Flat Earth

[BADecker]

^^^ Discrediting the inventor of the oscilloscope isn't going to fly, it's game over for relativity. There's no credible argument against the results of the 1887 M&M experiment; the Earth is motionless.

But it's not what you think, since there are plenty of proofs that fly in the face of the things that you say. The Earth isn't flat, even though the complex experiments that you quote might suggest it in some ways.

Simple things like the horizon being shown to be near, when the eye is at 1 inch above the water, is one of them. Another simple one is the water level being different between the Atlantic and the Gulf. Another is all the misinterpretation you use with regard to the Bible.

If the things that you talk about prove that certain aspects of standard science are wrong, flat Earth doesn't answer your ideas. Here is what is closer to the truth. The fact that the nature of the aether isn't what FE people say, or even what aether people say. And certainly the aether exists, contrary to what standard science says.

There are reasons why the people behind standard science don't want the truth about the aether to become known. Part of it is that we wouldn't have to rely on crude oil if we understood how the aether works. And there would be additional freedom, like easy ways to get to space, if common people understood the aether.

What wouldn't surprise me at all would be to find that you are working for standard science. Your FE junk is being used to warp any true knowledge people are figuring out about the aether, just to help keep big oil in business through the continuation of the ignorance of the people.

[1714872366]

1714872366

[1714872366]

1714872366

[1714872366]

1714872366

[1714872366]

1714872366

[1714872366]

1714872366

[BADecker]

^^^ You make unsubstantiated claims to support your spinning clown world, and I provide experimental results that falsify relativity and establish a stationary Earth. Who's to say what's right, your passion for balls in motion at the cost of empirical measure or, actually following the scientific method?

You and your clowns are the only ones who talk about a spinning world. So you, yourself, are the spinning world clowns.

GE people KNOW that the world isn't spinning. We know that it makes its 360 degree turn very slowly... 1 turn in 1 day. But you call that spinning. Why? Because you are so mentally slow that 1-turn-in-30-days would be spinning for you.

Wake up and realize that you and your FE buddies are kinda on the low end of the IQ scale... and then start to take reality lessons.

[Astargath]

^^^ You make unsubstantiated claims to support your spinning clown world, and I provide experimental results that falsify relativity and establish a stationary Earth. Who's to say what's right, your passion for balls in motion at the cost of empirical measure or, actually following the scientific method?

You make unsubstantiated claims to support your deluded view of the world, I provide hundreds of different experimental results that falsify the flat earth, not only that but livestreams 24/7 of the earth from space. All the scientific theories follow the scientific method, dummy. Established scientific theories like gravity you knucklehead. Can you even read?

[notbatman]

^^^ It's not even gravity anymore, Newtonian gravity (1687) was a test to see if you're paying attention to his calculated description of motion and optics or not. He stated outright in his letters that there was a conspiracy of Jews and secret societies. Today and in response to the 1887 M&M experiment it's not "gravity" but relativity (1905). Unfortunately relativity was falsified in 1939 by D&P with their replication of the Sagnac experiment (1913).

You might as well have a 24/7 live-stream from the the Star Trek universe, it's currently got about as much credibility if you read the comments people leave.

[BADecker]

^^^ The reason why it is still gravity is, people don't go into consideration of Newton or Sagnac when they use gravity. They just use it. And they call it gravity because that is the word they were taught to call it.

For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.

All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.

[Astargath]

^^^ It's not even gravity anymore, Newtonian gravity (1687) was a test to see if you're paying attention to his calculated description of motion and optics or not. He stated outright in his letters that there was a conspiracy of Jews and secret societies. Today and in response to the 1887 M&M experiment it's not "gravity" but relativity (1905). Unfortunately relativity was falsified in 1939 by D&P with their replication of the Sagnac experiment (1913).

You might as well have a 24/7 live-stream from the the Star Trek universe, it's currently got about as much credibility if you read the comments people leave.

''Unfortunately relativity was falsified in 1939 by D&P with their replication of the Sagnac experiment (1913)''

Prove it, I have seen no evidence that gravity has been falsified aside from you saying it, you can't even prove the experiment happened, you didn't do the experiment yourself and you didn't meet Sagnac or the others, you don't even know if they are real, why should you believe it? You think they are faking gravity/space and the whole earth yet believe some written papers on the internet quite easily, don't you think?

[notbatman]

^^^ The reason why it is still gravity is, people don't go into consideration of Newton or Sagnac when they use gravity. They just use it. And they call it gravity because that is the word they were taught to call it.

For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.

All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.

Things fall or sink because they're more dense than the air or water they're surrounded by; they're pushed down by the medium.

With government, schools, churches and the media all preaching the miracle of the globe in unison they need the magic of gravity to hold it all together. Telling people there's a giant ball below them with a magic force pulling them down to explain away the absurdity of sticking to a sphere while it spins in a vacuum, is the perfect example of gaslighting or, to "mess up the minds of people" as you so ineloquently put it.

There's a reason they can't explain what causes gravity, because the theory is 100% pure bullshit!

[El duderino_]

Earth-FLAT

[Astargath]

^^^ The reason why it is still gravity is, people don't go into consideration of Newton or Sagnac when they use gravity. They just use it. And they call it gravity because that is the word they were taught to call it.

For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.

All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.

Things fall or sink because they're more dense than the air or water they're surrounded by; they're pushed down by the medium.

With government, schools, churches and the media all preaching the miracle of the globe in unison they need the magic of gravity to hold it all together. Telling people there's a giant ball below them with a magic force pulling them down to explain away the absurdity of sticking to a sphere while it spins in a vacuum, is the perfect example of gaslighting or, to "mess up the minds of people" as you so ineloquently put it.

There's a reason they can't explain what causes gravity, because the theory is 100% pure bullshit!

Prove it, you read that somewhere and believed it, why? Did you do any experiments yourself or do you just believe anything you read if it fits your narrative? How many experiments have you done using density which by the way requires gravity. You are a knucklehead and ignore the hard questions because you know you have done 0 experiments and you simply believe what you read online.

[af_newbie]

^^^ The reason why it is still gravity is, people don't go into consideration of Newton or Sagnac when they use gravity. They just use it. And they call it gravity because that is the word they were taught to call it.

For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.

All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.

Things fall or sink because they're more dense than the air or water they're surrounded by; they're pushed down by the medium.

With government, schools, churches and the media all preaching the miracle of the globe in unison they need the magic of gravity to hold it all together. Telling people there's a giant ball below them with a magic force pulling them down to explain away the absurdity of sticking to a sphere while it spins in a vacuum, is the perfect example of gaslighting or, to "mess up the minds of people" as you so ineloquently put it.

There's a reason they can't explain what causes gravity, because the theory is 100% pure bullshit!

And what causes the 'medium' to push objects down?  How does the 'medium' know that it needs to push the object down not in any other direction?

I think you have just discovered gravity.

[BADecker]

^^^ The reason why it is still gravity is, people don't go into consideration of Newton or Sagnac when they use gravity. They just use it. And they call it gravity because that is the word they were taught to call it.

For most people by far, gravity is an event thing. It isn't theories that discuss why it works the way it does, or why not.

All you are trying to do is mess up the minds of people. Your explanations of why gravity should be called something else don't have anything to do with flat Earth. Rather, they have to do with messing with the minds of people.

Things fall or sink because they're more dense than the air or water they're surrounded by; they're pushed down by the medium.

With government, schools, churches and the media all preaching the miracle of the globe in unison they need the magic of gravity to hold it all together. Telling people there's a giant ball below them with a magic force pulling them down to explain away the absurdity of sticking to a sphere while it spins in a vacuum, is the perfect example of gaslighting or, to "mess up the minds of people" as you so ineloquently put it.

There's a reason they can't explain what causes gravity, because the theory is 100% pure bullshit!

The medium that pushes things down is called gravity.

You can take a light aircraft up 20,000 to 30,000 feet, and dive it so that you have zero gravity effect inside the plane for a few moments. Without this gravity effect, density inside the plane doesn't act at all to separate less dense objects from more dense objects.

You can't say that it is static electricity, because static electricity of the amount necessary to handle a plane would shoot all over the place with lightening bolts.

If standard science is all wrong about what gravity is and what makes it tick, FE theory is way more wrong. FE science doesn't hold a candle to gravity science, even if FE happened to be true. Why not? Because without gravity, the flame of the candle would engulf the whole candle. There isn't any FE explanation for that, that operates on other materials at the same time. So, are there two or more kinds of density?

[notbatman]

Earth's electric field defines up & down and provides the constraints that density and buoyancy work within. Coulomb's inverse square law quantifies the forces involved.

[BADecker]

^^^ Except that if this were the case, we wouldn't need the generators in hydroelectric. The falling of the water would be enough to produce the electricity we need.

[af_newbie]

Earth's electric field defines up & down and provides the constraints that density and buoyancy work within. Coulomb's inverse square law quantifies the forces involved.

Faraday's cages block both static and non-static electric fields.

Objects weigh the same inside Faraday's cages as they weigh outside of them.  Checkmate.

[Astargath]

Earth's electric field defines up & down and provides the constraints that density and buoyancy work within. Coulomb's inverse square law quantifies the forces involved.

Isn't density and buoyancy based on gravity? Did you not read that pretty important part when you did your awesome research? Or are you actually this stupid? It's quite remarkable that you pick a few scientists and a few scientific laws to believe and disregard all the others, I wonder how your brain works.

[notbatman]

^^^ You're the idiot for claiming unproven theory is fact. Coulomb's inverse square law is something that can be demonstrated in the lab, gravity or more accurately relativity is unproven theory that has been falsified in the lab.

@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.

[Astargath]

^^^ You're the idiot for claiming unproven theory is fact. Coulomb's inverse square law is something that can be demonstrated in the lab, gravity or more accurately relativity is unproven theory that has been falsified in the lab.

@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.

An unproven law is not a fact and cannot be demonstrated in a lab, have you demonstrated it in a lab yourself or are you trusting information you read on the internet? If it has been falsified then recreate it and do it yourself, otherwise you are just trusting people for no reason.

[af_newbie]

^^^ You're the idiot for claiming unproven theory is fact. Coulomb's inverse square law is something that can be demonstrated in the lab, gravity or more accurately relativity is unproven theory that has been falsified in the lab.

@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.

Like I said. Checkmate.  All done using your 'electric field theory', and your arguments.

[lightlord]

^^^ You're the idiot for claiming unproven theory is fact. Coulomb's inverse square law is something that can be demonstrated in the lab, gravity or more accurately relativity is unproven theory that has been falsified in the lab.

@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.

Like I said. Checkmate.  All done using your 'electric field theory', and your arguments.

[notbatman]

The only one in checkmate here is anybody using gravity or relativity to argue their point, why do you think Astargath is trying so hard to discredit and ignore Dufour & Prunier's 1939 replication of Sagnac experiment.

The force acting on an object is from the displaced medium, that being aether (vacuum), air, water or whatever the object is surrounded by. Aether flows through all matter with little to no resistance and can't be shielded against.

My point here is that the force pushing you down is ultimately electric in origin but it's not a direct action like how they claim gravity works. There's an entirely different process involved akin to what's known as "electromigration", this effect like the force pushing you down will continue to act even inside a Faraday cage.