Oh come on. Do you really think it's going back up? tbh did you though it would go up at some point to like uhm 30$? l0l  You know what, to be honest during the time I thought this coin might be a feasible project (for the couple of hours before I started researching) I did think so. But sadly it appears otherwise. |
|
|
|
Oh come on. Do you really think it's going back up? See? See what? It's just bouncing lower and lower. Am I not allowed to say that? |
|
|
|
Oh come on. Do you really think it's going back up? |
|
|
|
Guys, this is deeply, deeply embarrassing if you believe otherwise. That said, I am merely a highly paid financial services professional, so if you feel you know better than me, have at it.
It's not that embarrassing. It's to be expected really. The crypto scene is unbelievably ripe for rip offs. It's the perfect environment in which to nurture con tricks, all via the net from thousands of miles away. Full of teenagers and greedy fools seeing $$$ everywhere. And if you are one of these people it may just be that you have already lost money on another altcoin and are looking to win it all back, and more even, as if it was that easy. Just remember how stupid you felt the moment you had to take that first loss. |
|
|
|
What 'race' am I?  Well, obviously not Chinese |
|
|
|
...
Come on bitcad4u, I want to get to work. Please give me the number for CCL Pillay Group, South Africa.
call the companies... ask if u can speak to them. I did what u did already. Give them a call.
Please give me the number for CCL Pillay Group. I cannot find evidence of this company. Yes, I have already been making calls. And I did get through to GreenEarth. But I want to get through to the others, as for me confirming their existence and intentions is more important. |
|
|
|
I don't know...is this really the same guy? Who are you and why do you hide your whois in Panama? Who trusts a journalist who won't even give a real name. Lots of people trust me. I've been dishing out accurate info for months. Does that look like the same guy to you or not? Simple question. Answer it simply. The 'angry man' from the video chat and the guy from the website don't really look all that similar. I think you are affected by the "other-race effect": http://www.livescience.com/14879-faces-races-alike.htmlYou can't recognise people from other races easily. It's a lack of life experience. |
|
|
|
call the companies... ask if u can speak to them. I did what u did already. Give them a call.
Please give me the number for CCL Pillay Group. I cannot find evidence of this company. Yes, I have already been making calls. And I did get through to GreenEarth. But I want to get through to the others, as for me confirming their existence and intentions is more important. |
|
|
|
I'm no facial recognition expert but....  FFS, I am with the sceptics here but if you think they've gone to the trouble of hiring doubles... |
|
|
|
...
bitcad4u are you going to reply to my question to you about the invisible protocol ratifiers: Mr Schalk Davidson, Durban, South Africa Mr Mohamad Z. Sukri, Hong Kong You demand we do research. I did some. What do you think about it? |
|
|
|
I ask again - is it fully settled whether this is a scam or not, and if not, is there some definitive piece of evidence (besides the price chart) scheduled to come out that settles this question decisively (if so, when)?
If only it were that easy to have cast-iron proof there wouldn't be any ups and downs on the chart. There would be either only up or down. |
|
|
|
No - I am saying - the PAPER documents show the signatues that LEGALLY bind the 4 distributors to accept URO for their UREA. If you look up the 4 distributors, they are all LEGIT and still in business.
Do your own research... I would do it for it for you but then you would just claim I made the documents up... or photoshopped them... cause u know thats how people act here.
OK, Did 3 minutes research online. Out of the four ratifying parties of the Uro Protocol (members of the Uro Foundation), it is impossible to find even the slightest information online about the people representing two of them: Mr Schalk Davidson, Durban, South Africa Mr Mohamad Z. Sukri, Hong Kong (For the ratified protocol certificates see: http://uro.io/) This is not normal at all. Beware. I can't believe you also haven't Googled the high-ranking representatives of the ratifying companies. So please explain your findings. Do they differ from mine? |
|
|
|
Out of the four ratifying parties of the Uro Protocol (members of the Uro Foundation), it is impossible to find even the slightest information online about the people representing two of them: Mr Schalk Davidson, Durban, South Africa Mr Mohamad Z. Sukri, Hong Kong (For the ratified protocol certificates see: http://uro.io/) This is not normal at all. Beware. |
|
|
|
Hello,
follow Text i read on ntxcoin.org:
"Prevents the inflation of the block chains and makes the anonymity of the coin untraceable. Recycle some lost forever coins after a few rounds of recasting."
1) I did not understood the recycling process. Please help me.
Can somone explain me (in english or better in german), how coin recycling works?
How ntx will track down not more used coin, because someone dies or forget his password for coins?
Through incactivity? If someone do for an certain time period no transactions then the coins will be lost for owner of coin and replaced through new coins? If yes who get the new coins?
2) How many developers exists for ntx? The coin is so cheap, why? The coin is innovative.
Developers are escaped? Perhaps no developers exists more for ntx?
3) The recasting Process works automatically? Or coin owner must enable the recasting process manually?
Thanks
1) This appears to be an important part of this concept. Coins that stay stagnant will disappear over successive rounds of recasting. If someone dies - OK. If someone forgets their password - OK. But if someone simply wants to leave their coins in storage, I guess they would have to a) move the coins manually regularly to avoid the recasting effect or b) move the coins automatically for the same purpose. As far as I understand the old coins are distributed as fees to active coin holders or miners??? 2) Devs are not communicative. Difficult to get a clear picture of the situation. 3) Recasting is part and parcel of the system. Automatic. But it does not appear to be in place currently. There have been one or two posts claiming that recasting is being tested now. |
|
|
|
Look at the third partner site http://ureatradingindia.in/It's like a fuckin basic website template. The scammers didn't even bother to spice it up! Ha ha ha! This fertilizer distributer is now accepting donations in uro! Lol! That's done it for me. |
|
|
|
Great idea. And urea's not the only fertiliser you know. Anyone know a dev who wants to back my GUANOCOIN project? |
|
|
|
Not saying anything either way re URO, but the above article is pure speculation... |
|
|
|
I mean it's pretty much the same way DarkCoin uses MasterNodes right? Except Cloak uses staking wallets instead?
Er... ahem  ... Sounds quite different, even to me, a layman |
|
|
|
Sooo... does the amount you have staking affect the percentage of anon transactions you process? How does it work?
That I don't know. Things will be much more clear in a couple days (beta testing is about to start). All I can say is this. True anon is generally considered to be impossible or very complicated to achieve. Logically, this means work, and a lot of it, before an anon system has real value. The core Dark team is several people strong, with a dozen more helping with testing and other work. They have been working hard for months. This means the system being built is robust, and will continue to become more so. I do not believe there is a quick solution to anonymising transactions. |
|
|
|
Can someone confirm what it looks like - that at the moment the entire CLOAK anon system is centralized and managed by the CLOAK devs? If so, then this project is very, very far behind Darkcoin. With Dark we are considering how, to have a point of failure at the moment (regardless of further ongoing anon development), a series of masternodes has to be compromised. But if I understand it correctly all an interested agency would have to do to compromise CLOAK 100% is knock on the dev's door. Is this correct?
That was just the method used for the short term. PoSA uses wallets that are actively staking as nodes for anonymizing transactions. Sooo... does the amount you have staking affect the percentage of anon transactions you process? How does it work? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
