Something still not good, as can be seen on your capture, the hashrate keeps falling and falling...
I managed to squeeze out a little bit more speed by using the aes_ni version of groestl,setting it's datalenght to 512 instead of 1024.
But still the falling hashrate ...
should be the thermal throttling maybe, but this never happens on Limx version. |
|
|
|
Something still not good, as can be seen on your capture, the hashrate keeps falling and falling... I managed to squeeze out a little bit more speed by using the aes_ni version of groestl,setting it's datalenght to 512 instead of 1024. But still the falling hashrate ... |
|
|
|
damn gremlins  |
|
|
|
yes, i only made one "compatible" binary for now... my windows build env is a bit messed up for the other ones  i tested different compilers recently and the CPU #0 didnt put results in your log, 4x 66 should be 264 I compiled it myself on mingw. Yes, there should be 4 threads working, but as you can see on the pic only 3 are working. WHen i put 5 threads there are really 4 working threads etc etc. It's always t-1. Edit: Edited joblo's cpuminer opt with your optimizations and here everything works ok :  |
|
|
|
Threads 4 , no cpu 0 thread.. This is on windows, you are probably testing it on nix.  |
|
|
|
I think you have some kind of bug : i start mining with 4 threads, but always work only 3. Yeah its always threads-1  If i put 2 , then it uses 1. If i put 3, then it uses 2 |
|
|
|
see my git, same permut (starting with bmw 80) before : 2017-01-26 19:16:55] CPU #1: 1.26 kH/s
[2017-01-26 19:16:55] CPU #2: 1.33 kH/s
[2017-01-26 19:16:55] CPU #0: 1.27 kH/s
[2017-01-26 19:17:28] timetravel block 387151, diff 0.419
now: [2017-01-26 19:20:33] CPU #2: 78.91 kH/s
[2017-01-26 19:20:33] CPU #3: 76.86 kH/s
[2017-01-26 19:20:33] CPU #1: 74.50 kH/s
[2017-01-26 19:20:36] accepted: 2/2 (diff 0.007), 308.84 kH/s yes!
with a few lines changes on linux with an i5 4440 (with bmw512 as first algo) 2x bitbandi miner speed is this the timetraveler ? edit: oh yeah baby it is |
|
|
|
Guys, just NAT your 4004 port and you will get more connections |
|
|
|
Yes, this is it. Nice hashrate  |
|
|
|
|
just wait to find a block
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, the hashrate on this one does not drop after some time.
|
|
|
|
guys think about mining this again : very hard now to find a block, and check your power consumption...  |
|
|
|
draws "only" double the electricity as cryptonight algo  This is sick. |
|
|
|
ya, it's almost 100% faster Thank you |
|
|
|
|
I like this coin and want to mine it, but i really don't get that mining speed fluctuation?
|
|
|
|
Working for free also gives me the right to be sarcastic or unresponsive if I choose. You can do that even when payed LOL |
|
|
|
|
Yesterday when i started mining this coin i had about 60 kh/s on my i5 4.0ghz and about 100 kh/s on a 8 core xeon.
This morning the speed decreased on both so now i have about 15 kh/s on i5..
Restarted computer, speed stayed the same. I don't get it ?!
USing tpruvot's miner.
Edit:
After all day slowness, now it jumped up suddenly to 225Kh/s on i5 lol.
So is this normal?
|
|
|
|
the price should be close to ZEC since its so hard to mine, please stop dumping
That would make sense if it was hard to mine for everyone Unfortunately some people are taking advantage of cloud mining credits both ethically and unethically to obtain a mining advantage A small percentage is getting the majority of the mining rewards and dumping them on the market This is just a temporary problem though as the dev team is working feverishly testing out a Nvidia and Amd Miner to offset cloud mining domination. If the GPU solution is effective and is released in a timely manner, you should see things start to even off until they release a miner itt will be mid february, and then in march comes the new algo |
|
|
|
As I said, anyone who doesn't want to take the time should gtfo.
You are wrong. They should mine with nicehash |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
