[0Th]Ozcoin Pooled Mining |DGM 1%|Stratum+VarDiff port 80|NEW CN mining|

[crazyates]

makes up for the super short rounds earlier eh? 

karma's a bitch.

[1680230365]

1680230365

[1680230365]

1680230365

[1680230365]

1680230365

[1680230365]

1680230365

[1680230365]

1680230365

[runlinux]

makes up for the super short rounds earlier eh? 

karma's a bitch.

+1  ungh....

[Graet]

heh
15hours
11M shares
404%
looks bad, but we have had (at lower diff) 800% blocks

not saying I'm enjoying it
looks can be deceiving though
and yeah, awesome run the other day

ø Shares/Difficulty Ratio:   99.24% - since we started DGM, longterm we are doing ok

[Tittiez]

heh
15hours
11M shares
404%
looks bad, but we have had (at lower diff) 800% blocks

not saying I'm enjoying it
looks can be deceiving though
and yeah, awesome run the other day

ø Shares/Difficulty Ratio:   99.24% - since we started DGM, longterm we are doing ok

Ouch, glad I am mining at 50btc right now.

[Graet]

BLOCK: 197954 | 13445774 shares | 18h 40m 44s | Amount: 50.052 | Found by fydel | 499.09% of difficulty
finally
well done fydel 
long in hours
high in shares
still well below our 800% block

[organofcorti]

BLOCK: 197954 | 13445774 shares | 18h 40m 44s | Amount: 50.052 | Found by fydel | 499.09% of difficulty
finally
long in hours
high in shares
still well below our 800% block

Bah! 5xD is nothing! I remember back in the day when Slush got 12xD. Now there was a bunch of complaining!

[Tittiez]

Feature request.

A per user DGM vs PPS.

Simply, show how much you've made mining DGM, and show how much you would have made mining PPS side by side. Maybe just the two numbers, or if you wanted to take it a step further, graphs displaying over time. Line graph would be better then a bar graph I think. I dunno.


Yes I'm aware of this, but I mean one of those per user, and maybe taking it a step further?

[Graet]

Feature request.

A per user DGM vs PPS.

Simply, show how much you've made mining DGM, and show how much you would have made mining PPS side by side. Maybe just the two numbers, or if you wanted to take it a step further, graphs displaying over time. Line graph would be better then a bar graph I think. I dunno.


Yes I'm aware of this, but I mean one of those per user, and maybe taking it a step further?

maybe, wouldn't really show anything meaningful for anyone but fulltime miners though and they get what that graph shows

[Graet]

[wknight]

Lol.. pretty sad when you need to post up just to keep the post alive


Nothing Broke here.. just keep mining.

Thanks

[os2sam]

I see you still haven't updated your "About Ozcoin Mining Pool" list to reflect that you use/support rolltime?

Being that CGMiner's load balance and balance options cause the majority of shares being submitted to rolltime pools it would be nice to know which pools support rolltime.

I was really suprised that BTCGuild doesn't support rolltime, which was implied by ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.
Thanks,
Sam

[Graet]

I see you still haven't updated your "About Ozcoin Mining Pool" list to reflect that you use/support rolltime?

Being that CGMiner's load balance and balance options cause the majority of shares being submitted to rolltime pools it would be nice to know which pools support rolltime.

I was really suprised that BTCGuild doesn't support rolltime, which was implied by ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.
Thanks,
Sam

Thanks Sam
Added to list

yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.

[kano]

...
yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.

The balance issue was that the old balance option was trying to balance based on getting work.
However, if one pool has roll-n-time - and the rest don't - then that one pool will be able to roll the work and thus generate much more work and thus the balance would be greatly in it's favour (and not balanced)

So there are now 2 balance options:
1) LoadBalance - the old one
and
2) Balance - based on trying to submit the same number of shares to each pool

[Graet]

...
yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.

The balance issue was that the old balance option was trying to balance based on getting work.
However, if one pool has roll-n-time - and the rest don't - then that one pool will be able to roll the work and thus generate much more work and thus the balance would be greatly in it's favour (and not balanced)

So there are now 2 balance options:
1) LoadBalance - the old one
and
2) Balance - based on trying to submit the same number of shares to each pool

Ahh, thanks for that kano
I didn't realise the implementation was so rare, had assumed most pools would be rolling time

[kano]

...
Ahh, thanks for that kano
I didn't realise the implementation was so rare, had assumed most pools would be rolling time

Slowly becoming more common ... but I've no idea why it's common for other pools not to have it already though!
The (hack) idea has been around and been used for a quite a while ...

[os2sam]

I see you still haven't updated your "About Ozcoin Mining Pool" list to reflect that you use/support rolltime?

Being that CGMiner's load balance and balance options cause the majority of shares being submitted to rolltime pools it would be nice to know which pools support rolltime.

I was really suprised that BTCGuild doesn't support rolltime, which was implied by ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.
Thanks,
Sam

Thanks Sam
Added to list

yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.

It's something that had bugged me for a long time through many versions of CG Miner, but was never really that big of a deal to me and thought it was unique to something on my side.  But then someone else it as a problem which caused me to inquire into it a bit more.

Here is a link to Kano's reply

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.msg1111517#msg1111517

Thanks,
Sam

[os2sam]

...
yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.

The balance issue was that the old balance option was trying to balance based on getting work.
However, if one pool has roll-n-time - and the rest don't - then that one pool will be able to roll the work and thus generate much more work and thus the balance would be greatly in it's favour (and not balanced)

So there are now 2 balance options:
1) LoadBalance - the old one
and
2) Balance - based on trying to submit the same number of shares to each pool

Yep, what he said .

[Graet]

...
yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.

The balance issue was that the old balance option was trying to balance based on getting work.
However, if one pool has roll-n-time - and the rest don't - then that one pool will be able to roll the work and thus generate much more work and thus the balance would be greatly in it's favour (and not balanced)

So there are now 2 balance options:
1) LoadBalance - the old one
and
2) Balance - based on trying to submit the same number of shares to each pool

Yep, what he said .

Thanks Sam,
yeah, knew what it does, just not that there was an issue with balance between pools
only ever mined on 3 pools so not something I use
cheers
Graet

[crazyates]

heh
15hours
11M shares
404%
looks bad, but we have had (at lower diff) 800% blocks

not saying I'm enjoying it
looks can be deceiving though
and yeah, awesome run the other day

ø Shares/Difficulty Ratio:   99.24% - since we started DGM, longterm we are doing ok

We had a good day yesterday, and then today had another 17 hour, 11M share block. Fun times.

[Graet]

heh
15hours
11M shares
404%
looks bad, but we have had (at lower diff) 800% blocks

not saying I'm enjoying it
looks can be deceiving though
and yeah, awesome run the other day

ø Shares/Difficulty Ratio:   99.24% - since we started DGM, longterm we are doing ok

We had a good day yesterday, and then today had another 17 hour, 11M share block. Fun times.

yeah, high diff and variance starting to work together, deepbit had a 22M share block yesterday from what I hear.
that block of ours was 426% of diff , we have had 800%+ blocks before
Also at 800Ghash shares take longer to accumulate those shares than at the 1.8 - 2Thash we were running at for a while

I did notice on blockchain.info slush had 6 of the last 10 displayed blocks at one stage - I guess the luck moves around