just because you have a free market, does not mean that you have the skills to build a nuclear bomb
Not bomb because bomb has limited radius . Plutonium can be dispersed over entire planet thanks to jet streams. We live on single interconnected world, someone else's freedom is interfering with your own even if you dont see it. "6 billion other people will have the freedom to come and stop you by any means they see fit." There you go , your first regulation. "You cant buil nuclear plants full of obsolete fuel type based on plutonium". it's not a regulation, it's a self-defense against what i perceive as your violence towards me. you are free to try to build it, i am free to try to stop you, you are free to try to stop me from stopping you, etc, etc. |
|
|
|
wow [3] still 860 bucks  what kind of website do you think these domains would be useful for? i see they are blank at the moment. |
|
|
|
Finally i can build my own nuclear plant full of plutonium rods and then blow it up.
Game over mankind.
6 billion other people will have the freedom to come and stop you by any means they see fit. |
|
|
|
|
profile -> personal message options -> Save a copy of each Personal Message in my outbox by default.
i can't explain the no replies though.
|
|
|
|
speaking of spendbitcoins.com, my next 10 btc will probably be spent at godaddy. |
|
|
|
I don't see how what you've said so far is a problem.
no sub-accounts? the documentation basically recommends that accounts should be used to organise customers, say alice and bob. so under normal circumstances your wallet file might have: [alice]=>0.5 [bob]=>1.3 but let's say you have a second website which has customers alice and jane, but the catch is, it's NOT THE SAME ALICE [alice]=>5000 [jane]=>20 so the only way to get around this is to add prefices to account names to designate what site they're customers of: [a-alice]=>0.5 [a-bob]=>1.3 [b-alice]=>5000 [b-jane]=>20 would be much better organised with sub accounts: [site a]=>1.8, ( [alice]=>0.5 [bob]=>1.3 ) [site b]=>5020, ( [alice]=>5000 [jane]=>20 ) actually, even if it was the same alice, you wouldn't want her to log in to site a or b and see her balance as 5000.5 ...those balances should remain separate. |
|
|
|
just one reason of many, i'd say.
Do share the other reasons as they come to you. I don't see how what you've said so far is a problem. Don't take me the wrong way, I am genuinely interested in where the existing functionality fails to suffice okay well here's one more reason i can think of... let's say there are TWO types of ways a site can use bitcoin: 1) the kind of site where new temporary addresses are constantly being generated for incoming payments, eg. btcflip.com 2) the kind of site where there is only ever 1 permanent address generated per customer (I think tradehill might be starting to do this). for a site in category 1, it's wallet.dat is going to be constantly growing day by day, hour by hour, and will probably need to be replaced with a fresh one periodically, so that the site isn't running off a 100mb wallet file. These are just 'temporary' payment addresses, 99% of which might not have ever even had payments sent to them. the site in category 2 might have 1000 customers, but it's wallet.dat could have as little as 1000 addresses and not need periodically replacing. Indeed for this kind of site replacing the wallet would be a bad thing, as each customer has been given his 'personal' address for that site. now you tell me, what would be the best way to run these two types of sites on the same server? |
|
|
|
how about a lack of sub-accounts and sub-sub-accounts? just one reason of many, i'd say. |
|
|
|
try this: $url = "https://www.instawallet.org/api/v1/w/$wallet/payment";
$postdata=array('address'=>$address,'amount'=>$amount);
$ch = curl_init();
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL,$url);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_USERAGENT, 'Opera/9.23 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en)');
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER,1);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER, FALSE);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST, 2);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_POST, 1);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS, $postdata);
$result = curl_exec($ch);
echo $result; |
|
|
|
|
have you double-checked the $wallet var to make sure it contains what you expect? (not empty?)
just before your curl, echo or log $url and take a look at exactly how it's been formed.
also: it says on that instawallet page that the url you're trying to connect to should be done with a POST. so look at curl options and CURLOPT_POST:
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_POST, 1);
|
|
|
|
well i guess your correct
wouldn't it be easier to just learn how to spell? it often surprises me how some people find it so difficult. one thing that should be considered though, is just because you can't spell things the 'official' way, doesn't necessarily mean that it's your fault that communication isn't working... it can also be considered a failure of the receiver not to understand mis-spellings. p.s. one of my rhymes that i say in my head: there's no eve in receive. |
|
|
|
Seems to me like anyone who actively invests in bitcoins is a gambler at heart, in the very least.
seems to me it's quite different. i wouldn't normally set foot in a casino, but i'd regularly invest in risky ventures. i don't consider myself a gambler at all, although some of my investment decisions have seemed pretty crazy. |
|
|
|
Not Found, Error 404 For many time I thought that Julian Assange may be related (even being its founder). wow, i just read that article a couple of hours ago, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand it's gone. |
|
|
|
Damn this looks awesome. Looking forward to watching it.
isn't there something in south park about someone running out of time? i think the doctor tells cartman's mum that cartman needs more time. i'm asking you because you have randy on your avatar |
|
|
|
Who is that guy and why is he related to gox? i see his "normal" photo everywhere
looks surprisingly similar to that guy from 'how i met your mother': I don't see the resemblance.  i guess it's just me then.   |
|
|
|
If half the BTC are missing, and everyone is reporting that it looks like coins weren't moved ... how is it happening?
simple: everyone who's coins weren't moved are reporting it. |
|
|
|
from that list... asus.us ($1050)... i wonder who owns as.us. |
|
|
|
|
bitcoin memes are inherently inherent within the bitcoin community.
it's gotta be this forum's second favourite word after 'troll'.
if you're posting in the economics section you should say 'inherent' at least twice per day, otherwise no one will think you're smart.
|
|
|
|
What's a Mio Bitcoin?
that was supposed to be short for million. 7 million bitcoins are now in circulation (minus those spilled) so if there's approx 21,000 lost so far (just a rough guess based on various posts on this forum), then we need another 14000 coins to make it to the 1/3 circulating mark... two more days System doesn't know the difference between lost coins and hoarded coins, so from the perspective of how long this is going to take, it's 1/3rd there yep, just making a comment about the current amount in circulation (7m - 21k) vs the highest possible amount that can ever be in circulation (21m - 21k). One third of (21m - 21k) is exactly (7m - 7k), hence my saying we needed a further 14000 coins. |
|
|
|
Max 300; characters remaining: 13 Not enough characters left to squeeze a donation address in my signature, please use 19qC8KWTk4c8gvajsVKT5toFkmSQnx7YAW Get a picture of a slutty sheep in return. You can use your personal phrase line to put it. you could also fit payb.tc/tim  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
