Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 11:00:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 [421] 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 ... 760 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839038 times)
Botnake
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 667



View Profile
December 13, 2016, 11:59:10 AM
 #8401

@Claymore
Rig 6xR9 390 1150/1500

v.1.0 - v.8.0 - 0 crashes for all the time.

v.9.0/9.1 – crashes each 10-15 min, various GPUs. (any -i value)

Something is wrong with this version.
Rollback on v.8 returns stability.

Again and again.
Problems can be:
1. PSU  wattage load
2. PSU ripple suppression
3. PSU voltage regulation at different load variations
4. Bad risers and other cables. (Least likely if still working in other versions)
5. Incorrectly configuring windows

Answer to myself, maybe be helpful for someone.

The problem was in Radeon driver. If all of previous versions worked fine with v. 16.10 (including Claymore's ethereum miner), the version 9/9.1 in some configurations (including my 6xR9 390) works only* with drivers v. 15.12.
For sporting interest, made few clean re-installation to purity of the findings.

310 h/s from 1 GPU (-i 8 )  now.

2. Tips in 1-5 - utter nonsense and completely useless demagoguery. Only misleads readers.

So 15.12 is more stable?

█████▄▄██
███▄█████
██▄███████▄
████████████████
███▀██████████▀
██▄████████████▄
░█████▀▀▀▀▀▀█████
████▀████████▀████
▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄█████████
█████▀███████▄████
███████▀▀▄▄▄█████
███████████████▀
████████████▀▀
OMBARD.com|.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
██████░██░████░██
▄▄░▄▄░▄▄░▄▄░▄▄░▄▄▄▄
▀▀░▀▀░▀▀░▀▀░▀▀░▀▀▀▀
██████████████
▄▄░▄▄▄▄░▄▄░▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀░▀▀▀▀▀▀
██░██░██████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄░▄▄░▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀░▀▀░▀▀▀▀
.
PICK,
PLAY,
PROSPER!
|.

██████
██████████
██████████
██████████████
████████████████
████████████████
████████████████
████████████████
████████████████
█████████████████   ██
PROVABLY
FAIR
1%█████████████████   ██
HOUSE
EDGE
100%█████████████████   ██
DEPOSIT
BONUS
.
  Play now  
1714474858
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714474858

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714474858
Reply with quote  #2

1714474858
Report to moderator
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714474858
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714474858

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714474858
Reply with quote  #2

1714474858
Report to moderator
1714474858
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714474858

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714474858
Reply with quote  #2

1714474858
Report to moderator
gennadiv
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 139
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 12:01:04 PM
 #8402

I do not see that devfee was less devfee DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'equihash.eu.nicehash.com' <5.153.50.217> p
ort 3357 (unsecure)
DevFee: Pool sets new share target: 0x001e1e1e (diff: 2176H)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (6895 ms)!
DevFee: start mining (90sec)   ------  instead   72sec instead
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:19 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:19 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (109 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (234 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)!
ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:31 - New job from equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 481.104 H/s, Total Shares: 141, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:15
ZEC: GPU0 164.042 H/s, GPU1 165.742 H/s, GPU2 151.320 H/s
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
Ursul0
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 857
Merit: 262


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 12:02:34 PM
 #8403

since all the stink about flypool payouts, which feels like promotional effort on the part of dwarfpool or whatever...

...been mining there since day 1, with a few days on nanopool due to constant crashing of some early genoils miner
So far it seems fair to me, as I'm able to get what my daily target numbers are.
I'm pointing my rigs to different algos to get the best results.
The current situation is well balanced: dagger-hashimoto, equihash and cryptonight are very neatly aligned so the final decision could be your own vision of the coin's future.

Now will do focused check of zec on flypool and report back here.  
fmz89
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1766
Merit: 1002



View Profile
December 13, 2016, 12:07:43 PM
 #8404

noobs miner flooding in every way, and good buyer catching all noobs dumper  Grin Grin Grin Grin
zcash bringing to much noobs miner out from his big pocket

  ▄█▀                       ▀█▄
 ██           ▄▄ ▄▄           ██
███       ▄ ▄███ ███▄ ▄       ███
████▄   ███ ████ ████ ███   ▄████
 ██████████ ███▀ ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄ ▄██████
  ▀▀███████  ▀▄█████████ ████▀▀
       ███▀▄ ██████▀▀▀ ▄▄
       █▀▄██ ████▄▄█▀▄████
        ████ ▀█████▄▀██▀
        ████ █▄▀█████▄
        ████  ▀▀ █████▀
         ▀▀█      ▀█▀
.REXX.|||
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████▀    ▐███████
███████████    ▄▄█████████
▐██████████▀    ▀▀█████████▌
▐█████████▌       █████████▌
▐███████████    ███████████▌
███████████    ███████████
██████████    ██████████
▀████████▄  ▄████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀  █████
████████████▀▀      ██████
▐████████▀▀   ▄▄     ██████▌
▐████▀▀    ▄█▀▀     ███████▌
▐████████ █▀        ███████▌
████████ █ ▄███▄   ███████
████████████████▄▄██████
▀████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
████ ▄▀██████████  █████
██████▄▀▄▀██████  ████████
▐████████▄▀▄▀██  ██████████▌
▐██████████▄▀▄ ████████████▌
▐██████████  ▄▀▄▀██████████▌
████████  ████▄▀▄▀████████
█████  ████████▄▀ ██████
▀████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|.BUY REXX.
gennadiv
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 139
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 12:08:53 PM
 #8405

I do not see that devfee was less devfee DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'equihash.eu.nicehash.com' <5.153.50.217> p
ort 3357 (unsecure)
DevFee: Pool sets new share target: 0x001e1e1e (diff: 2176H)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (6895 ms)!
DevFee: start mining (90sec)   ------  instead   72sec instead
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:19 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:19 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (109 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (234 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (140 ms)!
ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:31 - New job from equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357
ZEC - Total Speed: 481.104 H/s, Total Shares: 141, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:15
ZEC: GPU0 164.042 H/s, GPU1 165.742 H/s, GPU2 151.320 H/s
DevFee: ZEC: 12/13/16-18:54:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
Hotmetal
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 12:21:52 PM
 #8406

yes they had a web server problem but shares were still being collected and were recalculated correctly.  I have been allocated what I would expected to earn so I do not see a problem with staying on the pool

Their hash rate is climbing quickly. I certainly will keep on dwarfpool as it's considerably more profit even through the hiccups. Set and forget.
Hotmetal
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 12:22:24 PM
 #8407

DevFee: start mining (90sec)   ------  instead   72sec instead

Only if you use SSL.
TimLev
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 12:29:08 PM
 #8408


So 15.12 is more stable?

Yes, 15.12 works perfectly. 0 crashes on win 10.
c2n14
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 12:40:11 PM
 #8409

Dwarfpool EU server again @ 3000ms+ Sad
enrique3uro
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 12:44:33 PM
 #8410

I do not know the settings for dwarfpool does anyone help me?
c2n14
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 12:49:34 PM
 #8411

I do not know the settings for dwarfpool does anyone help me?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1670733.msg17153528#msg17153528
Assaro
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 01:02:16 PM
 #8412

Dwarfpool EU server again @ 3000ms+ Sad

well if you have problems with dwarf eu server just change the server to US server.... worked well for mee this morning, even with 200-250 ms connection of shares......

same advice in future, just change the server, dont have to change the pool....
enrique3uro
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 01:08:13 PM
 #8413


thanks friend.

What do you think of nanopool?

Flypool theft my actions.
gaah
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 01:16:52 PM
 #8414

Dwarfpool EU server again @ 3000ms+ Sad

well if you have problems with dwarf eu server just change the server to US server.... worked well for mee this morning, even with 200-250 ms connection of shares......

same advice in future, just change the server, dont have to change the pool....



THX! Did work well for me to
c2n14
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 01:27:04 PM
 #8415

Dwarfpool EU server again @ 3000ms+ Sad

well if you have problems with dwarf eu server just change the server to US server.... worked well for mee this morning, even with 200-250 ms connection of shares......

same advice in future, just change the server, dont have to change the pool....

3 hours ago, after the dwarf problem was sorted out, I set miner back to EU server and the connection was OK - 78ms.
Now, half hour ago, I've checked it and it's again @ 3000ms+.
It will be nice if we would have a switch in CM to change pools automatically depending on the connection lag.



e46btc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157
Merit: 103


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 01:28:47 PM
 #8416

@Claymore,
looks like something strange there...  v9.1 (and maybe other versions - not tested) send shares below target after diff change (vardiff). So all of these shares rejected by pool. Why new diff ignored?  Can you please check?  I can be wrong and I have limited debug data - not sure if this happens always or only sometimes at some conditions.

https://txid.io https://double-spending.com - Automatic BTC double-spending tool.  Legacy, Segwit and Bech32 supported.
https://dgb256.online - Digibyte mining pool , https://combine.dgb256.online - DGB mining payouts consolidation service.
https://sha256.io , https://solomining.io - DGB, BTC, BCH SOLO pools, Instant payouts, AsicBoost supported
gaah
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 01:44:34 PM
 #8417

Dwarfpool EU server again @ 3000ms+ Sad

well if you have problems with dwarf eu server just change the server to US server.... worked well for mee this morning, even with 200-250 ms connection of shares......

same advice in future, just change the server, dont have to change the pool....

3 hours ago, after the dwarf problem was sorted out, I set miner back to EU server and the connection was OK - 78ms.
Now, half hour ago, I've checked it and it's again @ 3000ms+.
It will be nice if we would have a switch in CM to change pools automatically depending on the connection lag.







I have mail them about this.
Relaqs
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 01:49:05 PM
Last edit: December 13, 2016, 02:55:27 PM by Relaqs
 #8418

Hi, need some help. i like to undervolt my AMD gpu 's+ best settings for zec mining. gpu's saphire 280x  7970, 7950. (not all hynix), Asrock 970 extreme4, 8gb memory. using claymore's zec miner. mining 280/7970 185 sol, 7950 170 sol. faster is possible. too much watt...):  test on win7, win 8.1, win 10, what is best?  (win 7 max 4 gpu, more sol)

Best  easy option?. 1. Custom bios? 2. Hacked Modified Memory Strap  3. overclocking tools 4. claymore's -mclock -cclock setting.
what to do, not to do. for newbie   Thx appreciate your help!

1. New bios/ Custom bios created by other zec miners)
https://www.techpowerup.com/rbe/
https://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/
https://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/124572/ati-hd7950-3072-120706   etc

2. Hacked Modified Memory Strap BIOS Database for ZEC MINING
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1676474.0;all
http://www.overclock.net/t/1554360/tahiti-memory-timings-patch-for-hynix-vram

3. Overclocking tools
http://www.overclock.net/a/getting-started-with-radeon-hd-7970-overclocking
https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/how-to-enable-core-voltage-control-on-amd-cards.2262996/
http://www.overclock.net/t/1609782/watttool-a-simple-tool-that-combines-overclocking-with-vrm-monitoring-tweaking-for-rx-400-series
Setting??:
gpu 1070
mem 1500
vddc 1.094

4. Claymore's: -mclock 1900 -cclock 1300 setting
1150/1450  -mclock  1200 -cclock  1500 ?
Best clock settings for:
Saphire r9 280x 1500/ 1150 ?
Saphire hd 7970 ?
Saphire hd 7950  ?
Bat.file
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool pool -zwal wallet.name -zpsw x -i 4 -mclock 1900 -cclock 1300
dragonchopper9
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 361
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 13, 2016, 01:53:17 PM
 #8419

I have no problem with delay on dwarfpool, using eu server.

           ▄▄█████████▄▄
       ▄████▀▀       ▀▀████▄
     ▄██▀▀               ▀▀██▄
    ██▀                    ████
   ██                     ███▀██
  ██                    ▄██▀   ██
 ██                    ▄██      ██
██▀                  ▄██▀      ▄███
██                  ▄██      ▄██▀██
██                 ██▀    ▄███▀  ██
██               ▄██▀   ▄██▀     ██
██▄             ▄██  ▄███▀      ▄██
 ██           ▄██▀ ▄██▀         ██
  ██         ▄██▄███▀          ██
   ██       █████▀            ██
    ██▄   ▄████▀            ▄██
     ▀██▄███▀            ▄▄██▀
       ▀████▄▄       ▄▄████▀
           ▀▀█████████▀▀
L I V E T R E E   A D E P T TM
Own the future of entertainment
The World's 1st Community-Powered,
Film, TV and Content Network  ★
Assaro
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 13, 2016, 02:02:34 PM
 #8420

I have no problem with delay on dwarfpool, using eu server.

well noticed the delays 30 min ago, up to 6000-7000 ms but accepted...

Now it looks normal, 47-93 ms....
Pages: « 1 ... 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 [421] 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 ... 760 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!