Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 06:04:28 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 [599] 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 ... 760 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839038 times)
pilotbtc1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 89
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 05:07:46 AM
 #11961

Claymore super! My 5 cards give 2% more than Optiminer. Thank you  Grin

Since 2% is equivalent to the devfee (if you mine on an SSL/TLS connection), I'll ask if you've deducted CM's devfee from the hash rate shown in the miner log? CM shows the hash rate *before* his devfee comes out, while Optiminer shows the hash *after* the devfee is deducted. It's not a big deal, and either way is fine, but when you're making comparisons, you need to keep that in mind (and I'm not saying you didn't, just asking).


look at the payments, which the miner is better? I need time Grin
1714197868
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714197868

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714197868
Reply with quote  #2

1714197868
Report to moderator
1714197868
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714197868

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714197868
Reply with quote  #2

1714197868
Report to moderator
1714197868
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714197868

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714197868
Reply with quote  #2

1714197868
Report to moderator
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
alucard20724
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 703
Merit: 272


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 05:18:02 AM
 #11962

my one RX460 went from 100sols/s to 94 sols/s...   and it seems i can't choose asm for it... it just stays in algorithm 1
kev7112001
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 479
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 05:26:56 AM
 #11963

Wow what a nice bunch of idiots around here, asking for a pascal dual miner. You will kill the coin before you can make some profit, and the power consumption and heat would kill the cards faster than the ETH dual miner does. Dual miners squeezes the card in such way, that they last 10 months at least. I had to stop using the dual miner functions because the heat screwed 3 of my cards.

No pascal dual miner, it would be great to improve the Cryptonight miner. And if you want to release a pascal miner, do it only to improve the pascal mining process, not for dual mining. Don't kill a promising coin right now.

lol that the dumbest thing i have heard if u killed your cards next time dont run them blazin hot or buy better designed card = better components


MCXNOW MODERATOR
zzzzzzzzzz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 05:34:24 AM
 #11964

Claymore super! My 5 cards give 2% more than Optiminer. Thank you  Grin

Since 2% is equivalent to the devfee (if you mine on an SSL/TLS connection), I'll ask if you've deducted CM's devfee from the hash rate shown in the miner log? CM shows the hash rate *before* his devfee comes out, while Optiminer shows the hash *after* the devfee is deducted. It's not a big deal, and either way is fine, but when you're making comparisons, you need to keep that in mind (and I'm not saying you didn't, just asking).


look at the payments, which the miner is better? I need time Grin

Yes, I agree. It's your effective hash rate on the pool (or solo) that counts - that's what produces the revenue! Smiley
Eisenkopf89
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 262
Merit: 101



View Profile
February 14, 2017, 05:42:13 AM
 #11965

my one RX460 went from 100sols/s to 94 sols/s...   and it seems i can't choose asm for it... it just stays in algorithm 1

Same here for me the RX460 is slower now then in the old Version.
kinsik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 05:51:56 AM
 #11966

Does anyone have Fury on drivers higher than 16.3.2 as they do not support RX series?
If yes what is the speed you get?
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 1708



View Profile
February 14, 2017, 05:52:09 AM
 #11967

Wow what a nice bunch of idiots around here, asking for a pascal dual miner. You will kill the coin before you can make some profit, and the power consumption and heat would kill the cards faster than the ETH dual miner does. Dual miners squeezes the card in such way, that they last 10 months at least. I had to stop using the dual miner functions because the heat screwed 3 of my cards.

No pascal dual miner, it would be great to improve the Cryptonight miner. And if you want to release a pascal miner, do it only to improve the pascal mining process, not for dual mining. Don't kill a promising coin right now.

lol that the dumbest thing i have heard if u killed your cards next time dont run them blazin hot or buy better designed card = better components



Pretty sure he is making stuff up.

Dual mining uses like 40-50 Watts more on a 280X. So it uses 250 Watts instead of 200 Watt solo mining ETH.

Back in Scrypt LiteCoin days, each 280X used 350 Watts and we were all fine.

On the newer RX cards, I think dual mining uses even less power.

.BEST..CHANGE.███████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████████
..BUY/ SELL CRYPTO..
ffthomas
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 06:05:54 AM
 #11968

Make cryptonote not crash on RX 4x series.  God damned crashing non stop on default bios.  Zcash 11.1 runs for 500+ hours but i want to mine cryptonote coins.  Less than one hour before crash.  Pile of shit!

Same problem here. That's why I can't mine XMR so I need to stay on ZEC. It's rock-stable Wink
citronick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080


---- winter*juvia -----


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 06:35:14 AM
 #11969

Make cryptonote not crash on RX 4x series.  God damned crashing non stop on default bios.  Zcash 11.1 runs for 500+ hours but i want to mine cryptonote coins.  Less than one hour before crash.  Pile of shit!

Same problem here. That's why I can't mine XMR so I need to stay on ZEC. It's rock-stable Wink


sgminer-gm v5.5.5 and wolf 0.4 is better and stable for XMR mining - until Claymore updates the XMR miner for RX cards....

If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
Qazo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 211
Merit: 101



View Profile
February 14, 2017, 06:39:18 AM
 #11970

Yeah I did not concentrate on tonga cards.
I can reach 430H/s on stock 390X. Or I can try to add Pascal coin to dual miner, or improve CryptoNight miner. Need to select.

please update cryptonight miner, it's unstable to use
ffthomas
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 06:46:34 AM
 #11971

I tried CZM12 and it works great!

I got 289H/s on one of my RX470 4GB ref. (Sapphire) card, with ASM, -i 6, stock bios. The average values on these cards are about 280H/s.

Thank you @claymore!  Wink
Pennywis3
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 327
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 07:02:42 AM
 #11972

Another vote for XMR here.

Zcash seems to be loosing value and we don't realy know what will happen with ETH in the following months so i guess XMR is the best option to develop atm.
Love the power consumption on XMR  Cheesy
devlin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 272
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 07:08:06 AM
 #11973

Nice speed improvement.
"...not enough memory, intensity value reduced (5)" this is related to GPU memory or system memory? For me  280X and 7950 with 3G can run at i 5.
ffthomas
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 07:25:42 AM
 #11974

I tried CZM12 and it works great!

I got 289H/s on one of my RX470 4GB ref. (Sapphire) card, with ASM, -i 6, stock bios. The average values on these cards are about 280H/s.

Thank you @claymore!  Wink

~295H/s on RX480 8G
~400-410H/s on 390X
~380H/s on 390
~160-165H/s on 380X (no improvement for Tonga)
chohav
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 14, 2017, 07:28:04 AM
 #11975

Great work with v12.0, improved speed on all of my rigs. Sapphire Nitro+ RX470 4GB doing 295h/s.
And I vote for improving the CryptoNight miner too.
Mr047
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 07:28:56 AM
 #11976

History of speed improvement (Sol per version)

GPU----   v12   v11   v10   v9.2   v9    v8     v7    v6    v5    v4    v3    v2
7870---   170   150   140   140   140   110    95    65    55    40    35    32
7950---   265   235   205   190   190   180   155   125   95    70    45    38
7970---   290   250   205   210   210   200   165   120   95    65    55    48
270x---   180   150   145   145   145   115   100    67    55    40    35    32
280x---   290   255   220   210   210   200   165   125   90    65    60    51
285----    190   160   150   150   150   125   110    85   70    40    36    32
RX 470    290   245   230   217   207   180   155   144   120  70    60    47


Demarsac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 272



View Profile
February 14, 2017, 07:36:13 AM
 #11977

Good Work Claymore

Indeed speed is increased
Out of 6 RX 480's I am now getting 1860-1880 H/s
That is 310-315 H/s per GPU

The power consumption though is still High
Measured from the wall i get 1150 Watts

In comparison with Optiminer i get
1840 H/s That is an average of 305-307 H/s per GPU
But measured from the wall i get 940 Watts

So for the people that pay their electricity Opti ( In Linux) is still a better deal

PS. I am about to check Claymore in Linux also to see if i get better consumption
ffthomas
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 07:48:43 AM
 #11978

Great work with v12.0, improved speed on all of my rigs. Sapphire Nitro+ RX470 4GB doing 295h/s.
And I vote for improving the CryptoNight miner too.

+1 for CN miner upgrade and optimization for Polaris cards
deadsix
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 751
Merit: 517


Fail to plan, and you plan to fail.


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 08:10:21 AM
 #11979

History of speed improvement (Sol per version)

GPU----   v12   v11   v10   v9.2   v9    v8     v7    v6    v5    v4    v3    v2
7870---   170   150   140   140   140   110    95    65    55    40    35    32
7950---   265   235   205   190   190   180   155   125   95    70    45    38
7970---   290   250   205   210   210   200   165   120   95    65    55    48
270x---   180   150   145   145   145   115   100    67    55    40    35    32
280x---   290   255   220   210   210   200   165   125   90    65    60    51
285----    190   160   150   150   150   125   110    85   70    40    36    32
RX 470    290   245   230   217   207   180   155   144   120  70    60    47


Great job maintaining that history mate.

Ethereum/Zcash/Monero Mining Bangalore https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1703592
Spectr12341234
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 14, 2017, 08:35:44 AM
 #11980

Pleas up speed r9 380  Cry r9 380 4gb memory have 190 h/s, in game testing is  10 to 15 percent less R9 280, 280 but we 295 h/s Undecided
Pages: « 1 ... 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 [599] 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 ... 760 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!