there is a big problem with this:
1) if a cryptocurrency dies that means there is no longer anyone mining it, there is no blockchain and there are no nodes. you having any dogecoin can not be proven since there is no blockchain and it is just a number on your computer unless you collect the code. the source code or the blockchain which requires a huge storage space for each coin.

2) Fungibility. i am not an expert in this but coins are not different from each other and unless you can get your hands on block rewards as in the coinbase transaction created in first block or blocks lower than a certain number i don't see any "collector's value" to it.

with all that said, this is just my opinion and i am not a collector

well that's the thing. i have pointed out this problem in my previous answer. their platform is terrible. have you even tried it yet?
anybody who has tried their services know it is very bad. and as long as there are by far better services out there, why would anyone even choose this platform!
you are advertising bitsler in your signature so i am sure you have visited their site since you get paid there. now go visit Yobit's dice section and see what i mean when i say "terrible platform"

sorry to be offtopic here since you said it i should ask, wasn't brave browser supposed to be like THE browser to use to see the advertisements not to block them.
because i remember reading that it is supposed to manage ads within browser and pay the users for seeing additional ads inside the browser and pay them with bitcoin.

the thing about litecoin that you need to know is that it always has a lot of potential, as it always had. the pumps are always big, there is never a small half-ass pump. and Chinese are crazy about this coin. Chinese exchanges have only 2 coins listed: bitcoin and litecoin!

on top of all these things litecoin SegWit is now at 80.21% and within 1 days, 19 hours, 47 minutes from my typing this SegWit will be activated.

all the while, traders have been silently accumulating and then dumping if price tries to go above 0.0098-0.01BTC in order to be able to accumulate more in low prices.

most probably not.
i have asked this question many times, even sent them a ticket but never got any answers. the only conclusion is that they want to cheat their users with a non-fair dice game.

most things you see on yobit are fake. the volumes, the order history, the orderbook, also the bet history.
but also there are many signature campaign participants that are populating that site. and on top of that since they give out free coins, many use those shit-dead-coins to make bets with. these are coins in their free coin tab which you can never sell because 1000 units of many of them is worth 1 satoshi.

[/quote]
what i see is simple design from year 1990.
what so special that 2 Millions players go there  every month ?
[/quote]
no way the real number is even remotely close to that!
they have less than 100 signature participants and from those i doubt if a handful play the games or even trade.

i have checked it out.
ZEIT  also has 2000X  bitcoin's current orphan rate.

the number of orphans created by ZEIT is about 1500 to 2000 blocks per day.

when price falls under 1 satoshi we no longer call it "extremely low" we call it dead coin.
no inflation change can save or change the price anymore.
current price is 0.6 satoshi!

spam attack on a network where blocks are empty is useless.
asking for more fee on a network that nobody uses is also useless. which means whether fee was 1 zeit or 1 trillion zeit that would have made no difference.

why would you even need offchain when your chain can handle it
and FYI if we wanted to use third parties we would have used banks not cryptocurrencies.

that is possibly because the list of countries is an automatic generated list. most sites are like this, their designer usually forgets to explicitly exclude the countries they don't accept until someone points it out to them. (i have seen this issue with many new services).
but if your registration from US was successful that is different though. was it?

interesting, any examples i can check when i get some time?

read my p.s. and that is a genuine interest of mine wanting to see how other altcoins can handle a spam attack as massive scale as bitcoin (100K tx) and as long as bitcoin (2-3 years).

and yeah, there is always going to be limitations and downsides in any system. nothing is perfect.

there are at least a 100 topics on this subject which you can search for and find lists of alts after alts saying they have the highest speed of transactions.

but having faster transactions on its own is meaningless. instead you should ask
- how their network is doing? is there even nodes running by users (real decentralization) or is it a couple of nodes by a couple of services and mining pools.
- how is the orphan rate? and how is the risk of double spend!
- how is the hashrate distribution? is there any risk of different types of attacks.
- how big is their blockchain if you want to use their wallet, or run a full node at home. and how big is it going to be in a year, 2 or 8 years from now?

ask these questions and some more (that i can not remember right now) and you will end up concluding bitcoin is the only cryptocurrency with ability to handle TPS at whatever rate it currently is.

edit: a simple hint:
higher TPS > more transactions per second (each transaction takes space) > bigger blocks > blockchain size increasing at a much faster speed > storage problems
+
higher TPS > more number of transactions > more network traffic needed from nodes to propagate these transactions + more system resources needed to validate them
=
less running nodes, low network security and lots more in long run.

p.s. i'd genuinely love to see how any of these coins can handle a spam attack like bitcoin is experiencing.

the monthly wagered amount is useful and i can even say nessasary since you guys are accepting investors.

and YOLODice actually has something similar, unless i am mistaken it is in this tab: https://yolodice.com/#stats/investor
it has a very nice chart which is showing the stats for the investors. if you mouse over the chart it shows each day's data on top right of the chart.
at the bottom chart it is "Wagered BTC" and on top left it shows in numbers with short form "W"
for example 2017-4-9 was 12.652...BTC

in the end, it will all come down to each user's personal preference.
i have even argued before in second or third round of this topic, that listing all these sites together is not 100% right.
because for example you can't say i like bitsler and don't like a sportsbook site for example. they are different games in different categories and having them all in one list is like comparing apples and oranges.

but i have to hand it to OP that the multi choice poll made it much better.

these things need some king of incentive to be made. a high level encryption on cell phones is not necessary since most people aren't really looking for it.

with a lower voice i have to add some 3 letter agencies will do anything they can to prevent addition of hardware to cellphones that allow users hide their personal matters from them.

i could see why JackpotRacer nitpicking that particular part only but another user saying my English is bad! is it that bad or are you just messing with me.
i did some edits to make it more "grammatically correct" i hope that helped!

as a summary:
- the investment in moneypot is not the most profitable based on my observations.
- in the time i spent observing moneypot and also based on the link that i gave the loss was never big as OP claims.
- things that OP says such as accusing admins with database access to steal are just empty accusations without proof.

as i said people won't spend time typing but they will click on multi choices.

in order of magnitude of the top of my mind:
1) Centralization
2) A big ICO which worked as its premine
3) Bug in the code
4) Manipulations of price
5) Extremely large supply, no max amount (no cap)
6) A huge blockchain size which is growing at a very fast speed
7) Terrible platform, bad wallet, not at all user friendly
edit) i remembered another one: their advertising campaign is annoying and full of lies. the amount of spam by them is unbelievable during pumps.

well, no offense but this survey has no academic value and i am saying this as someone with an academic degree and some experience in this matter.
and the problem is not at all your English.

here is a short and non technical help just to give you some idea: https://oqi.wisc.edu/resourcelibrary/uploads/resources/Survey_Guide.pdf

so much drama these days, what is up!

we know that investment moneypot (for some reason) has not bee the best for a long time. i watched it for a while when i wanted to invest and since i didn't see it as profitable i changed my mind. i never saw 400BTC or saw any deletion of posts or in general any shenanigan though. that is investment, some businesses are profitable and some aren't. learn to find the best to invest in, instead of making weird accusations.

there is also this topic here which had a public investment in moneypot and the OP of that thread stopped it since it wasn't going anywhere.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1585408.0

I can confirm that I received the payment.
Thanks.

post the direct link (docs.google.com) instead of the shortened version (goo.gl) and it should show up even if you are a newbie member.

and your questions are very bad because you are making an assumption that ethereum is good and based all your questions on that.

your first question starts like this:

and to be honest this seems more like an advertisement of this coin rather than being a legit "university research on Blockchain and platforms running on the Blockchain"

also a questionnaire like this should be a multi-choice one because people won't waste their times typing answers but they can choose between choices easily.
google some studies on how to create a proper multi-choice questionnaire and try again because what i saw is a very terrible thing. and as i said you are not really asking questions, you made an assumption on etherum being good and then implied some additional stuff.
even if it were good you shouldn't be asking it like that.

to be honest if you were my student, i would have failed you when i saw this type of question.

the site actually supports https encryption. it is just not enforced.
visit the website link with manually added https before the url and you will see it is fine.
look at the picture below:


i am not an expert but it has something to do with the headers they send. it needs to change to show the site supports and enforces https.

it is best to speculate altcoin prices ins bitcoin not in USD because most people are trading them versus bitcoin anyways and in the end there is only bitcoin that everyone withdrawas and holds.

and yes it is something similar to Dash and Eth but with some differences.
for example it is a pump and price can be considered inside a bubble.
but also the difference is that Dash and ETh pumped based on lies and not really anything useful in their coins while litecoin is going up because it is releasing a very game changing improvement called SegWit. and that has a big effect on everything.