Flat Earth

[Oppolee]

If we imagine for a moment that the earth was still flat, then who and how people live at the end of the earth. How to share the land due to weather conditions? How does this happen.

[PanZerrr]

If we imagine for a moment that the earth was still flat, then who and how people live at the end of the earth. How to share the land due to weather conditions? How does this happen.

Imagine a miracle every Japanese see if they have become so narrow eyes. It's not just nature created them.

[Gleb Gamow]

i trust earth is flat

Over the edge.

If you put a straight edge to the horizon you will notice it's flat

Ergo horizon and not curvizon.

<fuck me! i thought i coined a neologism: https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS549US549&btnG=Search&q=%22curvizon%22 (at least i still have a banana dick, ergo ...>

[exemplaar]

Why so many words. Just put a plain and simple statement. I've been successfully indoctrinated by the religion of monkey man science to believe it.

Blinded by that science bonus material: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmCE8GhTi-M

EDIT: In a fairy tale of course you can prove spinning ball earth with that science, no doubt. But point is that flat earth reality destroys it and you should wake up.

What is it with flat earthers calling everyone monkeys? or monkey man science? you sound brainwashed when you talk like that. like how scientologists sound.

But anyway.
can you prove Flat earth with logic? NO
Can you perform tests/experiments to support your claims? NO
Is their sound reasoning behind your claims? NO
Do you try to counter argue to expand your knowledge? NO

But i can prove my beliefs with logic, tests, sound reasoning, and valid arguments.

your belief was popular with Socrates but then it was completely disproved by Aristotle. ever since then the debate was closed. there is no point in trying to make up reasons to believe in it with fringe reasoning.

The best you can do is say that it is your belief, and YOUR reality. and that you cant prove it but you believe it. then turn it into a religion. because that it what those are for.

I wouldn't worry about it too much.  Among most conspiracy theorists, providing evidence contrary to their beliefs will only make their beliefs stronger, and this is usually proportional to how good the counter-evidence is.  If it doesn't make them think the first time, it likely never will.

That being said, they're already paying for their mindset in real life, and how much they pay is proportional to both the time spent and how public they are with it (e.g. are they just sharing their beliefs anonymously, or are they sharing them with friends, family, coworkers, etc.?).  The more they dive into the conspiracy, the more it will take a toll on their social success, financial success, and overall life satisfaction.

As I said earlier, it is easy to prove spinning ball earth with monkey man science, but reality is totally different. Look for tons of evidence in real life and this thread if you do not believe me and others posting here, or take your next session with your monkey man science preacher(below)and his sidekicks. The choice is yours.

[CC-Resurgam]

Why so many words. Just put a plain and simple statement. I've been successfully indoctrinated by the religion of monkey man science to believe it.

Blinded by that science bonus material: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmCE8GhTi-M

EDIT: In a fairy tale of course you can prove spinning ball earth with that science, no doubt. But point is that flat earth reality destroys it and you should wake up.

What is it with flat earthers calling everyone monkeys? or monkey man science? you sound brainwashed when you talk like that. like how scientologists sound.

But anyway.
can you prove Flat earth with logic? NO
Can you perform tests/experiments to support your claims? NO
Is their sound reasoning behind your claims? NO
Do you try to counter argue to expand your knowledge? NO

But i can prove my beliefs with logic, tests, sound reasoning, and valid arguments.

your belief was popular with Socrates but then it was completely disproved by Aristotle. ever since then the debate was closed. there is no point in trying to make up reasons to believe in it with fringe reasoning.

The best you can do is say that it is your belief, and YOUR reality. and that you cant prove it but you believe it. then turn it into a religion. because that it what those are for.

I wouldn't worry about it too much.  Among most conspiracy theorists, providing evidence contrary to their beliefs will only make their beliefs stronger, and this is usually proportional to how good the counter-evidence is.  If it doesn't make them think the first time, it likely never will.

That being said, they're already paying for their mindset in real life, and how much they pay is proportional to both the time spent and how public they are with it (e.g. are they just sharing their beliefs anonymously, or are they sharing them with friends, family, coworkers, etc.?).  The more they dive into the conspiracy, the more it will take a toll on their social success, financial success, and overall life satisfaction.

As I said earlier, it is easy to prove spinning ball earth with monkey man science, but reality is totally different. Look for tons of evidence in real life and this thread if you do not believe me and others posting here, or take your next session with your monkey man science preacher(below)and his sidekicks. The choice is yours.

man if you only look at things straight forward and dont question it or try and prove it using logic, you must think that harry potter is real cause ive read it, ive seen the movies, it must be real. never mind all the evidence and logic that says otherwise i saw it with my eyes.

also gravity doesnt exist cause i cant feel it, air isnt real cause i cant see it, that train isnt moving tward me it is just getting bigger. man my entire perspective has chan... *gets hit by train*

[exemplaar]

Harry Potter is a product of a human mind, made manifested in TV series.

Gravity is a product of a human mind, manifested in a dream world of a spinning ball earth. Is it real? 

Also considering that physics as we know of today was derived mainly from Newton, and Newton was both a mason and occultist, you can pretty much toss physics right out the window as having any type of merit.




 

[BADecker]

Harry Potter is a product of a human mind, made manifested in TV series.

Gravity is a product of a human mind, manifested in a dream world of a spinning ball earth. Is it real? 

Also considering that physics as we know of today was derived mainly from Newton, and Newton was both a mason and occultist, you can pretty much toss physics right out the window as having any type of merit.
 

Is gravity really the product of a human mind? Consider. People stay on the ground rather than floating off into the sky. If a person is sitting on a tree branch, and he falls off, he winds up on the ground. If you are at the top of the Empire State Building, and you hold a ball over the edge, when you let go of the ball, it moves towards the ground.

If the above, and all kinds of similar things in addition, are simply products of a human mind, then we are truly living in a Matrix-like artificial universe.

If, on the other hand, things fall towards the earth if they have nothing holding them aloft, gravity exists... and it works.

Now, the theories about why gravity works the way it does, or theories about what gravity is made of, all might be incorrect. But people mostly don't think about the theories when they think about gravity. What they think of is stuff falling towards the ground if nothing holds it up higher than the ground.

What this means is that gravity exists no matter what you call it. Go to, say, the Bing translator at http://www.bing.com/translator/. Type in the word "gravity." Then use the translator to see the various forms of the word in the various languages supported by Bing. Many of the forms of this word are very different from "g r a v i t y." But they all mean the same thing.

If you really want to transpose the word "density" for the word "gravity," you have the right to do so. But why? You are simply mixing people up who understand the word "gravity" to describe exactly the same natural action as the "density" you are using. Doing this is causing chaos rather than order, and it certainly isn't furthering your flat earth ideals.

It's kinda like when nomad****** uses perversion to try to uphold a serious flat earth idea. All he is doing when he does this is to turn people against the flat earth idea... except possibly some other perverts.

[BADecker]

Harry Potter is a product of a human mind, made manifested in TV series.

Gravity is a product of a human mind, manifested in a dream world of a spinning ball earth. Is it real?  

Also considering that physics as we know of today was derived mainly from Newton, and Newton was both a mason and occultist, you can pretty much toss physics right out the window as having any type of merit.
 

Are you saying that Newton was not a man, a person, a human being? If you are, the things you say about Newton might make a little sense. But if Newton was a man, then he lived the same way as other men... breathing air, drinking water, eating food, wearing clothing, living in a house, etc.

If you throw out the logic that Newton used, then you have to throw out your own. Why? Because much of it works the same way as yours does... or far better.

Throw out Newton's logic if you want. But if you do, you will be walking around without any logic, like the Dark Ages, bordering on the chaos of the Roman Church. Why? Much of Newton's logic was basic logic that everyone can see and understand today, if he thinks about it a little.

One of the pieces of logic is gravity. An apple fell off the tree and hit him in the head, making him realize that gravity exists. Newton's 3rd Law, action and reaction, was proven to exist at the same time. The action of gravity on the apple causing it to fall made the reaction in Newton... the realization of gravity. Just because Newton later tried to figure out what gravity really was mathematically, if he was wrong about it, doesn't make gravity to not exist.

[exemplaar]

LOL, what a funny philosopher you are.

There were probable millions of people before Newton, with same experience - apples are constantly falling of on people's heads in autumn. No big deal.
By the way this "apple incident" is a bogus story and I'm not buying it.  

[Gleb Gamow]

I have no less than three guys calling me a troll because I proved beyond a doubt that Leroy Fodor could not have traded and mined bitcoins in 2009 as he is quoted in stating because he also stated in mid-2014 that he was new to this Bitcoin thingy. Either they're wrong or I'm right, both can't be true after real evidence was presented presenting my case against Leroy Fodor.

I'm bringin' this up as an example to how hard it is convince opposing parties truisms.

That said, as I've stated before, this thread has opened my eyes to a few a things of which I, personally, cannot easily dismiss, and for that, thanks.

[BADecker]

LOL, what a funny philosopher you are.

There were probable millions of people before Newton, with same experience - apples are constantly falling of on people's heads in autumn. No big deal.
By the way this "apple incident" is a bogus story and I'm not buying it.  

And a few of them probably wrote white papers on gravity just like Newton did.

[BADecker]

I have no less than three guys calling me a troll because I proved beyond a doubt that Leroy Fodor could not have traded and mined bitcoins in 2009 as he is quoted in stating because he also stated in mid-2014 that he was new to this Bitcoin thingy. Either they're wrong or I'm right, both can't be true after real evidence was presented presenting my case against Leroy Fodor.

I'm bringin' this up as an example to how hard it is convince opposing parties truisms.

That said, as I've stated before, this thread has opened my eyes to a few a things of which I, personally, cannot easily dismiss, and for that, thanks.

The difference between the flat earth/globe earth controversy is...

You look at the logic behind globe earth, and then you believe...

You have faith in flat earth, and if your faith is strong enough, flat earth makes sense.

[nomad13666]

RESEARCH FLAT EARTH
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22flat+earth%22

PS; Nice dress you have on there, BADecker. Don't leave a slug trail on the North Pole.

 

[BADecker]

<>

RESEARCH FLAT EARTH
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22flat+earth%22

PS; Nice dress you have on there, BADecker. Don't leave a slug trail on the North Pole.

 

nomad13666, the pervert, strikes again.   

[nomad13666]

<>

RESEARCH FLAT EARTH
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22flat+earth%22

PS; Nice dress you have on there, BADecker. Don't leave a slug trail on the North Pole.

 

nomad13666, the pervert, strikes again.   

I love it when you talk dirty, you sexy little bitch.

 

[BADecker]

<>

RESEARCH FLAT EARTH
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22flat+earth%22

PS; Nice dress you have on there, BADecker. Don't leave a slug trail on the North Pole.

 

nomad13666, the pervert, strikes again.   

I love it when you talk dirty, you sexy little bitch.

 

We knew that. You are perverted just like flat earth is perverted science. That's why you fit right in.

[nomad13666]

RESEARCH FLAT EARTH
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22flat+earth%22

 

[Whtwabbit]

"floating off into the sky" <---- watched to many Disney movies while young (why not fall through the ground?)

[nomad13666]

It's kinda like when nomad****** uses perversion to try to uphold a serious flat earth idea. All he is doing when he does this is to turn people against the flat earth idea... except possibly some other perverts.

Nice try, goof.



 

[nomad13666]

Catholic Church & Heliocentrism & Flat Earth
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22catholic+church%22+heliocentrism+%22flat+earth%22