Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[Akito S. M. Hosana]

This is like the movie Groundhog Day.
Groundhog is behind the wheel.

[albert0bsd]

I am the creator. No,, not god man. I am the creator of this puzzle! I apologize, I had a bug in my script that generates WIF and ADDRESS so I was 100% sure it was using a 66 bits key but in fact it was using 62 . Well the money is still with me, so bug have been fixed, we will try again Tomorrow

I don't know what are you trying to prove, you don't need to do it. In any case you can generate address in any range with my tool

https://github.com/albertobsd/ecctools?tab=readme-ov-file#keygen

[lmajowka]

I am the creator. No,, not god man. I am the creator of this puzzle! I apologize, I had a bug in my script that generates WIF and ADDRESS so I was 100% sure it was using a 66 bits key but in fact it was using 62 . Well the money is still with me, so bug have been fixed, we will try again Tomorrow

I don't know what are you trying to prove, you don't need to do it. In any case you can generate address in any range with my tool

https://github.com/albertobsd/ecctools?tab=readme-ov-file#keygen

I want see if someone would be able to create a transaction before my transaction is confirmed and get the BTC. This can potentially happen to the winner of 66, but we want to see it happening in the real world. Like when they start to prove Enstein's stuff after they can't progress with the theory anymore

[albert0bsd]

I want see if someone would be able to create a transaction before my transaction is confirmed and get the BTC. This can potentially happen to the winner of 66, but we want to see it happening in the real world. Like when they start to prove Enstein's stuff after they can't progress with the theory anymore

I have a script program almost complete to do that, it actually check the mempool if there is a TX it extract the public key, send it to my keyhunt server retrieve the private key and the last part is  still  not complete, just need to make the TX i already have some script for that I just need to put all together, if you wait me i can finish it tomorrow and test it with a smaller TX. Send me a email or telegram i can show you that tomorrow.

[citb0in]

I have a script program almost complete to do that, it actually check the mempool if there is a TX it extract the public key, send it to my keyhunt server retrieve the private key and the last part is  still  not complete, just need to make the TX i already have some script for that I just need to put all together, if you wait me i can finish it tomorrow and test it with a smaller TX. Send me a email or telegram i can show you that tomorrow.

can you show us that script, please?

[lmajowka]

I want see if someone would be able to create a transaction before my transaction is confirmed and get the BTC. This can potentially happen to the winner of 66, but we want to see it happening in the real world. Like when they start to prove Enstein's stuff after they can't progress with the theory anymore

I have a script program almost complete to do that, it actually check the mempool if there is a TX it extract the public key, send it to my keyhunt server retrieve the private key and the last part is  still  not complete, just need to make the TX i already have some script for that I just need to put all together, if you wait me i can finish it tomorrow and test it with a smaller TX. Send me a email or telegram i can show you that tomorrow.

I don't have your email or telegram, I will do the transfer Tomorrow at 15:30 (Brasilia), Live on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/live/CjxjkDEE43s
The Address: 197kFKvMHoRJPXktc8xJwMjeTuE9xijBQ

[wilspen]

I want see if someone would be able to create a transaction before my transaction is confirmed and get the BTC. This can potentially happen to the winner of 66, but we want to see it happening in the real world. Like when they start to prove Enstein's stuff after they can't progress with the theory anymore

I have a script program almost complete to do that, it actually check the mempool if there is a TX it extract the public key, send it to my keyhunt server retrieve the private key and the last part is  still  not complete, just need to make the TX i already have some script for that I just need to put all together, if you wait me i can finish it tomorrow and test it with a smaller TX. Send me a email or telegram i can show you that tomorrow.

I have a theory, when making a transfer using the electrum wallet and sending the total, the value in the wallet is reset to zero, how would your program do to cancel the transaction if there are no more funds? and to do the RBF you would need funds to increase rates, and without funds it would only be possible to make the first transaction. Do you have any theories if it would still be possible?

[citb0in]

I have a theory, when making a transfer using the electrum wallet and sending the total, the value in the wallet is reset to zero, how would your program do to cancel the transaction if there are no more funds? and to do the RBF you would need funds to increase rates, and without funds it would only be possible to make the first transaction. Do you have any theories if it would still be possible?

Your theory is wrong. It doesn't matter what amount you will transfer or how high the fee is or the software you will use.

The transaction can be replaced at any time by anyone from any location. Only a higher fee is required to make this fully effective.

[wilspen]

That man is clown...Another address that is not in the range of 66...

This is not the case, we are testing whether it would be possible to make a new transaction from the moment the creator (lmajowka) of the puzzle sends the funds to another wallet, to simulate a possible withdrawal of funds from the 66-bit puzzle wallet.

I want to find out with this test if from the moment he sent the funds, if it would be possible to do the RBF or make a new transaction, using Electrum when sending the entire amount the balance remains with 0 BTC, this way there is no way to increase fee to do the RBF, or override the transaction in the meempool since there is no balance.

Stop complaining and be grateful that someone is spending money to know if it is safe or not to look for wallets below 100 bits.

One thing I noticed yesterday in the test was that I was wrong, the guy placed 7 late blocks at the lowest possible rate and still had the first confirmation in less than 1 minute, this is interesting information for those who think the transaction will be stopped for 10 minutes.

I have a theory, when making a transfer using the electrum wallet and sending the total, the value in the wallet is reset to zero, how would your program do to cancel the transaction if there are no more funds? and to do the RBF you would need funds to increase rates, and without funds it would only be possible to make the first transaction. Do you have any theories if it would still be possible?

Your theory is wrong. It doesn't matter what amount you will transfer or how high the fee is or the software you will use.

The transaction can be replaced at any time by anyone from any location. Only a higher fee is required to make this fully effective.

Yes, as I said, it's just theory, I believe that if only one transaction is made with the full value and RBF deactivated, there is no way to modify this transaction, and in my opinion there is no way to make a new one, since from the moment Since the value comes out of the electrum, it doesn't allow you to do it again, anyway, tomorrow whoever wants to test theories, Imajowka (capujowka) posted the details for this experiment there.

[citb0in]

Yes, as I said, it's just theory, I believe that ...

---snip---

faith belongs in the church. Even if you don't like to hear it, it doesn't matter what you or I think, feel, hope or believe. What counts are the facts, and these are implemented in the Bitcoin protocol, can be read and reproduced. It's a program, it has a way of working and it will stick to it

This topic has already been dealt with many times on previous pages, including links to the technical explanations. It is completely irrelevant which software you use, whether you activate RBF or not. I would highly recommend that you read and study the technical documentation on this topic.

[nomachine]

I have a script program almost complete to do that, it actually check the mempool if there is a TX it extract the public key, send it to my keyhunt server retrieve the private key and the last part is  still  not complete, just need to make the TX i already have some script for that I just need to put all together, if you wait me i can finish it tomorrow and test it with a smaller TX. Send me a email or telegram i can show you that tomorrow.

can you show us that script, please?

I will show you part of my latest script. It uses Iceland's rsz_rdiff_scan.py to obtain the public key....

Code:

# Setup logging
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)

def run_rsz_rdiff_scan(address):
    command = f"python3 rsz_rdiff_scan.py -a {address}"
    result = subprocess.run(command, shell=True, capture_output=True, text=True)
    return result.stdout

def extract_public_key(output):
    match = re.search(r'PubKey:\s+([0-9a-fA-F]+)', output)
    if match:
        return match.group(1)
    return None

def save_public_key(pubkey):
    with open("66.txt", "w") as f:
        f.write(pubkey)

def run_keyhunt():
    command = "./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 66.txt -b 66 -q -S -t 12 -k 4096 -S"
    subprocess.run(command, shell=True)

def extract_private_key():
    try:
        with open("KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.txt", "r") as f:
            for line in f:
                if "Key found privkey" in line:
                    privkey = line.split("Key found privkey")[1].strip()
                    return privkey
    except FileNotFoundError:
        logging.error("KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.txt not found")
    return None

def convert_to_wif(privkey):
    return ice.btc_pvk_to_wif(privkey)

def start_electrum_daemon():
    command = "electrum daemon -d"
    subprocess.run(command, shell=True)
    time.sleep(1)

def stop_electrum_daemon():
    command = "electrum stop"
    subprocess.run(command, shell=True)
    time.sleep(1)

def restore_wallet(wif_key, password):
    command = f"electrum -w /root/.electrum/wallets/66 restore {wif_key} --password {password}"
    result = subprocess.run(command, shell=True, capture_output=True, text=True)
    logging.info(f"restore_wallet output: {result.stdout} {result.stderr}")

and so on....

[zahid888]

I am the creator. No,, not god man. I am the creator of this puzzle! I apologize, I had a bug in my script that generates WIF and ADDRESS so I was 100% sure it was using a 66 bits key but in fact it was using 62 . Well the money is still with me, so bug have been fixed, we will try again Tomorrow

I don't know what are you trying to prove, you don't need to do it. In any case you can generate address in any range with my tool

https://github.com/albertobsd/ecctools?tab=readme-ov-file#keygen

I want see if someone would be able to create a transaction before my transaction is confirmed and get the BTC. This can potentially happen to the winner of 66, but we want to see it happening in the real world. Like when they start to prove Enstein's stuff after they can't progress with the theory anymore

Your testing would have been successfully completed yesterday if you had kept the private key in the correct range. No worries, just be mindful of it this time. If the funds you sent go to this address (1ND6VxAAdamzix1ZffoZww78YcMZQAWDEa), understand that I have won this Bot race. I invite all bots to participate in this race. Let's see something new tomorrow ... after a long time.

Edit:
Wait a moment. Why are you giving us a specific time? There is no fixed time for the transaction of puzzle 66. Just complete this task at any time tomorrow and let all the bots do their work.

[nomachine]

I am the creator. No,, not god man. I am the creator of this puzzle! I apologize, I had a bug in my script that generates WIF and ADDRESS so I was 100% sure it was using a 66 bits key but in fact it was using 62 . Well the money is still with me, so bug have been fixed, we will try again Tomorrow

I don't know what are you trying to prove, you don't need to do it. In any case you can generate address in any range with my tool

https://github.com/albertobsd/ecctools?tab=readme-ov-file#keygen

I want see if someone would be able to create a transaction before my transaction is confirmed and get the BTC. This can potentially happen to the winner of 66, but we want to see it happening in the real world. Like when they start to prove Enstein's stuff after they can't progress with the theory anymore

Your testing would have been successfully completed yesterday if you had kept the private key in the correct range. No worries, just be mindful of it this time. If the funds you sent go to this address (1ND6VxAAdamzix1ZffoZww78YcMZQAWDEa), understand that I have won this Bot race. I invite all bots to participate in this race. Let's see something new tomorrow ... after a long time.

Edit:
Wait a moment. Why are you giving us a specific time? There is no fixed time for the transaction of puzzle 66. Just complete this task at any time tomorrow and let all the bots do their work.

It is not the same to send 6.6 BTC and 0.0045 BTC. We need a list of transactions that recently sent 6 BTC to see how long it takes so that we can draw a conclusion. If sending 6 BTC takes 30 seconds, I will give up using the bot.

[albert0bsd]

Edit:
Wait a moment. Why are you giving us a specific time? There is no fixed time for the transaction of puzzle 66. Just complete this task at any time tomorrow and let all the bots do their work.

I think that is the hour he can sit down and do his streaming

I have a theory, when making a transfer using the electrum wallet and sending the total, the value in the wallet is reset to zero, how would your program do to cancel the transaction if there are no more funds? and to do the RBF you would need funds to increase rates, and without funds it would only be possible to make the first transaction. Do you have any theories if it would still be possible?

Well first there is not such thing as "Cancel Transaction" even if the wallet call it as is. In reality it is just a Full RBF tx to a new wallet still owned by you.

And that is just a software feature of some wallets, if I do that with a script it don't care about the Virtual "Zero Balance" it only does a new TX with the available utxos for that address regarless if they are waiting confirmation in mempool, that is actually the whole point of Full RBF

[nomachine]

send it to my keyhunt server retrieve the private key and the last part is  still  not complete....

I'm more interested in the techniques you use to preload files like:

keyhunt_bsgs_4_4294967296.blm

Mine range from 14 to 32 gigabytes. 😄

I’ve tried several techniques:

/etc/udev/rules.d/99-nvme-readahead.rules

Code:

ACTION=="add|change", KERNEL=="nvme0n1", RUN+="/sbin/blockdev --setra 65536 /dev/nvme0n1"

Code:

vmtouch -t keyhunt_bsgs_4_3258974208.blm

Some of these methods can speed up loading by up to 10 seconds.

[wilspen]

Wait a moment. Why are you giving us a specific time? There is no fixed time for the transaction of puzzle 66. Just complete this task at any time tomorrow and let all the bots do their work.

his audience is on YouTube, a channel for Brazilians who speak Portuguese, I brought it here to show you since we are testing technology, the more people the better, that's why he has an appointment with his audience in Brazil, which is the time he can do the live.

[albert0bsd]

I'm more interested in the techniques you use to preload files like:

Well is interesting know what you are doing, maybe i test it in the future.

To "preload" the files in memory I actually use the BSGSD  (bsgs daemon)


https://github.com/albertobsd/keyhunt/blob/main/BSGSD.md

It is a keyhunt server that only run BSGS for some small ranges like 66 bits it listen in a TCP socket on some PORT for incoming jobs, this is a public key and range to scan it only returns the private key if that was found or "404 NOT FOUND", check the link above for more information.

[nomachine]

I'm more interested in the techniques you use to preload files like:

Well is interesting know what you are doing, maybe i test it in the future.

To "preload" the files in memory I actually use the BSGSD  (bsgs daemon)


https://github.com/albertobsd/keyhunt/blob/main/BSGSD.md

It is a keyhunt server that only run BSGS for some small ranges like 66 bits it listen in a TCP socket on some PORT for incoming jobs, this is a public key and range to scan it only returns the private key if that was found or "404 NOT FOUND", check the link above for more information.

puzzle 63 in ~8 Seconds


Thanks for this info. This is genius for a bot.

[wilspen]

Yes, as I said, it's just theory, I believe that ...

---snip---

faith belongs in the church. Even if you don't like to hear it, it doesn't matter what you or I think, feel, hope or believe. What counts are the facts, and these are implemented in the Bitcoin protocol, can be read and reproduced. It's a program, it has a way of working and it will stick to it

This topic has already been dealt with many times on previous pages, including links to the technical explanations. It is completely irrelevant which software you use, whether you activate RBF or not. I would highly recommend that you read and study the technical documentation on this topic.

perfect, since you are the guy, tomorrow at 15:30 (UTC -3. Brasilia Time), the creator will do the transaction and expose the public key, put your knowledge into practice and prove what you are saying, otherwise , and if it is not hacked, it can be said that we still have hope.

[jacky19790729]

I have a theory, when making a transfer using the electrum wallet and sending the total, the value in the wallet is reset to zero, how would your program do to cancel the transaction if there are no more funds? and to do the RBF you would need funds to increase rates, and without funds it would only be possible to make the first transaction. Do you have any theories if it would still be possible?

Your theory is wrong. It doesn't matter what amount you will transfer or how high the fee is or the software you will use.

The transaction can be replaced at any time by anyone from any location. Only a higher fee is required to make this fully effective.

yesterday , I am online and use Kangaroo.exe crack private key about 2 minutes
then I import private key to Electrum  ( Win10 )
I got 2 transaction notifications immediately, one was +0.00495561  BTC , the other was -0.00495561 BTC , while the balance was 0 BTC
At the time , Transaction is  0  confirmations  , but I can't do anything ....
Electrum show the balance 0 BTC