Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2017, 08:53:42 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: I will be posting the DNET Price on the twitter at a set interval. Please vote for the frequency I will post it, I Want to lessen the complains of over activity.. Smiley
every 15 min - 31 (13.1%)
every 30 min - 10 (4.2%)
every hour - 46 (19.5%)
every 2 hours - 19 (8.1%)
every 4 hours - 130 (55.1%)
Total Voters: 236

Pages: « 1 ... 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 [244] 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 ... 391 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][PIVX] - PRIVATE INSTANT VERIFIED TRANSACTION - POS 2.0 - ZEROCOIN PROTOCOL  (Read 445119 times)
Equalizer1970
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 442



View Profile
October 18, 2016, 10:27:48 PM
 #4861

Check, correct the bug, and reimburse the quantity through proposal approved by MN owners. Could be a solution?? If true, and  it looks legit, as Mn owner y prefer to find some kind of solution than a flame war here.

That would be fair.

Really need to protect the rep of the coin. Cannot let this stand. Would undermine faith and confidence of any longterm holder.

This should of been rectified by now, but slipped through. I will refund to all the originating address soon.

I greatly apologize for this. It is not a hack, but was an issue in the budget system.

There are 13 proposals that went through, so there are 13 of you missing funds. Please PM me you addresses, and I will cover the coins.

Thank you. I still have faith in this project.


▄████▄▄████▄▄████▄
██████▄██████▄██████
██████▀██████▀██████
▀█████▀████▀▀████▀
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
▄████▄█████▄▄████▄
██████████████████
██████████████████
▀████▀▀████▀▀████▀
░░░░░░░░░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░
▄████▄▄████▄▄████▄
████████████▄██████
████████████▀██████
▀████▀▀████▀▀████▀





▄████▄
██████▄▄▄▄
██████▀▀▀▀
▀████▀

▄████▄
██████
██████
▀█████
░░░░░░
▄████▄░█████▄
██████░██████▄▄▄
██████░██████▀▀▀
▀████▀░█████▀
░░░░░░
▄█████
██████
██████
▀████▀





░░░░▄████▄
▄▄▄▄██████
▀▀▀▀██████
░░░░▀████▀

1493585622
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493585622

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493585622
Reply with quote  #2

1493585622
Report to moderator
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1493585622
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493585622

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493585622
Reply with quote  #2

1493585622
Report to moderator
1493585622
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493585622

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493585622
Reply with quote  #2

1493585622
Report to moderator
1493585622
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493585622

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493585622
Reply with quote  #2

1493585622
Report to moderator
s3v3nh4cks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2016, 10:30:29 PM
 #4862

My opinion about proposals:

Android Wallet Development - low priority, we will need it when true anon transactions will be finished.

In-Wallet Bittrex Trading - personally i don't need this feature at all, i always can log in to bittrex to trade there.

In-Wallet Encrypted Chat - useful feature, goes well with the general Darknet idea.

In-Wallet Input Splitter - middle priority.

In-Wallet Announcements - high priority.

In-Wallet Masternode Management - i need this feature very much!

In-Wallet Multi-Send - don't know, what is it. Please, explain.

In-Wallet Multi-Sig Escrow System - middle priority.

In-Wallet Paper Wallet Generator - low priority.

In-Wallet U2F Integration - don't know, what is it. Please, explain.

Website Development - high priority.

Multi-send is a function that will send a percentage of you stake, to another address of your choice, every stake.

U2F stands for Universal 2-Factor Authentication, would allow you to use an encrypted key (like a yubico nano)

PIVX: DPQabewFmgSFxAtZPKszNKb2E6eHqPfJt5
liberatorium
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47


View Profile
October 19, 2016, 01:04:53 AM
 #4863

can someone please explain. minted -2900 dnet?



Status: 896 confirmations
Date: 18.10.2016 11:49
Debit: 0.00000000 DNET
To: DNYHWg4LSGvaSYhxaSwXcvQfcqTYBn44tr
Debit: -2000.00000000 DNET
Transaction fee: -900.03463478 DNET
Net amount: -2900.03463478 DNET
Transaction ID: 900171831ef221671b52d6d5497f5f878c1bf31747438fc5e23dd6d365c21bd9-000

jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980



View Profile
October 19, 2016, 02:13:44 AM
 #4864

can someone please explain. minted -2900 dnet?
<snip>

That was already explained just few posts above yours. Tongue
It's due to a bug and you can get reimbursed from the dev.

Follow me on Twitter for latest PIVX updates @ https://twitter.com/jakimanboy
jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980



View Profile
October 19, 2016, 10:52:27 AM
 #4865

Cool. Bitcoin_Dad is tweeting about DNET. I think it's his first time? Smiley
https://twitter.com/bitcoin_dad/status/788410259404500992

I've also been buying some more past week. Even scored some at 499 sat! Grin Grin Grin


Follow me on Twitter for latest PIVX updates @ https://twitter.com/jakimanboy
berron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 486



View Profile
October 19, 2016, 11:00:05 AM
 #4866

Cool. Bitcoin_Dad is tweeting about DNET. I think it's his first time? Smiley
https://twitter.com/bitcoin_dad/status/788410259404500992

I've also been buying some more past week. Even scored some at 499 sat! Grin Grin Grin
He has quoted DNET more times. Nosofast has also quoted DNET some times has a promising low cap crypto. And I think both hold  good bags. 
jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980



View Profile
October 19, 2016, 11:06:49 AM
 #4867

FYI - DNET's daily inflation is now only 57600 per day. Reduced by over 11% since yesterday.

He has quoted DNET more times. Nosofast has also quoted DNET some times has a promising low cap crypto. And I think both hold  good bags. 

Ah. I must have missed it. I did know about notsofast though. Wink

Follow me on Twitter for latest PIVX updates @ https://twitter.com/jakimanboy
q327K091
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


View Profile
October 19, 2016, 11:09:17 AM
 #4868

Cool. Bitcoin_Dad is tweeting about DNET. I think it's his first time? Smiley
https://twitter.com/bitcoin_dad/status/788410259404500992

I've also been buying some more past week. Even scored some at 499 sat! Grin Grin Grin
He has quoted DNET more times. Nosofast has also quoted DNET some times has a promising low cap crypto. And I think both hold  good bags.  

thats great to know, that man has been doing crypto when bitcoin was right after genesis block, in the meantime I aint selling even a single DNET and running 78 master nodes non stop (zero downtime) in few weeks I shall convert payouts to new master nodes

and notsofast is a solid person too, looks for value off the bottom, here for long term also good voice to have behind

https://twitter.com/notsofastcrypto

also just checked bittrex I don't see that many large lots (large to me would be like 100K >) lined up , for many it is just not worth to sell (finally people got smarter)

78 DNET master nodes that is 4.6 BTC @ Todays prices, will be fun to recall this at some later time

aaaaand you (inc. I) are lucky to have dev's genuinely interested in cryptography/technology and willing to refund on errors, team might grow so called "quality assurance" can be performed on the deeper level , all depends on the market

please don't panic on small errors! however you right to have it somehow refunded cause if the market moves up it moves up, and small becomes big.. so you right in that sense

new upcoming awesome coin

the Gulden Coin: GKWHEPx3rQyPnbgQUSHu8gtgoRCgpqed1j
berron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 486



View Profile
October 19, 2016, 12:59:22 PM
 #4869

Oh, fuck, let them fill in my orders, please...
borris123
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700


View Profile
October 19, 2016, 01:04:17 PM
 #4870

Cool. Bitcoin_Dad is tweeting about DNET. I think it's his first time? Smiley
https://twitter.com/bitcoin_dad/status/788410259404500992

I've also been buying some more past week. Even scored some at 499 sat! Grin Grin Grin
He has quoted DNET more times. Nosofast has also quoted DNET some times has a promising low cap crypto. And I think both hold  good bags.  

thats great to know, that man has been doing crypto when bitcoin was right after genesis block, in the meantime I aint selling even a single DNET and running 78 master nodes non stop (zero downtime) in few weeks I shall convert payouts to new master nodes

and notsofast is a solid person too, looks for value off the bottom, here for long term also good voice to have behind

https://twitter.com/notsofastcrypto

also just checked bittrex I don't see that many large lots (large to me would be like 100K >) lined up , for many it is just not worth to sell (finally people got smarter)

78 DNET master nodes that is 4.6 BTC @ Todays prices, will be fun to recall this at some later time

aaaaand you (inc. I) are lucky to have dev's genuinely interested in cryptography/technology and willing to refund on errors, team might grow so called "quality assurance" can be performed on the deeper level , all depends on the market

please don't panic on small errors! however you right to have it somehow refunded cause if the market moves up it moves up, and small becomes big.. so you right in that sense

can see a move coming up once these push/proposals are verified. a few devs now working on different projects. wont be long at this low price.

badenglishtea
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63


View Profile
October 19, 2016, 02:41:08 PM
 #4871

Bought in over the last few weeks to DarkNet.

Currently holding 300,000 DNET at about average 550 SATs. I am thinking I may try and push my holdings to 500K.

Few questions.

1. If I wanted to get 30 - 50 masternodes up and running, what is the easiest way to do that? I think I saw something about using a paid server with unique IPs for each node?
2. What is the maintenance on those masternodes? Do I need to update all of them every time there is a wallet update?
3. What is the risk in setting up those masternodes? Any chance I lose my coins if i don't update a wallet or bug?
4. Can I stake with my wallet instead?

Keep up the great work.

I actually sold a bunch of Dash and partially cashed out of my masternode. Dash price is way too inflated and too pre-mined. When is website coming back on? Community seems pretty good.
DRPD
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


View Profile
October 19, 2016, 02:49:06 PM
 #4872


i will try to answer some:

Bought in over the last few weeks to DarkNet.

Currently holding 300,000 DNET at about average 550 SATs. I am thinking I may try and push my holdings to 500K.

Few questions.

1. If I wanted to get 30 - 50 masternodes up and running, what is the easiest way to do that? I think I saw something about using a paid server with unique IPs for each node?
i guess easiest way is to use mp-hosting
2. What is the maintenance on those masternodes? Do I need to update all of them every time there is a wallet update?
for mandatory updates yes
3. What is the risk in setting up those masternodes? Any chance I lose my coins if i don't update a wallet or bug?
hmm don't think so. all your coins are in controller wallet. so just take care of your controller wallet and you will be fine
4. Can I stake with my wallet instead?
yes but you can't stake with coins reserved for masternodes

Keep up the great work.

I actually sold a bunch of Dash and partially cashed out of my masternode. Dash price is way too inflated and too pre-mined. When is website coming back on? Community seems pretty good.


borris123
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700


View Profile
October 19, 2016, 03:26:37 PM
 #4873

Check, correct the bug, and reimburse the quantity through proposal approved by MN owners. Could be a solution?? If true, and  it looks legit, as Mn owner y prefer to find some kind of solution than a flame war here.

That would be fair.

Really need to protect the rep of the coin. Cannot let this stand. Would undermine faith and confidence of any longterm holder.

This should of been rectified by now, but slipped through. I will refund to all the originating address soon.

I greatly apologize for this. It is not a hack, but was an issue in the budget system.

There are 13 proposals that went through, so there are 13 of you missing funds. Please PM me you addresses, and I will cover the coins.

hmm just thinking about that. how have you fixed the problem and why is it able to do such things anyway? you should not be able to change something however you did it in a wallet that will stop coins from being pulled from peoples wallets?? how is this budget system able to pull coins from peoples wallets?? thats flagging as a no no. can you explain.

jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980



View Profile
October 19, 2016, 08:53:14 PM
 #4874

I see that there are still nodes in my peer list that are running v2.1.2.3.

If you have not upgraded to v2.1.3.0, you need to upgrade you wallet.

Follow me on Twitter for latest PIVX updates @ https://twitter.com/jakimanboy
Equalizer1970
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 442



View Profile
October 19, 2016, 11:50:04 PM
 #4875

Check, correct the bug, and reimburse the quantity through proposal approved by MN owners. Could be a solution?? If true, and  it looks legit, as Mn owner y prefer to find some kind of solution than a flame war here.

That would be fair.

Really need to protect the rep of the coin. Cannot let this stand. Would undermine faith and confidence of any longterm holder.

This should of been rectified by now, but slipped through. I will refund to all the originating address soon.

I greatly apologize for this. It is not a hack, but was an issue in the budget system.

There are 13 proposals that went through, so there are 13 of you missing funds. Please PM me you addresses, and I will cover the coins.

hmm just thinking about that. how have you fixed the problem and why is it able to do such things anyway? you should not be able to change something however you did it in a wallet that will stop coins from being pulled from peoples wallets?? how is this budget system able to pull coins from peoples wallets?? thats flagging as a no no. can you explain.

I agree. The dev was cool with refunding me but we need to address this bug in the next release.


▄████▄▄████▄▄████▄
██████▄██████▄██████
██████▀██████▀██████
▀█████▀████▀▀████▀
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
▄████▄█████▄▄████▄
██████████████████
██████████████████
▀████▀▀████▀▀████▀
░░░░░░░░░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░
▄████▄▄████▄▄████▄
████████████▄██████
████████████▀██████
▀████▀▀████▀▀████▀





▄████▄
██████▄▄▄▄
██████▀▀▀▀
▀████▀

▄████▄
██████
██████
▀█████
░░░░░░
▄████▄░█████▄
██████░██████▄▄▄
██████░██████▀▀▀
▀████▀░█████▀
░░░░░░
▄█████
██████
██████
▀████▀





░░░░▄████▄
▄▄▄▄██████
▀▀▀▀██████
░░░░▀████▀

q327K091
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


View Profile
October 20, 2016, 03:45:27 PM
 #4876

Check, correct the bug, and reimburse the quantity through proposal approved by MN owners. Could be a solution?? If true, and  it looks legit, as Mn owner y prefer to find some kind of solution than a flame war here.

That would be fair.

Really need to protect the rep of the coin. Cannot let this stand. Would undermine faith and confidence of any longterm holder.

This should of been rectified by now, but slipped through. I will refund to all the originating address soon.

I greatly apologize for this. It is not a hack, but was an issue in the budget system.

There are 13 proposals that went through, so there are 13 of you missing funds. Please PM me you addresses, and I will cover the coins.

hmm just thinking about that. how have you fixed the problem and why is it able to do such things anyway? you should not be able to change something however you did it in a wallet that will stop coins from being pulled from peoples wallets?? how is this budget system able to pull coins from peoples wallets?? thats flagging as a no no. can you explain.

I agree. The dev was cool with refunding me but we need to address this bug in the next release.

super glad to hear it,  very professional, look, on any serious uptick I will sponsor here cryptography innovation research

new upcoming awesome coin

the Gulden Coin: GKWHEPx3rQyPnbgQUSHu8gtgoRCgpqed1j
s3v3nh4cks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008


View Profile WWW
October 20, 2016, 04:14:50 PM
 #4877

We have an active Payment Processor for those who are interested. Cointopay.com has added Darknet and I have tested it to be working. I have also Posted it on the OP.

Thanks

PIVX: DPQabewFmgSFxAtZPKszNKb2E6eHqPfJt5
borris123
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700


View Profile
October 20, 2016, 05:24:41 PM
 #4878

We have an active Payment Processor for those who are interested. Cointopay.com has added Darknet and I have tested it to be working. I have also Posted it on the OP.

Thanks

Can you explain how coins were withdrawn from people's wallets please.

s3v3nh4cks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008


View Profile WWW
October 20, 2016, 05:30:26 PM
 #4879

It was a bug when we changed from PoS to PoW, when the superBlock is processed, it is taking the coins from the user that finds that block. Stakebox is looking into a fix, so waiting to hear back from him.

PIVX: DPQabewFmgSFxAtZPKszNKb2E6eHqPfJt5
borris123
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700


View Profile
October 20, 2016, 06:01:59 PM
 #4880

It was a bug when we changed from PoS to PoW, when the superBlock is processed, it is taking the coins from the user that finds that block. Stakebox is looking into a fix, so waiting to hear back from him.

It's just worrying that some code that is in there is able to take coins directly from a user's wallet and put it into another. Will wait for stakebox to provide the technical solution and how it was able to do that. We're these wallets not locked? Still shouldn't be able to take coins.

Pages: « 1 ... 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 [244] 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 ... 391 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!