Zhou Tong, can you check your github private repo if it was indeed genjix who cloned it on May 31, or there isn't a log that you can get that info from? I'm assuming there is an access log because it's a private repo, but I may be wrong, ofcourse.
^this I'd like to know as well. It may help the ones that pursuit litigation on finding the person who was responsible for the last theft.
|
|
|
Zhou Tong, can you check your github private repo if it was indeed genjix who cloned it on May 31, or there isn't a log that you can get that info from? I'm assuming there is an access log because it's a private repo, but I may be wrong, ofcourse.
|
|
|
Most likely your missing balance is on change addresses, yes. Easy way to fix. Send all your balance to an address which isn't a change address on the same wallet.
|
|
|
Yes, beeing able to post my referrals is one of the reasons I have joined the forum.
<moderator> This doesn't bode well for you, admitting you joined the forum to spam referral links. You better take it easy, ok? </moderator>
|
|
|
I was trying to make more of a joke commenting on my opinion of twitter than anything But if he is actually seeming interested, all the better. My reply was more to the poster you were replying to than to you, sorry about the confusion. Edited my post for clarity.
|
|
|
So anyway, I've read through this and the articles online and it seems he is completely ignoring the bitcoin suggestions and everyone is ignoring that he is ignoring them. I don't use twitter though. Thoughts on this?
How can he be ignoring those suggestons if he is retweeting them? Have you seen him retweet any other payment provider suggestion besides Bitcoin? He also retweeted Matonis article on Forbes. https://twitter.com/ForbesTech/status/223409880755740672
|
|
|
I agree that all coins are created equal and I am not talking about tainted coins, I'm saying that if you *know* that 100 BTC comes directly from the theft ( https://blockchain.info/tree/12134191 ) then the ethical thing to do is return 100 BTC to the rightful owner (doesn't have to be the exact same coins IMHO). The 100 BTC were in fact returned to the rightful owners, or didn't you read that part about genjix saying Bitcoinica's customers would take the loss? I figured that meant customers were the victims of the theft, not Bitcoinica
|
|
|
Is it just me, or am I the only one who couldn't make out head nor tail of this post? What does funding 'Glari Mining Project' has got to do with modifying the forum? No, it wasn't just you. I even looked at the username/avatar and post count two more times to be sure it wasn't just an automated spam reply lol
|
|
|
A propósito, o que aconteceu com o Bitcoinica não foram roubos?! O Bitcoinica não é a vítima!?
Se foram roubos pq não apresentaram queixa ás autoridades? Não é fácil de explicar às autoridades, é um caso complexo e iria implicar custos. O Bitcoinica parado não vai a lado nenhum, a cada dia que passa perdem mais dinheiro. Desculpa, penetrar um sistema informático de terceiros sem autorização é um crime. Deixemos os Bitcoins de lado. Apenas a intrusão não autorizada em sistema informático chegava para uma queixa-crime. E que eu saiba, para crimes públicos não existem custos em apresentar queixas. Não posso falar sobre outros países, mas em Portugal eles estariam a cometer um crime apenas pelo facto de terem tido conhecimento de um crime e não apresentarem queixa. Tens toda a razão, cada dia que passa perdem mais dinheiro... O simples facto de arrastarem a devolução do dinheiro aos utilizadores já lhes custou(aos utilizadores) $400.000
|
|
|
I see plenty of native english speakers around here who can't tell the difference between THERE, THEIR and THEY'RE... and it's just a little example as there are much more.
Don't you mean many more? Oh crap... But I haz excuze. Me not native-engrish.
|
|
|
A propósito, o que aconteceu com o Bitcoinica não foram roubos?! O Bitcoinica não é a vítima!?
Se foram roubos pq não apresentaram queixa ás autoridades?
|
|
|
We have at no point ever operated an exit node. We may or may not be operating a relay. Our system keeps no records of deposits or withdraws, only a balance, even if someone gained access to our hidden server there is no way they could link past deposits and withdraws, only ones in the future.
Even if you just ran it as a middle-relay. You admited you ran it and you admited it went down on a specific date with an aproximate hour. That was not a smart thing to do. Next time your server goes down, keep the reason to yourself. We just experienced about an hour of down time. We thought it would be a good idea to configure Tor as a relay to increase security, but it used up all the ram on the server and we had to reboot it.
Please do not worry if you had deposits. We are here for the long term.
|
|
|
I had thought a similar thing. Only I was thinking more along the lines of letter sized bonds but with the 'cool Hollywood look' for cold storage or private transfer of significant funds (personal gifts, etc)
Yes, you mean like this? I could put this in my safe with important documents, and people would realize it has value. WOW. That's just... sexy!
|
|
|
Psy tu tens muito tempo livre Mantenho o que disse, nem todos os users daqui do forum vivem no Brasil. Tenho tempo livre suficiente. Mas tendo em conta que o/a guida só tem 14 posts não foi dificil encontrar esse. Tb não desmenti que nem todos vivemos no Brasil
|
|
|
wait the bank of dank needs an interest free loan? say it isn't so.
Should dank be spending bank of dank's customers money for his own personal stuff? Personal stuff. Heh, that's funny. Not as funny as you. Granted!
|
|
|
Hacker, or somebody, can't spell or purposely misspelled word: LASTPAS; OFFICALY
And the hacker used hotmail. Surely an IP can be traced via them/there.
The spelling is most certainly on purpose, and Hotmail last time I checked (years ago) includes a header in outgoing mail called X-Originating-IP. It will surely turn out to belong to a TOR exit node or anonymizing service. The captchas on Hotmail registration page aren't very fond of showing themselves to persons who use proxies... even private ones... Never tried with Tor, tho.
|
|
|
AFAIK any search term that is enclosed on quotation marks is an expression search and will only return results that contain said expression. I've just tried it myself(using quotation marks) and it only shows me around 45k results for each search, not 385k, and the results resturned are very different from each other. Lrn 2 google Google has been tuning their searches to individual users for quite some time already, so each user can get a different result. But anyway the totals, though not the ordering, for the two different searches are the same, showing that Google Search is broken, which has been irritating me every day since Google did these changes. I will stop explaining Google Search here, because we are drifting too far off-topic. I'd like to return to the more interesting question through which institutions (in addition to GPUMAX?) the money is laundered. I know very well what personalized search is, but that only ranks certain sites above others depending if you already clicked those results on previous searches or if someone in your G+ circles gave it a +1. Search operators work the same as before and always will. Google isn't broken, I can guarantee. Stop trying to find excuses. You don't know how to use a search engine, period. Good thing you stopped explaining Google Search here, 'cause you clearly don't know jack shit about it. Also, I'm still waiting for you literary analysis on Pirate's posts.
|
|
|
AFAIK any search term that is enclosed on quotation marks is an expression search and will only return results that contain said expression. I've just tried it myself(using quotation marks) and it only shows me around 45k results for each search, not 385k, and the results resturned are very different from each other. Lrn 2 google
|
|
|
This sucks, i can't get out of newbie hell for the life of me!
Spend 42 minutes reading and you'll get out. I recommend the Bitcoinica drama threads
|
|
|
|