Also, die Idee ist für mich nicht ganz vom Tisch ... oder wurde sie im StableCoin-Thread endgültig widerlegt?
nö, ging nur niemand wirklich drauf ein.  |
|
|
|
|
Meine Hypothese war, dass eine Währung ihre Popularität auch aus Transaktionsdichte und -volumen ableiten kann und darauf basierend ihre Geldmenge steuert.
|
|
|
|
Niemand hat die Absicht eine Zwangsabgabe zu entrichten!  For real, wenn jeder Privatanleger 10% seiner Assets verkaufen müsste
"verkaufen"? 
|
|
|
|
|
ah so jo, gehört zum US-Unternehmen takeaway.com anscheinend.
|
|
|
|
In der Tat, macht super Sinn. Als Konkurrenz zur Echtzeitzahlung gibt's wohl nur die datenschutztechnisch unsägliche SOFORT AG. Wer von uns hat den lieferservice.de denn missioniert?  |
|
|
|
heh das war ich  |
|
|
|
 lmao! hahaha, it was me! you have a cam in my room somewhere? that is amazing ahaha love it, should be a whole page just of this Once we break the ATH we should spam this thread with this gif alone, each of us one time, that would rock he's famous in Germany, he's the "DJ der guten Laune" (DJ of the good mood). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7H7p80kZN8 |
|
|
|
man wird den Bitcoin dann auch nicht mehr vernünftig in USD oder EUR denominieren können. Sicher, 1 BTC ist bald vielleicht 15 Milliarden EUR wert, aber eben nicht heutige EUR.  Ich denke, solang der BTC noch nicht gesättigt ist, wird man ihn dann in Big Macs oder Gold denominieren. |
|
|
|
Ü-B-E-R 1 0 0 (!) DOLLAR ist ein Bitcoin schon wert !?!!1!  |
|
|
|
sry, hatt ich gar nich wirklich mitbekommen in meiner höhle |
|
|
|
http://www.focus.de/finanzen/news/staatsverschuldung/tid-34471/sparer-sollen-bluten-irre-iwf-idee-zehn-prozent-sonderabgabe-auf-deutsche-sparguthaben_aid_1147912.htmlBisher wähnten sich deutsche Sparer in der Euro-Schuldenkrise noch sicher. Doch ein Gedankenspiel des IWF lässt die Alarmglocken schrillen. Die Währungsexperten dozieren über eine einmalige, zehnprozentige Sonderabgabe.
Noch ist es nur ein Gedankenspiel, das der Internationale Währungsfonds (IWF) in seinem aktuellen Staatsschuldenbericht offenbart – doch das hat es für die Sparer in Deutschland in sich. Die Idee des IWF: Neben den Staaten selbst könnten auch deren Bürger einen direkten Beitrag leisten, um die Staatsverschuldung im Euroraum auf ein erträgliches Maß zu reduzieren.
Eine entsprechenden Passus entdeckte die Redaktion der „Welt am Sonntag“ auf Seite 49 des aktuellen IWF-Berichts. Dort beschreiben die Experten des IWF in einem Gedankenspiel, dass der Teil der privaten Vermögen, der die eigenen Schulden übersteigt, einmalig mit einem Steuersatz von zehn Prozent belastet werden könne. So könne die Verschuldung innerhalb der Währungsunion bis auf den Stand aus dem Jahr 2007 sinken. Im Verhältnis zum Bruttoinlandsprodukt (BIP) lag sie damals bei gut 66 Prozent – 2012 waren es bereits knapp 91 Prozent.
[...] -> bitcoinusernotaffected.jpg
|
|
|
|
Well I still don't think the word communism applies here, although there are similarities. The communist movement did not plan to remove labour or scarcity for instance. The goals of a RBE are also broader and they are meant to be applied on a global scale, since we are all one species and don't want to deplete the earth's resources or sacrifice the environment we all share. A resource based economy is about managing the earth's resources intelligently and eliminate labour and scarcity so humans can live in harmony with nature and each other again.
again, nothing new under the sun. Marx/Engels called their economic theory Scientific Socialism as well. Marx was even talking about automation back then already. In fact, his analysis is all about the surplus value which, while acknowledging it will lead to technological progress and appreciating the dynamics of capitalism, will throw capitalism into crisis after crisis as long as the means of production are in private hands (aka the "profit motive"), until capitalism will ultimately fail and abolish itself, and the world will finally awaken and convert to the socialism/communism route. This "utopian communism" does (largely) imply elimination of scarcity and intelligent and fair redistribution of resources. "From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_each_according_to_his_ability,_to_each_according_to_his_needWhat actually happens is that since semiconductors are inexpensive people will want to use more of them. If an i7 costs $0.005, then I'll want a room full of them.
 |
|
|
|
Basically the main difference as I see it is that a resource based economy places technology and the scientific method at the forefront of decision making, instead of politicians obsessed with votes and spreading propaganda. Humans when placed in a position of power can easily become corrupt and make bad decisions, but computerized systems that apply math and science to questions like resource allocation are not prone to these human flaws.
Well, this is communism, almost blueprint. Read up on communism. The USSR and the Eastern Bloc were not communism. It's not only anarcho-communists that say so, even the Soviet leaders said so. How? The idea of communism has always been the vision of a classless society, explicitly with the goal of removing the state (and thus, leaders and politicians with it). It has always been projected into the future as some kind of utopia. The differences between the various strains of the diverse socialist and communist movements have merely been about how to get there (which might be the only difference to the Zeitgeist movement, as they don't seem to lay out any road map). Socialism is sometimes defined as the intermediate phase on the road to communism. The USSR categorized themselves as socialist in this respect. Lenin's approach specifically had been to implement Marx's idea of the temporary(!) "dictatorship of the proletariat". This approach was heavily attacked by anarcho-communists like Kropotkin etc... The "computerized systems" are nothing new either. In fact, Allende tried to implement a cybernetic society in Chile in the beginning of the 70ies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Cybersyn - We didn't really see the results, as he was removed by Pinochet too soon. |
|
|
|
Actually, never mind that. That doesn't bother me. What bothers me is how terrible McAfee Antivirus is. How can you block the NSA if you can't even write a usable UI?
guess you didn't get the memo, he sold the company looooong ago, and no, he doesn't know how to uninstall it either http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKgf5PaBzyg |
|
|
|
|
so far, Bitcoin rather brings WU a lot of business.
Lots of trades on localbitcoins.com go over WU (no, don't ask me why).
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
