Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[WhyMe]

Can someone share his hashrate on ETH and ZEC with MSI RX 470 ARMOR 4G OC?

28M on ETH @1100/1950 with 1500 strap That's on my 480s ...

[1714201005]

1714201005

[1714201005]

1714201005

[1714201005]

1714201005

[1714201005]

1714201005

[Fujitzo]

There seems to be an issue with -li mode.
I have tested out -li 2 and -li 8 for alle cards (unmodded rx 480)

I get the same sol/s reporting rate when running with -i 6.  But far lass power use. But in the pool I only get about half the sol/s when running with -li 2.
Could there be a reporting error when running low intensity mode?

Exactly! Once I installed v12 I got stability problems on all 3 rigs (mixed 280s and 290s) I guess from the heavier Vram utilization, which is clocked to 1500 on all cards (no bios mod, just MSI aft)  So I read here about the li mode, so I switched it on and noticed immediate 20% drop in consumption and same hashrate in miner. Thought hm... too good to be true ?? But ok, let's give it a try. I mined in coinmine.pl pool for 1 night and the reported by pool speed was more than 30% lower over this period. I switched to flypool - the same. Finally removed li mode and speeds in pool improved (and payouts consequently) but are still quite far from speeds in miner. In miner I get 5300 H/s total in the pool is like 4300 - 4700 which is a whopping 17% difference. They say pool luck.. ok, but then I should be getting speeds ABOVE what I see in miner from times to times, right? So if this is due to variance the 24h average should be pretty close to what I see in miner. Why is such a big difference ?

Anyone else have such a big gap in reported speed in miner vs pool? Have you tried several pools and noticed which one is closest to speeds in miner?

Cheers

[Benchman]

+1,

Definitely problem with -li command. I'm not using it righ now. On pool, i'm getting 10-15% smaller hashrate.

[Claymore]

Again:

Do not use -li and -ttli options for now, there is a bug there:

More info:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1670733.msg17848866#msg17848866

I will release an update in 1-2 days.
Added to OP.

[IOTUSA]

+1,

Definitely problem with -li command. I'm not using it righ now. On pool, i'm getting 10-15% smaller hashrate.

Same, pool hash rate at least 10% lower than hash rate reported by Claymore, and Awesomeminer.

[adaseb]

Well its common sense, if it uses much less electricity and all, why would the hashrate stay exactly the same?

[IOTUSA]

Well its common sense, if it uses much less electricity and all, why would the hashrate stay exactly the same?

That's not what at least I mean. What I mean is that the reported hash rate in Claymore differ wildly from the reported hash rate pool-side. Something that for me is new with version 12 vs. any other version. Previously the reported hash rate as per Claymore software was very similar to the pool side reported result, not so with version 12.

[stealth.money]

Claymore, you could try to reach 450 h/s for 390x  

If you could let us know what is the wattage it would be useful, this post considered useless and no point of posting it. Say 390x could reach 555 h/s with 750w, there is not much profit. All miners want is profit/s.

[WhyMe]

Well its common sense, if it uses much less electricity and all, why would the hashrate stay exactly the same?

if, like me, you test -li for the first time with v12 only, you don't know hashrate is bad ...

[br2459]

Claymore, you could try to reach 450 h/s for 390x  

If you could let us know what is the wattage it would be useful, this post considered useless and no point of posting it. Say 390x could reach 555 h/s with 750w, there is not much profit. All miners want is profit/s.

You mean you don't mine for the fun of it?? 

[stealth.money]

Claymore, you could try to reach 450 h/s for 390x  

If you could let us know what is the wattage it would be useful, this post considered useless and no point of posting it. Say 390x could reach 555 h/s with 750w, there is not much profit. All miners want is profit/s.

You mean you don't mine for the fun of it??  

Back in the old day(Litecoin/Dogecoin) I mine for fun, now a days I'm looking to mine for profits.

[Benchman]

Well its common sense, if it uses much less electricity and all, why would the hashrate stay exactly the same?

Lol, though I found magic stealth optimisation trick.  

[rpg]

There seems to be an issue with -li mode.
I have tested out -li 2 and -li 8 for alle cards (unmodded rx 480)

I get the same sol/s reporting rate when running with -i 6.  But far lass power use. But in the pool I only get about half the sol/s when running with -li 2.
Could there be a reporting error when running low intensity mode?

Exactly! Once I installed v12 I got stability problems on all 3 rigs (mixed 280s and 290s) I guess from the heavier Vram utilization, which is clocked to 1500 on all cards (no bios mod, just MSI aft)  So I read here about the li mode, so I switched it on and noticed immediate 20% drop in consumption and same hashrate in miner. Thought hm... too good to be true ?? But ok, let's give it a try. I mined in coinmine.pl pool for 1 night and the reported by pool speed was more than 30% lower over this period. I switched to flypool - the same. Finally removed li mode and speeds in pool improved (and payouts consequently) but are still quite far from speeds in miner. In miner I get 5300 H/s total in the pool is like 4300 - 4700 which is a whopping 17% difference. They say pool luck.. ok, but then I should be getting speeds ABOVE what I see in miner from times to times, right? So if this is due to variance the 24h average should be pretty close to what I see in miner. Why is such a big difference ?

Anyone else have such a big gap in reported speed in miner vs pool? Have you tried several pools and noticed which one is closest to speeds in miner?

Cheers

yes, the only pool where i see an accurate hash is at dwarf but they are way too small and luck goes up and down like a rolercoaster

[Madmach]

R-280 - 290H/s(230W), R-380 - 200H/s(130W). Really??? Very curious algo.

[magicsys.nw]

I got 4 rigs with 290/290x, 3 of them on win10 - cant run under -i 8 (always drops to 5) and one rig with 290 with win7 runs fine eith -i 8.

[GTCG]

Claymore v.12 in Linux after 12 hours seems pretty stable even with modded Rom

Currently this is the biggest weapon of Claymore vs the Optiminer

In Linux:
Claymore is slightly more power hungry vs Optiminer
Optiminer gives slightly bigger hashing vs Claymore

But

Claymore's stability is a winner since you don't have to be there to reboot because everything is stuck like in Optiminer (stuck to the point that you can't reboot remotely)

If Claymore breaks the 2-day straight without reboot it's the winner for me

Regardless of that Claymore thanks for a great job and that you always deliver and keep promises
This shows character...

Indeed it does. His miner has been running here stable for over a month. great work.

[Rtyf]

at the beginning of mining Miner v12.0  it is one of the five cards  will not start. At v11.1 is all OK. What's the problem can be?

Win 10, 5 card's - 390x sapphire

[br2459]

at the beginning of mining Miner v12.0  it is one of the five cards  will not start. At v11.1 is all OK. What's the problem can be?

Win 10, 5 card's - 390x sapphire

Check your Virtual Memory setting in windows. If it's 16GB increase it and reboot.

[Mitja1998]

modded rx 470 -285 h/s (80W in Afterburner), modded rx480 - 305 h/s (86W in Afterburner), modded HD7950 - 245 h/s (around 110w I think). Very nice results Claymore, you made equihash most profitable algo at nicehash again.

[Schwacke]

modded rx 470 -285 h/s (80W in Afterburner), modded rx480 - 305 h/s (86W in Afterburner), modded HD7950 - 245 h/s (around 110w I think). Very nice results Claymore, you made equihash most profitable algo at nicehash again.

would you pls post your settings?

BR