thesaltonsea
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 15, 2017, 09:19:40 AM |
|
Hi,
i have maybe other bug , i have 2x 280x (moded bios and same clocks 1100/1555 ) and 2x 7950 (stock bios at 1000/1500) , but from some versions one of the 280x is hashing only with like 7950 speeds ...
First two are the 280x -
ZEC - Total Speed: 1095.744 H/s, Total Shares: 356, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:10
ZEC: GPU0 305.492 H/s, GPU1 269.935 H/s, GPU2 260.302 H/s, GPU3 260.095 H/s
I have tried 3 different motherboards , win7 and win10 with all version drivers (cleaning with DDU every time) , 3 different types of extenders , different psu's , i tried different slots and riser combinations but again only one of the 280x is hashing with normal speeds ...
With optminer they are hashing normaly but it is not stable and crash even without mods and oveclock.
Anyone have idea if it is a bug in the application or .... ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
feriq2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
February 15, 2017, 11:28:39 AM |
|
Hi,
i have maybe other bug , i have 2x 280x (moded bios and same clocks 1100/1555 ) and 2x 7950 (stock bios at 1000/1500) , but from some versions one of the 280x is hashing only with like 7950 speeds ...
First two are the 280x -
ZEC - Total Speed: 1095.744 H/s, Total Shares: 356, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:10
ZEC: GPU0 305.492 H/s, GPU1 269.935 H/s, GPU2 260.302 H/s, GPU3 260.095 H/s
I have tried 3 different motherboards , win7 and win10 with all version drivers (cleaning with DDU every time) , 3 different types of extenders , different psu's , i tried different slots and riser combinations but again only one of the 280x is hashing with normal speeds ...
With optminer they are hashing normaly but it is not stable and crash even without mods and oveclock.
Anyone have idea if it is a bug in the application or .... ?
check memory type and be sure that you're modifying memory straps for your memory type |
|
|
|
|
red_x
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 15, 2017, 11:56:42 AM |
|
on nanopool calculator
v11.1 - I was getting 450usd month
v12 - with more H/s i'm getting only 350usd?
|
|
|
|
|
AriesIV10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006
Mine for a Bit
|
|
February 15, 2017, 12:22:07 PM |
|
on nanopool calculator
v11.1 - I was getting 450usd month
v12 - with more H/s i'm getting only 350usd?
The price of ZEC is degrading faster than you can increase in hash. |
|
|
|
roony
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Did you see the roonies on him???
|
|
February 15, 2017, 01:29:43 PM |
|
on nanopool calculator
v11.1 - I was getting 450usd month
v12 - with more H/s i'm getting only 350usd?
The price of ZEC is degrading faster than you can increase in hash. If you want ZEC rise up again, just don't sell it |
Don't be rude, stop staring at my brows.
|
|
|
cryptowhat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
February 15, 2017, 01:32:41 PM
Last edit: February 15, 2017, 01:49:10 PM by cryptowhat |
|
on nanopool calculator
v11.1 - I was getting 450usd month
v12 - with more H/s i'm getting only 350usd?
The price of ZEC is degrading faster than you can increase in hash. My profits are down on my fury and my rx480's. It says hashing is higher however accepted shares are much lower than 11.1. Showing ~2000 sols for 7 rx480s, accepted shares steady at 1300 sols. Switched back to 11.1, new settings in nicehash 1.7.5 causing issues - Showing 1k sols only. Looks related to -ttli, manually setting it to 85 across all cards put my hash 2000~ sols and reported back in line. |
|
|
|
|
densets
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
February 15, 2017, 01:39:29 PM |
|
i have a rig with 3 rx470 and 1 280x that works with 11.1 but with v12 one cards always stays at 0.0sols. Anyone have a similar problem?
using 16.12.2
try setting virtual memory to at least 16gb or lowering intensity (-i) I would go 24GB virtual drive with v. 12 but otherwise yes. Im going to have to change that ssd since its only 32gb  |
|
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
February 15, 2017, 02:14:49 PM |
|
2100 sol/s 5x nanos underclocked and undervolted 900w @ wall @Claymore you rock my world  What bios and settings do you use on your nano for that result? |
|
|
|
byteme007
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
February 15, 2017, 02:35:29 PM |
|
Thank you claymore. I am getting about 550-560 H/s average on 2 unmodded RX 480's.
You should be getting around 600 H/s with unmodded RX 480's unless you have the 4gb version? what is command for 600h/s for rx480 8g im getting only 300max aaa on 2 rx480 |
|
|
|
|
|
rawbert
|
|
February 15, 2017, 02:37:23 PM |
|
Thank you claymore. I am getting about 550-560 H/s average on 2 unmodded RX 480's.
You should be getting around 600 H/s with unmodded RX 480's unless you have the 4gb version? what is command for 600h/s for rx480 8g im getting only 300max 600 was for 2x 480s.. |
|
|
|
thesaltonsea
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
|
|
February 15, 2017, 03:20:03 PM |
|
Hi,
i have maybe other bug , i have 2x 280x (moded bios and same clocks 1100/1555 ) and 2x 7950 (stock bios at 1000/1500) , but from some versions one of the 280x is hashing only with like 7950 speeds ...
First two are the 280x -
ZEC - Total Speed: 1095.744 H/s, Total Shares: 356, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:10
ZEC: GPU0 305.492 H/s, GPU1 269.935 H/s, GPU2 260.302 H/s, GPU3 260.095 H/s
I have tried 3 different motherboards , win7 and win10 with all version drivers (cleaning with DDU every time) , 3 different types of extenders , different psu's , i tried different slots and riser combinations but again only one of the 280x is hashing with normal speeds ...
With optminer they are hashing normaly but it is not stable and crash even without mods and oveclock.
Anyone have idea if it is a bug in the application or .... ?
check memory type and be sure that you're modifying memory straps for your memory type They are both Hynix and were working normally with same speed for months. |
|
|
|
|
red_x
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 15, 2017, 03:41:40 PM |
|
on nanopool calculator
v11.1 - I was getting 450usd month
v12 - with more H/s i'm getting only 350usd?
The price of ZEC is degrading faster than you can increase in hash. If you want ZEC rise up again, just don't sell it From one day to the other? I just stopped one miner and started the other - I'm not selling it |
|
|
|
|
roony
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Did you see the roonies on him???
|
|
February 15, 2017, 04:23:04 PM |
|
on nanopool calculator
v11.1 - I was getting 450usd month
v12 - with more H/s i'm getting only 350usd?
The price of ZEC is degrading faster than you can increase in hash. If you want ZEC rise up again, just don't sell it From one day to the other? I just stopped one miner and started the other - I'm not selling it You better not, cause price is starting to rise again |
Don't be rude, stop staring at my brows.
|
|
|
brole
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
February 15, 2017, 04:26:48 PM |
|
Thank you claymore. I am getting about 550-560 H/s average on 2 unmodded RX 480's.
You should be getting around 600 H/s with unmodded RX 480's unless you have the 4gb version? what is command for 600h/s for rx480 8g im getting only 300max aaa on 2 rx480 600h/s is impossible with single gpu I think. |
|
|
|
|
|
Demarsac
|
|
February 15, 2017, 04:45:20 PM |
|
Thank you claymore. I am getting about 550-560 H/s average on 2 unmodded RX 480's.
You should be getting around 600 H/s with unmodded RX 480's unless you have the 4gb version? what is command for 600h/s for rx480 8g im getting only 300max aaa on 2 rx480 600h/s is impossible with single gpu I think. Yes I meant for 2 RX 480's |
|
|
|
|
derselben
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
February 15, 2017, 05:06:19 PM |
|
The only difficulty I have is GCN assembler. I've spent a lot of time to create efficient environment for development in asm, that's the only reason of the delay. It's one-time delay related to all my miners, now I see that with assembler I can improve them all.
So, which one of your miner will be next? |
|
|
|
|
|
Demarsac
|
|
February 15, 2017, 05:09:16 PM |
|
As promised I also checked Clay's v.12 performance in Linux for the RX 480's
305 H/s average per GPU
Power consumption from the wall far better than WIndows 10
GPU = 480 8gb
Windows 10 = 1200 Watt from the wall, 315 H/s average
Linux = 975 watt from the wall, 305 H/s
Linux is much better ratio cost vs hash
I can say now that Claymore is almost equal to Optiminer
I am checking stability now, since Optiminer still has some stability issues
|
|
|
|
|
|
spyshagg
|
|
February 15, 2017, 05:37:21 PM |
|
I'm having 1750.00h/s with 5 290x. Is this correct? I keep seeing people reporting ~350h/s with 6 480 in the first few pages of this topic...
|
|
|
|
|
|
suggsy89
|
|
February 15, 2017, 07:10:34 PM |
|
I'm having 1750.00h/s with 5 290x. Is this correct? I keep seeing people reporting ~350h/s with 6 480 in the first few pages of this topic...
Depends on the GPU, my reference RX480's are doing 300 h/s Also, if we want zcash price to rise.. DO NOT SELL |
|
|
|
|
|
spyshagg
|
|
February 15, 2017, 07:15:02 PM |
|
I'm having 1750.00h/s with 5 290x. Is this correct? I keep seeing people reporting ~350h/s with 6 480 in the first few pages of this topic...
Depends on the GPU, my reference RX480's are doing 300 h/s Also, if we want zcash price to rise.. DO NOT SELLThanks does any one know how long does it take for suprnova to send balance onto poloniex wallet? Or should I register and keep the coins in suprnova and transfer them later? |
|
|
|
|
|
