gametech0101
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 20, 2017, 05:17:27 PM |
|
My setting:
Rig 1;
MOBO1 : Gigabyte z97 Gaming 7 LGA 1150
CPU: Intel Celeron G3250 LGA 1150
RAM: 4GB (2600 MHz)
Windows 10
with -i 8
GPU's
3 x MSI AMD R9 390 8GB, 1081/1500 (speed with CM V12.1 = 390 H/s)
2 x XFX AMD R9 390X 8GB, 1112/1500 (speed with CM V12.1 = 410 H/s)
1 x ASUS AMD R9 390 8GB, 1091/1500 (speed with CM V12.1 = 395 H/s)
Rig 2:
MOBO: MSI Z97 Gaming 5 LGA 1150
CPU: Intel Celeron G1840 LGA 1150
RAM: 4GB (2600 MHz)
Windows 10
With -i 8
GPU's
1 x MSI AMD R9 390 8GB, 1081/1500 (speed with CM V12.1 = 380 H/s)
1 x Gigabyte AMD Gaming G1 R9 390 8GB, 1065/1500 (speed with CM V12.1 = 388 H/s)
2 x XFX AMD Rx 480 Rs 4GB, 1400/1720 (speed with CM V12.1 = 290 H/s)
All running very well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed
timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It
takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but
hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Assaro
Member
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
|
February 20, 2017, 05:24:50 PM |
|
Hi guys.
Getting from time to time the "returned incorrect data!" message. Any idea about the problem asociation with it? Should I ignore it or will it crash after while?
Already reduced the i- from 8 to 7, same problem....
returned incorrect data!99400afb
returned incorrect data!8000d716
ty for any advice...
|
|
|
|
|
wolverinex1282
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
February 20, 2017, 05:55:02 PM |
|
Hi guys.
Getting from time to time the "returned incorrect data!" message. Any idea about the problem asociation with it? Should I ignore it or will it crash after while?
Already reduced the i- from 8 to 7, same problem....
returned incorrect data!99400afb
returned incorrect data!8000d716
ty for any advice...
just use intensity 4 or 5 .. i use intensity 2 only cause my driver always crash with 4 and above.. i got 4 280x around 285h/s per card |
|
|
|
|
economist2000
Member
Offline
Activity: 146
Merit: 10
|
|
February 20, 2017, 06:01:13 PM
Last edit: February 20, 2017, 06:27:54 PM by economist2000 |
|
Super version! 290X 12.0=346-350 sol, 12.1 = 136-186 sol!  7 x64, 16.9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
RentGPU
|
|
February 20, 2017, 06:12:21 PM |
|
Nice, the 12.1 fixed the invalid shares issue for me....thx,and more hashrate as bouns  |
2016 GPU Miner
|
|
|
gb84
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2017, 06:33:40 PM |
|
Instead of ab use wattman and everything will work just fine. (win10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
sezyumx
|
|
February 20, 2017, 06:40:16 PM |
|
Tnx claymore. Stable for 4 hours.
|
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
February 20, 2017, 07:07:57 PM
Last edit: February 20, 2017, 07:28:57 PM by rpg |
|
rx480 started at 325 and has been dropping since. Now at 280. temp and fan are normal ar 64C.
EDIT: Reverting to 12.0, there's a bug somewhere on the RX480 code. 7950 and 290x seem to be running stable although the 290x is also loosing steam (started at 380 now at 348). The rx480 is now at 275 lol
EDIT 2: now even on 12.0 is running in the 270s.
|
|
|
|
|
cracker666
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
February 20, 2017, 07:43:37 PM |
|
Super version! 290X 12.0=346-350 sol, 12.1 = 136-186 sol! 7 x64, 16.9.1 i had to reduce intensity to 6 to get mine going |
|
|
|
|
economist2000
Member
Offline
Activity: 146
Merit: 10
|
|
February 20, 2017, 07:50:08 PM |
|
Super version! 290X 12.0=346-350 sol, 12.1 = 136-186 sol! 7 x64, 16.9.1 i had to reduce intensity to 6 to get mine going Thank you! But in this case 290X speed remained at 12.0: 345-347 sol. |
|
|
|
|
crazyq
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2017, 08:14:08 PM |
|
I've got problem with my rig using 12.1 ver
On ver 12 i've got i8 and everything work smooth.
On ver 12.1 intens change from 8 to 7 automatically and rig god errors and stop mining between 3-4 sec sessions.
Anyone can tell me what's wrong with this?
Ubuntu 16.04
5 R9 Fury Air
MSI Z97 Gaming 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
February 20, 2017, 08:26:15 PM |
|
rx480 started at 325 and has been dropping since. Now at 280. temp and fan are normal ar 64C.
EDIT: Reverting to 12.0, there's a bug somewhere on the RX480 code. 7950 and 290x seem to be running stable although the 290x is also loosing steam (started at 380 now at 348). The rx480 is now at 275 lol
EDIT 2: now even on 12.0 is running in the 270s.
Edit 3: had to reboot and clear any lingering power for the rx480 to come back to its normal hashing |
|
|
|
|
CitricAcid
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2017, 08:37:02 PM |
|
So, I've read that Claymore coded some cards to use -i 7 instead of -8, which is no big deal. Glad I read it, cause knowing if half the battle.
A restart was needed between version 12 and 12.1, and copied the exact same config over from 12 to 12.1
My R9 Fury X's (stock bio's and all modifications is done in claymore config) are now pulling +500 sol's , which is what my other rig, with Nvidia 1080 cards are pulling
So, take a bow Sir! Bravo Sir...Bravo
|
|
|
|
|
stealth2600
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2017, 11:01:02 PM |
|
v12.1:
- slightly improved speed for some cards, about 410H/s on stock 390X, 450H/s on stock Nano, 290H/s on stock 280X, 300H/s on stock RX480.
- slightly improved stability. If it is still unstable for you, reduce "-i" value.
- fixed issue with wrong hashrate when "-li" or "-ttli" options enabled.
Did you make any improvements for Tonga cards in this release? Yes but not much, I see 193->200H/s on my stock 380. I don't plan any further good speedup for Tonga, these cards are really weak for zcash. Thanks Claymore! Any improvements for Tonga cards are always appreciated. On my 380X 4GB OCed at 1080/1550 I'm able to consistently keep 210 h/s using -i 6 and its been stable for several hours now. Based upon your comment, it sounds like some of us need to start considering upgrading to new hardware or mining another cryptocurrency if we'd like to keep using Tonga cards. If I decide to building another mining rig for zcash, what cards do you find the best? Is there a particular one you'd recommend? |
|
|
|
|
arielbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3402
Merit: 1059
|
|
February 20, 2017, 11:16:10 PM |
|
as usual..nice work claymore
for everyone who are having stability issues, check your mining intensity and overclocks first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
suggsy89
|
|
February 20, 2017, 11:25:01 PM |
|
With 4 x RX 480's I get 290h/s using 1150/1900 with -70mv undervolt and 1500 Timings with intensity set at 4.
Mining is very stable now after some tweaking, previously I had the core set at 1200 which was causing a huge amount of rejected shares, now it's less than 1%
|
|
|
|
|
GH
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
February 20, 2017, 11:30:23 PM |
|
Super version! 290X 12.0=346-350 sol, 12.1 = 136-186 sol! 7 x64, 16.9.1 lol, don't troll! 290x with -i 5 and 395 H/s here BTW: v12.1 average and no borderline value - 100% stable since release |
|
|
|
|
|
nesic1
|
|
February 21, 2017, 12:21:57 AM |
|
how much 7950 give and what are the clocks? i get around 261H/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
February 21, 2017, 01:09:36 AM |
|
rx480 started at 325 and has been dropping since. Now at 280. temp and fan are normal ar 64C.
EDIT: Reverting to 12.0, there's a bug somewhere on the RX480 code. 7950 and 290x seem to be running stable although the 290x is also loosing steam (started at 380 now at 348). The rx480 is now at 275 lol
EDIT 2: now even on 12.0 is running in the 270s.
Edit 3: had to reboot and clear any lingering power for the rx480 to come back to its normal hashing Edit 4: now with more time, tried again after rebooting and appears to be stable at 330 h/s |
|
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
February 21, 2017, 01:13:30 AM |
|
how much 7950 give and what are the clocks? i get around 261H/s
on mine gigabyte at 1190/1497 +10% power doing around 308 h/s. |
|
|
|
|
|
