Need a suitable solution for the p2p section whenever I open the p2p for buying or selling the currency but not showing any currency..when I uninstall the binance app then again installed then worked but after few seconds again same problem.  Quoted for better visibility (thanks to joker_josue's talkimg service). Let us know if Nwada001's advice solved your problem, or it was not the cause of your issue and you still need other solutions. Anyway, if you install the App and it works, I think that there is no problem with your coins but with the visualisation, so stay calm  Edit: I've just read that it didn't work. As I said, don't worry, you'll solve it. |
|
|
|
Yes this is scientifically proven as when people buy lotteries they have to wait quite some time before they see the results,usually it is once in a week for most lotteries and sometimes even once in a month.The people who buy lotteries usually are not gambling addicts but just some random people that buy a ticket knowing their very slim chances and they rely completely on luck,they don't care for the irrelevant amount of money that a ticket of such lotteries cost.
Real addicts can't stay long without playing,they usually are everyday players that can't stay without hitting that spin button.
Yes it is true that not most people who play the lottery game are gambling addict, some even play and show no interest, they are even cases where the winner have no idea they have won, the agency will have to start reaching out to them to come claim their winnings. But let’s note not all calls that come in the format are true, some are just scam calls. The addict will continue to chase bets that will lead to loss, gambling can stimulate the brain’s reward system much like drugs and alcohol can. And this will become a problem for individuals who can do without hitting the spin button. Even when there’s a thin line of possibilities to win, we still have some who crack the code, with enough observations one could guess with ever increasing certainty on which number or ball have a higher chance of appearing and then use that information to increase their odds. However the odds of winning vs price of the tickets would still make playing the lottery a losing gamble. Some persons just like playing lottery sometime to try there luck to earn from the gambling industry. I don't see people that play lottery bets as an addict although there are some people that had been eaten by gambling addiction which is very risky to ones financial decisions. Gambling can be very risky since there is no financial authentication attached that guarantee you of having profits in betting. People that gamble alot have the chances of becoming an addict. It is very obvious to differentiate a person that is an addict and someone that's not an addict mere looking at the person's gambling activities and the way they bets. I think that the clue here, as Youngkhngdiddy explained very well, is that the stimulation of the brain's reward system is much lighter and spaced in time in the case of lotteries. We could compare it with cocaine and methylphenidate for example: although both produce similar peaks of dopamine, the first does it almost instantly, while the latter takes a few hours to do it. That's why cocaine is so addictive, while ritalin is given to children. Of course, we can't compare gambling with cocaine, but what I want to highlight is the speed to reach these dopamine peaks in different games. I personally like the little doses of dopamine distributed over the week lotteries produce, more than other more hardcore games, but I guess that this has something to do with each person's personality. |
|
|
|
<...>
Ya, bueno, pero es que tú para viajar te identificas, tanto para el viaje como para reservar estancia. Que tenga buena suerte hacienda tratando identificar quien pagó una hamburguesa con bitcoins un sábado de febrero de 2022 o un taxi un martes de julio de 2021. Que sepas que la IA ya está cruzando datos de geolocalización para saber la identidad única de la persona que un sábado de febrero cenó en una hamburguesería y un martes de julio montó en taxi, para venderle luego esa info a quien sus dueños consideren oportuno. Bueno, bromas aparte (y digo broma, de momento), a mí me surge la duda acerca de si esos Bitcoin que cobran se transforman automáticamente en fiat a través de algún servicio especial de la pasarela de pagos que usan, o si reciben realmente la criptomoneda como forma de pago. En cuanto al engorro de tener que lidiar con las confirmaciones de las tx, aunque me repito más que la berza, esas cosas con LN no pasan. Y, por último, teniendo en cuenta que ya se pueden comprar tarjetas regalo de Uber con criptomonedas, y que la chavalería viene muy programada en hacerlo todo de manera digital, al sector tradicional del taxi más le vale empezar a renovarse si dentro de una década quiere seguir siendo competitiva. |
|
|
|
Chassing the winning is the sure way to becoming addicted and at most we have to be contented with the fact that it be a rear occasion to see lottery that can change the gamblers life life hitting a $1.000,000 jackpot, this is most and more rear as the days goes by and because of that, a lot pf gamblers have resulted into just picking lottery tickets just to do a try your lick games. So such activities can't give guarantee in any form and shouldn't be relied on for whatever reason or at any point to checkmate and avoid sliding into possible addiction due to negligence and greed. I think that this would be a good topic to open a new thread, as it seems that although there are some unusual cases of addiction to lotteries, it seems that there is a correlation between the time between you make your bet and you get the result and the probability to develop an addiction. If that's the case, and it is scientifically proven (I'll have to dig more into it), then chances are that lotteries are the less potentially addictive games, because there is usually a long period of time until the draw is carried out. |
|
|
|
pero siendo una persona que esté en Esáña, se van a otro país par poder hacer alguna transaccion importante? usando la cuenta de un amigo de otro país?
¿Cómo te vas a ir en 2023 físicamente a otro país para hacer transacciones de bitcoin si te quieres esconder del gobierno? Entre esto y lo mal que has escrito el post dudo si te habías tomado unas copas antes de hacerlo. Si te quieres esconder del gobierno para comprar bitcoin tienes DEX, P2P y cajeros bitcoin para compras por debajo de 1.000€. De hecho danadc creo que no es el punto de vista que compartimos muchos de los españoles que aquí posteamos. Lo que se debatía era sobre la obligatoriedad de declarar cantidades "pequeñas" (el entrecomillado es porque hablamos de 50.000€, que es una buena cantidad), por un lado, y de declarar lo que tengamos como ahorro en hardware wallets, por otro. Ambas cosas parecían desproporcionadas y desde mi punto de vista atentarían contra la intimidad, y la Dirección de Tributos efectivamente a respondido que no se va a meter. Así que lo que comentas de irte a otro país o utilizar algún amigo en el extranjero, para defraudar, sería meterte innecesariamente en un problema de ocultación que personalmente ni comparto ni aconsejo. De momento, podemos tener la conciencia tranquila holdeando. El día de mañana, cuando nuestros sats valgan millones, ya veremos lo que dice la ley en su momento y cómo lo hacemos para vivir una dear life. |
|
|
|
Yes, I'm not sure whether the OP misunderstood what FUD usually means (the effect of a flow of negative news usually orchestrated by some actors that leads to panic selling) with the classic paralyzing fear we like most mammals feel when we get surprised by something unexpected. Although a bit forced, the way he applied it to newbies in the forum is creative. But he shouldn't forget the conventional meaning of FUD. Yeah, typically there's this meaning of FUD as the classic one that we've seen and experienced throughout the period of time. But it all boils down with his reminder to the newbies about not being feared with what's the market is showing that includes the FUD that can be seen on the news and any other source that's being abused and used by whoever spreads it. Anyway, all of the newbies must be aware of it and don't let their emotions caught them because it's hard to control that force about being impacted by FUD. That's it. Newbie or not, one should have a plan before making any decision, and stick to the plan no matter what other sources of (dis)information say. If you really only invest what you can afford to lose, you'll be somehow immune to these news, because you accepted on beforehand the possibility of everything going to zero. |
|
|
|
nice list for jobs, i applied in some site but not got reply of any.
Thanks! Keep pushing forward and giving it another shot, buddy. I believe you can find a suitable job. Consider trying other ways to reach out to them, such as using Discord, Twitter, or LinkedIn if you genuinely think the job is a good fit for you. Keep up the good work! It is a great list, indeed, but everybody should be warned: Not raybuck's case, at least yet, but in my case I received several answers via Telegram which were straight frauds. It is always advisable to be wary just in case, but especially after provable antecedents like the ones I mention here. |
|
|
|
Ya no es la interpretación de una abogada (muy válida por un lado, pero no vinculante), sino que según resume este artículo de El Economista Tributos ha aclarado en una reciente Resolución que es tal y como comentábamos: 1.- No hay obligación de declarar importes menores a 50k. 2.- Las wallets de las que el usuario conserva las claves se interpreta que radican en España. Creo que más de uno por aquí estamos un poquito de enhorabuena |
|
|
|
The purpose of this thread is to first of all encourage my fellow newbies out there who are finding it hard to adapt to the forum or anything at all. Just keep on learning and writing until you can't keep track anymore. Knowledge is very important, don't let fear drive you away from anything, I thought that you were talking about the FUD that's being spread in the market which is related to Bitcoin and accumulation. However, this is also a reminder to the newbies that there is nothing to be feared if they're just all about learning and acquiring knowledge through the forum. They're all there and all they need to do is to extract them and not be lazy about it. Yes, I'm not sure whether the OP misunderstood what FUD usually means (the effect of a flow of negative news usually orchestrated by some actors that leads to panic selling) with the classic paralyzing fear we like most mammals feel when we get surprised by something unexpected. Although a bit forced, the way he applied it to newbies in the forum is creative. But he shouldn't forget the conventional meaning of FUD. |
|
|
|
~snip~
I think the impact of stopping gambling is quite difficult. but if it is to reduce gambling activities, it is still possible. Maybe you can stop gambling at a certain time when you reflect on the problems that are making you worse. but when the atmosphere returns, I think gamblers will return again and perhaps with more limited and responsible activities so as not to involve the people around them again. Maybe there is a story of a gambling addict who managed to quit, but I'm not sure it really stopped completely. there will be a time when they return to the table again. no gambler really stops completely once they are familiar with gambling, even when they have a family and have a permanent job they will definitely carry out gambling activities in their spare time when they feel tired or need entertainment but only occasionally do these activities. someone who has known gambling for a long time and has stopped, of course when they return to the world of gambling they will be more careful in playing games and yes they will be more disciplined in using their money to bet because they know how difficult it is to make money so they use gambling only as a means of entertainment. Do you both really thing that when someone got addicted to gambling it is impossible for him to quit forever? It seems a too pessimistic insight to me. AA members say that once alcoholic, forever alcoholic, but many never drink alcohol again, and in comparison gambling is not so dangerous, in my ignorance. For those who went too far with drugs or other addictions, although difficult, I think there is always hope if they have something to fight for. The problem is that when you go too far in your addictions, very often you also lose job, friends, family... pillars that are the basis in many cases for recovery. |
|
|
|
|
Como diría un viejo profesor de contabilidad: cash flow, cash flow, cash flow...
No sé cuál habrá sido la causa del descubierto, pero teniendo en cuenta que el precio de Bitcoin se está manteniendo inusualmente constante durante los últimos meses, no produciéndose imprevistos tampoco en otros frentes (el precio de la luz hace ya también bastante que subió en muchos países), quiero pensar que más bien puede tratarse de algún "accidente" de tesorería que podría haberse evitado.
Bueno, una vez visto, todo el mundo es listo. Veremos cómo gestionan esta crisis de cara a salir del bache.
|
|
|
|
When luck isn't on your side, consider an immediate pause to prevent further losses.
If you have won too, it is good to stop gambling because the day that has been going good could be ended in losses. You are right, and that's where many gamblers fail. According to the theory what explains why the martingale doesn't work, you can always continue betting when you win (there is no limit), but that's not the case when you lose (there is a very clear floor: the bankruptcy). If you quit when you lost enough, but keep gambling when you won big, until you lose it, you'll never really win. And it will happen, sooner or later, because of the effect called regression to the mean. |
|
|
|
To navigate these dangers, traders must educate themselves,
If you cannot educate yourself, then seek assistance to be educated. It is not easy to educate yourself sometimes and for some people, you can read through long paghes and watch videos and still not be educated enough. You have to know yourself and understand the kind of person you are whether you are the kind that can learn and educate yourself by yourself, or the kind that will need an educated person in the field they want to learn about to help them get educated. Know your kind. That's an interesting advice. Nosce te ipsum. We are used here to fit-for-all answers but you are right that self-awareness is crucial. The bad part is that personalities of some kinds are not able to admit their weaknesses, so your piece of advice can be in vain. I'd say that, in general, a good way to learn is by yourself: you can read about trading and it can be useful, but until you don't see what is it for yourself you'll lack real knowledge on what that practice implies. The best approach, for me, would be to test with very little money for a while, while you read about it or take classes, and most importantly, try to comprehend the reality underneath the TA, FA and whatever pseudoscientific analysis: that trading is, for the majority of users who don't have (illegal) inner knowledge, it is no more than a other way of gambling. |
|
|
|
What's the purpose of this thread?
Is every user in this forum must create a new thread or make a reply? where's the rule about this?
Is every user don't know what's search engine or how to type?
Is there any rule we must create a post without grammatical error and speak like a native?
Is there any rule we must click preview before posting?
It's a must we have to create a good title for clickbait in order to make people interested?
Well, although I thought a little bit the same when I started reading the OP, there is no need to be rude either. It is true that these are not the rules to follow each and every time we post (as long as we are polite, don't copy-paste and our comment is on-topic, it should be enough). But it is good to remember all those things when we start a new thread, and the guy made the effort to share them in a proper way, so maybe you don't like them, but I wouldn't call them stupid. |
|
|
|
|
Personalmente no me la jugaría demasiado a ver que pasa de aquí a 8 años. Si este nuevo ciclo esperado (que ya veremos si se cumple: la curva se está aplanando considerablemente y más rápido de lo proyectado) consigues llegar al hito de, por ejemplo y fortuna, no depender de una hipoteca, yo no me la jugaría si tuviera que elegir entre ser rico o esclavo del banco durante 30 años.
Si te da para alcanzar esa semi-autonomía financiera, y aún así guardar algo para el siguiente ciclo, o por si siguiera subiendo por encima de lo esperado, mejor aún, pero 8 años son muchos años de incertidumbre.
Incluso puedes pensar de este otro modo: sin hipoteca, te supondrá mucho menos esfuerzo acumular para el siguiente ciclo, si es lo que quieres.
Hablo sin saber, sin conocer tu situación personal, pero es lo que le recomendaría a cualquier amigo con la economía de un español medio.
|
|
|
|
Could we say that lotteries are made for the poor, so? As a poor man myself, maybe that's the reason I like to play this game from time to time  It seems that the question you asked is not quite right. Because basically everyone is free to gamble and everyone is also free to choose what type of game they will play, including lottery games. In gambling there are no boundaries, whether you are rich or poor, whether you are a businessman or an ordinary citizen, everyone can gamble as long as they have money to bet. -snip- Anyone can bet, regardless of wealth. Thats interesting, but lets think about something else. Games like Togel, which are cheap at initially, can give people a false sense of stability and hope. Gaming emphasizes choice, which is true. Do not dismiss its downside. Many believe they can win large and improve their lives immediately. Unfortunately, they often get locked in a cycle of chasing losses and hoping for a huge break. Do you desire freedom to choose when the consequences might be so bad for many? Well, it seems that I should explain that I was just kidding when I posed that question, of course anyone can bet almost any game he wants (although I don't think I would be welcome at the same table the King is playing at Montecarlo). About choice, I will repeat what I have said a few times before: I don't think that we have a real choice, at least in terms of outcome (you decide a number, a colour, a strategy, but the odds are already given before you choose). That's why I think that, in these games, one may fall in a false sense of control, that is very hard in lottery (apart from magical thinking). |
|
|
|
Because taking money away from gambling simply makes the game not worth playing.
Will you still participate if money is not involved? Many people will easily quit if all casinos are to be turned into no-money games, isn't it?
Money is still the real reasons why we gamble, been addicted or not, mutual greed or not, all gambling is done to make more money or get some form of reward in the end. Some gambling games are fun even without money. I still play poker without actual money bets. Other gambling games are boring with or without money(dice, crash, slots, roulette). Removing monetary bets would make them unbearable. You are right. 99% of the gamblers keep gambling because of the faith in their luck and the dream of making the big hit. Most gambling games aren't the same without money. I just don't have any delusions about "making the bit hit" and becoming very rich out of gambling. That's why I say(and write) that I gamble for fun. That's it. If money wasn't involved, the dopamine and other neurotransmitter peaks wouldn't be the same, and it would be the same either for all these emotions they produce (fun, if you want to focus on it). So, when players say that they gamble for fun, I think that what they mean is that they know well the mechanisms of gambling and are not expecting that it will be profitable / a source of income. When you go to a tavern you know that you will get fun, at a cost. To me, gambling is quite similar, and it is not the same to gamble in a logical way than the delusion of believing that it will improve your life in the long term. |
|
|
|
Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!
This is not good, 100 sugar daddies will mean 100 plus sexual partners. That is unhygienic. you both go find a hotel. Left aside the sexual thing, the point here is that these kind of sources of income are not scalable. Time is limited, and you need a certain amount of time for each "client". You may be earning money while you sleep, but when not sleeping you have some work to do, even if it's just answer to a phone call or simply a conversation on WhatsApp. To me, that's not passive income, so it's not the best example. And to rental property you have to buy it first, so you need the money. Even if you buy it, renting it is not a sure thing, and there are also other potential risks. And rest assured that you won't be able to get a private jet by just renting three typical properties. |
|
|
|
There are some lottery players out there who actually believe that the number of tickets one owns will raise their chances of winning, just like we see on Freebitco in our lottery page where they tell us the number of tickets we own, the total number of tickets of every player put together, and then our chances of winning.
There are some gamblers who think that winning a lottery depends on how many tickets one owns, but unfortunately for those with a lot of money to spend, and fortunately for those with not so much money, winning the lottery does not have to do with the number of tickets one owns or bought, if it was calculated by the number of ticket one owns, then it simply means its no longer a luck based game, but a game that depends on how much money owns..
We can draw our examples from freebitco lottery system, one of the lottery games I've come to trust honestly.
It will require a lot of money to be able to buy lottery tickets on freebitco because many people already have more tickets than others. And even though their chances are higher than other people, they still have to have luck to win. But people with only a few lottery tickets have the same chance of winning because they both need their luck to win. And we have also seen how luck ultimately comes to people who only have fewer tickets than others. So no matter how many lottery tickets we have, we still can win even though we have to compete with people with more tickets. That's what makes it interesting because there is actually no assurance for any person to actually secure a victory by buying tickets and knowing this is what's make people and gamblers still have that mind to gamble because even with a single ticket bought luck can still shine on you and before you know it you are the lucky winner of the lottery although there is a slight advantage of buying more tickets but there is no guarantee that you will come out victorious in the game. Could we say that lotteries are made for the poor, so? As a poor man myself, maybe that's the reason I like to play this game from time to time You are all right, even if you buy a huge amount of tickets, one hundred, for example, (and pay accordingly), a probability of 0.0000.... x100 is still 0.0000..... . Even if somebody spent all his money in lottery tickets, the probability would be almost the same in comparison with some player with just one ticket: next to zero. That's why I think that paying as little as possible in order to get a minimal possibility is enough in this kind of games. |
|
|
|
|
Es curioso de ver, en la tabla, cómo los primeros 11 miembros están ahí porque repartieron más méritos de los que recibieron en esta sección local. El puesto número 12 quedó en tablas: recibió lo mismo que dio. Y el resto, grupo de ingratos entre los que me incluyo, tenemos un déficit debido a que repartimos por el norte parte de los méritos que generosamente nos donaron por acá.
Mención especial merecen paxmao y fillippone y DdmrDdmr, como importadores netos. Si no fuera por esa "inyección", supongo que haría falta un rescate, cual crisis financiera.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
