on http://pom.m-hash.com no block found since 1201570, i mined two days there for nothing. Avoid this pool. |
|
|
|
|
i haven't try on any other than 16.10.3, but if any gains on other drivers, i don't believe they are significant +- 5hs
|
|
|
|
I remember having around 860-870 and doing 910-915 on windows with the wrong drivers, yeah.. most probably 950 on windhows now :p
You say with wrong drivers, which are those, and which are the good drivers? |
|
|
|
1320/2025 (470 not 480)  default on 1260/2000  hardcore  |
|
|
|
Did anybody modified the SGMiner - AMD GPU's for better hashrate ?
w0lf did but its not free |
|
|
|
|
dont be funny, use this :
--xintensity 256 -w 12
|
|
|
|
|
Holy sh*t,someone made a nvidia gpu miner for this.
It's criminal :
ccminer/1.8.2 1 0 1 67.82% 42.1 Mh/s
LOL
|
|
|
|
Nice results, congrats  |
|
|
|
No no, do it on linux with sgminer  So if you use macOS you would say do it on macOS... Anyways all my rigs are on windows, all my friends rigs are on windows, everyone i know is mining on windows.. Sorry i won't install linux just to prove you that my modification can do 800+ on it lol. Even if it can't it doesn't bother me because i am just into increasing hash = more earnings, doesn't matter if its on freebsd, ubuntu, windows lol |
|
|
|
|
i don't know why are you stuck with the voltage thing?
If you can't lower it by -100 then you simply won't do it, the hashrate stays same (or even better) if i don't undervolt.
The point is the ~ 850hs at 1260/2100 with samsung memory. Thats stock core/+100 mem, which doesn't add on the power consumption.
On full stock 1260/2000 i get around 815hs.
Will put this rom tomorrow on my 5x470 rig and run with sgminer if that's whats "the thing".
|
|
|
|
|
I checked it now for you:
Idle : 105w from wall
Working : Hash ~ 807 H/s, VDDC : 0.8938 V, 197w from wall
|
|
|
|
Congrats, you have a card that won the sillicon lottery... You do realize that 98 out of 100 cards like that can't handle -100mV while running 1300 core?? Try this on a 6xGPU rig.. and while NOT using claymore.. if you can do that, i will say: Congratulations to you sir. Why do you think that 1300 is much when the def clock is 1266 ?  Also why not claymore ? Not enough power hungry? Better sgminer ? Why? Also im running a 5xGPU rig with -120mV for weeks now on ETH (145mhs)... |
|
|
|
My custom timings for 470 8GB Nitro+ OC (11256-02-20G) - Samsung mem For the powersaver guy : (1126/2100 @ -120mV)  For normal usage guy : (1300/2100 @ -100mV)  |
|
|
|
|
auto switch so dont worry
|
|
|
|
Is this faster than the Djm miner? this is CPU miner, djm has GPU miner |
|
|
|
|
I am sorry but i did not ask for any confirmations from anyone, i just released an optimization for an algo, that's all.
Anyone can use it, that's why i shared it.
I don't get it why you act like this, so if i ask wolf to give me the source of his kernel because i don't believe its faster than mine, and he won't do it (for obvious reasons), i should get mad at him or what?
|
|
|
|
affraid of viruses, gotta run it in a vm |
|
|
|
joblo, you are all wrong. I said i implemented matrix usage like optiminer did in his miner a long time ago, and i used it on your code, yes. Never said it was optiminers code, lol. Anyways i like reworking your miner because i like it the most.. coulda work on tpruvot version or any other.. but yours is the nicest And i don't get it why are you pissed on me for the speedup i achieved with timetravel algo. I told you, test it for yourself if you don't believe in that speedup. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
