You already are a Jr.Member, no need for whitelisting you.

Where was that proven, Phinn?

You should take a deep breath and slow down a bit. Maybe grab a couple beers, smoke a cigar, relax a bit...

Talk to Atlas lol

Then it's probably real
Looks so empty, besides wall comments from people who friended him lol

Naaaahhhhh... can't be!

Dude, don't troll me lol
Also, don't SHOUT my name, please

I don't think Charlie will be happy with that statement.

Why having such a link on my signature suggests I'm an hypocrite, mind explaining?
In fact if you posted there I bet they would email Charlie/Bitinstant right away to let them know and allow them to defend themselves.


Because they are not scammers and already proved themselves not to be scammers many times before.
Also because you didn't post it there. If you did they would be there, and the matter would be resolved the same way and the whole world would see they are not scammers.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<moderator_hat>
Are you going to edit the title of your thread to let everyone know it's resolved or should I do it for you, slick?
</moderator_hat>

The problem started to get solved after you emailed the right person.
That still doesn't negate what i said.
Thanks for the laughs, tho, slick.

I love it when Silk Road users fuck it up or something goes wrong when buying BTC and they get an account here to try and solve their problems lol

triple checking doesn't work?

I think that's a fake profile...

So, after you lost because you couldn't double check a bitcoin address you decide that you'll get the money back by playing on the same place where you lost the money...

Oh boy... You're in for quite a ride lol

Why did they do it? 

That won't bring in much money.
I suspect most SD players have the addresses saved already

Never seen that behaviour before.
But I notice that every time I get a transaction when the client is not running it always gets timestamped with the date/time of when the client knew about it when I start it and the transaction arrives, which is consistent with the rescan timestamping when the wallet has all transactions cleared.

Maybe it's the date the transactions have on the wallet.dat that is giving those discrepancies, as you still have them on the wallet.dat, even if you delete the blockchain.

Maybe one of the devs will chime in and give you a logic explanation for that behaviour.

The last time I deleted all transactions from my wallet and did a rescan they all got the date/time of when the rescan found the transactions on the blockchain.
So, if you were downloading the blockchain, the date/time is the date/time at which the transactions were found by the client.

Why would banks restrict BTC withdrawals?

I did.

Intersango