Just plugged in 2x GTX 750ti in addition to my main gpu which is connected to my monitor. Trying to mine FTC and I get this error: *** ccminer 1.5.69-git(SP-MOD) for nVidia GPUs by sp-hash@github ***
Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 6.5
Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot, tsiv and pallas.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://coinotron.com:3337
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] 3 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2 (mask 4)
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Stratum difficulty set to 64
Cuda error in func 'scanhash_neoscrypt' at line 48 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'scanhash_neoscrypt' at line 48 : out of memory.
[2015-10-24 12:09:29] coinotron.com:3337 neoscrypt block 932991
[2015-10-24 12:09:29] coinotron.com:3337 neoscrypt block 932991 Any ideas? I'm pretty sure gtx750ti can mine neoscrypt. I know the gtx750 can.... Increase the pagefile by a few gigs. Ya, I tried doing this but no change. In any case, I've got 32gb ddr4 installed, so I know it's not a RAM issue. Anyone else have any idea how to solve this? Edit: I think this problem only exists for SP-mod version of ccminer. I tried with tpruvot's fork, and it works with no problems. Also, NiceHash can run multiple algos across all my gpus without any issue. In any case, I'm happily hashing away  |
|
|
|
Just plugged in 2x GTX 750ti in addition to my main gpu which is connected to my monitor. Trying to mine FTC and I get this error: *** ccminer 1.5.69-git(SP-MOD) for nVidia GPUs by sp-hash@github ***
Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 6.5
Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot, tsiv and pallas.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://coinotron.com:3337
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] 3 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2 (mask 4)
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Stratum difficulty set to 64
Cuda error in func 'scanhash_neoscrypt' at line 48 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'scanhash_neoscrypt' at line 48 : out of memory.
[2015-10-24 12:09:29] coinotron.com:3337 neoscrypt block 932991
[2015-10-24 12:09:29] coinotron.com:3337 neoscrypt block 932991 Any ideas? I'm pretty sure gtx750ti can mine neoscrypt. I know the gtx750 can.... Increase the pagefile by a few gigs. Increase pagefile for gpus? How do I do this? I assume the error means gpu memory. I have 32gb ddr4 installed in my system, in case that matters. |
|
|
|
I'm having an issue with ccMiner after adding 2x GTX 750ti. Any ideas? *** ccminer 1.5.69-git(SP-MOD) for nVidia GPUs by sp-hash@github ***
Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 6.5
Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot, tsiv and pallas.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://coinotron.com:3337
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] 3 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2 (mask 4)
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Stratum difficulty set to 64
Cuda error in func 'scanhash_neoscrypt' at line 48 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'scanhash_neoscrypt' at line 48 : out of memory.
[2015-10-24 12:09:29] coinotron.com:3337 neoscrypt block 932991
[2015-10-24 12:09:29] coinotron.com:3337 neoscrypt block 932991 |
|
|
|
Just plugged in 2x GTX 750ti in addition to my main gpu which is connected to my monitor. Trying to mine FTC and I get this error: *** ccminer 1.5.69-git(SP-MOD) for nVidia GPUs by sp-hash@github ***
Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 6.5
Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot, tsiv and pallas.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://coinotron.com:3337
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] 3 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2 (mask 4)
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Stratum difficulty set to 64
Cuda error in func 'scanhash_neoscrypt' at line 48 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'scanhash_neoscrypt' at line 48 : out of memory.
[2015-10-24 12:09:29] coinotron.com:3337 neoscrypt block 932991
[2015-10-24 12:09:29] coinotron.com:3337 neoscrypt block 932991 Any ideas? I'm pretty sure gtx750ti can mine neoscrypt. I know the gtx750 can.... |
|
|
|
So...I somehow managed to lose the password to my wallet. It's not much, but its ~7000 coins. I remember some of the parts of the password, but not all. Are there any tools anyone knows of to help recover a password? Even maybe some brute-force scripts or something? Any help at all is appreciated!
Private key encryption is done based on a CMasterKey,
which holds a salt and random encryption key.
CMasterKeys are encrypted using AES-256-CBC using a key
derived using derivation method nDerivationMethod
(0 == EVP_sha512()) and derivation iterations nDeriveIterations.
vchOtherDerivationParameters is provided for alternative algorithms
which may require more parameters (such as scrypt).
Wallet Private Keys are then encrypted using AES-256-CBC
with the double-sha256 of the public key as the IV, and the
master key's key as the encryption key (see keystore.[ch]).
EVP_aes_256_cbc(), EVP_sha512(), 25k iterations crypter.cpp and crypter.h tell the story Good luck. You'll need it. lol thanks! Anyone heard of or used this? https://github.com/gurnec/btcrecover |
|
|
|
|
So...I somehow managed to lose the password to my wallet. It's not much, but its ~7000 coins. I remember some of the parts of the password, but not all. Are there any tools anyone knows of to help recover a password? Even maybe some brute-force scripts or something? Any help at all is appreciated!
|
|
|
|
Question for you all...
So I'm relatively new to burstcoin, and I've just started mining recently.
I'm using Uray's Burst Miner 1.1r4 on Ubuntu 14.04, and mining to pool.cryptomining.farm.
I haven't had any problems with the setup that I couldn't figure out, and I'm seemingly happily mining away... (at least my balance on the pool is growing)
The problem, if it is a problem, I don't know... Is when I watch the mining logs, for a specific round, it'll submit a nonce before it's done reading all my plot files, and thus for a specific round I might have 2 or 3 submissions. They say they are successful in the miner log, but some of the early submissions suck, and my balance for the round doesn't seem to improve a few seconds later when a better nonce submission is made. So, when my miner submits a few submissions for a given round, am I being credited with the best one? Is this a problem at all? Is there something I can do to avoid it?
Thanks in advance.
As far as i know, devPool rewards all deadlines below a given target, other pools only want your best deadline and should skip previous commits on better result. That's exactly as I understand it, too. I've been mining on Dev's V2 pool since (my) day 1, and haven't had any reason to change pools yet. |
|
|
|
The new 0.9.41 ethminer gives me this error: miner 18:43:38|main Mining on PoWhash #bea8e41fΓǪ : 17457792 H/s = 16515072 hashes / 0.946 s
X 18:43:39|main Failed to submit hashrate.
X 18:43:39|main Dynamic exception type: class jsonrpc::JsonRpcException
std::exception::what: Exception -32700 : JSON_PARSE_ERROR: The JSON-Object is not JSON-Valid: empty That is on a GTX 980 with this config: C:\Miners\ethminer-cuda\ethminer.exe -U -F http://coinotron.com:3342/NewbieMiner.gpu:derpy/ Can anyone help me out with this error? |
|
|
|
Houston, we do not only have one major problem, we have several which will decide if this coin has any future.
....
As an educated man, you could start with the white paper! (Google Document!) You do not need to write it alone, just start, what should be included in, just headlines and we (the community) could add piece by piece. Some of us have marketing skills, some have technical skills, some have other (not even directly related to BURST) skills, ... Each of us can focus on the skill he has to add to a great document. Before we show this to others, we could check if we could get some acknowledgement of the (one/two) original developers. I'm contributing quite a lot behind the scenes already, but I could try to contribute to a short white-paper. Saying that, I think it is a much better idea if someone else writes the concise Abstract and include the suitable headlines for the paper - just have a look at how others' white-papers are structured and follow that. Then I can probably fill it with some introductory text under each heading, even if I beleive there are people here better suited to do so. But I write much in my profession and is not afraid to try and get the needed critique for improvement. However, I'm not an expert on the detailed technical aspects of PoC or Burst: Plenty of people here understand those processes better than me and must fill in those spaces. My English is also poor and have to be checked. Well, I'm a Requirements Engineer so I've tons of experience in technical documentation. I'm not long out of college, so have little experience is something as technically complex as PoC, but the least I can do is editing reviews. English is my first language also, so I can fix any grammar or syntax issues  Just keep me filled in if this gets started. |
|
|
|
Even with merged mining Proof of Work is not always such a great idea, without out is stupid, it is hard enough to get enough hashing power to secure a coin if you do use merged mining, ridiculously unlikely without it. Part of what is so scammy about most new coins is the very fact the creators do not care about making it secure, they are just out to dump it, so they make it proof of work so they can instamine it and do not care about its long term security because they will not be in it long term anyway.
They don't like to start it with merged mining because then the big miners already set up to merged mine will get most of the coins, but look what DOGE did, no merged mining at first so the existing miners might not all jump on it, then merged mining later once they got their hoard of coins and actually decided the damn thing might be worth securing.
Meanwhile all these scams coming out without merged mining seems to be detracting from merged mined coins, as miners and speculators alike all jump on the latest scams each day instead of settling down to secure the few coins that we might actually be able to make secure by merging them all together.
Some day folks are going to realise that a currency needs to be secure, this storm of scams of the day surely is not going to forever be more profitable than actually securing a few blockchains for the long haul?
-MarkM-
Well said. I sincerely hope a secure coin can eventually be more profitable, but as with everything in life, there are those scumbags who will try to make profit exactly as you described. All we can do is continually innovate so crypto is harder to cheat. Coin Magi is a good example of this, with their dynamically adjusted block rewards (doesn't exactly stop deadbeat clones from being made, but it's an excellent innovation against other issues, imo). |
|
|
|
What happened to ETH?
I saw that ETH was around 0.005 for a while. All of a sudden, ETH rises so much.
http://www.augur.net/If people take advantage of all that Ethereum offers, it's gonna change the face of crypto. This is just the beginning |
|
|
|
For mining Ether, would it be worth the investment to buy 2 gtx 980ti, or 1 more gtx 980 and SLI it with the one I already have? I don't have room for a proper mining rig, so I have to use my own desktop, which is pretty much a monster gamer/miner when i'm not gaming or at work Thoughts? |
|
|
|
Right now im mining using Ethereumpool.co. Seems like a good pool. I also tried Alphapool, those guys gifted 1 ETH to all miners from yesterday. Difference is that Ethereumpool pays after you mine 1 Eth, Alpha pays out every 1 hour.
I mined on Alpha for 12 hours and didn't get squat. Prob not goin back there. |
|
|
|
There's no way you can actually prove this coin was a scam from the beginning. It's just as plausible that things unfolded exactly as AxiomCryptocurrency said. That being said, I think I'm gonna go back to mining XMG (very strong CPU only coin). I'll let my wallet keep staking instead of dumping, and we'll see how things are going after next big mining period.
No. Well played, child. Think what you want then. Does not change the fact. Again....it's not "fact". It's conjecture. I'm not saying this thing is going to the moon or anything, I'm just saying it might not be an actual scam, just a poorly executed project. |
|
|
|
Agree, Supranova is the best available pool for Ethereum at the moment. Can highly recommend it. Supranova is definitely the best ETH pool highly recommended, all other pools show a fraction of my hashrate! Great work!
Can't register. Why not, I thought this pool was brand new? |
|
|
|
There's no way you can actually prove this coin was a scam from the beginning. It's just as plausible that things unfolded exactly as AxiomCryptocurrency said. That being said, I think I'm gonna go back to mining XMG (very strong CPU only coin). I'll let my wallet keep staking instead of dumping, and we'll see how things are going after next big mining period.
No. Well played, child. |
|
|
|
From your tweet: $AXIOM has over 600 solo minersNot hardly. Too funny. Another cpu only/private miner coin. I don't usually quote my own posts but it seems appropriate with this coin. Did anyone actually think that there wouldn't be a private GPU miner? Please do not use this event to try and defame the developer team as having a GPU miner, we never had one and we refused to buy it because we don't believe they are necessary. If this becomes an issue, we will simply make the necessary changes to eliminate it. This is just a minor situation that is being magnified by few who are more interested in reducing the price for their own benefit than addressing the actual issue and realizing that it's both minor currently, and completely resolvable. We have yet to see this GPU miner in action, we've got nothing more than a screen shot posted that is simple to create using an editor as basic as microsoft paint, or as simple as modifying the existing minerd code to post a 750Ti and adding a multiplier to the hash so the output is higher. Bottom line We're investigating the GPU miner and if it turns out to be an issue in which few get an unfair advantage the problem will be resolved. Axiom Team Another so called cpu only coin with a massively crippled miner at launch for the masses while optimized cpu miners and gpu miners were being used in private from the very beginning. Pumped by a bunch of shill accounts and dumped by those behind the coin launch. Just another typical altcoin based on nothing but false promises hiding behind smoke and mirrors. Like I said a couple of weeks ago... There's no way you can actually prove this coin was a scam from the beginning. It's just as plausible that things unfolded exactly as AxiomCryptocurrency said. That being said, I think I'm gonna go back to mining XMG (very strong CPU only coin). I'll let my wallet keep staking instead of dumping, and we'll see how things are going after next big mining period. |
|
|
|
Nightly giveaways and faster mining at alphapool.xyz!We have some very, very exciting news for AlphaPool. Having run for about 24 hours, we're pretty sure that our Go-based algorithm delivers the most efficient pool mining on the market right now. Here's a highlight reel of what we have to offer for our miners: - 0% transaction fee, automated payouts every hour (forget about waiting 24hrs for payments...)
0% pool fee for the first week, 1% thereafter
1ETH bonus to every miner on the website at 12:00am PST every night until August 26, 2015
A proprietary multithreaded Go-server that delivers pretty damn good efficiency
We just need more miners, so check us out! http://alphapool.xyzMake sure you are using the latest version of cpp-frontier (0.9.41) which contains an updated ethminer, which sends hashrate info to the server. So I switched to this pool about 12 hours ago...still haven't seen anything. Pool stats indicate no hashrate, no balance, and no payments. My config: ethminer -F http://alphaminer.xyz:8080?miner=0x1f9b145fdaef2b82aef29c2f3c9b875a8b017512 -G My miner says it's been submitting shares. Any ideas before I jump back to another pool? |
|
|
|
|
why does staking take 12-20% cpu load? I'm using the "expiremental" wallet that was released not long ago. i7-5930k
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
