[ANN][VRM] Verium PoWT | CPU mining | scrypt² | Scaling | New Roadmap Released

[r.o.o.t]

I wanted to try other pool, but it says estimated time to block 2 weeks
Is really everybody so keen to mine with the biggest pool, so they cause the death of this coin ?

[wgd]

I wanted to try other pool, but it says estimated time to block 2 weeks
Is really everybody so keen to mine with the biggest pool, so they cause the death of this coin ?

I do not have an alternative, cpuminer on europe has 500 ms ping, there is impossible to mine

[thesilex]

Hello,
I am trying to build my pool using UNOMP.
I have forwarded 10 machines, running each 2200h/m.
I could not find any blocks for 2 days.

verium.json

{
    "name": "Verium",
    "symbol": "VRM",
    "algorithm": "scrypt-n"
    "nvalue": 19,
    "peerMagic": "70352205",
    "peerMagicTestnet": "cdf2c0ef"
}

verium.conf

addnode=vrmsupernode.vericoin.info
addnode=vrmsupernode3.vericoin.info
rpcuser=username
rpcpass=password
rpcallowip=localhost
gen=0
server=1
daemon=1

Redis is installed,works.
Posix is not installed. (Webpage does not open if i install)
I did not set blocknotify.
I set stratum difficulty to 0.0001.

Should i set blocknotifier? Whats missing?
Thank you for your help..

[testbug]

I have spotted some payouts relateing the transaction fee.
Seems like bigger payouts require much more VRM (i have spotted a payout consumeing 0.6 VRM)
Payouts will get adjusted in the next 2 days. Currently i have collected enough VRM to keep the pool running, even if you only pay 0.21VRM per payout and the pool has to pay 0.4 - 0.6 VRM.
But it musst have to be changed
Pool is monitored and i also have access from my mobile phone to fix things when i am not @ home



I have spotted this:
seems like for 0-20VRM you have to pay 0.2VRM -> 20-40 0.4VRM and so on. Could a vrm dev please confirm this?

[pnosker]

I have spotted some payouts relateing the transaction fee.
Seems like bigger payouts require much more VRM (i have spotted a payout consumeing 0.6 VRM)
Payouts will get adjusted in the next 2 days. Currently i have collected enough VRM to keep the pool running, even if you only pay 0.21VRM per payout and the pool has to pay 0.4 - 0.6 VRM.
But it musst have to be changed
Pool is monitored and i also have access from my mobile phone to fix things when i am not @ home



I have spotted this:
seems like for 0-20VRM you have to pay 0.2VRM -> 20-40 0.4VRM and so on. Could a vrm dev please confirm this?

It's dependent on the number of inputs and is affected by the transaction size in kb. It can certainly be above 0.2 VRM-- if say you use 30 inputs and take 1 VRM from each of them to pay out 30 VRM total, the fee could be a few VRM itself.

[wgd]

where is devs? where is the promotion? 

[souljah1h]

where is devs? where is the promotion? 

They talked to a marketing company last week. Working on the details. Devs are at work lol.

[wgd]

I think on bittrex working hard on dumping

[_Django05_]

I tried to mine this with opt and Pooler's miner and it's flooding with BOOOOOOO's.
minerd -a scrypt -o stratum+tcp://poolinat0r.com:4443 -u x.x -p x

Not working on those 2 miners.
minerd -a scrypt:1048576 -o stratum+tcp://poolinat0r.com:4443 -u x.x -p x

what's wrong with the settings?

Edit:

guess i'm on the wrong pool.

[MarcusDe]

Anyone has working test node?

[wixfreeman]

where is devs? where is the promotion? 

They talked to a marketing company last week. Working on the details. Devs are at work lol.

an update regarding current developments, the price being a fraction of the ico buy in, solo mining essentially died -it was suppose to promote decentralization, instead half the mining is in a single pool, stuff like that.  the name of the marketing company would also help, because if a phone call to jay jay to discuss twitter marketing is the latest verium news i'll be dumping immediately. 

i know people are busy but taking 10 minutes out of the day to assemble a twitter update makes a huge difference. 

[wgd]

new fast Unomp mine available from europe, tested on testnet. We need more workers

http://verium.graymines.net:8000

Port: 9662, Diff: 0.02
Port: 9663, Diff: 0.03
Port: 9664, Diff: 0.04
Port: 9665, Diff: 0.05
Port: 9666, Diff: 0.01

--url=stratum+tcp://verium.graymines.net:[PORT] --user=[ADDRESS] --pass=[PASSWORD]

>> mine is managed by Marcus

[MarcusDe]

new fast Unomp mine available from europe, tested on testnet. We need more workers

http://verium.graymines.net:8000

Port: 9662, Diff: 0.02
Port: 9663, Diff: 0.03
Port: 9664, Diff: 0.04
Port: 9665, Diff: 0.05
Port: 9666, Diff: 0.01

--url=stratum+tcp://verium.graymines.net:[PORT] --user=[ADDRESS] --pass=[PASSWORD]

>> mine is managed by Marcus

VT69bgAhFieqCUGpoTDi2AtS6L5i7DEMer -- remember to use -a scrypt:1048576

[MarcusDe]

Guys, unless you are testing low diff abuse please use -a scrypt:1048576 in your miner command line :-)

For example:

Code:

minerd.exe -a scrypt:1048576 --url=stratum+tcp://verium.graymines.net:9666  --user=VHVb4gKjpz1dGk58XcCGxVJMbg2MHZZ9Wx  --pass=worker1

[manasd]

Guys, unless you are testing low diff abuse please use -a scrypt:1048576 in your miner command line :-)

For example:

Code:

minerd.exe -a scrypt:1048576 --url=stratum+tcp://verium.graymines.net:9666  --user=VHVb4gKjpz1dGk58XcCGxVJMbg2MHZZ9Wx  --pass=worker1

Is Verium (vrm) pool in testing mode still?

[Sir loin]

Meanwhile, in shitcointalk...

where is devs? where is the promotion?  

They talked to a marketing company last week. Working on the details. Devs are at work lol.

an update regarding current developments, the price being a fraction of the ico buy in, solo mining essentially died -it was suppose to promote decentralization, instead half the mining is in a single pool, stuff like that.  the name of the marketing company would also help, because if a phone call to jay jay to discuss twitter marketing is the latest verium news i'll be dumping immediately.  

i know people are busy but taking 10 minutes out of the day to assemble a twitter update makes a huge difference.  

So, after acknowledging that

1.- Shitcoin "the shit standard" is 20-80% down - value increase from mining i.e. from electricity+mining equipment costs were BS claims which seriously retarded devs with multiple PhDs pulled out of their asses

2.- Solo mining died - decentralized security and performance increase were also BS claims which seriously retarded devs with multiple PhDs pulled out of the same source

You hilariously threaten to dump your veriturds - take a hearty dump I guess - in a 1 BTC a day volume market?!

ahahahaha

how veritarded of you... truly pathetic

Bravo

media.giphy.com/media/cEYC1G6YexEHu/giphy.gif

[pnosker]

where is devs? where is the promotion?  

They talked to a marketing company last week. Working on the details. Devs are at work lol.

an update regarding current developments, the price being a fraction of the ico buy in, solo mining essentially died -it was suppose to promote decentralization, instead half the mining is in a single pool, stuff like that.  the name of the marketing company would also help, because if a phone call to jay jay to discuss twitter marketing is the latest verium news i'll be dumping immediately.  

i know people are busy but taking 10 minutes out of the day to assemble a twitter update makes a huge difference.  

Blue Lynx marketing. Solo mining hasn't died, considering the network hash rate was around 400 KH/min before the pool went live and is over 800 now, I'd say it's slightly stronger. All those mining on the pool are paying significant tx fees.

[wgd]

pnosker but you're doing something? Is it just you write that you do?

http://verium.graymines.net:8000/stats hit 2 blocks 

[Walrusbonzo]

VRM almost dropping below the profitability threshold. Might have to stop mining. 

[wgd]

VRM almost dropping below the profitability threshold. Might have to stop mining. 

if the dev team does nothing for two weeks, the entire ico was embarrassing. Smacks of a scam