Flat Earth

[BADecker]

Here at the edge of the lunar eclipse shadows cast by the Earth to the Moon, it is always an arc of a circle, and the only body capable of providing a shadow at any position and direction of the light source, there is a ball. Can think?

If you are of the opinion that this is a realistic straight level all help is beyond reasoning.

So, how big is your standard level on that 25,000 mile level above? Find the blue dot to take a gander at it.

[notbatman]

Here at the edge of the lunar eclipse shadows cast by the Earth to the Moon, it is always an arc of a circle, and the only body capable of providing a shadow at any position and direction of the light source, there is a ball. Can think?

I can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth is not in motion using a combination of established and replicated scientific experiments. The spinning ball is model has been broken and you're clinging onto a corpse of an idea.


A reasonable conclusion here is that there's a 3^rd celestial body in between the plane of the Earth and the Moon.

[BADecker]

Here at the edge of the lunar eclipse shadows cast by the Earth to the Moon, it is always an arc of a circle, and the only body capable of providing a shadow at any position and direction of the light source, there is a ball. Can think?

I can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth is not in motion using a combination of established and replicated scientific experiments. The spinning ball is model has been broken and you're clinging onto a corpse of an idea.


A reasonable conclusion here is that there's a 3^rd celestial body in between the plane of the Earth and the Moon.

Keep your reasonable doubt. All kinds of people have proven conclusively that the earth is a spinning globe in motion with the rest of the spinning-globe bodies throughout the universe.

[notbatman]

Here at the edge of the lunar eclipse shadows cast by the Earth to the Moon, it is always an arc of a circle, and the only body capable of providing a shadow at any position and direction of the light source, there is a ball. Can think?

I can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth is not in motion using a combination of established and replicated scientific experiments. The spinning ball is model has been broken and you're clinging onto a corpse of an idea.


A reasonable conclusion here is that there's a 3^rd celestial body in between the plane of the Earth and the Moon.

Keep your reasonable doubt. All kinds of people have proven conclusively that the earth is a spinning globe in motion with the rest of the spinning-globe bodies throughout the universe.

The Sagnac Experiment shows there's an aether with irrefutable empirical proof. With an aether the Michelson & Morley Experiment proves the Earth is motionless and Airy's Failure Experiment corroborates these results.

You've got no room left to wiggle worm.

[Logical Fallacy Detector]

A reasonable conclusion here is that there's a 3^rd celestial body in between the plane of the Earth and the Moon.

• Homunculus fallacy
• Denying the antecedent
• Existential fallacy
• Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise
• Argumentum ad lapidem
• Argumentum ad ignorantiam
• Onus probandi

[Gleb Gamow]

A reasonable conclusion here is that there's a 3^rd celestial body in between the plane of the Earth and the Moon.

• Homunculus fallacy
• Denying the antecedent
• Existential fallacy
• Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise
• Argumentum ad lapidem
• Argumentum ad ignorantiam
• Onus probandi

• Desertous-operativus Idioticus

[nomad13666]

• Homunculus fallacy
• Denying the antecedent
• Existential fallacy
• Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise
• Argumentum ad lapidem
• Argumentum ad ignorantiam
• Onus probandi

• Desertous-operativus Idioticus

• Zoological Phallus Erector
• Phallus impudicus
• Gleba

[notbatman]

I would like to make a public note that reddit.com has started deleting Flat Earth comments related to gravity. They don't seem to like me giving detailed technical explanations. When I suggested an experiment the user could try a home with a balloon they took action and removed the comment.

[BADecker]

I would like to make a public note that reddit.com has started deleting Flat Earth comments related to gravity. They don't seem to like me giving detailed technical explanations. When I suggested an experiment the user could try a home with a balloon they took action and removed the comment.

Consider Grue's notice post at the top of this basic group of threads. Part of it goes something like ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1334019.0 ):

Off topic is a section for any other topics that do not fit into any other sub, however, it is not a subforum for account farmers to lazily spam their way through the ranks and doing so will no longer be tolerated. If you are caught spamming unsubstantial posts just to farm or rank up your account your account(s) will be immediately permabanned without warning.

Why might such a notice exist?... even though Bitcointalk doesn't enforce it in a firm way? Perhaps it exists because they want quality things talked about in Bitcointalk. Or maybe it is a bandwidth issue.

When you continue to talk about "gravity" in a way that is semantics oriented, making an issue about "gravity" words and points that attempt to change dictionary meanings rather than point out flaws in the gravity principle, you can expect to get banned in some forums. And that is exactly the way many flat earthers talk about gravity. So, what else can you expect? Just be happy that Bitcointalk is a bit more lenient than other forums might be.

[Gleb Gamow]

I would like to make a public note that reddit.com has started deleting Flat Earth comments related to gravity. They don't seem to like me giving detailed technical explanations. When I suggested an experiment the user could try a home with a balloon they took action and removed the comment.

Consider Grue's notice post at the top of this basic group of threads. Part of it goes something like ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1334019.0 ):

Off topic is a section for any other topics that do not fit into any other sub, however, it is not a subforum for account farmers to lazily spam their way through the ranks and doing so will no longer be tolerated. If you are caught spamming unsubstantial posts just to farm or rank up your account your account(s) will be immediately permabanned without warning.

Why might such a notice exist?... even though Bitcointalk doesn't enforce it in a firm way? Perhaps it exists because they want quality things talked about in Bitcointalk. Or maybe it is a bandwidth issue.

When you continue to talk about "gravity" in a way that is semantics oriented, making an issue about "gravity" words and points that attempt to change dictionary meanings rather than point out flaws in the gravity principle, you can expect to get banned in some forums. And that is exactly the way many flat earthers talk about gravity. So, what else can you expect? Just be happy that Bitcointalk is a bit more lenient than other forums might be.

Talk about going full-circle (never referred to as 'going full-globe): https://www.reddit.com/r/RWBY/comments/2galt5/posted_on_montys_facebook_height_chart_for_all/ckhqb01

Remnant has for sure a different set of physic rules governing it, and for sure a more lenient gravity. So that might also be a factor to consider.

[matt4054]

So, getting to page 100, this is a candidate for favorite idle thread...

And flat is the new trend as far as bitcoin price goes, too

[numismatist]

I would like to make a public note that reddit.com has started deleting Flat Earth comments related to gravity. They don't seem to like me giving detailed technical explanations. When I suggested an experiment the user could try a home with a balloon they took action and removed the comment.

It's not about Terry Pratched beeing right about earth beeing a disk (carried by four elephants standing on a turtle traveling through space) more about Reddit beeing above all laws in censoring opinions!

We got rights about stating our opinions.
It's mostly about secret services collecting them, using our opinions against us at any later time. But about expressing our opinions, too. Not beeing able to do would be like ...

[notbatman]

My reddit balloon comment that was deleted (clowns) was in fact on static electricity i.e. rubbing of the balloon. Here's a sample of what "they" don't want you to know:

Flat Earth: Tangled Electric Web of Deceit
https://youtu.be/rMLzEE8M57U

[CC-Resurgam]

i dont understand how people can truely believe the earth is flat. besides minor circumstantial evidence there are tons of hard evidence opposing the theory.

[montaga]

i dont understand how people can truely believe the earth is flat. besides minor circumstantial evidence there are tons of hard evidence opposing the theory.

Hard Evidence, oh really and why have you locked it up in your wee little cabinent?
We like to see it too, please share. As you see the thread is getting long and you seam the last hope to smack the thread killing evidence on the table.
Eagerly awaiting.

[Logical Fallacy Detector]

...smack the thread killing evidence on the table.

• Existential fallacy
• Argumentum ad ignorantiam
• Argument from (personal) incredulity
• Onus probandi
• Inflation of conflict

The Flat Earth Society has members all around the globe.

[exemplaar]

LOL what a joker 

Did you ever learn math?

Spinning ball earth = Logical fallacy detector

[Gleb Gamow]

i dont understand how people can truely believe the earth is flat. besides minor circumstantial evidence there are tons of hard evidence opposing the theory.

Hard Evidence, oh really and why have you locked it up in your wee little cabinent?
We like to see it too, please share. As you see the thread is getting long and you seam the last hope to smack the thread killing evidence on the table.
Eagerly awaiting.

Unless a Freudian slip, I sea no logical reason for tying an 'a' in lieu of an 'e', especially when typing consecutive Es is faster than the stated incorrect course of action, spelling aside. Perhaps 'cabinent' is a reference to continent?

To be fair, your response was more grammatically correct than the post you replied too, so I guest were all too blame.

[BADecker]

My reddit balloon comment that was deleted (clowns) was in fact on static electricity i.e. rubbing of the balloon. Here's a sample of what "they" don't want you to know:

Flat Earth: Tangled Electric Web of Deceit
https://youtu.be/rMLzEE8M57U

In your post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg16436037#msg16436037 you said it was gravity. Now you say it was static electricity. In other posts you talk about gravity as density. Now you are trying to say that static electricity is density?

If you are an example of the average flat earther, what funny farm do you live at?

[Gleb Gamow]

My reddit balloon comment that was deleted (clowns) was in fact on static electricity i.e. rubbing of the balloon. Here's a sample of what "they" don't want you to know:

Flat Earth: Tangled Electric Web of Deceit
https://youtu.be/rMLzEE8M57U

In your post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg16436037#msg16436037 you said it was gravity. Now you say it was static electricity. In other posts you talk about gravity as density. Now you are trying to say that static electricity is density?

If you are an example of the average flat earther, what funny farm do you live at?

"We all live at the Funny Farm. Rub our centers to make us hard create static."