crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 09, 2012, 01:50:35 AM |
|
makes up for the super short rounds earlier eh? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) karma's a bitch.
|
|
|
|
runlinux
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 09, 2012, 02:18:40 AM |
|
makes up for the super short rounds earlier eh? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) karma's a bitch. +1 ungh....
|
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 09, 2012, 04:02:55 AM |
|
heh 15hours 11M shares 404% looks bad, but we have had (at lower diff) 800% blocks not saying I'm enjoying it ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) looks can be deceiving though ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) and yeah, awesome run the other day ø Shares/Difficulty Ratio: 99.24% - since we started DGM, longterm we are doing ok ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 09, 2012, 04:32:29 AM |
|
heh 15hours 11M shares 404% looks bad, but we have had (at lower diff) 800% blocks not saying I'm enjoying it ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) looks can be deceiving though ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) and yeah, awesome run the other day ø Shares/Difficulty Ratio: 99.24% - since we started DGM, longterm we are doing ok ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Ouch, glad I am mining at 50btc right now. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 09, 2012, 07:29:36 AM |
|
BLOCK: 197954 | 13445774 shares | 18h 40m 44s | Amount: 50.052 | Found by fydel | 499.09% of difficulty finally ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) well done fydel ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) long in hours high in shares still well below our 800% block ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 09, 2012, 07:31:19 AM |
|
BLOCK: 197954 | 13445774 shares | 18h 40m 44s | Amount: 50.052 | Found by fydel | 499.09% of difficulty finally ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) long in hours high in shares still well below our 800% block ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Bah! 5xD is nothing! I remember back in the day when Slush got 12xD. Now there was a bunch of complaining!
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 09, 2012, 10:11:27 AM |
|
Feature request. A per user DGM vs PPS. Simply, show how much you've made mining DGM, and show how much you would have made mining PPS side by side. Maybe just the two numbers, or if you wanted to take it a step further, graphs displaying over time. Line graph would be better then a bar graph I think. I dunno. Yes I'm aware of this, but I mean one of those per user, and maybe taking it a step further?
|
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 09, 2012, 10:43:52 AM |
|
Feature request. A per user DGM vs PPS. Simply, show how much you've made mining DGM, and show how much you would have made mining PPS side by side. Maybe just the two numbers, or if you wanted to take it a step further, graphs displaying over time. Line graph would be better then a bar graph I think. I dunno. Yes I'm aware of this, but I mean one of those per user, and maybe taking it a step further? maybe, wouldn't really show anything meaningful for anyone but fulltime miners though and they get what that graph shows ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 12, 2012, 03:42:23 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
wknight
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 889
Merit: 1000
Bitcoin calls me an Orphan
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 12, 2012, 09:44:17 PM |
|
Lol.. pretty sad when you need to post up just to keep the post alive Nothing Broke here.. just keep mining. Thanks
|
Mining Both Bitcoin and Litecoin.
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3582
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 13, 2012, 12:06:19 PM |
|
I see you still haven't updated your "About Ozcoin Mining Pool" list to reflect that you use/support rolltime?
Being that CGMiner's load balance and balance options cause the majority of shares being submitted to rolltime pools it would be nice to know which pools support rolltime.
I was really suprised that BTCGuild doesn't support rolltime, which was implied by ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity. Thanks, Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 13, 2012, 12:09:01 PM |
|
I see you still haven't updated your "About Ozcoin Mining Pool" list to reflect that you use/support rolltime?
Being that CGMiner's load balance and balance options cause the majority of shares being submitted to rolltime pools it would be nice to know which pools support rolltime.
I was really suprised that BTCGuild doesn't support rolltime, which was implied by ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity. Thanks, Sam
Thanks Sam Added to list ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 13, 2012, 12:24:09 PM |
|
... yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) The balance issue was that the old balance option was trying to balance based on getting work. However, if one pool has roll-n-time - and the rest don't - then that one pool will be able to roll the work and thus generate much more work and thus the balance would be greatly in it's favour (and not balanced) So there are now 2 balance options: 1) LoadBalance - the old one and 2) Balance - based on trying to submit the same number of shares to each pool
|
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 13, 2012, 12:27:33 PM |
|
... yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) The balance issue was that the old balance option was trying to balance based on getting work. However, if one pool has roll-n-time - and the rest don't - then that one pool will be able to roll the work and thus generate much more work and thus the balance would be greatly in it's favour (and not balanced) So there are now 2 balance options: 1) LoadBalance - the old one and 2) Balance - based on trying to submit the same number of shares to each pool Ahh, thanks for that kano ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I didn't realise the implementation was so rare, had assumed most pools would be rolling time ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 13, 2012, 12:33:00 PM |
|
... Ahh, thanks for that kano ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I didn't realise the implementation was so rare, had assumed most pools would be rolling time ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Slowly becoming more common ... but I've no idea why it's common for other pools not to have it already though! The (hack) idea has been around and been used for a quite a while ...
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3582
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 13, 2012, 12:33:32 PM |
|
I see you still haven't updated your "About Ozcoin Mining Pool" list to reflect that you use/support rolltime?
Being that CGMiner's load balance and balance options cause the majority of shares being submitted to rolltime pools it would be nice to know which pools support rolltime.
I was really suprised that BTCGuild doesn't support rolltime, which was implied by ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity. Thanks, Sam
Thanks Sam Added to list ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) It's something that had bugged me for a long time through many versions of CG Miner, but was never really that big of a deal to me and thought it was unique to something on my side. But then someone else it as a problem which caused me to inquire into it a bit more. Here is a link to Kano's reply https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.msg1111517#msg1111517Thanks, Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3582
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 13, 2012, 12:35:33 PM |
|
... yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) The balance issue was that the old balance option was trying to balance based on getting work. However, if one pool has roll-n-time - and the rest don't - then that one pool will be able to roll the work and thus generate much more work and thus the balance would be greatly in it's favour (and not balanced) So there are now 2 balance options: 1) LoadBalance - the old one and 2) Balance - based on trying to submit the same number of shares to each pool Yep, what he said ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) .
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 13, 2012, 12:43:15 PM |
|
... yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) The balance issue was that the old balance option was trying to balance based on getting work. However, if one pool has roll-n-time - and the rest don't - then that one pool will be able to roll the work and thus generate much more work and thus the balance would be greatly in it's favour (and not balanced) So there are now 2 balance options: 1) LoadBalance - the old one and 2) Balance - based on trying to submit the same number of shares to each pool Yep, what he said ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) . Thanks Sam, yeah, knew what it does, just not that there was an issue with balance between pools only ever mined on 3 pools so not something I use ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) cheers Graet
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 15, 2012, 11:28:49 PM |
|
heh 15hours 11M shares 404% looks bad, but we have had (at lower diff) 800% blocks not saying I'm enjoying it ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) looks can be deceiving though ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) and yeah, awesome run the other day ø Shares/Difficulty Ratio: 99.24% - since we started DGM, longterm we are doing ok ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) We had a good day yesterday, and then today had another 17 hour, 11M share block. Fun times.
|
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 16, 2012, 03:44:19 AM |
|
heh 15hours 11M shares 404% looks bad, but we have had (at lower diff) 800% blocks not saying I'm enjoying it ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) looks can be deceiving though ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) and yeah, awesome run the other day ø Shares/Difficulty Ratio: 99.24% - since we started DGM, longterm we are doing ok ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) We had a good day yesterday, and then today had another 17 hour, 11M share block. Fun times. yeah, high diff and variance starting to work together, deepbit had a 22M share block yesterday from what I hear. that block of ours was 426% of diff , we have had 800%+ blocks before ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Also at 800Ghash shares take longer to accumulate those shares than at the 1.8 - 2Thash we were running at for a while ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I did notice on blockchain.info slush had 6 of the last 10 displayed blocks at one stage - I guess the luck moves around ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
|