Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 07:15:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 [412] 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 ... 760 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839038 times)
mettalmag
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003


≡v≡


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:35:06 AM
 #8221

I use numeric system twall.001 and etc,
but all the shares rejected dunno why, trying different ports now

Can't say I have much rejected shares with dwarfpool. Is your latency on accepted shares good?

ok so so far no rejected shares on port 3337, lets wait 10 more minutes,
as far as I know dwarfpool doesn't support ssl right ?

At this point, last I saw it doesn't support SSL. Even so, I'm still getting considerably more from dwarfpool than flypool (didn't use to be that way).
I was on coinmine.pl now I have to switch to dwarfpool I think its better,
update: after switching diff port to 3337 I got zero rejected shares, but I don't understand the difference between mining difficulties
1714504519
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714504519

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714504519
Reply with quote  #2

1714504519
Report to moderator
1714504519
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714504519

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714504519
Reply with quote  #2

1714504519
Report to moderator
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714504519
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714504519

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714504519
Reply with quote  #2

1714504519
Report to moderator
1714504519
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714504519

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714504519
Reply with quote  #2

1714504519
Report to moderator
1714504519
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714504519

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714504519
Reply with quote  #2

1714504519
Report to moderator
ghostfaceuk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 410
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:42:45 AM
 #8222

I use numeric system twall.001 and etc,
but all the shares rejected dunno why, trying different ports now

Can't say I have much rejected shares with dwarfpool. Is your latency on accepted shares good?

ok so so far no rejected shares on port 3337, lets wait 10 more minutes,
as far as I know dwarfpool doesn't support ssl right ?

At this point, last I saw it doesn't support SSL. Even so, I'm still getting considerably more from dwarfpool than flypool (didn't use to be that way).
I was on coinmine.pl now I have to switch to dwarfpool I think its better,
update: after switching diff port to 3337 I got zero rejected shares, but I don't understand the difference between mining difficulties

I've been with Dwarfpool for nearly 24hrs now, using the :3333 port and have been getting what I would expect for 410h/s which is about 0./04 - 0.05 ZEC a day.

http://http://imgur.com/a/LIUfQ
mettalmag
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003


≡v≡


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:47:11 AM
 #8223

I use numeric system twall.001 and etc,
but all the shares rejected dunno why, trying different ports now

Can't say I have much rejected shares with dwarfpool. Is your latency on accepted shares good?

ok so so far no rejected shares on port 3337, lets wait 10 more minutes,
as far as I know dwarfpool doesn't support ssl right ?

At this point, last I saw it doesn't support SSL. Even so, I'm still getting considerably more from dwarfpool than flypool (didn't use to be that way).
I was on coinmine.pl now I have to switch to dwarfpool I think its better,
update: after switching diff port to 3337 I got zero rejected shares, but I don't understand the difference between mining difficulties

I've been with Dwarfpool for nearly 24hrs now, using the :3333 port and have been getting what I would expect for 410h/s which is about 0./04 - 0.05 ZEC a day.

http://http://imgur.com/a/LIUfQ
after more than 10 minutes I got 35 shares and 0 rejected on port 3337
I'll try to switch 15 more rigs and see
ghostfaceuk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 410
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:48:55 AM
 #8224

I use numeric system twall.001 and etc,
but all the shares rejected dunno why, trying different ports now

Can't say I have much rejected shares with dwarfpool. Is your latency on accepted shares good?

ok so so far no rejected shares on port 3337, lets wait 10 more minutes,
as far as I know dwarfpool doesn't support ssl right ?

At this point, last I saw it doesn't support SSL. Even so, I'm still getting considerably more from dwarfpool than flypool (didn't use to be that way).
I was on coinmine.pl now I have to switch to dwarfpool I think its better,
update: after switching diff port to 3337 I got zero rejected shares, but I don't understand the difference between mining difficulties

I've been with Dwarfpool for nearly 24hrs now, using the :3333 port and have been getting what I would expect for 410h/s which is about 0./04 - 0.05 ZEC a day.

http://http://imgur.com/a/LIUfQ
after more than 10 minutes I got 35 shares and 0 rejected on port 3337
I'll try to switch 15 more rigs and see

Hope youve got everything sorted now and those rejects stay low or removed completely
Hotmetal
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:56:10 AM
 #8225

after more than 10 minutes I got 35 shares and 0 rejected on port 3337
I'll try to switch 15 more rigs and see

Aren't you managing all those rigs in an automated manner? Sounds like you're doing things manually.
mettalmag
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003


≡v≡


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:57:48 AM
 #8226

after more than 10 minutes I got 35 shares and 0 rejected on port 3337
I'll try to switch 15 more rigs and see

Aren't you managing all those rigs in an automated manner? Sounds like you're doing things manually.
I'm doing it manually, till now all of them were on 9.0 and on coinmine.pl
atm I updated 12 rigs to 9.1 and switched them to dwarfpool
yslyung
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002


Mine Mine Mine


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:07:39 AM
 #8227

I'm also getting more at dwarf. much better that fly pool.

it's definitely v9-9.1 issue with regards to spikes & instability.

let's see if next version fixes it.
aidia
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 257
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:09:49 AM
 #8228

What kind of hashes should I except with r9 270x 2gb?

mettalmag
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003


≡v≡


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:12:55 AM
 #8229

I'm also getting more at dwarf. much better that fly pool.

it's definitely v9-9.1 issue with regards to spikes & instability.

let's see if next version fixes it.
I switched 1/5 of all my rigs lets see what happens,
also I'm confused about different difficulties on dwarfpool
Main-Port (vardiff): 3333
Stratum-Port (diff=8): 3334 for CPU
Stratum-Port (diff=128): 3335 for videocards
Stratum-Port (diff=512): 3336 for rigs
Stratum-Port (diff=1024): 3337 for big rigs
beIbox
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:36:50 AM
 #8230

I have 0.4% / 24h rejected shares at flypool
e46btc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157
Merit: 103


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:43:47 AM
 #8231

I'm also getting more at dwarf. much better that fly pool.

it's definitely v9-9.1 issue with regards to spikes & instability.

let's see if next version fixes it.
I switched 1/5 of all my rigs lets see what happens,
also I'm confused about different difficulties on dwarfpool
Main-Port (vardiff): 3333
Stratum-Port (diff=8): 3334 for CPU
Stratum-Port (diff=128): 3335 for videocards
Stratum-Port (diff=512): 3336 for rigs
Stratum-Port (diff=1024): 3337 for big rigs
3333 works fine.
BTW Dwarfpool shows actual hashrate and it is almost 10% higher than Flypool.
Dwarf also the honest one for long time on ETH.

https://txid.io https://double-spending.com - Automatic BTC double-spending tool.  Legacy, Segwit and Bech32 supported.
https://dgb256.online - Digibyte mining pool , https://combine.dgb256.online - DGB mining payouts consolidation service.
https://sha256.io , https://solomining.io - DGB, BTC, BCH SOLO pools, Instant payouts, AsicBoost supported
kiffner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 505
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:45:23 AM
 #8232

What kind of hashes should I except with r9 270x 2gb?


This are actualy prety good..  135 - 140 sols - v9.1. Good ratio w/sol.. Specialy if undervolted
mettalmag
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003


≡v≡


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:46:45 AM
 #8233

I'm also getting more at dwarf. much better that fly pool.

it's definitely v9-9.1 issue with regards to spikes & instability.

let's see if next version fixes it.
I switched 1/5 of all my rigs lets see what happens,
also I'm confused about different difficulties on dwarfpool
Main-Port (vardiff): 3333
Stratum-Port (diff=8): 3334 for CPU
Stratum-Port (diff=128): 3335 for videocards
Stratum-Port (diff=512): 3336 for rigs
Stratum-Port (diff=1024): 3337 for big rigs
3333 works fine.
BTW Dwarfpool shows actual hashrate and it is almost 10% higher than Flypool.
Dwarf also the honest one for long time on ETH.
on eth we were using dwarfpool without any issues
here are the stats of last hour after switching some of my rigs to dwarfpool on zec:

I can't get what Shares with diff means :/
osnwt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353
Merit: 251


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:48:32 AM
 #8234

how can I enable worker names in case of dwarfpool Huh i'm confused

Use only numbers as worker name, for example -zwal t1RjQjDbPQ9Syp97DHFyzvgZhcjgLTMwhaq.1
When I tried to use something like t1RjQjDbPQ9Syp97DHFyzvgZhcjgLTMwhaq.a1 in past, when setting up ETH mining, I got errors until I discovered that only numbers worked.

Not for DwarfPool:

Code:
1. rig01	1610.76	16-12-12, 12:24:58 (1 minute ago)	1240	158720	517	66176
2. rig02 1374.81 16-12-12, 12:25:02 (1 minute ago) 1020 130560 429 54912
3. rig03 1535.46 16-12-12, 12:24:59 (1 minute ago) 1190 152320 492 62976

It worked for Ethereum as well @ DwarfPool.

I was on coinmine.pl now I have to switch to dwarfpool I think its better,
update: after switching diff port to 3337 I got zero rejected shares, but I don't understand the difference between mining difficulties

It controls the share rate of your rig. If you have lot of "easy" shares, it only adds load to pool and your Internet link. If you have "difficult" shares, they come with big time intervals and hashrate shown will have high variance. So using vardiff the pool adapts to the hashrate of your rig making share rate optimal.

You may want to choose easier shares for a single reason: if your internet uplink is not ideal and sometimes loses shares, then you lose more in case of "difficult" share (you may mine a minute and share is lost thus all minute is lost). In that case I would choose easier ones so one lost share does not cost me few percents. If your uplink is good, use vardiff port.

PS.Statistically, losses should not depend on share rate if probability of lost share is the same. But in reality we have a TCP connection that may be lost. So the sooner you find it's lost, the better. In case of lot of easy shares you find that soon and lose few seconds of mining. In case of rare shares (let's say 1 per 5 minutes) losses are higher.
mettalmag
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003


≡v≡


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:53:56 AM
 #8235

how can I enable worker names in case of dwarfpool Huh i'm confused

Use only numbers as worker name, for example -zwal t1RjQjDbPQ9Syp97DHFyzvgZhcjgLTMwhaq.1
When I tried to use something like t1RjQjDbPQ9Syp97DHFyzvgZhcjgLTMwhaq.a1 in past, when setting up ETH mining, I got errors until I discovered that only numbers worked.

Not for DwarfPool:

Code:
1. rig01	1610.76	16-12-12, 12:24:58 (1 minute ago)	1240	158720	517	66176
2. rig02 1374.81 16-12-12, 12:25:02 (1 minute ago) 1020 130560 429 54912
3. rig03 1535.46 16-12-12, 12:24:59 (1 minute ago) 1190 152320 492 62976

It worked for Ethereum as well @ DwarfPool.

I was on coinmine.pl now I have to switch to dwarfpool I think its better,
update: after switching diff port to 3337 I got zero rejected shares, but I don't understand the difference between mining difficulties

It controls the share rate of your rig. If you have lot of "easy" shares, it only adds load to pool and your Internet link. If you have "difficult" shares, they come with big time intervals and hashrate shown will have high variance. So using vardiff the pool adapts to the hashrate of your rig making share rate optimal.

You may want to choose easier shares for a single reason: if your internet uplink is not ideal and sometimes loses shares, then you lose more in case of "difficult" share (you may mine a minute and share is lost thus all minute is lost). In that case I would choose easier ones so one lost share does not cost me few percents. If your uplink is good, use vardiff port.

PS.Statistically, losses should not depend on share rate if probability of lost share is the same. But in reality we have a TCP connection that may be lost. So the sooner you find it's lost, the better. In case of lot of easy shares you find that soon and lose few seconds of mining. In case of rare shares (let's say 1 per 5 minutes) losses are higher.
so you are saying no matter how big my farm is I have to use vardiff port 3333 to loose less ?
but why on 3333 port was so much rejected shares ?
markus124
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:55:28 AM
 #8236

I'm also getting more at dwarf. much better that fly pool.

it's definitely v9-9.1 issue with regards to spikes & instability.

let's see if next version fixes it.
I switched 1/5 of all my rigs lets see what happens,
also I'm confused about different difficulties on dwarfpool
Main-Port (vardiff): 3333
Stratum-Port (diff=8): 3334 for CPU
Stratum-Port (diff=128): 3335 for videocards
Stratum-Port (diff=512): 3336 for rigs
Stratum-Port (diff=1024): 3337 for big rigs

if ur rig is hashing at 1024 in claymore miner and u use port=3337 then u should see one share per second in ur miner control. If u use 3336 u should get 2 shares. Vardiff port, adjust difficulty to not spam the pool with shares, in my case im mining at 1020 hashes per second and my difficulty is adjusted to 16384. So I'm getting one share per 16 seconds. (16384/1020).
osnwt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353
Merit: 251


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:56:55 AM
 #8237

I can't get what Shares with diff means :/
Shares: real shares you rig sent
Shares with diff: equivalent number of "easiest" shares (same for all miners and rigs).

Now you see that single real share for your last rig is equal to 1024 easiest shares.
In my case I have not so good uplink and I chose easier shares (not vardiff), and my real share is equal to 128 easiest ones. Probably I will switch back to another port.
mettalmag
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003


≡v≡


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 12:04:57 PM
 #8238

So for me using high diff port is good choice right ?
gaah
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 12:07:14 PM
 #8239

i have been on flypool 30 days Sad and dwarfpool for 38 hours flypool took 0.02 every 24 hours from me i did get 0.04 there on dwarfpool i get 0.06 it's like 20% more on dwarf so don't use flypool they rob you.
osnwt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353
Merit: 251


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 12:09:02 PM
 #8240

So for me using high diff port is good choice right ?
If you have low share losses, then it should be good. But vardiff works well and adopts difficulty to hashrate of your rigs. So I would not bother if have less then 0.5% lost shares and use 3333 port.
Pages: « 1 ... 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 [412] 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 ... 760 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!