Thank you for adding more context and actually adds the growing list of OP's inconsistencies.

OP, I take that you actually don't have any contact with a law firm, and Roeloef Bijkerk is another bluff, an attempt to threaten BC and keep them from performing the video verification, because you know you'll fail if you do, as well as to buy more time to get in touch with the unfortunate woman whose identity you use? Because if you have... I wonder why else you need a lawyer with no-win-no-pay basis when you already have one?

If Bijkerk is just a bluff, it ironically goes consistent with all of those slips you made, though. The "advise" that their PM [a written statement] has no weight, the sarcasm that can be used as a statement against yourself, the epic fail to record the damning evidence.

I wonder what will a lawyer think and say if they know someone uses their name without their permission, to cover your muddy traces... and to threaten "someone else", to say the least.

---

I don't think swaga is their alt. The cluster and him have some differences; swaga is a script seller, while simpleghostingjoana is a pure gambler with a condition. I can't see this two background works together. Also, they don't seems to share a quirk.

[Side note: you might want to read this other quirk shared between simple-ghosting-joana that I found, amongst other, it kinda seal the connection between them three, IMO]

I will try to reach someone from BC's support and notify them about this... by notify, I mean I am pursuing them to the depth of hell to get this one done. Please give some time.

Interesting cherry picking, is it not? I raised so many points on my previous question, like the sudden drop of grammar, the existence of abbreviation through Google translate, your proficiency level, the real role of your son in the interview, the lawsuit you promised... ehm, threaten them that will loom over them, or... the extremely interesting similarities in error with ghostingura2 and SimpleMachin34, "aswell". Care to explain them all?


Figured that much, I assume he'll provide some misleading "facts" to high ranked and influential members in private to avoid people who's been following his cases from the beginning to correct those statements and provide a more accurate truth.

Remove the password protection prior to uploading it to them, perhaps? Follow this tutorial from adobe if you're not familiar with it. Alternatively [though I think it'll raise more issue and allow them to reject the data because it's been through an image processor] open them through Photoshop and re-publish it in PDF. I believe it will remove the password protection, as well? Just... try number one first.

I am sorry for being a little bit unclear about response time and probably caused you some confusion. I was talking about and advising you to stop making rather pointless post, because when I think when you made a new post on your complaint page, their timer gets resetted to full. So, when they previously only have 24 hours left to respond, by you "bumping" the thread with your post, it goes back to (IIRC) 90 hours, effectively dragging the case by giving them more time to delay an answer.

As for the AG will just reset a timer, yes they usually will give another chance for casino [and player] to give their response once the timer runs out, but they'll only give it once or twice instead of repetitively. And, still related to above, bumping the thread with a post before the ball goes into your court will just give them an even longer response time.

Now, regarding them being paid [sponsored], it's been brought numerous times by many complainants, how arbitrators at the very least should be supporting the casinos on their platform, given they donned the casino's referral link. But it's also been repetitively explained here, as well as on their FAQs page, the profit gained from referral link was used to help with the operation cost. Mind that arbitrators [much like us here] are not getting paid to mediate a case.

He has made [or claimed to be] a plan to file a lawsuit against BC before he did the video call, the first one, refused to attend the video verification because the invitation was not [according to his lawyer] written formally in a way that has weight in court-room, somehow missing the fact that it actually did. He also said he'll make a recording of the session as part of evidence in court, in case BC played funny, which he also somehow did not. It strongly point to a possibility that the whole lawsuit thing is a threat just to scare BC to pay him without having to undergo the KYC, because he knew he'll lose if it got to the point of video verification.

In case you missed this, OP is a suspected prolific abuser and extortionist. He previously weaponized his "gambling addiction" to force Rollbit to pay him because their system failed to exclude his alt-account. Succeeded with that, he disposed the SimpleMachin34 account, made a complaint against BC under ghostingura2, for a missing bets, that when the case was paid by BC, escalated another one, on the very same thread, saying that he can't counter-bet because they took a little while to settle.

Upon further investigation and it's made known by AHOYBRAUSE that he's SimpleMachin34 with other account, and that he had a gambling addiction, he tried to pull a stunt requiring BC to take responsibility for not blocking him due to the addiction.

Simultaneously, he made this complaint with this account for this case, which BC found out that the KYC made for this account has no credibility and that the ID being used are very highly likely someone else's. Judging from his history, I am strongly believe he has several accounts in BC, got banned for one or two reason, and tried to use this account to circumvent it. The connection between Joana226, ghostingura2, and SimpleMachin34 are through the inconsistencies of English proficiency of Joana226, the attempt to mislead people by deliberately [and so abruptly] losing his grammar fluency, and the uncanny writing quirk shared between the accounts [please read my post number #167 and #170 on this thread, as well as post #704 on this thread].

In fact... has he sent you that PM? I believe it's roughly about him and his attempt to get a support and/or to twist yet another story?

OP, I challenged you, do you dare enough to give permission to BitcoinGirl.Club to publish what you wrote to him publicly?

I am sorry, I usually will not challenge someone to do such a violation to anyone's privacy and approach cases with level-headedness, but this particular user with his disgusting history across platforms really irk me.

I've been closely monitoring his account activity since my last post [and by closely, I mean really closely, several times every time I am online, coming back to his page right after every post I made] and I noticed he's never going back online upon realizing that his nefarious agenda failed miserably, that everybody can see through his facade, and that I kindly inform him that the more he post, the more I can learn about his writing style to help me identify his other account in future case. I believe he's been monitoring this thread as a guest or through his yet another account, and only jumped when he saw he get a chance to manipulate someone else... not knowing that the user he tried to manipulate is a seasoned user of the forum.

With some things [hopefully] cleared from my plate, I am going back to this one in wish that I can see this one resolved, if it haven't already. OP, are you sure the bug still persist and you can still replicate it? I am in agreement that if it's a recurring bug, BC should take that matter into their hand and remove the game from the time being.

BUT, given their representative told us ten days ago that their team are currently investigating it, add the fact that the game is still available and some people can play it without so much of an issue, I think it's either been fixed [thus, this situation is resolved] or maybe the error is from your side.

I am not meaning it in a bad way, what I'm trying to say is it's perhaps your cache, cookies, etc. or [as ridiculous as it sound] perhaps the internet connection was poor that when you close your page, the result was actually not made yet, i.e. the winning/losing are not sent to their system yet. Thus when you close the page, it's an equal to you closing a game without playing. have you try to replicate it on a completely different device and IP?

I can feel your frustration and annoyance, and though it might sound unsympathetic, all I can advise you right now is to wait a little bit more, perhaps a week max, to see Stake's response on AG and/or the status of your level 3 and 4 KYC, see if this long and taxing path brought any fruit.

And stop posting on AG unless they replied you or you need to give other information that contributes to the development of the case. I think each time you post, the response timer was reset to it's starting number, giving Stake more time to delay giving their answer.

I understand that you managed to get in touch with Razer personally through my last suggested method, by the email subject thingy? I am glad it worked! Albeit a bit too much, but apparently proven to be effective.

As for the received sum is not the exact value of what's being deposited, I think you should better take what you can get. Casinos [including Rollbit] very seriously frowned upon an attempt of abuse, especially self-exclusion circumvention as they have to take gambling responsibly act seriously. Though you're not the one who asked for it [giving you benefits of doubt here] all signs point to it. Indeed, this is a bizzare situation, probably we won't find similar one like this in hundred cases.

Now, as you've receive the fund back and you accepted the amount, I understand you consider it resolved and you have no other issue with Rollbit? I'll ask you to kindly lock this thread to prevent meaningless discussion and mark the title as "resolved". I'm updating the list.

Oh, no. No, no, no. Nooo...

Please, by all means, me thinking that it's resolved and the truth has been revealed doesn't necessarily mean you need to stop posting or closing this thread. In fact, please keep posting, do what you threaten you'll do,


Keep on writing and keep this thread [and your other ones] alive. It helped me a lot in studying your writing quirk, I can probably [or... hopefully] identify your next other account easier with the ever-growing list of your quirk. As I keep on reading your posts, I found and noticed more and more similarities between them.

As the old proverb said, one can probably a coincidence, but two? Three? I've find others aside from the "or wtv", so please, keep on. Aren't you curious how many uncanny similarities I've already noticed between the accounts? Three? Four, maybe? More?

And no, this is not sarcasm, I actually really hope you'll keep writing.

Edit: oh, just you won't think I'm just bluffing, here:




I mean, I can understand if ghostingura2 a.k.a. SimpleMachin34 misused the word. FYI: "aswell" is not a correct English word ^{[1] [2]}, he probably thought the word is a valid English word. But you? How does Google translate misspelled the same word being used by ghostingura2?

Need more? Nahh, let me keep the list for myself so you can't use it against the forum to avoid us identifying you on your next account.

Simple, I just needed your confirmation that you're very limited in English, that you needed the help of google translate to string these posts, to cross the Ts and dot the Is.

Why? Here:


Interesting isn't it?

Do you mind to tell us what's the exact prompt you wrote in Tamil in Google translate that it translated it into English, in abbreviation? I've never know Google translate deliberately abbreviating a translation. Unless, it's you the one who manually pressed backspace on "in my opinion" and replace it. But why?

If we take that you're the one who manually change it, I personally think it'll be quite dangerous to toy with a translation of a language that I am very limited at, lest it change the meaning, especially since it doesn't bring any added benefit.

So, which one is it? You're poor in English that you can't understand the interview and had to rely to your son to translate, or were you proficient enough to edit a translation, or better yet, string those words and sentences on this whole thread yourself?

Talking about stringing words, I can't help but recall this:


It's specifically ingrained into my mind because I find it so nicely written, so beautifully stringed use of metaphor... that I intended to borrow it for future use. Such phrase come from someone who barely understand English? I understand it's not a common expression? What's the prompt you use on Google translate or chatGPT again to bring this phrase into table?

And to think that those words come from someone or a translation and AI service who suddenly find it difficult to spell "casino", so abruptly that one may think she he they deliberately mistyped that to exagerrate the poor proficiency in English, don't you agree there's more than meet the eye? Unless you're saying google translate and chatGPT suddenly worked poorly after nine pages of perfectly spelling "casino" for you?


It's not. I've told you, at this point it's basically rhetorical.


Umm... I am neutral. Why do I asked you more than I asked BC? Not sure, maybe because so far you're acting more suspicious than the casino?


Why don't you? You previously said you'll record the session to serve as evidence in court. You didn't? Or was it just an attempt to threat BC, that you drag their ass to the court if they didn't settle? Hmm... it reminds me of someone, relying on threats and extortion.

I believe we can all agree that this case is as good as resolved and the bad actor on this case is very evident, unless anyone believe otherwise?

---

Edit: AHOYBRAUSE, stop stealing my words, LOL. We've been thinking alike and noticing similar things like...way too a lot on this case.

First, regarding English, just to confirm, all of this fluency of yours, down to the grammar and the use of tenses, it's because you use a translation service? To translate from Tamil to English? You don't speak English at all, have near zero proficiency in that language?

Second, regarding what else can you do, I wanted to say something about lawyer and multi-acc, but what I wanted to say was very nicely conveyed by Lakai01 and I can't say it better.

Third, regarding clueless about account and I can't believe we circled back to this but... actually, up to this second, you can't even describe to me what situation you were during that initial KYC. And no, I'm not only talking about the "under duress" situation, I'm talking about this:


So far, you can't even describe anything about that KYC, showing cluelessness about yourself, deflecting the questions by asking other things, conveniently keep missing details of that "duress", and instead you demanded to see the photo yourself. Why? Because you don't know how it looks like?

I believe you can answer them now? Given you've get in touch with the woman whose identity being used as your KYC? I believe she'll remember at least what's the background and where was she when she's forced to undergo that KYC, because people who did their KYC tends to at least remember --even the faintest hint-- of the situation revolving their KYC, like the room they're in. Hell, I can even perfectly recall the situation I was in during a KYC I did back in 2018.

This part is basically rhetorical at this point.

Ahh... I see.

Given Rollbit can not share private information here, and you insist that the evidence is nonexistent, that you or your friend have never been warned by Rollbit, I don't think we can get a resolution without someone being a third-party and having an access to those info, in other words: an arbitrator.

Since it's sports-related, I don't think CG will want to handle this. You can try to escalate this to them though, see if they will try to mediate the case and limiting the scope to multi-account detection. Otherwise, I think the other way is only by escalating this to their master license holder. From time to time, Rollbit stated their willingness to cooperate with a mediation of their licensor, and will provide necessary information to them.

However, due to the nature of licensor's mediation that can take weeks, I'm advising you to give CG a shot first, see if they would want to mediate with condition as mentioned above.

Thank you for clarifying this, that a staff who speaks the language is being present, to minimize the possibility that you draw a baseless conclusion that the son is leading and supplying answer. With someone speaking the language, I think it is safe to assume you made your findings [that the mother is clueless and the translation is not a simple translation but also consist of prompts] not from a guess but rather from an understanding what actually transpired between the two.

---

OP, instead of grasping at straws and ask for things that you know very well BC can't provide here due to the privacy policy, do you perhaps more interested in explaining why your son need to prompt you and supplying you details while you --the one who operates the account-- seems clueless about the details of your own accout?

I've sent PM to Razer with your email subject as well as the screenshot of email body, and a brief explanation about the current situation between you and the live support [so he can probably get a better understanding why can't this issue be solved through chat with support]. Let me know if you ever get a reply for your email. Meanwhile, I'll update as well if I get a reply from Razer for that PM.

Talking about using an existing account rather than creating new one, past mistake, and things around it, do you mind to perhaps explain to me the situation with using maftukh's account to submit a content bounty? It's a content, I can't see the necessity of borrowing an account, be it currently actively used or dormant, just to submit an entry, that can be done through your own account. Unless you mistakenly made the post with different account, i.e. you didn't mean to submit with maftukh's account, but you didn't realize that you did?

Probably. Care to explain which part of crypto you referred that I don't understand?


If I may inform you, you're not the only one jumping through hoops to get this case [and other ones] resolved. There are other members who are in contact with me, and they [as well I] has been trying to be in touch with each of their own's Stake contact and tried to get these cases resolved. Just a piece of info that you probably missed, we are in no way benefitted from this, whatever the outcome is, we all here just trying to help, so I am not sure why you lashed at me [hopefully I just read that post wrongly].

Now, escalating to a class action lawsuit, if that's what you think the best, then you're free to pursue that path. I am not familiar with their [and AG's] approach for a lawsuit, but I assume it'll be like when a case is being escalated to the licensor, namely they will cease to respond from every other mediator and focusing their resources to achieve result on that particular media. This is what I mean with my post above, and thus perhaps wait for the result of that verification before pursuing other venture, especially as --the way I understand it-- the documents for level 3 and 4 are being reviewed within just a couple of days ago.

If you're sure with your decision though, then --once again-- you're free to pursue this path.

The whereabout of the evidence of you being warned not to open new account, I believe only you [or your friend] can provide it. Rollbit has previously expressed reluctance in sharing private-natured information to public, a txID, in concern of and in respect to their privacy. I strongly assume they will not be willing to share something that's even more private like an exchange of email.

What was your bet about, again? Was it casino games or sport related?

I can understand your frustration, but I think hiring a lawyer is not the best course of action for the time being, especially with an attempt of class action. The time needed to build a class action suit and file them and get them heard in the courtroom, and so on, will probably take longer than having it resolved through AG.

I can see on AG that your KYC is currently under review. Do you mind to perhaps wait for the outcome of that document check?

Unfortunately, there isn't much that I can do. Rollbit take their customers' privacy very seriously, and on this case they can't provide the txID publicly, or even through me. One that I can suggest [risking Razer being very pissed at me because I kept poking him, LOL] is to perhaps write an email to their support, with a screenshot of Razer's post regarding returning deposit, and then tell me the subject of your email [making it unique and forum-specific will be a good idea], I'll send Razer a PM, informing him about your email and its subject, and he'll hopefully willing to track down that email by the subject and reply to you personally with the txID.