Up Like Trump

[Wilikon]

The illegal criminals, are problematic. Not until trump talked about it, no other republicans dared talked about it, fearing of losing the hispanic vote.

I agree! I have legal Mexican friends though who understand what he's saying and will vote for him.

HISTORY! Trump Shatters Republican Primary Vote Record by 1.4 Million Votes

On Tuesday Donald Trump closed the door on the Republican nomination for President by winning all five of the remaining primaries — New Jersey, South Dakota, Montana, New Mexico and California. Trump won the last 16 Republican contests.

Trump has 1,536 delegates and counting.

The Republican Party started the year with 17 bona fide candidates for President.  This was more candidates than any major party in history.

Trump has more wins than any other Republican or Democrat candidate in this year’s race with 36. He also has more primary wins with 33 and leads all candidates in percent of overall wins and in percent of primary wins.

Trump surpassed the number of delegates needed to win the Republican nomination for President a couple weeks ago.

This may be more delegates than any other Republican candidate and a higher percentage of delegates than any Republican or Democrat candidate in the race.

Trump received 13,406,108 votes to date in the elections according to www.thegreenpapers.com.

As a result Trump has more votes than any candidate in Republican history.

Trump shattered the previous record by 1.4 million votes — and that was with 17 candidates in the race

George W. Bush had 12 million votes in 2000.  The Republican Party also set a party record this year in pre-convention state election turnout with over 28 million votes to date which is 139% of the record high voter turnout in 2008.  This increase in votes can be attributed to Donald Trump.

Trump won a higher percentage of votes than any candidate ever when considering the number of contenders in the race. He also has the highest percent of delegates when considering the competition than any candidate ever.

Trump may also be the first candidate in the modern era to have funded his campaign by himself during the primary season.

Although his results are much more impressive, he only spent a quarter the amount of money as Democrats Clinton and Sanders. He proved to be the real capitalist in the primary while Clinton and Sanders proved to be the socialists freely spending other people’s money.

Trump’s accomplishments will now go down in history. On the Democratic side, Hillary Clinton pulled out the win with more delegates than socialist Sanders. However, nearly a quarter of her delegates came from controversial ‘super delegates’. Her road to the Democratic nomination was far less impressive and may also go down in history because she may be under indictment before the November election.


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/06/trump-trumps-wins-historic-race-record-fashion/

[1714489209]

1714489209

[BADecker]

Authoritarian Hillary is Now on the Defensive

We have Hillary all wrong: Americans hate a politician of the press' imagination. To her detractors, she's either a bloodless automaton or the devil incarnate. Is it any wonder that she's guarded? -Salon

This article posted at Salon suggests that much of the criticism aimed at Hillary occurs because she is not a man.

As best we can tell, if we are properly following the article, Hillary's problems begin with her womanhood.

As Gov. John Hickenlooper of Colorado, a Hillary supporter, put it on CBS's Face the Nation, "If she was a man, all this stuff wouldn't be at the same level."  Of course, Trump fired back that she plays the "woman card," and the media didn't dare rebut it for fear, I suppose, of seeming to lend Trump proof.

This in turn generates a certain level of defensiveness.

Even when Hillary is in full campaign mode, she feels she needs the cover of policy so that the press won't eviscerate her.

Or put another way, she believes she has to be perceived as taking the high road even when she isn't. We will see how long it takes the press to turn on this feisty Hillary they seem to like now.

If this article is to be believed, Clinton's unpopularity has more to do with her personality than any particular misbehaving.

Her "sins are fairly standard," especially for someone who has been in public life for so long.

She has made mistakes and errors of judgment. She has also suffered from hubris, mostly because of her "associations with Big Money."

In fact, she isn't disliked for what she's done. She is disliked for "who she is."

This is the media's fault, we learn from the article. The media pounces on Hillary's defensiveness and plays it up.

Why? Because "bashing her" is a convenient way to rebut criticism that the mainstream media is generally sympathetic to liberalism.

Everything about Hillary is subject to criticism, from her shoes, to her hair to her voice.

The article ends on a discouraging note, if you are a Hillary supporter.

She has no strategy for placating the media and thus can "only plod along," absorbing press criticism and ignoring it as best she can.

The trouble with this analysis, it seems to us, is that criticism to which Hillary is subject is actually mild, compared to what could be aimed at her.

Her husband has been accused of rape and drug smuggling. Both have been accused of murder and other serious crimes.

A new book, Crisis of Character, by law enforcement agent Gary Byrne, who was stationed at the Oval Office when Bill Clinton was president, claims that Hillary is too "erratic, uncontrollable and occasionally violent" to be president.

A popular video clip on the Internet shows Hillary laughing when describing the death of Muammar Gaddafi. "We came, we saw, he died," she exclaims.

For her enemies, her glee in Gaddafi's death is symptomatic of a larger character flaw. She will adopt almost any policy and perform almost any action if it advances her personal and professional ambitions.

She portrays herself as a "liberal" but it seems she is actually an authoritarian who believes in state power.

Read more at http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/media-attacks-on-hillary-prove-damaging-but-dont-go-far-enough/.

[BADecker]

Trump Versus Mexico: The Conflict That's Bringing Union

'Take that order and throw it the hell out': Trump reportedly rails against campaign staff for telling surrogates to stop attacking judge … Donald Trump advised prominent campaign surrogates to go after journalists who ask questions about a Trump University lawsuit and encouraged them to defend him against criticism of his comments about the US district judge presiding over the case. – AOL

Donald Trump is facing two fraud lawsuits over a for-profit real-estate school that supposedly didn't provide appropriate services.

The case currently is being presided over by US District Judge Gonzalo Curiel.

Supposedly, Curiel has indeterminate linkages to La Raza, a Mexican-based rights group that wants a large part of the Western US returned to Mexico, or at least turned into an independent country.

Some media reports have denied a direct linkage. But alternative media outlets like WorldNetDaily have made the case for a broader linkage.

Trump has objected to Curiel's continued presence on his case, and  his statements regarding Curiel being "Mexican" have caused considerable controversy.

The GOP presidential nominee has been pilloried as "racist" for his observations regarding Curiel.

The fundamental issue is once again Mexico versus America and how the two countries can put aside differences and exist harmoniously.

Right now, however, there is no harmony.

We told you so.

We've written a number of articles stating that the subtext of the Trump campaign is much larger than "immigration versus a wall."

The Trump campaign has surely reignited the controversy surrounding the so-called North American Union.

This was an elite plan to create a North American Union comprising the US, Canada and Mexico.

We suggested some three months ago that the Trump campaign would unite pro-Hispanic forces and put the North American Union back in play.

Our first article on the subject, posted March 14, was entitled, Trump and '60s Propaganda: Strategy to Launch North American Union?

Then only a few days later, we learned that George Soros had funded a large anti-Trump coalition that supposedly presented a Hispanic point of view.

We wrote about this on March 16 in a post entitled, Broadening the Race War? Soros Creates Anti-Trump Pro-'Illegals' Super Pac.

On May 4, we posted an article entitled, Trump Irony: Candidacy May Unify U.S. with Mexico

Then on May 14, we followed with an article entitled, As Predicted, Trump's harsh Rhetoric Reignites Mexican-American Embrace

In this last article, we pointed out the following:

The idea of merging Mexico, America and Canada into one large region sharing political and regulatory oversight subsided a few years ago because of determined and angry opposition in the US.  Highways between Canada and Mexico intended to bisect the US and further ruin the national economy are still being built. But their construction is surreptitious and indirect.  But Trump has set the debate in motion again. It has been reignited just as we feared.

Before a solution can be presented, the issue must be resuscitated and the arguments reheated.

This is what's going on now.

Our prediction, whether Trump wins or not, is that there will be advances made toward a union.

Too often it works that way in this weary, modern world.

Thesis, antithesis, synthesis. The synthesis is a union.

That's our take as observers of elite propaganda. The dominant social themes that run the world.

We still have no idea if Trump is complicit. It could be that he is simply being used.

Click the links in the article at http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/trump-versus-mexico-the-conflict-thats-bringing-union/.

[techgeek]

I think another candidate will jump in at the last minute. Am I alone in that feeling?

When? December 25th?

After a most unusual convention (I'm stockpiling popcorn) we'll see the Dem's fielding a Biden/Warren ticket.

That is a fine-tuning of my earlier predictions.  I stand by my prediction that if the Repubs cannot figure out a way to get rid of Trump we have a damn good chance of seeing some mixture of next 911, war, and economic collapse and will be damn lucky to have elections at all.  For my part, I'm trying to analyze Trump's leadership abilities more generally than as a 'traditional' president.

I just ran across a clip which gives me as much hope as just about anything that Trump is 'good people' in my own way of looking at things:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72wM6cqPS-c

http://www.infowars.com/report-trump-refused-200-million-to-pick-gingrich-as-vp/

If the guy makes billions a year, $200 mill is a joke to him lol.

Also how are they going to bribe a billionaire who already a ton of money to begin with, makes no sense lol.

[bryant.coleman]

I am glad that the primaries are over. Now we can concentrate on the real fight, that is between Donald Trump and Hitlery Clinton. And there is another piece of encouraging news from the opinion polls team, after the one from Florida yesterday. In Pennsylvania, both of them are tied at 44% each. PPP is a Democrat-leaning pollster, and we can assume that right now Donald is leading in that state.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_PA_60816.pdf

BTW... this Gary Johnson guy is stealing a lot of Republican vote. Trump needs to take care of him without wasting any further time.

[RoomBot]

I am glad that the primaries are over. Now we can concentrate on the real fight, that is between Donald Trump and Hitlery Clinton. And there is another piece of encouraging news from the opinion polls team, after the one from Florida yesterday. In Pennsylvania, both of them are tied at 44% each. PPP is a Democrat-leaning pollster, and we can assume that right now Donald is leading in that state.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_PA_60816.pdf

BTW... this Gary Johnson guy is stealing a lot of Republican vote. Trump needs to take care of him without wasting any further time.

He'll take a load of votes away from Shillary too.

[bryant.coleman]

I am glad that the primaries are over. Now we can concentrate on the real fight, that is between Donald Trump and Hitlery Clinton. And there is another piece of encouraging news from the opinion polls team, after the one from Florida yesterday. In Pennsylvania, both of them are tied at 44% each. PPP is a Democrat-leaning pollster, and we can assume that right now Donald is leading in that state.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_PA_60816.pdf

BTW... this Gary Johnson guy is stealing a lot of Republican vote. Trump needs to take care of him without wasting any further time.

He'll take a load of votes away from Shillary too.

The opinion polls are predicting otherwise. For example in Pennsylvania, he is getting 8% of the Republican vote, and just 3% of the Democrat vote. His support base is overwhelmingly male. Jill Stein is stealing some votes from the Democrats, but her support is still very low. This Johnson guy is indirectly helping Hitlery to win crucial states.

[Wilikon]

 

[Wilikon]

Liberal Journalist Visits Border And Is Surprised By What Residents Want

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vMptxLtIUY

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/opinion/2016/06/07/opinion-big-data-reports-latino-support-for-trump-on-rise-at-37/

 

[Karartma1]

I am glad that the primaries are over. Now we can concentrate on the real fight, that is between Donald Trump and Hitlery Clinton. And there is another piece of encouraging news from the opinion polls team, after the one from Florida yesterday. In Pennsylvania, both of them are tied at 44% each. PPP is a Democrat-leaning pollster, and we can assume that right now Donald is leading in that state.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_PA_60816.pdf

BTW... this Gary Johnson guy is stealing a lot of Republican vote. Trump needs to take care of him without wasting any further time.

He'll take a load of votes away from Shillary too.

The opinion polls are predicting otherwise. For example in Pennsylvania, he is getting 8% of the Republican vote, and just 3% of the Democrat vote. His support base is overwhelmingly male. Jill Stein is stealing some votes from the Democrats, but her support is still very low. This Johnson guy is indirectly helping Hitlery to win crucial states.

Does anybody here have some sort of polls or projections that can be useful to get a sense of who is leading right now in every single US state?

[HammaSan]

Donald Trump explaining the reason for the high bitcoin: See the video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDrfE9I8_hs

[starswper]

Dump on the trump and pump for Hillary by way of Barak.
Trump is finished here and now Hillary is going to be the president.
Does it scar you, It scares me.

[Wilikon]

Dump on the trump and pump for Hillary by way of Barak.
Trump is finished here and now Hillary is going to be the president.
Does it scar you, It scares me.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/282864-roseanne-barr-we-would-be-so-lucky-if-trump-won

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally! A soul brave enough to be an open, out of the closet Harpy Rodent Clinton supporter. Welcome to the TRUMP party and enjoy your stay!

 

[bryant.coleman]

Does anybody here have some sort of polls or projections that can be useful to get a sense of who is leading right now in every single US state?

Such polls are not available for minor states such as North Dakota, Rhode Island, and Nebraska (anyway... who will be even interested in these deep-red / deep-blue states?) For the other states, you will be able to find the poll data here:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/2016_elections_electoral_college_map.html

Just click on the state name / state map to get the poll data.

[kalaria]

I dont like trump,That is real hitler...I dont want war

[Racey]

I dont like trump,That is real hitler...I dont want war

The real one is Hillary 

[Spendulus]

I dont like trump,That is real hitler...I dont want war

The real one is Hillary 

I think that from the things the two candidates have actually said, Hillary is more likely to create wars.

That's not even counting the wars she has ALREADY CREATED.

Now, how many wars has TRUMP CREATED?

Zero.  Zip.  Nada. Nunca.

[Racey]

I dont like trump,That is real hitler...I dont want war

The real one is Hillary 

I think that from the things the two candidates have actually said, Hillary is more likely to create wars.

That's not even counting the wars she has ALREADY CREATED.

Now, how many wars has TRUMP CREATED?

Zero.  Zip.  Nada. Nunca.

How many will he create, will he get the wrong advisors (he could get threatened) to do as he is told, I really hope not.
You know the war machine relies on making trouble all over the world, even when they are wrong they still continue on.

[RoomBot]

The moment when Trump first calls Kim Jong Un a "Baby-Faced Loser," we're ALL getting nuked!!!!

[Wilikon]

The moment when Trump first calls Kim Jong Un a "Baby-Faced Loser," we're ALL getting nuked!!!!

By whom?