This is so stupid. And unfortunately, it is not uncommon. There is a great need for reliable and independent tools to audit these exchanges. They all seem to have used similar practice at some point. When a problem occurs, simulate for a while, hold the funds, trade on the platform using non-existent funds, and use the profit to escape or to cover the gap.

It is a fact that the public lost a lot of interest in Bitcoin. If you read news sites and other forums the comments have greatly diminished as well. On the other hand, the number of enterprises that were created, new funds, and commercial and educational interest increased greatly.

I think this should be seen as a new phase. Where there had been scattered and hypothetical discussions before, we now have attempted at practical applications and preparation for the various uses that this new environment can provide.

My favorite newsletter about technology is from Ben Evans. He used to talk only with total disbelief about Bitcoin and during the BUM he reinforced the risks involved. Today, he comments as if it were something natural, he always has some news item related to some company or experiment of the sector. And the a16, investment fund that he works, has a sector completely involved in cryptocurrencies making big investments.

The public will come back... soon.

Is there any way to know if they ignore some other bitcoin? Is it just the Genesis block? This detail becomes clear after a little thought, but it would be interesting to put this information as a warning.

https://www.blockchain.com/pt/btc/address/1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa

He's probably a better trader than you;

The volatility of the crypto market turns what is already risky into something 100x riskier. That is why everyone is preferring to use Bots or investing in the long run with fundamentalist analysis. Trying to make daily or weekly profits is too complicated for manual operations.

The account may have been "awake" too because it is an alt of someone containing multiple accounts. I think in a recent campaign this happened a few times ...

 I believe that as a manager, you should have an estimate of the maximum time you are willing to use to verify an account. And this is very much based on the campaign you will manage.

A campaign like chipmixer and other long-term, require the manager to spend more time checking the account. The old posts are worth a lot and the potential of future posts as well.
In these campaigns, an account that was dormant for a long period, perhaps more than 2 years, and just woke up, can be a great addition to the campaign. And there is time to check if the owner is the same and the possibility of removing it if the quality of the new posts is bad.

But in short campaigns with smaller budgets and with the need to demonstrate quick results, it seems to be a waste of time to add these users. Even if they can verify a signature from an old address. Adding to remove soon before the week ends, or worse, pay for a week of bad posts on mega topics, ends up being a loss of campaign resources.

Vit05

 2473

bc1qmdq2d8c886zsfp5xcefqkgrcegmx9vwdj3shee

I am sick so I haven't post in the last days.

Great game Lakers-Bucks. Ingran is playing well. Let's see if LeBron is really on playoff mode. Because they really need this win.

I have just read your presentation from the project https://www.glowbe.org/about/img/page_1.png .

It appears to me that you have a lot of difficult to synthesize what exactly you want or need. You probably have never seat with seed investors before, I think it would be great for you to meet those people. If you can not explain in a simple way what you want, people will never help. You are unable to demonstrate if you want: users, helpers or people with some specific skill. Neither is willing to explain in a simple and direct manner what gain people would have to help you.

A Brazilian exchange, which today is the largest in volume in the country, announced a new sidechain with another exchange that belongs to the same group.

They announced in a video, but have not yet given great details about how it will work. As it was announced being a sidechain of Bitcoin, is it possible to do any verification on it? There are some doubts about the veracity of the transactions involving these two exchanges...

The address of the two exchanges:
https://www.negociecoins.com.br/
https://www.tembtc.com.br/

The explorer of this sidechain: https://fortexplorer.info/home

the video where they announce the project https://youtu.be/agF9WxYAgrk

And most of those users were dormant for some time. And didn´t receive any merit. So, the account is wake up, make 2 or 3 random posts, send 2 or 3 merits, go to the Stake signature campaign and start to make 20 posts a day.

The only way for Bitcoin to be adopted globally without these companies that put a foot in each world would be through a revolution. A revolution is when you pull down the pillars that sustain one environment to give way to another. This revolution would have to be made using weapons or cyber attacks.

Honestly, I do not believe that.

So it is useful for greater adoption of cryptocurrencies that we have companies with facilitated transit in both worlds. This should be seen as one of the steps towards a shift from the old world to the new. If you are already fully involved with the cryptocurrency facilities and you do not see any major problems in distancing yourself from the requirements imposed by governments, do not use those companies that have one foot in each place.

But think for people who are still in the ancient world and unsure of passing through the new. They need security and legality in their actions. Coinbase does not want to be the only option. They want to be the first choice.

This spreadsheet is for the first campaign and was always public. They have 2 campaign and the second doesn´t have a public spreadsheet here in the forum. The first one was closed.

Stake.com Signature Campaign - Up to 0.035 BTC a week
Stake.com - A signature campaign for everyone! Earn up to 0.1 BTC weekly

And I believe that not only the forum but also the Manager, benefit from the transparency of these campaigns. There are some users who like to search for possible scams or double accounts and this can help the manager. In addition, you can avoid various misunderstandings. Since most campaigns make spreadsheet public, leaving it closed gives the impression that there is something to hide.

You could use purse.io. It is a service where you could buy on Amazon using Bitcoin. They modified the operation a bit. But before, you just need to say the product that wanted to buy and how much would like to pay in Bitcoin. I think today you need to import a wishlist from Amazon and wait until someone accepts the task.  I've used it in the past buying products for other people and everything worked fine.

This is my referral link if you want to use it https://purse.io/?_r=HAnDVB
without: purse.io

BITCLOAK BITCOIN MIXER

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2349397.0

Legendary/Hero    BTC 0.008 / week
Senior    BTC 0.004 / week
Full member    BTC 0.002 / week
member    BTC 0.001 / week

4] Posts in Sections : Investor-based games, Off-Topic, Games&Rounds, Politics&Society, Local board , Legal and Archival will not be counted as eligible.

Eu participei em outros momentos dessa campanha e sempre recebi. O número de posts necessários por semana é de apenas 20, bem tranquila.
[h]

120,000 BTC, which iswas worth 72 million dollars. I think the most interesting part is that they have recover BTC. How they have recovered? Did they arrested someone and took his wallet? Or did they track until an exchange or another service and seized?

You are posting a referral link without disclosing this information.  It is more fair post the link without a referral and put your referral so people could choose if they want to help you.

https://15days.ledger.com/

referrals = https://15days.ledger.com/9375/6723203

Note if the Manager has provided a unique address to pay for the campaign and if he has enough funds to pay everyone. Ideally, the campaign has contracted an escrow with a good reputation in the forum to be responsible for storing the funds.

 You could increase de space destinate to the Driver you use for the blockchain. Check this tutorial I think moving the blockchain will be a lot of time-consuming and could occur many errors.

Coinbase is restricted to some countries. I think this is the main reason why it is not so talked about. It is a little list with USA and some European countries.

Binance and mostly of other exchange you could use in almost any country.

Here’s How the 2.09 Million EOS “Hack” Really Happened
By Jessica Klein

Over the weekend, an EOS “community updates” Telegram group reported the transfer of 2.09 million EOS (worth $7.26 million at time of writing) by a blacklisted account. Many reported this instance as the work of a “hacker,” but that’s not quite what took place. What happened really is about the breakdown of an early EOS arbitration group’s bandaid solution for blocking nefarious accounts.

Great article. It is easy to understand everything that has happened. I still can´t believe how EOS is on top10 with so many risky and being so centralized.