Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 08:30:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 [436] 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 ... 760 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839038 times)
bolt1909
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 10:41:58 AM
 #8701

9.1 going to be slow...nvidia card take over ZCASH...
BitcoinCleanup.com: Learn why Bitcoin isn't bad for the environment
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
joaocha
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 10:50:32 AM
 #8702

Mostly of Problems in stabilty are in Psu or the Pcie Riser power cable,

I have 7 Rigs, 2 of them was getting freeze/reboot problems,

*What i Did, replaced all Pcie Riser power cable, almost all of them have the yellow cable pretty burned or destroyed (chinese crapy)

*On my 5x480 Rig, I have 2 Corsair 750W,  1 PSU for 3x480 and 1 PSU for 2x480 + motherboard, everything is pretty smooth now
kuna95
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 10:59:38 AM
 #8703

On flypool they use fix difficulty (2000) for default setting. You can set it manually in password parameter.

Should I set the diff higher for a 6*RX400 rig?

Is vardiff better than using fix difficulty?

For the 6X RX 400 cards, it is better to use the default 2000 difficulty level so you send out one share about 1.5  second.

test with 32768

1 share = 2000 (diff) real share
1 share = 32768 (diff) real share
gaah
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 11:06:52 AM
 #8704

Claymore PLS drop new ver today! <3
Mapuo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1002



View Profile
December 16, 2016, 12:07:12 PM
 #8705


NVDIA's miner did huge progress. Worry they will be better for ZCASH mining. Lots of AMD users may be upset.


 On a $/hash basis, Claymore v9.1 on my RX 470s leads the Nicehash eqm miner on my 1070s by a fair bit even though I haven't worked with settings on the RX 470s as much - but the advantage got a LOT narrower with the .3a eqm version, and the 1070 does win now on hash/watt by a narrow margin if you aim for max efficiency.


 I don't think the AMD fanboys have much to worry about, nor do the NVidia fanboys have a lot to crow over.


 Just out of curiosity though, I would be interested in seeing what a Titan X Pascal could do on sol/s. 8-O


Please, stop spaming. Use edit button.
Apened
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 504


View Profile WWW
December 16, 2016, 01:12:22 PM
 #8706

Claymore; are you planning to fix the stability issues in 9.1? my rigs are still crashing in this version but work fine with 8.0.

They question has been answered already. There's no issues with the miner. Make sure your PSU's have plenty of capacity or downgrade to v8 as future releases will probably push GPU cards more.
Sometimes can help driver uninstalling after DDU cleaning...
btw i have 2xCorsair cs850m for 6xSapphire 390 - -30mv at the afterburner power consumtion 1140 core and 1500 mem. -1830 sols with -i 6
This rig always starts ok and crashes very seldom - 1-3 times per month

There is nothing wrong with the driver. You just need to reduce the core or the memory frequency. It will be fine then.
patientx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 01:36:33 PM
 #8707

Anyone here using 9.1 with nicehashminer ? I am still at v9.0 and didn't update it yet. Is it working good with that software and is there any improvements at all if I update ?
naeme18720
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 01:43:48 PM
 #8708

Hi to all

why my share found very very hight  327ms-1200ms--120ms--its Different why???

My memoory rom 4GB---and--cpu g3240 3.1Ghz..motherboard b85 asus

im tested all connection in pool drawfpool...but not fixed...what are you doing ...this see picture

in realy this problem in flypool i have......my problem where???


anticlimax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 01:49:52 PM
 #8709

Hi to all

why my share found very very hight  327ms-1200ms--120ms--its Different why???

My memoory rom 4GB---and--cpu g3240 3.1Ghz..motherboard b85 asus

im tested all connection in pool drawfpool...but not fixed...what are you doing ...this see picture

in realy this problem in flypool i have......my problem where???




My god, those poor fans.


twitter @antiiclimax
ivomm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1852
Merit: 2841


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 02:18:02 PM
 #8710

Hi to all

why my share found very very hight  327ms-1200ms--120ms--its Different why???

My memoory rom 4GB---and--cpu g3240 3.1Ghz..motherboard b85 asus

im tested all connection in pool drawfpool...but not fixed...what are you doing ...this see picture

in realy this problem in flypool i have......my problem where???




Кo peчe, кo?
thecasabe
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 02:22:18 PM
 #8711

 Smiley Wink
carlo_0000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 03:27:15 PM
 #8712

Anyone here using 9.1 with nicehashminer ? I am still at v9.0 and didn't update it yet. Is it working good with that software and is there any improvements at all if I update ?
fees are 5 too 3% if i remember, so yes  you get more after update
IOTUSA
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 16, 2016, 03:27:39 PM
 #8713

9.1 going to be slow...nvidia card take over ZCASH...

there are maybe 1/10th as many nVidia cards in mining operation as AMD, and they cost roughly 2.5x as much to reach equivalent hash rate. It won't even be noticeable.

GTCG
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 03:30:31 PM
 #8714

I'm running Claymore version 9.1. Everything is running stable:

Code:
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:21 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 374.633 H/s, Total Shares: 12364, Rejected: 61, Time: 18:59
ZEC: GPU0 201.921 H/s, GPU1 172.712 H/s
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:30 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:42 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:57 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:59 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:01 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=53C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:26 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:32 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:33 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (202 ms)!
ZEC: Share accepted (218 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:37 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (437 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:50 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:52 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (374 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:45:02 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 375.053 H/s, Total Shares: 12386, Rejected: 61, Time: 19:01
ZEC: GPU0 201.920 H/s, GPU1 173.142 H/s
This line concerns me:
GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
I have 2 GPU's running: 2x HD 7950

GPU1 seems to be acting lazy. How comes that the fan is only at 16% and t = 52C? It seems to me like the card is not performing as it should. Is this behavior normal?

There does not seem to be any ouput  about the amount of sols. Is there a way I can calculate this looking at the amount of Hashes per second?

I'm concerned about the fanspeed of GPU 0 as well, it's about 87%. What is the normal fan speed while mining?
ghostfaceuk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 410
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 03:35:00 PM
 #8715

I'm running Claymore version 9.1. Everything is running stable:

Code:
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:21 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 374.633 H/s, Total Shares: 12364, Rejected: 61, Time: 18:59
ZEC: GPU0 201.921 H/s, GPU1 172.712 H/s
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:30 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:42 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:57 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:59 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:01 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=53C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:26 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:32 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:33 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (202 ms)!
ZEC: Share accepted (218 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:37 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (437 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:50 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:52 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (374 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:45:02 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 375.053 H/s, Total Shares: 12386, Rejected: 61, Time: 19:01
ZEC: GPU0 201.920 H/s, GPU1 173.142 H/s
This line concerns me:
GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
I have 2 GPU's running: 2x HD 7950

GPU1 seems to be acting lazy. How comes that the fan is only at 16% and t = 52C? It seems to me like the card is not performing as it should. Is this behavior normal?

There does not seem to be any ouput  about the amount of sols. Is there a way I can calculate this looking at the amount of Hashes per second?

I'm concerned about the fanspeed of GPU 0 as well, it's about 87%. What is the normal fan speed while mining?


GPU 1 is giving you 172 sol/s, whiich is lower than GPU 0's 201.

have you attempted any clocking with the cards?  it may be worth checking with GPU-z or afterburner what clock/memory settings the cards are using.

as for the fan usage have you set a -tt figure in the batch file? the lower you set the temperature the harder the fans have to work
naeme18720
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 03:40:02 PM
 #8716

Hi to all

why my share found very very hight  327ms-1200ms--120ms--its Different why???

My memoory rom 4GB---and--cpu g3240 3.1Ghz..motherboard b85 asus

im tested all connection in pool drawfpool...but not fixed...what are you doing ...this see picture

in realy this problem in flypool i have......my problem where???




My god, those poor fans.



what??? how are you??

what are i doing??
naeme18720
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 03:42:34 PM
 #8717

I'm running Claymore version 9.1. Everything is running stable:

Code:
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:21 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 374.633 H/s, Total Shares: 12364, Rejected: 61, Time: 18:59
ZEC: GPU0 201.921 H/s, GPU1 172.712 H/s
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:30 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:42 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:57 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:43:59 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:01 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=87%, GPU1 t=53C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:26 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:32 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:33 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (202 ms)!
ZEC: Share accepted (218 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:37 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (437 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:50 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:52 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (46 ms)!
GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (374 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:44:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 12/16/16-13:45:02 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3443
ZEC - Total Speed: 375.053 H/s, Total Shares: 12386, Rejected: 61, Time: 19:01
ZEC: GPU0 201.920 H/s, GPU1 173.142 H/s
This line concerns me:
GPU0 t=68C fan=82%, GPU1 t=52C fan=16%
I have 2 GPU's running: 2x HD 7950

GPU1 seems to be acting lazy. How comes that the fan is only at 16% and t = 52C? It seems to me like the card is not performing as it should. Is this behavior normal?

There does not seem to be any ouput  about the amount of sols. Is there a way I can calculate this looking at the amount of Hashes per second?

I'm concerned about the fanspeed of GPU 0 as well, it's about 87%. What is the normal fan speed while mining?


please help me...my share found 300 ms ..whay??? how i fixed this share found???
ghostfaceuk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 410
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 03:47:13 PM
 #8718


please help me...my share found 300 ms ..whay??? how i fixed this share found???

are you using the pool closest to your location?  using a pool in a different location can increase the time it takes for a share to be accepted
ilia_vs
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 03:53:08 PM
 #8719

Hi to all

why my share found very very hight  327ms-1200ms--120ms--its Different why???

My memoory rom 4GB---and--cpu g3240 3.1Ghz..motherboard b85 asus

im tested all connection in pool drawfpool...but not fixed...what are you doing ...this see picture

in realy this problem in flypool i have......my problem where???




Кo peчe, кo?
Бa и aз нe гo вдяaaм кo викa Smiley
naeme18720
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 16, 2016, 04:01:39 PM
 #8720


please help me...my share found 300 ms ..whay??? how i fixed this share found???

are you using the pool closest to your location?  using a pool in a different location can increase the time it takes for a share to be accepted

ok ..I lived in iran...what server for me is beter in drawfpool???
Pages: « 1 ... 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 [436] 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 ... 760 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!