RawDog and I playing swords I said keep your twisted fantasies to your demented self you pig. |
|
|
|
knowing barry silbert of coindesk also has ownership stake in blockstream im guessing it will be a story of how adam back(blockstream ceo) is "one of the 4" satoshi's
by talking about his 1997 hashcash.
it could also be looking at craig wrights first appearance in the bitcoin scene via a skype call at a different conference a couple years ago where nick szabo introduced craig wright.
thus saying its a 4 way team of
nick szabo,
craig wright,
adam back
and a mysterious 4th party.
in short its one mysterious single party and the other 3 are non-satoshi's just trying to get some notoriety for different reasons
.. well thats my 2 cents
I didn't think Craig Wrght was Satoshi at first. He sure has a shit personality. He is a real fucking proper wanker if you ask me. But, now that the truth is coming out, I guess we have to accept it. One thing is for sure, HE thinks he is satoshi. He filed a SHITLOAD of Bitcoin patents and that IP portfolio could only come from someone who thinks they are the true inventor. I was expecting a much nicer guy to be Satoshi I must admit. Lol, great post, he really does act like the biggest wanker doesn't he, He might be a nice guy if you got to know him but he just comes off as so arrogant. If there is one reason why i believe that Mr Wright is not Satoshi it is the fact that Craig has applied for all those bitcoin patents, it just doesn't fit into Satoshi's style to me, he made bitcoin for the people, not for him to make a monopoly of it, although i could be wrong. One place where you don't get any argument whatever, that Craig Wright is a wanker. Everyone agrees with that. |
|
|
|
Great, so if you were in that room, you would've noticed that I WASN'T wearing knee pads. They looked like kneepads to me, ya fucking dirty fag. I'll tell you this much is certain, you weren't hitting that hot piece of meat you were standing next to. Not in a million years would she consider letting you put your filthy dick in her. replacing the content with how you and I have sucked each other's cocks till morn over the course of the past few years, I McLovin your clean cock more than you McLovin my filthy dick. Note to self: clean filthy dick. How about if you keep your disgusting filthy fantasies to yourself? It won't help if you clean your dick since you keep shoving it up little alter boy asses all day. |
|
|
|
Great, so if you were in that room, you would've noticed that I WASN'T wearing knee pads. They looked like kneepads to me, ya fucking dirty fag. I'll tell you this much is certain, you weren't hitting that hot piece of meat you were standing next to. Not in a million years would she consider letting you put your filthy dick in her. |
|
|
|
I'll give you a medium-sized blowjob if you can point to the knee pads that I'm supposedly wearing  You know what the irony is, I was actually in that room when that photograph was taken. Go ahead, ask me which corner Armory was in. Or, ask me where DiIorio was sitting in relation to where you were kneeling. I have first-hand eye witness knowledge of the matter. |
|
|
|
issues with flaming fags which I am not, but would gladly declare such if were the case. Pink tutu, knee pads, your own admission: Dude, you should know that anytime somebody alludes to dripping jeez, my cock gets harder than the doorknob denials aren't going to help against this backdrop. Facts are facts. There are no 'alternative facts'. I'll give you a medium-sized blowjob if you can point to the knee pads that I'm supposedly wearing OR have stated donning such by my own admission (speaking of There are no 'alternative facts'.): 'your own admission' was with specific regard to 'dripping jeez' - not kneepads. I prepared the quote accurately. The kneepads were in the original photo - not in the one you posted. But I must say, your alleging the knee pads aren't present is a pretty thin denial. As for the blowjob, no thanks I have a girlfriend for such things. Blowjobs from fags don't appeal to me. What a retard! The two images in question were taken within in a minute apart and there were no knee pads worn by myself prior to or during either snaps, including during the entire conference. But I must say, your alleging the knee pads were present is a pretty thin accusation. Your case of me being a flaming fag is a much stronger accusation, albeit false, although I do smoke [fags]. OK, pink tutu boy, if you say you are not a fag, you are not a fag. What's it to me? Nothing. But you also say your dick gets hard when you think of dripping jeez, so that must also be true, taking you at your word. You say you have a doorknob up your ass too. None of this shit matters to me. If you are not a fag, then your fag proclivities are your own nightmare. I just wanted to bring up the craig wright thing. You hijacked the topic with your faggy pink tutu. |
|
|
|
issues with flaming fags which I am not, but would gladly declare such if were the case. Pink tutu, knee pads, your own admission: Dude, you should know that anytime somebody alludes to dripping jeez, my cock gets harder than the doorknob denials aren't going to help against this backdrop. Facts are facts. There are no 'alternative facts'. I'll give you a medium-sized blowjob if you can point to the knee pads that I'm supposedly wearing OR have stated donning such by my own admission (speaking of There are no 'alternative facts'.): 'your own admission' was with specific regard to 'dripping jeez' - not kneepads. I prepared the quote accurately. The kneepads were in the original photo - not in the one you posted. But I must say, your alleging the knee pads aren't present is a pretty thin denial. As for the blowjob, no thanks I have a girlfriend for such things. Blowjobs from fags don't appeal to me. |
|
|
|
issues with flaming fags which I am not, but would gladly declare such if were the case. Pink tutu, knee pads, your own admission: Dude, you should know that anytime somebody alludes to dripping jeez, my cock gets harder than the doorknob denials aren't going to help against this backdrop. Facts are facts. There are no 'alternative facts'. |
|
|
|
Sixly, have you seen my doorknob? My bad! I already asked that, not sure as to why I asked it again.
I am sure. It is because you are a flaming fag with shit dick which you boldly admit on public interwebs. Now go flit around the neighborhood in your pink to try to attract another of your type. |
|
|
|
<no, this is not another thread like that other thread - this thread is about something much more> Why did you think you needed to start a new thread on the very same topic? What a dumbass. |
|
|
|
Tell me if I m wrong, but to me Satoshi and Bitcoin is all about facts, consensus and united community Might be the funniest post ever. Satoshi and Bitcoin are all about scams, lies, and cheating. The community is filthy with dirty fags wearing pink tutus among many other things. This place is a filth-pit. |
|
|
|
 this post is meant as respect to your comedic personality. not an attack  Look, any faggot who puts on a pink tutu and knee pads is only getting down there for one thing: to suck dick. This Gleb guy is a poof of the highest order. I can tell you that. |
|
|
|
Nope he's not Satoshi. Give it a few more days, the news is still breaking. The insiders know something and they are not telling why they now know Craig Wright is Satoshi. It is all in the article. Did you read it? |
|
|
|
Coinbase should be failing without enough murricans that want bitcoin.
Coinbase failed because when their users make a trade, and three days later a big gain on exchange rate, Coinbase produces and 'error' that reverses the trade. Total dishonesty. Why the fuck would anyone use Coinbase? It is just another scam. A trade is a trade. The deal is done. If there is an 'error' then it is Coinbases' loss not the client. They have a different strategy and theirs produces huge profits for their own pockets at the expense of their customers. Stealing your customer's money through trickery isn't such a clever business plan. This only happened to me once. About $200 lost. Stealing $200 puts you out of business. Bye, bye Coinbase. Stupid fuckers. Fire the employees, clean up the shop, turn out the lights. That shit is over. No faith in the community, no business. |
|
|
|
knowing barry silbert of coindesk also has ownership stake in blockstream im guessing it will be a story of how adam back(blockstream ceo) is "one of the 4" satoshi's
by talking about his 1997 hashcash.
it could also be looking at craig wrights first appearance in the bitcoin scene via a skype call at a different conference a couple years ago where nick szabo introduced craig wright.
thus saying its a 4 way team of
nick szabo,
craig wright,
adam back
and a mysterious 4th party.
in short its one mysterious single party and the other 3 are non-satoshi's just trying to get some notoriety for different reasons
.. well thats my 2 cents
I didn't think Craig Wrght was Satoshi at first. He sure has a shit personality. He is a real fucking proper wanker if you ask me. But, now that the truth is coming out, I guess we have to accept it. One thing is for sure, HE thinks he is satoshi. He filed a SHITLOAD of Bitcoin patents and that IP portfolio could only come from someone who thinks they are the true inventor. I was expecting a much nicer guy to be Satoshi I must admit. |
|
|
|
Why is it that the Bitcoin community is full of these people?
Are you specifically talking about Bitcointalk as a community, or the general Bitcoin community? Nice catch! Good question! Such wow! Personally, I assumed it was the former. RawDog, what say you? Ross Ulbricht, Charlie Schrem, Mark Karpeles, Josh Zerlan, Trendon Shavers, and many, many others are not really part of this community as far as I can tell, but are part of the overall bitcoin community. Same goes for most bitcoin hackers as far as I can discern. So, I am talking about everyone but not just the posters here. Although, there are plenty of assholes and protestants here too. |
|
|
|
As the time pass I am seeing more and more people talking about the "off-chain" transactions, but what is it exactly ? Exactly? It is a altcoin. It is another system where they shift the bulk of transactions away from the blockchain so they can charge fees that won't go to miners that validate blocks but rather to shareholders of private companies, especially Blockstream. It is really just a scam but has become very serious because Blockstream has been successful in crippling the blockchain with the burden of low capacity which increases demand for this stupid and expensive 'off chain' solution. |
|
|
|
Don't understand why you would include Protestants in your title? are you catholic or atheist?
Protestants are the worst. I probably should have put them first in the list. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
