying to make here is that there are several details to account to be able to decide if that sum is high or low

That is expected; I personal think that utility tokens can only gain more value when they are actually utilized in the platform as of now; the only thing that temporary effects the price are the announcements.

It will all fall in place when they evolve the system. I think there are much the team can do. It is great the focus is to have a smooth sale. In terms of tokens I think the contract does a good job reserving who own what and how much. Of the API I am not sure if it is usable yet; But at any case that is a nice catch. It should not be hard to implement so let us hope the team does it soon. Seems many trust it.

That is really something; I did not know they had one in place. Can users utilize it now? I guess one needs to give it a shot.

I have proposed this before; that a considerable amount of the gains should be set for R&D just to make the whole thing const effective. as far as my knowledge is extended it is a quite costly to set as of now.

There is that much they can do at once. I honestly think the focus on getting through this pre-sale first. This would render the public sale valid without the project can't move forward. Partnerships with universities would come later. I don't see it urgent now.

It reminds of the time when EC2 and Azure where new; the whole virtualization was basically new back then came Heroku; allowing easy deployment and pushing of applications without having to deal with the infrastructure made many developers happy. I have high hopes for squeezer let us see how it turns.

Most authorities require a KYC procedure in place to justify source of funds. How many are being KYCed? is the process manual or using a third party?

The release of the API was the an really important bit and I think they were successful in delivering whithn the time frame. I was a bit wary at first but when i saw that happening; I think the team did a good job setting that timeline. in many cases with icos; at least with what I have seen fall way behind schedule.

I liked how the team reacted to something not working quickly; as a business decision I think it was a really smart move; they basically gave the community a chance to invest early; that was not very rewarding maybe because of kickico am not sure; but going after investors was a really smart move if you ask me. Always have a plan B.

I am curious to see how is the progress looking like anything on the horizon? I am also curious on how are they nurturing their model I am sure they need alot of data; is the plan to buy that or how is it looking like?

Yep usually flippers are those with high ranking and activity; they end up getting the higher share. I have seen bounty campaigns where participants wasn't as high so each individual ends up getting a major share of the tokens and of course we know what will happen next. I think the safe way about it is to a dynamic allocation per participation.