[XBC] BitcoinPlus Official Thread

[BitcoinPlusBus]

[mastertrader777]

So guys peep this.

https://github.com/GENERALBYTESCOM/

Lets get the XBC code integrated into our software.

Then I will push a fresh build with XBC integrated to every single BTM I own.

So XBC will then be available for purchase in so many locations, it'll make your head spin.

Hows that sound?

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

[mastertrader777]

First person to post this on twitter with this within the post :


@richiela @BittrexExchange @coincheck_en @coincheckjp @btc38com @BTC38Exchange @btc38Ehang @btc382 @livecoin_net @Changelly_team @AltAccept





GETS FREE XBC (.01 XBC )

[Pap0u]

Guys, there is only 95,000 total supply, and 9500 for sale on the books on Polo. 250 BTC over half the sell book. What do you think the price will be when volume starts to flow through this? This coin will pump based on volume and scarcity alone.

[BitcoinDomainDeals]

@Egghead
@BitcoinPlusBus
@rushmybitcoin

Sorry guys for bothering again, but there is still something i wanted to ask You about.
I know our dev is working on enabling the wallet's internal messaging by-default.

And while i believe easy functionality is a good thing per se, i'm still a little worried about it's safety & security implications, especially for 24/7 staking nodes.
I admit i'm unable to assess, whether the messaging enabled by-default feature will mean a higher risk exposure to hacks or an increase of potential attack area.
But IF it will even mean just a SLIGHTLY higher risk of accounts (public keys) being spied upon, or having their IP's or onion-IP's sniffed out, for example by
unwanted incoming messages, SPAM or even outspoken threats,
i hope it's not too late already, to propose and appeal to our dev, to at least include a checkbox in the properties, for completely disabling the messaging.
I mean in a way, that when its disabled over the checkbox, that the messaging feature connection cannot be established and is permanently interrupted,
so that when disabled it's basically missing all the needed console commands (like in previous wallet version) which it needs to work.

In case the messaging is disabled, the data packets containing the message information should not even make it through to the other side,
and not that these data packets are coming through, regardless of checkbox setting, and are just not being displayed if disabled. I think you know what i'm trying to say.

I was thinking specifically about the security of accounts holding 50+ coins (but after further price increases, even accounts with less coins might feel concerned or get nervous),
and of course always-on staking nodes, whose operators simply do not need or not even want enabled by-default messaging.
I hope you will forgive me, if you think i wrote something stupid, but please consider, not all wallet users might feel the same about the messaging feature,
and the users will increase a lot over time.

Please also include the following providers on your list of payment-processors for a possible future integration:

https://www.altaccept.com/
https://www.edigicash.co/
https://www.expresscoin.com/
https://gourl.io/

Thanks for your attention and the continued efforts.

We were going to include an auto run feature or simply a push button generate public key through a graphical user interface but may just leave well alone.The suggested GUI part for other critical inputs/commands will have to wait for now anyway.

We have already contacted gourl and altaccept a few times but the other 2 are new ones the radar so will give them a go asap.

May we ask what is on the roadmap ?

[BitcoinPlusBus]

@Egghead
@BitcoinPlusBus
@rushmybitcoin

Sorry guys for bothering again, but there is still something i wanted to ask You about.
I know our dev is working on enabling the wallet's internal messaging by-default.

And while i believe easy functionality is a good thing per se, i'm still a little worried about it's safety & security implications, especially for 24/7 staking nodes.
I admit i'm unable to assess, whether the messaging enabled by-default feature will mean a higher risk exposure to hacks or an increase of potential attack area.
But IF it will even mean just a SLIGHTLY higher risk of accounts (public keys) being spied upon, or having their IP's or onion-IP's sniffed out, for example by
unwanted incoming messages, SPAM or even outspoken threats,
i hope it's not too late already, to propose and appeal to our dev, to at least include a checkbox in the properties, for completely disabling the messaging.
I mean in a way, that when its disabled over the checkbox, that the messaging feature connection cannot be established and is permanently interrupted,
so that when disabled it's basically missing all the needed console commands (like in previous wallet version) which it needs to work.

In case the messaging is disabled, the data packets containing the message information should not even make it through to the other side,
and not that these data packets are coming through, regardless of checkbox setting, and are just not being displayed if disabled. I think you know what i'm trying to say.

I was thinking specifically about the security of accounts holding 50+ coins (but after further price increases, even accounts with less coins might feel concerned or get nervous),
and of course always-on staking nodes, whose operators simply do not need or not even want enabled by-default messaging.
I hope you will forgive me, if you think i wrote something stupid, but please consider, not all wallet users might feel the same about the messaging feature,
and the users will increase a lot over time.

Please also include the following providers on your list of payment-processors for a possible future integration:

https://www.altaccept.com/
https://www.edigicash.co/
https://www.expresscoin.com/
https://gourl.io/

Thanks for your attention and the continued efforts.

We were going to include an auto run feature or simply a push button generate public key through a graphical user interface but may just leave well alone.The suggested GUI part for other critical inputs/commands will have to wait for now anyway.

We have already contacted gourl and altaccept a few times but the other 2 are new ones the radar so will give them a go asap.

May we ask what is on the roadmap ?

We will continue pushing for more vendors and services to adopt BitcoinPlus.Part 2 of the original planned wallet upgrade is on hold due to our current developer being too busy so we are working out what other things we can be going ahead with for now.We may scrap the auto setup feature for wallet messaging proposed but are working out some alternative ideas and may outsource the work to an alternative developer to see if they are doable within our current budget.

[BitcoinPlusBus]

[BitcoinPlusBus]

BitcoinPlus Exchange
XBC/BTC
Last Price
0.03295912
24hr Change
-1.91%
24hr High
0.03599990
24hr Low
0.03200000
24hr Volume:
54.51622197 BTC / 1632.83854271 XBC

[BitcoinPlusBus]

Remember if sending XBC to your wallet your updated balance will not show up on the wallet until it is fully synced even if shown on the blockchain.

[Robbert]

So guys peep this.

https://github.com/GENERALBYTESCOM/

Lets get the XBC code integrated into our software.

Then I will push a fresh build with XBC integrated to every single BTM I own.

So XBC will then be available for purchase in so many locations, it'll make your head spin.

Hows that sound?

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

This sounds really great. I am surprised the DEVS have not responded to this offer/suggestion? What is the take of the DEVs on this?

Kind regards,
Robbert

[Candice]

So guys peep this.

https://github.com/GENERALBYTESCOM/

Lets get the XBC code integrated into our software.

Then I will push a fresh build with XBC integrated to every single BTM I own.

So XBC will then be available for purchase in so many locations, it'll make your head spin.

Hows that sound?

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

This sounds really great. I am surprised the DEVS have not responded to this offer/suggestion? What is the take of the DEVs on this?

Kind regards,
Robbert

good job ,sir . let's do it  now .quickly

[BitcoinPlusBus]

So guys peep this.

https://github.com/GENERALBYTESCOM/

Lets get the XBC code integrated into our software.

Then I will push a fresh build with XBC integrated to every single BTM I own.

So XBC will then be available for purchase in so many locations, it'll make your head spin.

Hows that sound?

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

This sounds really great. I am surprised the DEVS have not responded to this offer/suggestion? What is the take of the DEVs on this?

Kind regards,
Robbert

Our developer will look into it and we will respond accordingly.We dont jump to attention when every idea and suggestion is put to us but we will look into it.

[prashanta]

BitcoinPlus Exchange
XBC/BTC
Last Price
0.03295912
24hr Change
-1.91%
24hr High
0.03599990
24hr Low
0.03200000
24hr Volume:
54.51622197 BTC / 1632.83854271 XBC

Sounds good. Best of luck. seems to me that this coin will hit at the end of this year.

[mastertrader777]

So guys peep this.

https://github.com/GENERALBYTESCOM/

Lets get the XBC code integrated into our software.

Then I will push a fresh build with XBC integrated to every single BTM I own.

So XBC will then be available for purchase in so many locations, it'll make your head spin.

Hows that sound?

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

This sounds really great. I am surprised the DEVS have not responded to this offer/suggestion? What is the take of the DEVs on this?

Kind regards,
Robbert

The outsourced dev may be too busy by the looks of it?

Other coins have a bigger budget for him?

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

Just my opinion anyway.

I personally want the best for XBC, and I'm sure the devs behind this maybe want this too, but its at their pace and not at the communities, and things that will bring advancement seem to always be put on hold...its happened with a number of things in the past, and this is certainly looking no different.

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

[BitcoinPlusBus]

So guys peep this.

https://github.com/GENERALBYTESCOM/

Lets get the XBC code integrated into our software.

Then I will push a fresh build with XBC integrated to every single BTM I own.

So XBC will then be available for purchase in so many locations, it'll make your head spin.

Hows that sound?

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

This sounds really great. I am surprised the DEVS have not responded to this offer/suggestion? What is the take of the DEVs on this?

Kind regards,
Robbert

The outsourced dev may be too busy by the looks of it?

Other coins have a bigger budget for him?

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

Just my opinion anyway.

I personally want the best for XBC, and I'm sure the devs behind this maybe want this too, but its at their pace and not at the communities, and things that will bring advancement seem to always be put on hold...its happened with a number of things in the past, and this is certainly looking no different.

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

Yes we all want whats best for XBC development and things will be done at our pace.We will see whats doable and if its suitable and can be accomplished within a particular timeframe it will be completed.I dont know what you are referring to regarding what "happened to a number of things in the past" but we are living in the present now and looking to a sustainable future not a quick moon.

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

Are you starting back with those conspiracy theories again?

[mastertrader777]

So guys peep this.

https://github.com/GENERALBYTESCOM/

Lets get the XBC code integrated into our software.

Then I will push a fresh build with XBC integrated to every single BTM I own.

So XBC will then be available for purchase in so many locations, it'll make your head spin.

Hows that sound?

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

This sounds really great. I am surprised the DEVS have not responded to this offer/suggestion? What is the take of the DEVs on this?

Kind regards,
Robbert

The outsourced dev may be too busy by the looks of it?

Other coins have a bigger budget for him?

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

Just my opinion anyway.

I personally want the best for XBC, and I'm sure the devs behind this maybe want this too, but its at their pace and not at the communities, and things that will bring advancement seem to always be put on hold...its happened with a number of things in the past, and this is certainly looking no different.

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

Yes we all want whats best for XBC development and things will be done at our pace.We will see whats doable and if its suitable and can be accomplished within a particular timeframe it will be completed.I dont know what you are referring to regarding what "happened to a number of things in the past" but we are living in the present now and looking to a sustainable future not a quick moon.

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

Are you starting back with those conspiracy theories again?

Don't make me start. Keep the market up, and I will keep my mouth shut.

[BitcoinPlusBus]

So guys peep this.

https://github.com/GENERALBYTESCOM/

Lets get the XBC code integrated into our software.

Then I will push a fresh build with XBC integrated to every single BTM I own.

So XBC will then be available for purchase in so many locations, it'll make your head spin.

Hows that sound?

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

This sounds really great. I am surprised the DEVS have not responded to this offer/suggestion? What is the take of the DEVs on this?

Kind regards,
Robbert

The outsourced dev may be too busy by the looks of it?

Other coins have a bigger budget for him?

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

Just my opinion anyway.

I personally want the best for XBC, and I'm sure the devs behind this maybe want this too, but its at their pace and not at the communities, and things that will bring advancement seem to always be put on hold...its happened with a number of things in the past, and this is certainly looking no different.

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

Yes we all want whats best for XBC development and things will be done at our pace.We will see whats doable and if its suitable and can be accomplished within a particular timeframe it will be completed.I dont know what you are referring to regarding what "happened to a number of things in the past" but we are living in the present now and looking to a sustainable future not a quick moon.

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

Are you starting back with those conspiracy theories again?

Don't make me start. Keep the market up, and I will keep my mouth shut.

\


Quit your threats!I am running this thread for a few years now since XBC went to the floor @ .00018btc.I also held no XBC since that price up to today so I have zero incentive to run a thread that helps keep the price up or down so stop your crazy insinuations as they are offensive to me and all team members who work on this project.

Head back to your own community that you have abandoned by the looks of things and sort out your own mess before coming on here and demanding this and that and throwing insinuations around.

[mastertrader777]

So guys peep this.

https://github.com/GENERALBYTESCOM/

Lets get the XBC code integrated into our software.

Then I will push a fresh build with XBC integrated to every single BTM I own.

So XBC will then be available for purchase in so many locations, it'll make your head spin.

Hows that sound?

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

This sounds really great. I am surprised the DEVS have not responded to this offer/suggestion? What is the take of the DEVs on this?

Kind regards,
Robbert

The outsourced dev may be too busy by the looks of it?

Other coins have a bigger budget for him?

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

Just my opinion anyway.

I personally want the best for XBC, and I'm sure the devs behind this maybe want this too, but its at their pace and not at the communities, and things that will bring advancement seem to always be put on hold...its happened with a number of things in the past, and this is certainly looking no different.

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

Yes we all want whats best for XBC development and things will be done at our pace.We will see whats doable and if its suitable and can be accomplished within a particular timeframe it will be completed.I dont know what you are referring to regarding what "happened to a number of things in the past" but we are living in the present now and looking to a sustainable future not a quick moon.

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

Are you starting back with those conspiracy theories again?

Don't make me start. Keep the market up, and I will keep my mouth shut.

\


Quit your threats!I am running this thread for a few years now since XBC went to the floor @ .00018btc.I also held no XBC since that price up to today so I have zero incentive to run a thread that helps keep the price up or down so stop your crazy insinuations as they are offensive to me and all team members who work on this project.

Head back to your own community that you have abandoned by the looks of things and sort out your own mess before coming on here and demanding this and that and throwing insinuations around.

Nothing was abandoned...I'm still staking MTR, and wallets are still running all over the country.

I'm waiting for Bitcoin to blossom for a few years before picking the project back up again.

I've done a lot for my own community spent over $80k of my own money and massive amounts of time on the project, and I'm trying to help in ways that will benefit this community as well.

I'm invested, and I'm purposely trying to help my investment mature.

If you suppose getting XBC on BTM's all over the country is a bad idea, or one you can't simply hire a dev to implement into General Bytes BTM code base then so be it. I'll hang up the idea and forget I offered it.

If you keep playing the thread like a fiddle I will keep calling you guys out on it, because its not what the new comers deserve.

I'm bringing people to this thread, and this coin is a reflection of what I know can be certainly a great project and investment long term.

So stop taking me as a threat, and put your money where all that mouth is...

Do you know how easy it is to find another reputable free lance dev begging for work such as this?

Whats the budget for advancements BitcoinPlusBus?....You guys have prob 20k XBC staking in Poloniex, and haven't updated the payout spreadsheet in some time.

Get serious with this as the competition is certainly heating up, and your roadmap plans for getting on new exchanges is getting quite exhausting to bare with.

I'm trying VERY HARD to make great things happen for many crypto currency projects I support and I'll admit, XBC is a bit more personal to me as I have quite a bit invested in this at the present time and my investors do as well...So can we get serious and stop with the falsetto like updates and bs here.

Stop trying to frame me out to be a bad guy, because everyone can see I'm trying harder than you it seems at times to get XBC in the real limelight. How can you take offense of what I bring to the table, who else is trying harder than me in this thread? Keep it real man before I take offense. 

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

[BitcoinPlusBus]

So guys peep this.

https://github.com/GENERALBYTESCOM/

Lets get the XBC code integrated into our software.

Then I will push a fresh build with XBC integrated to every single BTM I own.

So XBC will then be available for purchase in so many locations, it'll make your head spin.

Hows that sound?

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

This sounds really great. I am surprised the DEVS have not responded to this offer/suggestion? What is the take of the DEVs on this?

Kind regards,
Robbert

The outsourced dev may be too busy by the looks of it?

Other coins have a bigger budget for him?

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

Just my opinion anyway.

I personally want the best for XBC, and I'm sure the devs behind this maybe want this too, but its at their pace and not at the communities, and things that will bring advancement seem to always be put on hold...its happened with a number of things in the past, and this is certainly looking no different.

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

Yes we all want whats best for XBC development and things will be done at our pace.We will see whats doable and if its suitable and can be accomplished within a particular timeframe it will be completed.I dont know what you are referring to regarding what "happened to a number of things in the past" but we are living in the present now and looking to a sustainable future not a quick moon.

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

Are you starting back with those conspiracy theories again?

Don't make me start. Keep the market up, and I will keep my mouth shut.

\


Quit your threats!I am running this thread for a few years now since XBC went to the floor @ .00018btc.I also held no XBC since that price up to today so I have zero incentive to run a thread that helps keep the price up or down so stop your crazy insinuations as they are offensive to me and all team members who work on this project.

Head back to your own community that you have abandoned by the looks of things and sort out your own mess before coming on here and demanding this and that and throwing insinuations around.

Nothing was abandoned...I'm still staking MTR, and wallets are still running all over the country.

I'm waiting for Bitcoin to blossom for a few years before picking the project back up again.

I've done a lot for my own community spent over $80k of my own money and massive amounts of time on the project, and I'm trying to help in ways that will benefit this community as well.

I'm invested, and I'm purposely trying to help my investment mature.

If you suppose getting XBC on BTM's all over the country is a bad idea, or one you can't simply hire a dev to implement into General Bytes BTM code base then so be it. I'll hang up the idea and forget I offered it.

If you keep playing the thread like a fiddle I will keep calling you guys out on it, because its not what the new comers deserve.

I'm bringing people to this thread, and this coin is a reflection of what I know can be certainly a great project and investment long term.

So stop taking me as a threat, and put your money where all that mouth is...

Do you know how easy it is to find another reputable free lance dev begging for work such as this?

Whats the budget for advancements BitcoinPlusBus?....You guys have prob 20k XBC staking in Poloniex, and haven't updated the payout spreadsheet in some time.

Get serious with this as the competition is certainly heating up, and your roadmap plans for getting on new exchanges is getting quite exhausting to bare with.

I'm trying VERY HARD to make great things happen for many crypto currency projects I support and I'll admit, XBC is a bit more personal to me as I have quite a bit invested in this at the present time and my investors do as well...So can we get serious and stop with the falsetto like updates and bs here.

Stop trying to frame me out to be a bad guy, because everyone can see I'm trying harder than you it seems at times to get XBC in the real limelight. How can you take offense of what I bring to the table, who else is trying harder than me in this thread? Keep it real man before I take offense. 

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

Explain exactly what you have brought to the table bud?Break it down barney-style.

[BitcoinPlusBus]

Currently the developer wallet holds 14,000 units and sustainability plan will be updated when the next stake arrives.We have not had any stake for around 2 months now due to poloniex backload.Current development bitcoin balance is approx 3 BTC and weighs in @ around 8K usd.We are in a healthy position thanks to prudence and sustainable spending and will continue to adopt this approach.