|
Tras unas pocas semanas "en obras", posteo para anunciar que ya está terminada la traducción de este artículo del mundialmente famoso fillippone.
Cualquier sugerencia de mejora será bien recibida, así como comentarios sobre el tema en cuestión, tanto aquí como en el hilo original. El texto ha quedado un poco ladrillo, pero siento que no soy quién para modificar el formato original. En todo caso, el contenido merece su lectura, y muestra un punto de vista distinto al que estamos acostumbrados a leer en otros medios.
|
|
|
|
One can be inactive for no reason at all, its their personal choice.
I was out of a campaign for more than 2months last year end and I was regularly active in my Local board and on the global boards, so campaigns being the reason is out of the question. Fellow local board members like @pakhitheboss can confirm this.
Genuine users will be active as long as things are working out for them.
And if you didn't post much in these 2 months it wouldn't necessarily be a bad sign either: people on campaigns have to post regularly, but we are all human (except a few AIs lately) and we have peaks of motivation sometimes, but also the contrary. Not that posting here is like any job, but having a little break from time to time should be viewed as something positive or at least normal. And if it coincides with the time you don't have signature, better IMO. |
|
|
|
So I have been wondering what if we had only one language?
What if all the countries of the world speaks just one language, would it have brought peace and unity in the world?
What's even the scientific explanation to the different languages we have in the world?
Well, I believe that having only one language will make communication easier. There will be no requirement for interpretation or translation, and people will be able to understand each other better. This could result with higher commerce, teamwork, and creativity. However, other scholars of language think that having a single language will reduce imagination and creative thinking. They think that language variability enables the emergence of new ideas and conceptions. This could encourage peace. However, speaking one language would result in a loss of ethnicity and variation, which I do not think would be enjoyable, and there would be no need to travel because everyone speaks the same language. Easier communication isn't necessarily a positive thing by definition. Globalisation has brought many good things to humanity, but also not so good ones, and speaking the same language could increase the tension between great world powers. While in China, Russia and USA/Europe speak their own languages and live in their own bubbles, the world is more peaceful than if we all spoke the same. Even the search engines are different. In fact, geopolitical problems usually arise when their political leaders meet to talk and don't share the same point of view. Little by little these bubbles are getting more blurred, but as long as different ideologies remain primarily in separated territories, the balance is easier to maintain. My two cents. |
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, he can also use swap services online. Simpleswap is quite intuitive to use and he can get the TRX he needs in a matter of minutes, without having to sign up in any exchange, but there are many different services of this kind you can find with little research.
Anyway, by the time he decides to swap a part of his USDT in order to get the needed coins, chances are that another member sends a few to the address he shared in the OP. Unfortunately I don't hold any TRX and can't be the one who helps him in a more direct way, and if the solution is swapping then it is preferable if he learns to do it himself.
|
|
|
|
|
I remember that I once got "black" ten times in a row, and lost all the money I put on stake and which was meant to last for long. The good thing is that I didn't lose because of any Montecarlo fallacy (I was aware that every time I gambled the probabilities to lose were the same) but because I sticked to my plan. The bad thing is that my plan didn't go as expected.
|
|
|
|
Trump sigue haciendo guiños a las criptomonedas y a bitcoin:
<…>
- Luego habla sobre sus bambas (las "creadas por el mismo") e indica que muchas fueron pagadas con bitcoin.
<…>
No sé de dónde saca este dato que indica en el video, dado que la página web oficial donde vende sus bambas (horteras donde las haya) no se puede paga con bitcoin, sino únicamente con tarjeta bancaria. Dudo que la página oficial permitiese la venta en bitcoin puntualmente durante el rato que estuvieron a la venta las 1.000 unidades. Suena a que se lo iba inventando sobre la marcha haciendo un "poyaque": pues ya que hablamos de bitcoin, voy a colar lo de mis bambas en la entrevista … El típico "yo he venido aquí a hablar de mi libro...". Quién sabe, quizá a los más cercanos les haya vendido algunas en Bitcoin bajo cuerda, o a lo mejor algún empresario haya hecho alguna oferta singular de x unidades a cambio de x satoshis. Lo que sí está bastante claro es que en los términos en los que hablaba seguramente no se trate de otra cosa que allanar el terreno con cierto olor a precampaña. Por otra parte, si no me equivoco en EEUU las cosas funcionan bien distintas a como funcionan en otros sistemas, y no es tan fácil que las preferencias del Presidente (tanto a favor como en contra de algo) tengan su traducción en las leyes del país. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Due to these winnings, I might stay playing on this website a little longer. I feel like my luck hasn't run out yet.
-snip-
I'm glad to read your story and know that it finished that well for you. But consider learning about the Montecarlo fallacy, because chances are that you may end losing more than what you won if you keep believing in streaks of good luck. Of course, gambling from a scientific perspective can be boring, and magical thinking is part of the fun in gambling, but try not to overdo it with those thoughts. |
|
|
|
I can tell you one thing, trading platforms have find a way to attract more investment capital with the introduction of these new Bitcoin ETFs. (So they are milking a new Cow)
They saw the need of investors, wanting to invest in Bitcoin.. but not having to worry about having to worry about securing the coins and fighting over regulatory and tax issues.
Bitcoin ETFs also brought institutional investors into the Bitcoin scene with lower risk offerings on a regulated and familiar platform.
But not actually holding any real Bitcoin. It seems that they (ETFs) will work, attracting institutional money, but with a clear short-term/speculative vocation, so the new ATH can be unprecedented, but also the subsequent price drop. |
|
|
|
I think it's bullshit and personally I would never do such a thing in my life. Your individual bet doesn't influence the performance of your team, it doesn't make it better or worse. If anything it's the other way around, if your team was better, you'd bet on it winning more often. In other words, it is the performance of your team that influences your bets, not the other way around.
Yes, thinking that your bet will have any impact in the result is a clear case of magical thinking. But, on the other hand, it is not the only reason to bet for the loser. I rarely bet on sports, but when I do I often bet for my preferred team, even if chances of winning are low. This way, if they lose I'll have won the bet and, if they win, I will be happy so the bet doesn't matter so much. Some will say that this way I'll never have it all, but also the opposite, so it can make sense to bet for the team least likely to win if you don't care so much about the result and simply bet for fun (I'm curious about who here really gambles that way). |
|
|
|
<...>
The advice touched me most as I felt the impact of what I means for not getting information if the forum early but believe that any time one wake become it's morning if only he can work as he wake. I see that working hard and applying smartness, and consistency help I as we help to achieve a goal . Op I was like you without a Merritt when saw transparency in the forum I believe I will succeed with time. As senior colleagues said take your time and be devoted that is the only way out given you self to study all about the forum all pin post, article and link that will carterput you speedily. Joining this forum is more like a long-distance race than a sprint, so the OP should take it easy and enjoy his stay here instead of looking for merits fast. Let's not forget that people doesn't rank up just because of the number of merits, but also activity, which is linked to posting and time. Therefore, if you want to succeed you must be active, patient, and strive for good quality and meaningful contributions to the knowledge we share here. |
|
|
|
La cuestión, es que si es posible ganar dinero con las apuestas, pero yo personalmente veo esas ocasiones como casualidades cuando una persona está más que dispuesta a correr un riesgo real con su dinero. Obviamente, la recompensa dentro del casino siempre será directamente propocional al riesgo, si no de arriesga no se gana y la mayoría de las veces igualmente se pierde.
Yo no aconsejaría a nadie el meterse de lleno dentro del mundo de los casinos y apostar dinero de forma descarrilada sin saber realmente lo que está haciendo, incluso aquellos que supuestamente saben lo que están haciendo pierden dinero.
Cuando se trata de tener una entrada de dinero confiable, creo que lo mejor es dejar las apuestas y los casinos de lado, las expectativas que se pueden crear un torbellino de dolor y decepciones.
Cuidense mucho y recuerden que las apuestas deberían ser vistas como mero entretenimiento, nadas más alla de eso. Amenos que ustedes sean los dueños de la casa de juegos, solo en ese caso es valido hablar de negocios.
Claro, si te refieres a apuestas en general está claro que las victorias son fruto del azar y que a la larga, estadísticamente, se acaba perdiendo. Los únicos juegos en los que hay personas que se profesionalizan son los que mencionaba, más basados en habilidad que en azar y, con todo, el componente "suerte" no deja de estar ahí para jugársela (nunca mejor dicho) incluso al mejor jugador. Como dices, no se puede confiar en el juego como una entrada de dinero. Hay quien lo ve como una inversión, pero para mí se trata de un gasto. |
|
|
|
Just don't look back at your gambling history and you wouldn't regret it  . But honestly we choose to gamble with it so we should accept whatever happens to the price, it is what it is crypto price could always go up or fall down. If you don't want to regret it then use fiat to gamble, don't use your cryptocurrency. Depending on how you look at it, then we should also regret all the money we didn't use to buy crypto. That sandwich we ate last year, or the fancy phone that costed $1,000. It is better not to feel bad because of unrealized gains, and better be careful with potential future loses. |
|
|
|
Hey Bitcointalk fam!  So, I've been aware of this community for like 4 years now, just kind of hanging around the edges. But I've finally decided to jump right in and be a part of the action! As a newbie, I'm super excited to soak up all the knowledge you guys have been sharing and maybe even throw in a few of my own ideas about Bitcoin. Let's learn and grow together. <...> On what boards would I learn the most about Bitcoin? That would be Bitcoin board. Before anything else, I think you should refresh your memory of the forum rules. Welcome (as new member) to the forum IdaraAbasi . Apart from the basics I'm sure you already know, remember that there are also local boards where you can post in your mother language, if you're not native English. Have fun! |
|
|
|
|
Technically speaking, if certain activity is not regulated is not "legal", and if it is not forbidden it is not "illegal". So, if in certain country there are no laws regulating gambling, it should be considered as an "alegal" activity in Spanish, translated as "unregulated" in English.
But beware because in certain jurisdictions what is not regulated may be forbidden, although this is not the case in most developed countries AFAIK.
|
|
|
|
He visto el artículo abajo enlazado, y pensaba que se trataba de fake news. Luego me fui al video para ver si era un Deep Fake y no, es original. De hecho, lo tiene colgado en su Twitter.
El tema es que el artículo indica que Peter Schiff pronostica bitcoin a 100K$ (*), y lamenta no haber invertido en él. ¿WTF?
<…>
Eso era en el 2021. Ahora en el 2024 la cifra pronosticada está más cerca, y parece que sigue arrepintiéndose, no tanto (o nada) por una fe en la base tecnológica ni conceptual de Bitcoin, sino por la pérdida de oportunidad de no haber invertido cuando un compañero de trabajo le habló sobre Bitcoin en el 2010. Digamos que su despecho hacia Bitcoin tiene un precio y un momento: no haber comprado bitcoin en el 2010 a 1$/btc (aprox.). Ver: https://es.cointelegraph.com/news/peter-schiff-called-bitcoin-pure-ponzi-now-wishes-he-bought-someBueno, quien más quien menos todos nos lamentamos de no haber comprado Bitcoin antes  yo escuché por primera vez hablar de Bitcoin en 2023, pero hasta 2017 no le presté la atención que debía. El problema de Schiff, que la mayoría de nosotros no tiene, es que a diferencia del resto él sí que es conocido como figura pública que despotricó frente a BTC cuando la estrategia más rentable, en retrospectiva, hubiese sido la contraria. De sabios es rectificar, pero le va a costar cambiar la percepción del público. Y respecto de su último comentario sobre su arrepentimiento por no haber comprado antes, seguimos leyendo titulares en sentido contrario, como el de hace 14 días sobre lo de que Bitcoin es "la burbuja definitiva". ¿En qué quedamos Peter? Lo peor es que una y otra afirmaciones no son excluyentes, para mayor mareo del personal. |
|
|
|
|
Kahnemann would've told that you should go for the 5 BTC, but in television quizzes for example they know that most people needs or wants that 1 BTC and won't be willing to take the risk (it would be different of they invited rich people to play). It is probabilistically reasonable to take the risk, but when you have debt and this BTC can change your life it may be more intelligent to play safe and run with the money.
|
|
|
|
Send your child to school while teaching about crypto currencies don't just throw them to investing in a young age, they need to learn also to blend-in, they should also have a a job from the start, and save and invest this is the proper way not just teach them investment, what will happen if they are not graduates? or learn something in the schools, they will be bullied, and will not have confidence, teach them while studying, in this case they will also learn how to multitask, also give them room to grow at the same time, they will also understand it, don't rush them but teach them along the way.
Yes, why choose when they can have both? the stability of a job in the Government if things go as expected (statu quo) while investing in BTC as a plan B just in case. And, to be honest, holding some satoshis isn't that difficult, some people talk as if they were totally incompatible things. |
|
|
|
|
We are not a valid representative sample as we are members of a forum around a "innovative" investment. Most of us see saving as a waste of money and we believe in hodling.
But investing means taking risks: even if some of you believe that this is a sure practice because cycles repeat and Bitcoin is antifragile etc. chances are that you lose much money.
If you save, on the contrary, you can take for granted that you'll lose a part to inflation, but unless you live in a country were things are really bad, it can be a not so bad strategy for those who seek stability at low cost.
|
|
|
|
|
We should take all we see in social medias as if it was fiction by principle. I like Don Pedro Dinero's comment and I don't think he would've done the same if he wasn't being filmed.
On the other hand, this kind of content is very interesting for marketing purpose: when you see it, chances are that you want to feel the same (in a smaller degree, I don't think people are stupid enough to bet all their savings), just like when you see people drinking or smoking in Netflix. So who knows what is the real story behind this video, and without that knowledge it is better to doubt.
|
|
|
|
|
Es muy interesante eso que decís de que el jugador medio bueno de antes ahora es más bien malo. Con lo fácil que es acceder a partidas de poker, blackjack etc. hay mucha más gente no solo aficionada, sino que también son muchos más los casos en los que se ha profesionalizado. Y a mayor número de competidores, más difícil sobresalir. Por eso, aunque sean juegos más de habilidad que de azar, incluso en la parte de habilidad se pierde ese control que antaño quizá podías lograr siendo relativamente bueno y jugando contra mediocres.
En cuanto a las deportivas, aquí la habilidad cuenta mucho menos, y aunque muchos no sean conscientes también hay una house edge como decíais. Ese decimal que no parece ir a ninguna parte en ese partido, es a la larga el que va desequilibrando la balanza a favor del casino.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
