Who cares which one is the hashlet? Maybe all of it. The buliding is there and so are the miners, which means those who said he's not mining should take it back.
You can like the guy or not but next time please refrain from prosecuting him until you get some proof.
Proof of what? And who is "he"? Some of the pictures had already been posted two months ago: https://hashtalk.org/t/gaw-miners-generation-a-hosted-update/1347The was never any doubt that GAW hosting was real (read the first post), at least it had and still has hashrate showing up on pools etc. It was just not working properly. But now this magic Zen cloud that GAW purchased just recently is actually the same "datacenter"? And the revolutionary multi-algo hashlet, a result of "most ambitious R&D initiative ever" is actually made by Zeus? Well I guess by GAW standards this is within acceptable limits of bending the truth. Ok, I realize some of us wanted pictures and we got pictures of something. And the address. Great. Hopefully we'll be getting the rest of it soon. Like where is the 138 GH/s. So... you just keep moving the bar huh? |
|
|
|
|
Don't come in with a sockpuppet account and trash members. How about addressing what he is saying instead of being a sheep?
|
|
|
|
|
Grrrr I AM SO HAPPY WITH GAW! SO HAPPY!
|
|
|
|
4-5% is a normal error rate for a fury not 9%
9% you need to improve the cooling.
@381mhz i have 1.6Mh/s and less than 5% and very stable.
Fresh air is the key.
Exactly right. If you're running above about 350 and getting that many errors (9%), I would guess that you're running out of juice. Need more volts. i added heat sinks to he ASICs and better thermal compound and found that the hash rate, errors, and rejects didn't show any improvement under 350. over 350 the ASICs are starving for power. i just posted the wright up @ http://www.techunboxed.com/2014/07/gaw-miners-fury-power-supply-mod.htmlYeah I added heatsinks and better compound and found the same thing - no change at all. |
|
|
|
And i know those clowns from hashtrader are looking at this post and reporting back at hashtrader, AlienXXX, Vegas etc. Shut me here if you can. Don't bother to target me because what ? saying i cause drama in your holy ground ? Save it. Blind followers shutting people with honest comment by digging whatever they post and they do and try to shame them. But too bad this wont work with someone that has no shame.
Do something big for your favorite than, stop whining behind the PC saying we are slamming and smacking them.
If they are really that good, why would they even be worried about the slams ? Joke of the year.
I'm not shaming you, just pointing out that you are incredibly inconsistent. Honestly, there seems to be two or three people living in your body because your story constantly shifts. Hardware vendor, reseller, happy customer, pissed-off customer, down-on-his-luck guy looking for help, dude looking for free stuff. Make up your mind and stick with one. |
|
|
|
|
I've been trying to run my Gridseed Blades on NiceHash but it just doesn't seem to like them. They run great at first then it seems like nothing gets submitted after awhile. I've tried a couple of things but still it's unstable, toss in NH's reliability problems and its a no-go for them. I head over to weminltc and it's smooth as silk.
...and my two Black Widows just went down again. Reliability really sucks over here. Up and down, DDOS, repeat. Going to have to bail until things become more stable because even if the payout is greater, all the downtime makes it less than others are offering right now.
|
|
|
|
Something is going on. The front end has been going up and down for the last couple of hours. Interestingly, both NiceHash.com and WestHash.com go up and down at the same time. This seems odd if they are running on different servers.
Sure does strike me as odd too. |
|
|
|
I'm really not a fan of forking the service like this. Sellers will have to watch two or three sites now to determine which is the best paying. Buyers are going to have to watch two or three sites now to see which has the lowest price. Sorry, but I feel this is going to dilute the service and make things more complicated for everyone.
I can understand having multiple stratum frontends to spread load out but those frontends should be trunked on the backside so they still operate as a single service. For the buyers, they should either be able to select an exit point for the lowest latency to their pool or the service should choose an exit point by doing a ping test from the different exit points.
Ya I agree...was scratching my head over this one... Yep, if this was merely about load balancing then that would be great but setting these up as stand-alone services isn't going to help anyone. |
|
|
|
|
How about offering payouts in LTC? I think there might be more growth potential there than in BTC price.
Oh and 83% prof really sucks!
|
|
|
|
Agreed with poster from a couple posts above regarding regulations. Legislatures now make a law and delegate authority to make regulations to certain agencies. If OP is talking about regulations then I think this is something that agencies could just make on their own. They will probably allow for public comment though, right?
Yes they said after it was submitted they would allow for a 45 day comment period. I think in this case a law would actually have to be passed to suspend the regulations although I could be wrong. Either way, this is an ass-hat move by NY considering there are quite a few BTC startups in NYC. |
|
|
|
Same problem as Utahjohn  Pool keep reseting my dif to 0.168 and connection timeout like every 5 or 10min  ccminer -r 3 -R 5 -a x11 -o stratum+tcp://eu.wafflepool.com:3331 -u 1G5BiEDSaEmoHHDFqG2EhbpJvhdx8JvSYW_750ti -p d=0.008" Dude, I'm only getting like 2100 for my 750tis what version/setting are you using? |
|
|
|
Am I mistaken or Zeus is trying to sell mini-blades? https://zeusminer.com/product/pre-order-blizzard-x6/I'm calling mine mini-blade X3 (3 blizzard together), my specs after over clocking are around 4.9MH/s for 180 watt. With a slight down clock and undervolt, it should fit exactly in their specs. If they are doing it correctly, they will even make more profit selling this "new" blizzard since they sell it for more than what we can pay for 3 fury. You can spare at the very least 8 bolts, 8 screws and 2 fans. Look at the number of chips on them - 32. Regular Blizzfury has what 6? So they dumped a ton of chips in here and undervolted the heck out of it and there you have it. |
|
|
|
|
The price on the A2s is way to high now. Gaw has them for 1/2 that price.
|
|
|
|
|
Look at the line chart below and you should be fine. Sometimes the circle gets screwed up.
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty crazy. This is the thing with paying with crypto, there are no protections for the sender. I think anyone sending directly like this is crazy, this should be done through a vendor that provides customer protection or through escrow.
|
|
|
|
|
I think Terk should just amend the policy and say anything below .0005BTC (just throwing a number out there) after fees will be abandoned after a month if the user does not start mining again. I can't see how it's worth the hassle for him and it would certainly cut down on posts about this.
|
|
|
|
Dear Nicehash
I really like the way you hear our proposal. New default profit table looks very nice!
Well done bro!
Much better than it was before! |
|
|
|
Are you guys still going at it?  Is it really that surprising, considering how big a GAW shill one of them is. It irks me to no end seeing his sig. i.e. "100% refund any time". Have you ever tried getting money back from GAW? These guys are full of promises they can't (or won't) keep. That's not fair I think. I've gotten a refund from them on a cancelled order no problem. I have no signature campaign either. |
|
|
|
|
0.00088230BTC is hardly worth it after the wallet/exchange fees. You're going to be left with like .00058 that's worth a whopping 36 cents or so. This is really crying over spilled milk.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
