Bitcoin Forum
February 17, 2020, 01:01:28 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: .
.
.

Pages: « 1 ... 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 [257] 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 ... 536 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][PIVX] - PRIVATE INSTANT VERIFIED TRANSACTION - PROOF OF STAKE - ZEROCOIN  (Read 753405 times)
q327K091
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1010


View Profile
November 12, 2016, 05:59:23 PM
 #5121

update: starting collection process on nodes to be put back into the network
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
FogHorn_LegHorn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 245
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 12, 2016, 06:32:57 PM
 #5122

How do I fix this to get my masternode to work?



Not capable masternode: Invalid port: 0 - only 51472 is supported on mainnet.
Haunebu81
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 525
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 12, 2016, 06:48:27 PM
 #5123

How do I fix this to get my masternode to work?



Not capable masternode: Invalid port: 0 - only 51472 is supported on mainnet.


Sounds like you have the wrong port number in your masternode.conf

It should look like this:

Alias IPADDRESS:51472 GENKEY TXID Output

Or

Code:
Masternode1 23.24.65.15:51472 87fQTm5BJuh1F5X3MgQ1wPeg3JokzcZr1NvTyxiDWjbNveMS5gh 17897faq68e5fc93d74aaf3692a371334dd6a4d86cddac89f0ca3e5083ebe6e0 0


You might also have to add the following line in your darknet.conf file for the actual Masternode, not thecontrol wallet, but I'm not sure it's needed:

Code:
port=51471
berron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 722
Merit: 501



View Profile
November 12, 2016, 07:41:27 PM
 #5124

I have a quite strange MN payment here:

Status: 7 confirmations
Date: 12/11/2016 20:30
Credit: 0.00000000 DNET
Net amount: 0.00000000 DNET
Transaction ID: 665f6ac3a254f7cb19beb378484e081058e5b74287333a43068e0d9b30e40d42-000

Seems like all my MN payment has gone as fee:

http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/DNET/tx.php?tx=665f6ac3a254f7cb19beb378484e081058e5b74287333a43068e0d9b30e40d42

No problem with the DNET lost, well, when 1 DNET= 0.1 BTC maybe yes  Grin, but would like devs taking a closer look to this problem.

Salute


Beware with ENT, shaddy things happen when try to mine it...
q327K091
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1010


View Profile
November 12, 2016, 08:30:39 PM
 #5125

this is nice to see (max coin supply as function of block #): http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/DNET/charts.php?type=supply

it has been calculated extremely well, there is an incentive to grow master nodes and therefore security strength and newtork dynamics of course, looking around Today in the space, and not saying because I hold rather large amount , but this crypto is very well thought out thru

collection almost done, will be approx ~ .5 > slightly more BTC in three weeks or so, then spinning off nodes, 0 transaction errors thus far every fraction of dnet is accounted for (sorry to hear on the above, if you have a wallet backup can you restart off brand new blockchain sync?)

people are willing to spend 3$ a coin on zcash clone.. for instance and this makes me smile a bit, of course if clone team brings expertise to do different  than zcash than maybe..  it is an example of rush to riches without network growth and without slow buildup, wish all only the best ..

you all have something special on your hands here
jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


jakiman is back!


View Profile
November 12, 2016, 09:46:45 PM
 #5126

BTW, there is an important discussion regarding masternode voting and incentives / penalties around its participation on slack.
Essentially we want to ensure that everyone who owns masternodes vote on every proposal whenever possible.

My idea was to kick off the masternodes that don't vote in time off the network. (so those non-vote MN will go into MISSING status) This would mean the non-voters will need to restart them. But until they do, the remaining MN's (that voted) will get rewarded with a bigger share of the reward due to reduction is total MN count. Hence it would penalize the non-voters but reward the voters at the same time using the existing system.

This is just one of the ideas. If you have a great idea, feel free to share here or on slack. Smiley

DRPD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001


View Profile
November 13, 2016, 05:53:51 AM
Last edit: November 13, 2016, 06:33:45 AM by DRPD
 #5127

BTW, there is an important discussion regarding masternode voting and incentives / penalties around its participation on slack.
Essentially we want to ensure that everyone who owns masternodes vote on every proposal whenever possible.

My idea was to kick off the masternodes that don't vote in time off the network. (so those non-vote MN will go into MISSING status) This would mean the non-voters will need to restart them. But until they do, the remaining MN's (that voted) will get rewarded with a bigger share of the reward due to reduction is total MN count. Hence it would penalize the non-voters but reward the voters at the same time using the existing system.

This is just one of the ideas. If you have a great idea, feel free to share here or on slack. Smiley

i'm sceptical about this. i run ~5% of the current mn count and for some proposals there are not enough information for me to vote.
tbh I don't like the idea to be forced to vote yes or no.

at least i  need a warning before my nodes go missing cuz of missing votes so i would vote anything (not useful in my opinion)
maybe  some sort of abstention from voting or adopt a neutral position can be a option? not sure
q327K091
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1010


View Profile
November 13, 2016, 07:41:40 AM
 #5128

too early in the development of the coin to force anyone to do anything (my opinion) let anyone and at anytime spin as many nodes as possible , master node network growth is imperative but I do understand active participation also is imperative but yeah let it be more organic and free I feel... as much as humanly possible

update: upped master node # to 83 , waiting for next batch in 3 to 4 weeks and we repeat for linear growth on my side
jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


jakiman is back!


View Profile
November 13, 2016, 08:09:06 AM
 #5129

Yeah. Nothing is decided yet on the masternode voting of course. Still just brain storming ideas. I guess people need to understand that although it hasn't been an issue yet, it can become very important when a controversial proposal is made and couple of big whales vote YES to make it pass. (Not even sure DNET has such big whales yet) Heck, just look at the voting right now on the current proposals. We have nearly 1500 masternodes yet some proposals only have 200 votes.  However, I do understand that some people prefer to be passive and that should also be allowed considering that owning and running a masternode without voting is already doing good for the coin. So yeah, I would think that nothing will be decided just by the devs alone. I assume we will end up with multiple proposals for how we could go about improving the voting participation. Then let the masternode owners vote on what they want or don't want. That would be the fairest. Grin Grin

berron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 722
Merit: 501



View Profile
November 13, 2016, 08:13:13 AM
 #5130

BTW, there is an important discussion regarding masternode voting and incentives / penalties around its participation on slack.
Essentially we want to ensure that everyone who owns masternodes vote on every proposal whenever possible.

My idea was to kick off the masternodes that don't vote in time off the network. (so those non-vote MN will go into MISSING status) This would mean the non-voters will need to restart them. But until they do, the remaining MN's (that voted) will get rewarded with a bigger share of the reward due to reduction is total MN count. Hence it would penalize the non-voters but reward the voters at the same time using the existing system.

This is just one of the ideas. If you have a great idea, feel free to share here or on slack. Smiley

i'm sceptical about this. i run ~5% of the current mn count and for some proposals there are not enough information for me to vote.
tbh I don't like the idea to be forced to vote yes or no.

at least i  need a warning before my nodes go missing cuz of missing votes so i would vote anything (not useful in my opinion)
maybe  some sort of abstention from voting or adopt a neutral position can be a option? not sure


I think it also goes against the economical freedom cryptos try to represent. To be forced to vote sounds more to north korean puppet elections than to a free liberal system... I don't like the idea, maybe a small "bonus" for the MN's which vote, but not penalties and similar.

Beware with ENT, shaddy things happen when try to mine it...
suukool
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 415
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 13, 2016, 08:14:02 AM
 #5131

Official Website is now online also!
http://darknet-crypto.com


I have 2 proposals for site design:
1. Background of top slider is transparent but the text shouldn't be transparent.
2. Dark-red text is hard to read on dark-grey background. It's better to change it to something more contrast.

Agreed. I can do a site redesign for a bounty Wink
berron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 722
Merit: 501



View Profile
November 13, 2016, 08:17:21 AM
 #5132

Seems that we already have a web developer and a proposal for that...

Website Development: (jk9694 is working on this project)
BTC: 1ECVPTMjTR8KAiG1CprN5p5Tt7LRCRE5CA
DNET: DPLjVTdcr1mVhx9P19bma2SYpDEbgsVwyc

Maybe filipino translation???  Grin


Beware with ENT, shaddy things happen when try to mine it...
borris123
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 13, 2016, 10:39:58 AM
 #5133

Seems that we already have a web developer and a proposal for that...

Website Development: (jk9694 is working on this project)
BTC: 1ECVPTMjTR8KAiG1CprN5p5Tt7LRCRE5CA
DNET: DPLjVTdcr1mVhx9P19bma2SYpDEbgsVwyc

Maybe filipino translation???  Grin



translations in other languages would be a goo thing. then theirs the up keep of it tho?

ccoinpayments needs adding on main op as payment processor
berron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 722
Merit: 501



View Profile
November 13, 2016, 10:54:43 AM
 #5134

Only joking, borris  Wink

OTOH, is not already added or I'm missing something?

https://www.coinpayments.net/supported-coins

Salute

Beware with ENT, shaddy things happen when try to mine it...
jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


jakiman is back!


View Profile
November 13, 2016, 12:06:51 PM
 #5135

I think it also goes against the economical freedom cryptos try to represent. To be forced to vote sounds more to north korean puppet elections than to a free liberal system... I don't like the idea, maybe a small "bonus" for the MN's which vote, but not penalties and similar.

Well, forced voting happens here in Australia also. (you get fined if you don't)

But yeah, forced voting isn't what I want either really. I think increased awareness of new & existing proposals should be a priority.
Not sure what the best way for this is either yet. But something wallet based (proposals tab, alerting optioned ect.) would be best?
Also, there are talks of extra reward for masternodes that vote. But we also don't want extra inflation. So this seems a little tricky.

berron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 722
Merit: 501



View Profile
November 13, 2016, 12:32:06 PM
 #5136

Yes, it could be tricky, maybe any way to make MN's which vote to gain some posts in reward queue?? I don't know. But I prefer reward than penalty. And the tab in the wallet or similar could be a good idea.

Do you really have to vote to not be fined in AUS???  Huh Oh, shit....

Beware with ENT, shaddy things happen when try to mine it...
DRPD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001


View Profile
November 13, 2016, 12:46:50 PM
 #5137

I think it also goes against the economical freedom cryptos try to represent. To be forced to vote sounds more to north korean puppet elections than to a free liberal system... I don't like the idea, maybe a small "bonus" for the MN's which vote, but not penalties and similar.

Well, forced voting happens here in Australia also. (you get fined if you don't)

wow i did not know that, i even learn some general knowledge in this forum nice  Grin

But yeah, forced voting isn't what I want either really. I think increased awareness of new & existing proposals should be a priority.
Not sure what the best way for this is either yet. But something wallet based (proposals tab, alerting optioned ect.) would be best?

that would be ok for me, but i still would voting anything with this solution and i would recommend additional information for proposals
atm there are not enough information for many proposals to make a founded decision for me


what is the target, how exaclty looks the solution (in-wallet announcements for example) and so on

Also, there are talks of extra reward for masternodes that vote. But we also don't want extra inflation. So this seems a little tricky.

not my favorite solution

q327K091
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1010


View Profile
November 13, 2016, 03:31:51 PM
Last edit: November 13, 2016, 04:42:29 PM by q327K091
 #5138

Yeah. Nothing is decided yet on the masternode voting of course. Still just brain storming ideas. I guess people need to understand that although it hasn't been an issue yet, it can become very important when a controversial proposal is made and couple of big whales vote YES to make it pass. (Not even sure DNET has such big whales yet) Heck, just look at the voting right now on the current proposals. We have nearly 1500 masternodes yet some proposals only have 200 votes.  However, I do understand that some people prefer to be passive and that should also be allowed considering that owning and running a masternode without voting is already doing good for the coin. So yeah, I would think that nothing will be decided just by the devs alone. I assume we will end up with multiple proposals for how we could go about improving the voting participation. Then let the masternode owners vote on what they want or don't want. That would be the fairest. Grin Grin

got you, let me be honest I feel best thing for self (of course lol) but in general for the organic growth is growing critical mass of mn's so I just acquired and mined early large dnet stash and injected in , but never really voted so I will do so now and I am very very fair I see these votes and will cast em not even driven if payments have to go up POS go down etc that is not what I will look for.. let me see what is being voted and do it...  and do it now! immediately no delay , sorry about and others should proceed as well believe we have several people sporting ~100 mn's

ok.. will push for "In-Wallet-Masternode" (as with this, any help around master nodes like tooling docs etc,  we shall corner the market, growing network is hard and if we do its $$$$ big time + security of course will also play huge role in crypto development around the network + market place commerce) current vote count stands @ 587

done 669 votes now for te proposal which will help us grow master node network even bigger!

and back on up @$680,850 market cap @ 4K volume... I am tellin u telling u will well us be envy of communities as others trade for pennies we lock dollars in the network while at the same time doing development...

I might actually pay for a proposal of grabbing an undergrad or grad CS student with interest in crypto and C++ skills to take a look at what we do here, will get back to ya all on this one...
borris123
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 13, 2016, 05:05:39 PM
 #5139

top wallet on bittrex 1.2mil has pulled coins off the exchange. maybe staking or new masternodes coming?

seen the potential and not prepared to sell tho.

no point holding coins on exchange as well you may as well be staking.
s3v3nh4cks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1010


View Profile
November 13, 2016, 09:57:05 PM
 #5140

Ok, let me explain a bit, one of the main issues in the masternode voting, is when only a few vote, then the budget control becomes very centralised. Dash is experiencing this right now. We don't want to go there. But as pointed out, we have put some work into an announcement panel inside the wallet for direct communications. This particular subject isn't something we are rushing into, there will be a lot more research, and number crunching before a serious option can be considered, but saying this... something will need to be changed to get more to vote.

Also, there is an option to abstain during voting. You do not have to vote only yes/no

So please let us hear your ideas, and solutions.
Pages: « 1 ... 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 [257] 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 ... 536 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!