reb0rn21
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1897
Merit: 1024
|
 |
August 22, 2016, 05:39:58 PM |
|
After you use the patched atikmdag.sys, do you still need to disable the Windonws signature verification? I am sure you need to use test mode (disabled windows signature verification) while you use patched driver and modded not signed bios... and I don`t see problem in using test mode in windows at all |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
|
August 22, 2016, 05:49:36 PM |
|
After you use the patched atikmdag.sys, do you still need to disable the Windonws signature verification? I am sure you need to use test mode (disabled windows signature verification) while you use patched driver and modded not signed bios... and I don`t see problem in using test mode in windows at all For win7 is even better.. permanet test mode. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
|
August 22, 2016, 06:18:28 PM |
|
asus rx 470 4Gb win7 x64 @1140core/7504gddrr5 (hynix ajr R0C) 26.5mh/s  What's size of rom? 256 or 512 ? |
|
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
August 22, 2016, 06:47:42 PM |
|
asus rx 470 4Gb win7 x64 @1140core/7504gddrr5 (hynix ajr R0C) 26.5mh/s What's size of rom? 256 or 512 ? 256.0 @1020/7584 ---> 26mh/s stable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xccel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
August 22, 2016, 09:04:17 PM |
|
hey men can you share your bios modded ?? THX  |
|
|
|
|
|
Longsnowsm
|
|
August 23, 2016, 12:45:13 AM |
|
Wow, fantastic work! So 1050 was a low as you can go on the core before it hurts performance? |
|
|
|
|
|
Subw
|
|
August 23, 2016, 07:10:24 AM |
|
195W for one 470?? That's huge compared to GTX1070
|
|
|
|
|
blue1984 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
August 23, 2016, 08:11:16 AM |
|
195 Watt for the Total system (ca . 60-70 Watt the System) => 120 - 130 Watt for one Card.
|
|
|
|
|
Trasamania
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
August 23, 2016, 08:34:53 AM |
|
195 Watt for the Total system (ca . 60-70 Watt the System) => 120 - 130 Watt for one Card.
I think that is quite reasonable for the 470 to have 28 MHz at 130W. For my R9 390, that is 27MH/s for 160W on the wall. |
|
|
|
|
|
h311m4n
|
|
August 23, 2016, 09:45:18 AM |
|
195 Watt for the Total system (ca . 60-70 Watt the System) => 120 - 130 Watt for one Card.
What have you clocked your core at? If you left it stock, you can probably underclock it quite a bit without hurting the hashrate, should maybe save you a few more watts. |
|
|
|
|
blue1984 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
August 23, 2016, 10:41:34 AM |
|
i will test it again with core underclock  |
|
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
August 23, 2016, 12:36:56 PM |
|
I can hit 27.4 on linux.
just keep tweaking  |
|
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
August 23, 2016, 01:32:20 PM |
|
silicon lottery |
|
|
|
|
Q_R_V
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 428
Merit: 250
Inactivity: 8963
|
|
August 23, 2016, 01:47:18 PM |
|
Can you reveal your card manufacturer and model? Curious if memory modules are the same. |
|
|
|
|
xide
Member
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
|
|
August 23, 2016, 02:40:07 PM |
|
he has Asus Strix Rog 470 4gb ,SKhynix inside
|
BTC: 1L3ZAawXD3NxH82CSF241ZNQBS25ovNZtb LTC:LMyCbS4hmmoQyBn3LNRxydsECDWoKbdL2V PPC:PEZFPZmzoVe7STyQrjgBa943dzmLHim1uo FTC:6g2rnASKaPmVvPmtJG5b4MnAWz8XSgwpVs
NMC: My7Ee36vC4eR1Pk1ucqZCMNXBpuL7SNbvZ tnx for donations!
|
|
|
Q_R_V
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 428
Merit: 250
Inactivity: 8963
|
|
August 23, 2016, 08:54:22 PM |
|
Thank you very much, i will probably go for nitro, since asus seems to be blowing air in every direction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Longsnowsm
|
|
August 24, 2016, 06:13:39 PM
Last edit: August 24, 2016, 07:14:22 PM by Longsnowsm |
|
I been playing with doing some solo mining and playing with ethminer with my rx470 rig. Ethminer seems to be producing a lot lower hash rate than Claymore. Is this normal, is there a way to get more performance from ethminer with the rx470's? I am seeing 21-22mh with the Nitro 470 8gb with ethminer where I get 24+ with Claymore with stock bios and only tuned the power levels down a bit in Wattman.
So is this normal with ethminer to mine so much slower? Is this rx470 specific? Thanks.
Update: I tweaked on the global, local work, and farm rechecks and that seems to have squeezed a little more out of it, but still only at 22-23mhs per card. Still pretty low compared to Claymore, but I question if Claymore works well when working solo. The constant disconnect and reconnect for devfee I question if the network is going to trust my node and give me blocks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subw
|
|
August 24, 2016, 08:15:49 PM |
|
did you check pool side speed or miner reported only?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Longsnowsm
|
|
August 25, 2016, 04:49:03 AM |
|
did you check pool side speed or miner reported only?
When solo mining you don't really have a pool side speed. I can say however that solo mining the speed is pretty constant unlike pool mining. So you see pretty consistent hash rates. I was using claymore, but someone brought it to my attention that Claymore might affect my ability to get blocks as the miner disconnects for the devfee. However since I am connecting multiple miners through a single instance of geth I don't know for sure if this is a factor. So I started playing with ethminer to see if that might help. That is when I noticed the hash rates are low. I fired up another miner running 390's and it seems to be hashing at about the same speed at it was with Claymore. So that is what started me wondering if the slow hashing with ethminer is a 470 thing. So I have a mixture running tonight of Claymore and Eth miner forwarding the port to a single instance of geth running. Just watching and hoping to snag some blocks. |
|
|
|
|
|
