spyder09
Member
 Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 06, 2017, 09:37:03 PM |
|
Does everyone think holding their eth is best idea right now? Do you think price will go up when reward drops in next couple months?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zzzzzzzzzz
|
|
February 06, 2017, 10:13:32 PM |
|
Does everyone think holding their eth is best idea right now? Do you think price will go up when reward drops in next couple months?
This is a Zcash mining thread (see it in the thread title?). Your question is off-topic, and there's actually an entirely different forum topic for coin market discussions. You may say "big deal", but people coming to the thread really don't want to wade through pages of posts, like yours, that don't have anything to do with the subject of the thread they came to read. |
|
|
|
|
|
malandante
|
|
February 06, 2017, 11:48:39 PM |
|
All my ZEC rigs just locked up all at once. No idea if the pool died or not but it was a hard reset.
Had to physically yank the power cord from wall and replug.
Upon checking log, they all got the Temperature 511 error. So I dont think its a hardware issue since every rig got this error all at the same time.
Anyone got this issue also?
I had this issue a couple of weeks ago with my furys. Even one of them got fried. The problem seems to be the power spikes and PSU that can't provide enough power through a single pcie connector. Plugging two separate cables on each gpu solved it and it's running rock solid since then. |
|
|
|
|
stealth2600
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2017, 02:10:24 AM
Last edit: February 07, 2017, 01:22:36 PM by stealth2600 |
|
Optiminer 1.6.1 seems to be some 15% faster on 280x and 270x, power draw is equal.
I see about a 15% increase on a Radeon R9 380X (175 h/s vs 200 h/s)and about a 35% increase on a Radeon HD 7870 (125 h/s vs 175h/s) using Optiminer. However, I've found Optiminer to be far less stable than Claymore. I've been having to restart it every 3-4 hours and I'm also seeing "block" pixelation pretty consistently while Optimer is running. I do not have these issues with Claymore and for that reason I've switched back. At this point in time neither application is perfect, so pick your poison. I'm hoping Claymore's next release can match (or exceed) the speed of Optiminer while remaining a stable build. |
|
|
|
|
fr4nkthetank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
|
|
February 07, 2017, 01:46:35 PM |
|
Optiminer 1.6.1 seems to be some 15% faster on 280x and 270x, power draw is equal.
I see about a 15% increase on a Radeon R9 380X (175 h/s vs 200 h/s)and about a 35% increase on a Radeon HD 7870 (125 h/s vs 175h/s) using Optiminer. However, I've found Optiminer to be far less stable than Claymore. I've been having to restart it every 3-4 hours and I'm also seeing "block" pixelation pretty consistently while Optimer is running. I do not have these issues with Claymore and for that reason I've switched back. At this point in time neither application is perfect, so pick your poison. I'm hoping Claymore's next release can match (or exceed) the speed of Optiminer while remaining a stable build. hmmmmmmm So far optiminer hasnt crashed on me once. Maybe scale back the core clocks ? running 380s, 390, 280x on 15.12. Maybe i'm just lucky. |
|
|
|
|
|
batko
|
|
February 07, 2017, 01:53:30 PM |
|
Optiminer 1.6.1 seems to be some 15% faster on 280x and 270x, power draw is equal.
I see about a 15% increase on a Radeon R9 380X (175 h/s vs 200 h/s)and about a 35% increase on a Radeon HD 7870 (125 h/s vs 175h/s) using Optiminer. However, I've found Optiminer to be far less stable than Claymore. I've been having to restart it every 3-4 hours and I'm also seeing "block" pixelation pretty consistently while Optimer is running. I do not have these issues with Claymore and for that reason I've switched back. At this point in time neither application is perfect, so pick your poison. I'm hoping Claymore's next release can match (or exceed) the speed of Optiminer while remaining a stable build. hmmmmmmm So far optiminer hasnt crashed on me once. Maybe scale back the core clocks ? running 380s, 390, 280x on 15.12. Maybe i'm just lucky. R9 380X 200hs with optminer?, I have 250hs with R9 380X Nitro 1040/1625 -100mV |
Donation: ETH: 0x0c8ce94dd3d1bfd09c0f887559c61d1b551e4b4d
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
February 07, 2017, 02:20:40 PM
Last edit: February 07, 2017, 03:44:46 PM by IOTUSA |
|
I'm still looking for the 'ECO Bios' for Radeon R9 Fury. Looking to drop power consumption as low as possible while maintaining ballpark stock memory and core voltage (1000/500). SAPPHIRE NITRO Radeon R9 Fury Also interested in Bios for lower power consumption on RX 480 if someone has that laying around  A small reward is available to the person posting ECO Bios for Fury or 480 |
|
|
|
stealth2600
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2017, 02:43:34 PM |
|
Optiminer 1.6.1 seems to be some 15% faster on 280x and 270x, power draw is equal.
I see about a 15% increase on a Radeon R9 380X (175 h/s vs 200 h/s)and about a 35% increase on a Radeon HD 7870 (125 h/s vs 175h/s) using Optiminer. However, I've found Optiminer to be far less stable than Claymore. I've been having to restart it every 3-4 hours and I'm also seeing "block" pixelation pretty consistently while Optimer is running. I do not have these issues with Claymore and for that reason I've switched back. At this point in time neither application is perfect, so pick your poison. I'm hoping Claymore's next release can match (or exceed) the speed of Optiminer while remaining a stable build. hmmmmmmm So far optiminer hasnt crashed on me once. Maybe scale back the core clocks ? running 380s, 390, 280x on 15.12. Maybe i'm just lucky. R9 380X 200hs with optminer?, I have 250hs with R9 380X Nitro 1040/1625 -100mV Yeah that sound right to me. The difference is my clocks are running at 980/1425, this is why your getting 50 h/s more than me. I am also running the 15.12 driver. Can you share the values your using to achieve that clock speed? I've been having trouble figuring out how to use AMD's overdrive utility to OC my cards more. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
zzzzzzzzzz
|
|
February 07, 2017, 04:26:43 PM |
|
Optiminer 1.6.1 seems to be some 15% faster on 280x and 270x, power draw is equal.
I see about a 15% increase on a Radeon R9 380X (175 h/s vs 200 h/s)and about a 35% increase on a Radeon HD 7870 (125 h/s vs 175h/s) using Optiminer. However, I've found Optiminer to be far less stable than Claymore. I've been having to restart it every 3-4 hours and I'm also seeing "block" pixelation pretty consistently while Optimer is running. I do not have these issues with Claymore and for that reason I've switched back. At this point in time neither application is perfect, so pick your poison. I'm hoping Claymore's next release can match (or exceed) the speed of Optiminer while remaining a stable build. hmmmmmmm So far optiminer hasnt crashed on me once. Maybe scale back the core clocks ? running 380s, 390, 280x on 15.12. Maybe i'm just lucky. Yep, 20+ rigs running optiv1.6.1 and rock solid, not a burp for days. |
|
|
|
|
stealth2600
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2017, 05:00:56 PM |
|
Yep, 20+ rigs running optiv1.6.1 and rock solid, not a burp for days.
I wonder what I'm doing wrong, it's just not stable for me. Any ideas? Are you running Linux or Windows on your rigs? I'm using Windows 10 with the 15.12 driver. |
|
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
February 07, 2017, 05:11:34 PM |
|
Optiminer 1.6.1 seems to be some 15% faster on 280x and 270x, power draw is equal.
I see about a 15% increase on a Radeon R9 380X (175 h/s vs 200 h/s)and about a 35% increase on a Radeon HD 7870 (125 h/s vs 175h/s) using Optiminer. However, I've found Optiminer to be far less stable than Claymore. I've been having to restart it every 3-4 hours and I'm also seeing "block" pixelation pretty consistently while Optimer is running. I do not have these issues with Claymore and for that reason I've switched back. At this point in time neither application is perfect, so pick your poison. I'm hoping Claymore's next release can match (or exceed) the speed of Optiminer while remaining a stable build. hmmmmmmm So far optiminer hasnt crashed on me once. Maybe scale back the core clocks ? running 380s, 390, 280x on 15.12. Maybe i'm just lucky. R9 380X 200hs with optminer?, I have 250hs with R9 380X Nitro 1040/1625 -100mV I think you should get more then that. My 290x is doing 340 sols under claymore on 16 driver not overclocked ad I have to keep the fan at 60%. On optiminer it runs at around 260. My 7950 is the one running at 265 sols |
|
|
|
|
|
issie81
|
|
February 07, 2017, 05:12:45 PM |
|
Optiminer 1.6.1 seems to be some 15% faster on 280x and 270x, power draw is equal.
I see about a 15% increase on a Radeon R9 380X (175 h/s vs 200 h/s)and about a 35% increase on a Radeon HD 7870 (125 h/s vs 175h/s) using Optiminer. However, I've found Optiminer to be far less stable than Claymore. I've been having to restart it every 3-4 hours and I'm also seeing "block" pixelation pretty consistently while Optimer is running. I do not have these issues with Claymore and for that reason I've switched back. At this point in time neither application is perfect, so pick your poison. I'm hoping Claymore's next release can match (or exceed) the speed of Optiminer while remaining a stable build. hmmmmmmm So far optiminer hasnt crashed on me once. Maybe scale back the core clocks ? running 380s, 390, 280x on 15.12. Maybe i'm just lucky. Yep, 20+ rigs running optiv1.6.1 and rock solid, not a burp for days. Same here.. Optiminer seems to be winning miner 5x R9 Nano at 2100/2200sol and i have 115 of them:) |
|
|
|
|
|
zzzzzzzzzz
|
|
February 07, 2017, 05:15:03 PM |
|
Yep, 20+ rigs running optiv1.6.1 and rock solid, not a burp for days.
I wonder what I'm doing wrong, it's just not stable for me. Any ideas? I think folks are losing track of the fact that each GPU type has it's own hand-optimized GCN asm kernel. These GPUs are at max load. People are pushing their clocks, undervolting, running 6 and even 7 GPUs per rigs, mixing card types (and kernels). These rigs are running on the hairy edge. Any power perturbations are going to be an issue, etc. It's almost impossible to guess why some are running solid and some not. I guess it's the price we pay for pushing the envelop. Some will say that CM's miner is so much more stable, but to this point, he isn't using per card GCN asm optimized kernels, so ... we'll have to see if his next release starts exhibiting the same quirks. |
|
|
|
|
chronek
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 273
Merit: 250
BD People Are Legend
|
|
February 07, 2017, 05:36:44 PM |
|
[...] People are pushing their clocks, undervolting, running 6 and even 7 GPUs per rigs, mixing card types (and kernels). These rigs are running on the hairy edge. Any power perturbations are going to be an issue, etc. It's almost impossible to guess why some are running solid and some not. [...]
I have heavy overclock, undervolt, modded 6 cards rig. I run hwinfo, if any card produce memory errors it will be unstable, i have to sometimes start miner 4-th 5-th time to not produce errors and then it runs stable all time .. |
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
February 07, 2017, 05:40:06 PM |
|
[...] People are pushing their clocks, undervolting, running 6 and even 7 GPUs per rigs, mixing card types (and kernels). These rigs are running on the hairy edge. Any power perturbations are going to be an issue, etc. It's almost impossible to guess why some are running solid and some not. [...]
I have heavy overclock, undervolt, 6 cards rig. I run hwinfo, if any card produce memory errors it will be unstable, i have to sometimes start miner 4-th 5-th time to not produce errors and then it runs stable all time .. Do you Bios mod or undervolt/overclock via software? If so, what software? I am trying to figure out how to run my Fury/480 at stock or over with as low power draw as possible. |
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
February 07, 2017, 05:41:04 PM |
|
Optiminer 1.6.1 seems to be some 15% faster on 280x and 270x, power draw is equal.
I see about a 15% increase on a Radeon R9 380X (175 h/s vs 200 h/s)and about a 35% increase on a Radeon HD 7870 (125 h/s vs 175h/s) using Optiminer. However, I've found Optiminer to be far less stable than Claymore. I've been having to restart it every 3-4 hours and I'm also seeing "block" pixelation pretty consistently while Optimer is running. I do not have these issues with Claymore and for that reason I've switched back. At this point in time neither application is perfect, so pick your poison. I'm hoping Claymore's next release can match (or exceed) the speed of Optiminer while remaining a stable build. hmmmmmmm So far optiminer hasnt crashed on me once. Maybe scale back the core clocks ? running 380s, 390, 280x on 15.12. Maybe i'm just lucky. Yep, 20+ rigs running optiv1.6.1 and rock solid, not a burp for days. Same here.. Optiminer seems to be winning miner 5x R9 Nano at 2100/2200sol and i have 115 of them:) Do you undervolt/overclock your Nano? I have Fury's and would like to drop my power draw. What's your settings? |
|
|
|
chronek
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 273
Merit: 250
BD People Are Legend
|
|
February 07, 2017, 05:42:35 PM |
|
[...] People are pushing their clocks, undervolting, running 6 and even 7 GPUs per rigs, mixing card types (and kernels). These rigs are running on the hairy edge. Any power perturbations are going to be an issue, etc. It's almost impossible to guess why some are running solid and some not. [...]
I have heavy overclock, undervolt, 6 cards rig. I run hwinfo, if any card produce memory errors it will be unstable, i have to sometimes start miner 4-th 5-th time to not produce errors and then it runs stable all time .. Do you Bios mod or undervolt/overclock via software? If so, what software? I am trying to figure out how to run my Fury/480 at stock or over with as low power draw as possible. Yes they have memory timings changed, i undervolt by trixx with offset, not by miner ... But i have only one rig , so i can spend some time for it, with 20+ rig it would not be good |
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
February 07, 2017, 05:44:06 PM |
|
[...] People are pushing their clocks, undervolting, running 6 and even 7 GPUs per rigs, mixing card types (and kernels). These rigs are running on the hairy edge. Any power perturbations are going to be an issue, etc. It's almost impossible to guess why some are running solid and some not. [...]
I have heavy overclock, undervolt, 6 cards rig. I run hwinfo, if any card produce memory errors it will be unstable, i have to sometimes start miner 4-th 5-th time to not produce errors and then it runs stable all time .. Do you Bios mod or undervolt/overclock via software? If so, what software? I am trying to figure out how to run my Fury/480 at stock or over with as low power draw as possible. Yes they have memory timings changed, i undervolt by trixx with offset, not by miner Care to share bios/settings? |
|
|
|
chronek
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 273
Merit: 250
BD People Are Legend
|
|
February 07, 2017, 05:45:40 PM |
|
Care to share bios/settings?
I have 6x rx480 4gb hynix, it is simple copy 1500 timing to 1750 and 2000, i run 1350/1950, -106 mV, 1580 sols 910W at wall |
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
February 07, 2017, 05:54:00 PM |
|
Care to share bios/settings?
I have 6x rx480 4gb , it is simple copy 1500 timing to 1750 and 2000, i run 1350/1950, -106 mV, 1580 sols 910W at wall Do you use a custom bios or do you use software to set the timings, clocks and voltage offset? |
|
|
|
|
