[ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers

[bitbitch]

is this a recent photo? he doesn't look at all worried.

[thandie]

you guys are retarded. Max said in community meeting it will take year to ready SDK

Year in crypto is like 20 years.

A day with you weak heads in Bitcointalk are like 10 years in psychiatry.

[jjmv]

-No progress in development - I wouldn't be surprised if they decided to do it all again from scratch :-)

Such statements are completely false.
Anyone can track the development on GitHub https://github.com/LiskHQ

You're right... updates every few hours...

[MrPresident]

-No progress in development - I wouldn't be surprised if they decided to do it all again from scratch :-)

Such statements are completely false.
Anyone can track the development on GitHub https://github.com/LiskHQ

You're right... updates every few hours...

Exactly... one would be hard-pressed to find more work being done than at lisk's dev pace.
all these newb accounts uttering blatant lies are very suspicious.

[honolulumark]

is this a recent photo? he doesn't look at all worried.

lol, why would he be worried, his btc stash is growing in value

[bangomatic]

Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

[pieterjanvh]

Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

Because then they wouldn't be able to pay themselves their high wages for the rest of their lives .

[bitbitch]

Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

Because then they wouldn't be able to pay themselves their high wages for the rest of their lives .

and perhaps not all of the fund is in reality available to authentically spend. who knows what arrangements were in place at the beginning of the ICO with BTC whales, leading the charge with their oversized donations to suck others in. 10,000 BTC is now in long term cold storage, which is odd when the pace of development should be set to the maximum.

[Poly#Crypto]

 
Hey Liskers

Today I have published my third transparency report for February 2017.

Polycrypto's Transparency Report February

[Limx Dev]

Hey Liskers

Today I have published my second transparency report for February 2017.

Polycrypto's Transparency Report February

Good job @ Poly#Crypto 👍👍

[bangomatic]

Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

Because then they wouldn't be able to pay themselves their high wages for the rest of their lives .

and perhaps not all of the fund is in reality available to authentically spend. who knows what arrangements were in place at the beginning of the ICO with BTC whales, leading the charge with their oversized donations to suck others in. who knows.

One year to stabilize the core and another year to plan/develop SDK is just too long in cryptoland. I mean you can work at your own pace, but that doesn't mean that when you finish the project it will still be useful, the project may in fact not even matter by then. Crypto moves/evolves at a fast pace.

The current time timetable is comfy for lisk team but is really hurting investors.

[Poly#Crypto]

Hey Liskers

Today I have published my second transparency report for February 2017.

Polycrypto's Transparency Report February

Good job @ Poly#Crypto 👍👍

Thanks @Limx Dev

^^^sorry for my typo, this is my third report, not my second

[Bigcabrito]

Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

Because then they wouldn't be able to pay themselves their high wages for the rest of their lives .

and perhaps not all of the fund is in reality available to authentically spend. who knows what arrangements were in place at the beginning of the ICO with BTC whales, leading the charge with their oversized donations to suck others in. who knows.

One year to stabilize the core and another year to plan/develop SDK is just too long in cryptoland. I mean you can work at your own pace, but that doesn't mean that when you finish the project it will still be useful, the project may in fact not even matter by then. Crypto moves/evolves at a fast pace.

The current time timetable is comfy for lisk team but is really hurting investors.

The team will grow in the upcoming months, but we're taking into account the amount of time it takes for a new developer to get acquainted with the code. It may be seen as "too long" in the cryptocurrency space, but it is not long for software development. Every release is a step forward towards the right direction.

[s0nix]

Hey Liskers

Today I have published my third transparency report for February 2017.

Polycrypto's Transparency Report February

Good work Poly

And everyone can see most delegates don't sell, they donate some LSK for good actions and hold a lot of forging rewards, in this case over 90%.

[cc001]

published

cc001 - Transparency Report February

[s0nix]

Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

I don't understand that as an exact and 100% time table. It is more a guideline. And I think that was a calculation with the existing Devs at that time.
If the team grows and more developers work on it, it can go faster of course.

On the other hand, it is not good to say we are finished definitely in Q2, if they don' t know how many Devs are available to do the work.
A lot of projects know the problems when they need to postpone predicted dates. This is also bad.

[zanzibar]

Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

I don't understand that as an exact and 100% time table. It is more a guideline. And I think that was a calculation with the existing Devs at that time.
If the team grows and more developers work on it, it can go faster of course.

On the other hand, it is not good to say we are finished definitely in Q2, if they don' t know how many Devs are available to do the work.
A lot of projects know the problems when they need to postpone predicted dates. This is also bad.

WTF have they been doing for a year. Should have a working SDK by now. Look at the charts for Lisk, it's clear people have lost faith, it's dumping hard.

[s0nix]

Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

I don't understand that as an exact and 100% time table. It is more a guideline. And I think that was a calculation with the existing Devs at that time.
If the team grows and more developers work on it, it can go faster of course.

On the other hand, it is not good to say we are finished definitely in Q2, if they don' t know how many Devs are available to do the work.
A lot of projects know the problems when they need to postpone predicted dates. This is also bad.

WTF have they been doing for a year. Should have a working SDK by now. Look at the charts for Lisk, it's clear people have lost faith, it's dumping hard.

WTF did you inform yourself about the last 12 months? How do I become the best troll?
It's all said so far. So shut up

[charleshoskinson]

https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.com/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html

[gnargnar]

https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.com/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html

ouch!     Okay.. this hurts really bad.
Thanks for taking time to publish that Charles.

I'm definitely getting out of Lisk to never look back again 

still, I wish the best of luck and patience to all Lisk fans and, what we now can really call, bagholders.