Bitcoin Forum
December 06, 2016, 08:06:32 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 ... 139 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [0Th]Ozcoin Pooled Mining |DGM 1%|Stratum+VarDiff port 80|NEW CN mining|  (Read 368360 times)
Graet
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2012, 06:36:03 PM
 #1221

Stratum server is behaving itself nicely after a few tweaks earlier - more load would be appreciated Cheesy
We will continue to monitor in case of any issues
Recommended cgminer version 2.9.1 for people testing stratum
Best
Graet

| Ozcoin Pooled Mining Pty Ltd https://ozcoin.net Double Geometric Reward System https://lc.ozcoin.net for Litecoin mining DGM| https://crowncloud.net VPS and Dedicated Servers for the BTC community
1481054792
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481054792

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481054792
Reply with quote  #2

1481054792
Report to moderator
1481054792
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481054792

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481054792
Reply with quote  #2

1481054792
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481054792
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481054792

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481054792
Reply with quote  #2

1481054792
Report to moderator
1481054792
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481054792

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481054792
Reply with quote  #2

1481054792
Report to moderator
1481054792
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481054792

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481054792
Reply with quote  #2

1481054792
Report to moderator
Graet
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980



View Profile WWW
November 07, 2012, 02:45:56 AM
 #1222

Stratum server still going strong
connection is now possible from either
stratum.ozco.in:3333
http://stratum.ozco.in:3333
stratum+tcp://stratum.ozco.in:3333

I'm thinking the 1st one will be popular Smiley

| Ozcoin Pooled Mining Pty Ltd https://ozcoin.net Double Geometric Reward System https://lc.ozcoin.net for Litecoin mining DGM| https://crowncloud.net VPS and Dedicated Servers for the BTC community
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


View Profile
November 07, 2012, 03:29:49 AM
 #1223

Stratum server still going strong
connection is now possible from either
stratum.ozco.in:3333
http://stratum.ozco.in:3333
stratum+tcp://stratum.ozco.in:3333

I'm thinking the 1st one will be popular Smiley

I'm confused.  You list 3, but say either.  What's the difference between/among them?

I'm using http://stratum.ozco.in:3333, and have all along.

M

MMinerMonitor author, monitor/auto/schedule reboots/alerts/remote/MobileMiner for Ants and Spondoolies! Latest (5.2). MPoolMonitor author, monitor stats/workers for most pools, global BTC stats (current/nxt diff/USD val/hashrate/calc)! Latest (v4.2) 
Buyer beware of Bitmain hardware and services.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 07, 2012, 03:40:16 AM
 #1224

cgminer just accepts the input in whatever format you use since it detects what kind of server is at the other end. None of these differ on the pool side for how they're managed.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Graet
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980



View Profile WWW
November 07, 2012, 03:46:49 AM
 #1225

Stratum server still going strong
connection is now possible from either
stratum.ozco.in:3333
http://stratum.ozco.in:3333
stratum+tcp://stratum.ozco.in:3333

I'm thinking the 1st one will be popular Smiley

I'm confused.  You list 3, but say either.  What's the difference between/among them?

I'm using http://stratum.ozco.in:3333, and have all along.

M
when we first started testing only stratum+tcp://stratum.ozco.in:3333 worked, you can now connect on any of the above - sorry to be confusing

| Ozcoin Pooled Mining Pty Ltd https://ozcoin.net Double Geometric Reward System https://lc.ozcoin.net for Litecoin mining DGM| https://crowncloud.net VPS and Dedicated Servers for the BTC community
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
November 07, 2012, 01:01:12 PM
 #1226

Well here are my results using stratum vs. getwork

These were on the standard getwork us.ozco.in:8332.  My hash rate was 520Mhs U:7.5 WU:7.5
206873   2012-11-07 12:41:51   4,393   0.03354776
206808   2012-11-07 02:54:22   806   0.03152941
206800   2012-11-07 01:11:42   1,592   0.03447590
206778   2012-11-06 21:53:48   2,368   0.03428086

These were on Stratum stratum.ozco.in:3333.  My hash rate was 523Mhs U:6.7 WU:7.3
206752   2012-11-06 17:35:01   757   0.02448683
206736   2012-11-06 15:03:56   1,054   0.02756680
206723   2012-11-06 12:44:48   946   0.02476589
206709   2012-11-06 08:56:48   3,747   0.02780425

I've gone back to us.ozco.in:8332 for now.
Thanks,
Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


View Profile
November 07, 2012, 02:56:32 PM
 #1227

Well here are my results using stratum vs. getwork

These were on the standard getwork us.ozco.in:8332.  My hash rate was 520Mhs U:7.5 WU:7.5
206873   2012-11-07 12:41:51   4,393   0.03354776
206808   2012-11-07 02:54:22   806   0.03152941
206800   2012-11-07 01:11:42   1,592   0.03447590
206778   2012-11-06 21:53:48   2,368   0.03428086

These were on Stratum stratum.ozco.in:3333.  My hash rate was 523Mhs U:6.7 WU:7.3
206752   2012-11-06 17:35:01   757   0.02448683
206736   2012-11-06 15:03:56   1,054   0.02756680
206723   2012-11-06 12:44:48   946   0.02476589
206709   2012-11-06 08:56:48   3,747   0.02780425

I've gone back to us.ozco.in:8332 for now.
Thanks,
Sam

I've observed the same thing here.  I had 2 miners pointing to stratum, one around 660mh (one 7970), one around 2gh (3x7970).  The one 7970 is running up to par.  But the 3x7970 is running subpar.  All cards were running at 650 or less, and unit output is decreased.  I generally get a unit work of 9.1/7970.  The 3x7970 was running at 22, should be around 27.  (I have another 3x7970 on p2pool, and it's at 26.)

So I've switched my 3x7970 back to LP on oz, for now I'm leaving my 1x7970 on stratum.

M

MMinerMonitor author, monitor/auto/schedule reboots/alerts/remote/MobileMiner for Ants and Spondoolies! Latest (5.2). MPoolMonitor author, monitor stats/workers for most pools, global BTC stats (current/nxt diff/USD val/hashrate/calc)! Latest (v4.2) 
Buyer beware of Bitmain hardware and services.
wknight
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 889


Bitcoin calls me an Orphan


View Profile WWW
November 07, 2012, 04:23:41 PM
 #1228

The website looks a little "crippled"... with a html display in the middle

This issue has been resolved

Mining Both Bitcoin and Litecoin.
wazoo42
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
November 07, 2012, 06:34:53 PM
 #1229

I tried enabling the stratum server on one of my nodes (2 x 5830) and am getting the following error in bfgminer-2.9.1. Also, when I look at the pools in bfgminer the stratum server is listed as dead, which doesn't seem too surprising given the errors. All of the other pools I have used over time appear to work fine. What am I doing wrong?

 [2012-11-07 12:30:42] Testing pool http://stratum.ozco.in:3333/
 [2012-11-07 12:30:42] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from server
 [2012-11-07 12:30:42] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from server
 [2012-11-07 12:30:42] Stratum connect failed to pool 3: Couldn't resolve host '(null)'

bfgminer.conf
---------------------------------
{
"pools" : [
        {
                "url" : "http://us.ozco.in:8331/",
                "user" : "wazoo42.wiggin",
                "pass" : "xxxx"
        },
        {
                "url" : "http://mtred.com:8337/",
                "user" : "wiggin",
                "pass" : "xxxx"
        },
        {
                "url" : "http://bitcoinpool.org:8334/",
                "user" : "wazoo42",
                "pass" : "xxxx"
        },
        {
                "url" : "http://stratum.ozco.in:3333/",
                "user" : "wazoo42.wiggin",
                "pass" : "xxxx"
        }
]
,
"intensity" : "5,8",
"vectors" : "4,4",
"worksize" : "128,128",
"kernel" : "phatk,phatk",
"gpu-engine" : "0-0,0-0",
"gpu-fan" : "0-85,0-85",
"gpu-memclock" : "0,0",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0,0",
"gpu-powertune" : "0,0",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000,0.000",
"temp-cutoff" : "95,95",
"temp-overheat" : "85,85",
"temp-target" : "75,75",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "120",
"failover-only" : true,
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "60",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"verbose" : true,
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/lib/bfgminer"
}

crazyates
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile
November 07, 2012, 06:37:28 PM
 #1230

BFGMiner is designed with GBT as it's primary focus, with stratum support added later. CGMiner was designed with stratum as it's primary focux, with GBT support added later. I'd try CGMiner and see if it helps.

Tips? 1crazy8pMqgwJ7tX7ZPZmyPwFbc6xZKM9
Previous Trade History - Sale Thread
wazoo42
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
November 07, 2012, 06:46:09 PM
 #1231

Ah, I thought bfgminer was a fork with cosmetic changes, my mistake. I will go back to cgminer and try again. Thanks.
gyverlb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896



View Profile
November 07, 2012, 07:04:44 PM
 #1232

Ah, I thought bfgminer was a fork with cosmetic changes, my mistake. I will go back to cgminer and try again. Thanks.
Most forks begin with cosmetic changes Smiley But this one was made because Luke had a different approach on FPGA support so it most probably quickly diverged (didn't check the changesets myself but saw comments on them that strongly suggest it).
There should still be lots of common code, but each project has a life of its own.

P2pool tuning guide
Trade BTC for €/$ at bitcoin.de (referral), it's cheaper and faster (acts as escrow and lets the buyers do bank transfers).
Tip: 17bdPfKXXvr7zETKRkPG14dEjfgBt5k2dd
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 07, 2012, 07:53:55 PM
 #1233

Well here are my results using stratum vs. getwork

These were on the standard getwork us.ozco.in:8332.  My hash rate was 520Mhs U:7.5 WU:7.5
206873   2012-11-07 12:41:51   4,393   0.03354776
206808   2012-11-07 02:54:22   806   0.03152941
206800   2012-11-07 01:11:42   1,592   0.03447590
206778   2012-11-06 21:53:48   2,368   0.03428086

These were on Stratum stratum.ozco.in:3333.  My hash rate was 523Mhs U:6.7 WU:7.3
206752   2012-11-06 17:35:01   757   0.02448683
206736   2012-11-06 15:03:56   1,054   0.02756680
206723   2012-11-06 12:44:48   946   0.02476589
206709   2012-11-06 08:56:48   3,747   0.02780425

I've gone back to us.ozco.in:8332 for now.
Thanks,
Sam

I've observed the same thing here.  I had 2 miners pointing to stratum, one around 660mh (one 7970), one around 2gh (3x7970).  The one 7970 is running up to par.  But the 3x7970 is running subpar.  All cards were running at 650 or less, and unit output is decreased.  I generally get a unit work of 9.1/7970.  The 3x7970 was running at 22, should be around 27.  (I have another 3x7970 on p2pool, and it's at 26.)

So I've switched my 3x7970 back to LP on oz, for now I'm leaving my 1x7970 on stratum.

M
Unless you're getting lots of disconnects with stratum, and your SS: count has risen, then there is no way to blame this on stratum.

I often regret putting utility in as a counter in cgminer because it is a measure of hashrate x luck and people often blame stretches of bad luck on whatever their last software change was.

Now if it is an issue of lost shares due to disconnects, that's another story. The SS counter will tell you that.

EDIT: It's also worth noting most people are noticing a universal rise in their hashrate, which makes sense given the lack of dropout in work between getworks that stratum exhibits. Hashrate being an objective figure unrelated to luck.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Wave
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105


View Profile
November 07, 2012, 08:43:57 PM
 #1234

I feel brain dead, getting the following error in CGMiner 2.9.1:

"JSON Stratum Auth Failed (null)"

Trying to use:

   {
      "url" : "http://stratum.ozco.in:3333",
      "user" : "MinerName",
      "pass" : "MinerPassword"
   },

Thoughts?
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


View Profile
November 07, 2012, 09:04:13 PM
 #1235

Well here are my results using stratum vs. getwork

These were on the standard getwork us.ozco.in:8332.  My hash rate was 520Mhs U:7.5 WU:7.5
206873   2012-11-07 12:41:51   4,393   0.03354776
206808   2012-11-07 02:54:22   806   0.03152941
206800   2012-11-07 01:11:42   1,592   0.03447590
206778   2012-11-06 21:53:48   2,368   0.03428086

These were on Stratum stratum.ozco.in:3333.  My hash rate was 523Mhs U:6.7 WU:7.3
206752   2012-11-06 17:35:01   757   0.02448683
206736   2012-11-06 15:03:56   1,054   0.02756680
206723   2012-11-06 12:44:48   946   0.02476589
206709   2012-11-06 08:56:48   3,747   0.02780425

I've gone back to us.ozco.in:8332 for now.
Thanks,
Sam

I've observed the same thing here.  I had 2 miners pointing to stratum, one around 660mh (one 7970), one around 2gh (3x7970).  The one 7970 is running up to par.  But the 3x7970 is running subpar.  All cards were running at 650 or less, and unit output is decreased.  I generally get a unit work of 9.1/7970.  The 3x7970 was running at 22, should be around 27.  (I have another 3x7970 on p2pool, and it's at 26.)

So I've switched my 3x7970 back to LP on oz, for now I'm leaving my 1x7970 on stratum.

M
Unless you're getting lots of disconnects with stratum, and your SS: count has risen, then there is no way to blame this on stratum.

I often regret putting utility in as a counter in cgminer because it is a measure of hashrate x luck and people often blame stretches of bad luck on whatever their last software change was.

Now if it is an issue of lost shares due to disconnects, that's another story. The SS counter will tell you that.

EDIT: It's also worth noting most people are noticing a universal rise in their hashrate, which makes sense given the lack of dropout in work between getworks that stratum exhibits. Hashrate being an objective figure unrelated to luck.

I heard about the increase in hashrate as well.  I have not observed it myself though.

Here's a screenshot from LP on ozco after a few hours:

Code:
cgminer version 2.8.7 - Started: [2012-11-07 11:21:37]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):1.928G (avg):1.950Gh/s | Q:315  A:7491  R:62  HW:0  E:2378%  U:27.4/m
 TQ: 0  ST: 7  SS: 0  DW: 41  NB: 33  LW: 15384  GF: 1  RF: 0  WU: 27.6
 Connected to us2.ozco.in with LP as user xxxxxxxxx
 Block: 0471c542889416f71ade70aa...  Started: [15:49:11]  Best share: 129K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  73.0C 2796RPM | 641.7M/652.0Mh/s | A:2441 R:16 HW:0 U: 8.92/m I: 9
 GPU 1:  73.0C 2527RPM | 640.3M/645.6Mh/s | A:2523 R:18 HW:0 U: 9.22/m I: 9
 GPU 2:  73.0C 2316RPM | 650.3M/653.2Mh/s | A:2527 R:28 HW:0 U: 9.23/m I: 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll post the stratum equivalent after a few hours later for comparison.

M

MMinerMonitor author, monitor/auto/schedule reboots/alerts/remote/MobileMiner for Ants and Spondoolies! Latest (5.2). MPoolMonitor author, monitor stats/workers for most pools, global BTC stats (current/nxt diff/USD val/hashrate/calc)! Latest (v4.2) 
Buyer beware of Bitmain hardware and services.
abracadabra
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 946



View Profile
November 07, 2012, 09:05:53 PM
 #1236

I feel brain dead, getting the following error in CGMiner 2.9.1:

"JSON Stratum Auth Failed (null)"

Trying to use:

   {
      "url" : "http://stratum.ozco.in:3333",
      "user" : "MinerName",
      "pass" : "MinerPassword"
   },

Thoughts?

The miner name needs to be the complete name (user.worker)

Wave
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105


View Profile
November 07, 2012, 10:46:23 PM
 #1237

Thanks, and yes.  That should read "user.minername".
Blaksmith
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176



View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 12:39:47 AM
 #1238

Well here are my results using stratum vs. getwork

These were on the standard getwork us.ozco.in:8332.  My hash rate was 520Mhs U:7.5 WU:7.5
206873   2012-11-07 12:41:51   4,393   0.03354776
206808   2012-11-07 02:54:22   806   0.03152941
206800   2012-11-07 01:11:42   1,592   0.03447590
206778   2012-11-06 21:53:48   2,368   0.03428086

These were on Stratum stratum.ozco.in:3333.  My hash rate was 523Mhs U:6.7 WU:7.3
206752   2012-11-06 17:35:01   757   0.02448683
206736   2012-11-06 15:03:56   1,054   0.02756680
206723   2012-11-06 12:44:48   946   0.02476589
206709   2012-11-06 08:56:48   3,747   0.02780425

I've gone back to us.ozco.in:8332 for now.
Thanks,
Sam

I've observed the same thing here.  I had 2 miners pointing to stratum, one around 660mh (one 7970), one around 2gh (3x7970).  The one 7970 is running up to par.  But the 3x7970 is running subpar.  All cards were running at 650 or less, and unit output is decreased.  I generally get a unit work of 9.1/7970.  The 3x7970 was running at 22, should be around 27.  (I have another 3x7970 on p2pool, and it's at 26.)

So I've switched my 3x7970 back to LP on oz, for now I'm leaving my 1x7970 on stratum.

M
Unless you're getting lots of disconnects with stratum, and your SS: count has risen, then there is no way to blame this on stratum.

I often regret putting utility in as a counter in cgminer because it is a measure of hashrate x luck and people often blame stretches of bad luck on whatever their last software change was.

Now if it is an issue of lost shares due to disconnects, that's another story. The SS counter will tell you that.

EDIT: It's also worth noting most people are noticing a universal rise in their hashrate, which makes sense given the lack of dropout in work between getworks that stratum exhibits. Hashrate being an objective figure unrelated to luck.

I heard about the increase in hashrate as well.  I have not observed it myself though.

Here's a screenshot from LP on ozco after a few hours:

Code:
cgminer version 2.8.7 - Started: [2012-11-07 11:21:37]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):1.928G (avg):1.950Gh/s | Q:315  A:7491  R:62  HW:0  E:2378%  U:27.4/m
 TQ: 0  ST: 7  SS: 0  DW: 41  NB: 33  LW: 15384  GF: 1  RF: 0  WU: 27.6
 Connected to us2.ozco.in with LP as user xxxxxxxxx
 Block: 0471c542889416f71ade70aa...  Started: [15:49:11]  Best share: 129K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  73.0C 2796RPM | 641.7M/652.0Mh/s | A:2441 R:16 HW:0 U: 8.92/m I: 9
 GPU 1:  73.0C 2527RPM | 640.3M/645.6Mh/s | A:2523 R:18 HW:0 U: 9.22/m I: 9
 GPU 2:  73.0C 2316RPM | 650.3M/653.2Mh/s | A:2527 R:28 HW:0 U: 9.23/m I: 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll post the stratum equivalent after a few hours later for comparison.

M

One thing I see possibly wrong about the shares output that was first posted, is that it was also against different blocks, and possibly across different time spans. 

That being said, last night, there was also a hiccup in the server, where miners got disconnected unintentionally.  That issue has been resolved.  Today, about 20 min ago, we had to bounce the stratum server to implement a minor change.

I do not forsee any more issues that should cause workers to drop out, or require us to have to restart it.

Suggestion for a true "share count" test:
Use 2 identical mining rigs, on 2 separate accounts.
Have one put on the getwork server (8332) and one on stratum (3333). 
Let them run over time, and across a few blocks.  That way, each block listed will show the proper amount of shares.

After that, then it should be a fairly clean test to see which is more efficient.

"Your future is whatever you make it, so make it a good one." Dr. Emmett Brown
Donations welcome: Bitcoin: 1BLAKSMTjnME4ZJX7VzzUyEgbQYLShvqgi Catcoin: 9aw3Ttiz5yMALUm2DUj748cCHYQLatwLPz Unobtanium: uh3bjJua71jFijmz1yAB89KM8mqJEbzrek
Pool owner of: geekhash.org
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
November 08, 2012, 12:47:10 AM
 #1239

...
Suggestion for a true "share count" test:
Use 2 identical mining rigs, on 2 separate accounts.
Have one put on the getwork server (8332) and one on stratum (3333). 
Let them run over time, and across a few blocks.  That way, each block listed will show the proper amount of shares.

After that, then it should be a fairly clean test to see which is more efficient.

... ignoring statistical variation ...
The number of share found is the source to calculate U
U converges towards it's expected value after a few days ...

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


View Profile
November 08, 2012, 01:15:04 AM
 #1240

...
Suggestion for a true "share count" test:
Use 2 identical mining rigs, on 2 separate accounts.
Have one put on the getwork server (8332) and one on stratum (3333). 
Let them run over time, and across a few blocks.  That way, each block listed will show the proper amount of shares.

After that, then it should be a fairly clean test to see which is more efficient.

... ignoring statistical variation ...
The number of share found is the source to calculate U
U converges towards it's expected value after a few days ...

Mine converges within a few hours, never to change, unless I switch pools or something goes haywire.

So far it looks as if the folks here are right, stratum has nothing to do with it.  My stratum rig has been running for a few hours and shows the proper output.  Now if we can just get variable share difficulty we'll be all set for EOM. Smiley

M

MMinerMonitor author, monitor/auto/schedule reboots/alerts/remote/MobileMiner for Ants and Spondoolies! Latest (5.2). MPoolMonitor author, monitor stats/workers for most pools, global BTC stats (current/nxt diff/USD val/hashrate/calc)! Latest (v4.2) 
Buyer beware of Bitmain hardware and services.
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 ... 139 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!