mewhoyou
|
|
November 10, 2016, 03:48:18 AM |
|
Can you explain me your config ? I cant obtain more than 40 H/s on my 470 cards .
Wich parameters are you using , operating system , drivers?
I have memory timmings modified on my bios
Thanks in advice
No Problem, I help you with your Minituning Bro I have Win 10 Pro, 16 GB Ram, 6600K @ 4,2 Gh'z, latest AMD Driver 16.11.2 (4.November 2016) (16.11.3 is out, 9 Nov - will try that now) 470 Nitro 4GB, but it should work with other 470s 4gb as well. Here is my unique tutorial how to speed up your 470 4GB to 60+ H/s - only for lovely people http://xup.in/dl,27875229 DO NOT DOWNLOAD ... VIRUS
|
Ethereum the Next Big Thing?
|
|
|
bardacuda
|
|
November 10, 2016, 03:59:45 AM |
|
Does anyone here know how to get past the opencl error 0 #101 issues? I'm running a pair of older 6970s, and with every version so far I've had these errors pop up, one for each gpu. Then the miner proceeds to sit there and do nothing at all, or BSOD my system.
Sure, you just need to solder some more RAM chips onto your card and you're good to go! Seriously though, it's time for a new card. http://www.anandtech.com/show/4455/amds-graphics-core-next-preview-amd-architects-for-compute/3Wow that was some really easy shit to say just now, yet that info was so very hard to find. So to be clear: ONLY GCN cards are supported. Got it! Thanks.. Cryptonight, I'm comin home baby :-D Actually, he says it right in the OP and in the readme ... This version is for recent AMD videocards only: 7xxx, 2xx, 3xx and 4xx, 2GB or more. ...
That said; I did see a post on the zcash forum I think where someone managed to get a 6990 working, but it was only giving him 2Sol/s, per chip. So it is possible to get 1GB cards working, but not worth it on anything pre-GCN. There is hope for 1GB 7850s (and maybe even 77XXs), but again...not supported.
|
The future will rely on AI. SingularityNET lets anyone create, monetize, and use AI at scale. From the creators of Sophia the Robot.
|
|
|
gennadiv
|
|
November 10, 2016, 04:02:06 AM |
|
3.1 paбoтaeт лyчшe ZEC: 11/10/16-10:58:46 - New job from zec.coinmine.pl:7007 ZEC - Total Speed: 108.613 H/s, Total Shares: 605, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:5 ZEC: GPU0 34.012 H/s, GPU1 37.892 H/s, GPU2 36.709 H/s в 3.0 был cбoй c пoдключeниeм r9 380
|
|
|
|
CoinPro69
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2016, 04:08:02 AM |
|
Can you explain me your config ? I cant obtain more than 40 H/s on my 470 cards .
Wich parameters are you using , operating system , drivers?
I have memory timmings modified on my bios
Thanks in advice
No Problem, I help you with your Minituning Bro I have Win 10 Pro, 16 GB Ram, 6600K @ 4,2 Gh'z, latest AMD Driver 16.11.2 (4.November 2016) (16.11.3 is out, 9 Nov - will try that now) 470 Nitro 4GB, but it should work with other 470s 4gb as well. Here is my unique tutorial how to speed up your 470 4GB to 60+ H/s - only for lovely people http://xup.in/dl,27875229https://s12.postimg.org/ek0t8pgi5/470_4gb.jpg DO NOT DOWNLOAD ... VIRUS Are you nuts?There is no virus lol! I just did put the claymore package inside, that shows this: https://virustotal.com/de/file/f3527b0f2839b4163cd5075f6132cfb71749f83ee48645958ec51cd7e6df2467/analysis/However I repackaged it without the claymore miner, so it's clean now! Here is the cleaned package: https://virustotal.com/de/file/1fb6d26a917d4810be57db6aa28a4c7064c26ab03679b400dfa81a6c85e41d34/analysis/1478750577/Download Tutorial:http://xup.in/dl,12078179You can download all the exe files inside from other sources if you wish or don't trust, but you can check out those crc they are all original! It's mostly about the tutorial!
|
|
|
|
Swimmer63
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
|
|
November 10, 2016, 04:29:00 AM |
|
whit rx 470 uses 15.12 too? hoW? is this possible?
No. Use newer drivers. I loaded 15.12 then put in the disk that came with the RX miners. But 15.12 had already recognized them on ASRock H81 Pro BTC. You can also just run the newest driver. Claymore always uses 15.12, but for most the newest driver will work just as well.
|
|
|
|
Swimmer63
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
|
|
November 10, 2016, 04:38:22 AM |
|
I still can't understand why he won't release the linux version.
He's basically turning heads to the biggest miners out there, the large scale farmers.
Serious operations with lots of rigs don't run Windows. He could bank so much with his "dev fee" by providing binaries for linux.
As a group they stuck their foot in their mouth by demonizing Claymore and his DevFee. Also a lot of talk about how it's only a good miner because he stole code, despite his explanation and amends. Now that his miner runs faster than SilentArmy, Genoil and the rest they are all complaining he won't issue a linux version. Can't have it both ways. He is concentrating on the Windows version as we have stuck with him.
|
|
|
|
Nthused
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 10, 2016, 04:42:24 AM |
|
I still can't understand why he won't release the linux version.
He's basically turning heads to the biggest miners out there, the large scale farmers.
Serious operations with lots of rigs don't run Windows. He could bank so much with his "dev fee" by providing binaries for linux.
As a group they stuck their foot in their mouth by demonizing Claymore and his DevFee. Also a lot of talk about how it's only a good miner because he stole code, despite his explanation and amends. Now that his miner runs faster than SilentArmy, Genoil and the rest they are all complaining he won't issue a linux version. Can't have it both ways. He is concentrating on the Windows version as we have stuck with him. This is why there is a "DevFee" for this miner so that the dev can afford to produce these increases for us average users
|
|
|
|
gennadiv
|
|
November 10, 2016, 05:46:42 AM |
|
лyчшиe вapиaнты этo 2.1 и 3.1(лyчший)
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 10, 2016, 05:57:58 AM |
|
As for the no Linux issue - I think the reason is he can't pack binary to defend it from disassembler under Linux so he stops...
|
|
|
|
BlockChasers
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2016, 05:59:38 AM |
|
My r9 290 tri-x wont get stable. After 20 mins it goes to 0H/s then the pc crashes after a bit. v3.1 I have dropped the speeds to 1000/1300 (stock) and upped the volt +75 and its still dying.
|
|
|
|
d57heinz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
|
|
November 10, 2016, 06:06:49 AM Last edit: November 10, 2016, 06:29:28 AM by d57heinz |
|
To those mining on flypool. MOVE immediately. I was getting 30% less than Calcs on fly. Moved to coinmine.pl and haven't looked back. Making very close to calcs now. Test it for yourselves.
Rednow. That and the fact that now that we are surpassing their speeds they are losing their cool. Cause well they have investors breathing down their neck. Hope that was lesson to those that buy/sell cloud contracts before price and hashrate settle in. 50 BTC for 500s/s. Wow my 390x rig does that alone. A fool and his money! Really does give crypto a bad wrap.
BR d57heinz
|
As in nature, all is ebb and tide, all is wave motion, so it seems that in all branches of industry, alternating currents - electric wave motion - will have the sway. ~Nikola Tesla~
|
|
|
deucedeuce37
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2016, 06:18:26 AM |
|
HW: - 6x Reference Sapphire RX 470 OC 4GB (5x Elpida memory/1x Hynix memory) - Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3, Rev 1.0, Bios F8d (disabled USB3, lan, serial, audio, virtualization, and on chip vga) - G1840 CPU - 4G DDR3 1600MHz Single Channel - 120GB Micron m600 m.2 Sata SSD - RT73 USB wireless-n - PSU: 1200W Corsair AX1200i - 6x powered USB risers v006
SW: - Win10 Pro 64-bit version 1607 (anniversary edition) fully updated, stripped out a little bloatware - Crimson 16.10.3 - Claymore v 3.1 (-i 2 -dbg -1 -colors 0)
Results: - Reported Hashrate: 335 sol/s (56 sol/s per card) - Power: 610W
BIOS Settings - GPU 1100 @ 900mV - Mem 1900 @ 900mv with timings from 1500MHz - Fan 3800RPM / 60%
Stable for a few hours with 47C card temps. Will retry with an i5 4690k and 8gb 2133 mhz ram tomorrow. Also tempted to try 16.11.x drivers.
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
November 10, 2016, 06:25:59 AM |
|
HW: - 6x Reference Sapphire RX 470 OC 4GB (5x Elpida memory/1x Hynix memory) - Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3, Rev 1.0, Bios F8d (disabled USB3, lan, serial, audio, virtualization, and on chip vga) - G1840 CPU - 4G DDR3 1600MHz Single Channel - 120GB Micron m600 m.2 Sata SSD - RT73 USB wireless-n - PSU: 1200W Corsair AX1200i - 6x powered USB risers v006
SW: - Win10 Pro 64-bit version 1607 (anniversary edition) fully updated, stripped out a little bloatware - Crimson 16.10.3 - Claymore v 3.1 (-i 2 -dbg -1 -colors 0)
Results: - Reported Hashrate: 335 sol/s (56 sol/s per card) - Power: 610W
BIOS Settings - GPU 1100 @ 900mV - Mem 1900 @ 900mv with timings from 1500MHz - Fan 3800RPM / 60%
Stable for a few hours with 47C card temps. Will retry with an i5 4690k and 8gb 2133 mhz ram tomorrow. Also tempted to try 16.11.x drivers.
How did you edit bios for elipda cards? It doesnt work in PolarisBiosEditor, right?
|
|
|
|
deucedeuce37
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2016, 06:30:59 AM |
|
HW: - 6x Reference Sapphire RX 470 OC 4GB (5x Elpida memory/1x Hynix memory) - Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3, Rev 1.0, Bios F8d (disabled USB3, lan, serial, audio, virtualization, and on chip vga) - G1840 CPU - 4G DDR3 1600MHz Single Channel - 120GB Micron m600 m.2 Sata SSD - RT73 USB wireless-n - PSU: 1200W Corsair AX1200i - 6x powered USB risers v006
SW: - Win10 Pro 64-bit version 1607 (anniversary edition) fully updated, stripped out a little bloatware - Crimson 16.10.3 - Claymore v 3.1 (-i 2 -dbg -1 -colors 0)
Results: - Reported Hashrate: 335 sol/s (56 sol/s per card) - Power: 610W
BIOS Settings - GPU 1100 @ 900mV - Mem 1900 @ 900mv with timings from 1500MHz - Fan 3800RPM / 60%
Stable for a few hours with 47C card temps. Will retry with an i5 4690k and 8gb 2133 mhz ram tomorrow. Also tempted to try 16.11.x drivers.
How did you edit bios for elipda cards? It doesnt work in PolarisBiosEditor, right? PolarisBiosEditor worked fine for me with both memory types. Maybe it was a different card that other people were having problems with Elpida on. If you have one of those cards there is a thread on the ethereum community forum on how to edit it with a hex editor.
|
|
|
|
Havane
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 3
|
|
November 10, 2016, 06:36:08 AM |
|
To those mining on flypool. MOVE immediately. I was getting 30% less than Calcs on fly. Moved to coinmine.pl and haven't looked back. Making very close to calcs now. Test it for yourselves.
Rednow. That and the fact that now that we are surpassing their speeds they are losing their cool. Cause well they have investors breathing down their neck. Hope that was lesson to those that buy/sell cloud contracts before price and hashrate settle in. 50 BTC for 500s/s. Wow my 390x rig does that alone. A fool and his money! Really does give crypto a bad wrap.
BR d57heinz
How do you do your calcs ?
|
|
|
|
deucedeuce37
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2016, 06:39:13 AM |
|
To those mining on flypool. MOVE immediately. I was getting 30% less than Calcs on fly. Moved to coinmine.pl and haven't looked back. Making very close to calcs now. Test it for yourselves.
Rednow. That and the fact that now that we are surpassing their speeds they are losing their cool. Cause well they have investors breathing down their neck. Hope that was lesson to those that buy/sell cloud contracts before price and hashrate settle in. 50 BTC for 500s/s. Wow my 390x rig does that alone. A fool and his money! Really does give crypto a bad wrap.
BR d57heinz
Any advice on which port to use for 330 sol/s rigs? PORT (VARDIFF): 7007 HIGH DIFF PORT (VARDIFF): 7077 STATIC PORT (DIFF20): 8008 STATIC PORT (DIFF500): 8088
|
|
|
|
d57heinz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
|
|
November 10, 2016, 06:41:27 AM |
|
To those mining on flypool. MOVE immediately. I was getting 30% less than Calcs on fly. Moved to coinmine.pl and haven't looked back. Making very close to calcs now. Test it for yourselves.
Rednow. That and the fact that now that we are surpassing their speeds they are losing their cool. Cause well they have investors breathing down their neck. Hope that was lesson to those that buy/sell cloud contracts before price and hashrate settle in. 50 BTC for 500s/s. Wow my 390x rig does that alone. A fool and his money! Really does give crypto a bad wrap.
BR d57heinz
How do you do your calcs ? I use this site here. https://www.cryptocompare.com/mining/calculator/zec@dueceduece37 Use port 7007. The high diff static port starts at 32k. A bit much. Vardiff starts at 192 and adjusts accordingly
|
As in nature, all is ebb and tide, all is wave motion, so it seems that in all branches of industry, alternating currents - electric wave motion - will have the sway. ~Nikola Tesla~
|
|
|
Golku
|
|
November 10, 2016, 06:44:16 AM |
|
Thanks for the new update!
|
|
|
|
louiseth1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Bitfarms.io
|
|
November 10, 2016, 06:51:48 AM |
|
Huh.. He did release 1.1 in linux.
Usually when you have a solid source (and he does, and he already produced windows and linux binaries on previous releases) it is easy to compile for all platforms from the same source code. Are you sure you know what you are talking about?
Claymore said few times he will not do linux after 1.1. Read the tread. I did, just looking for a legit reason not to release it which someone else provided (the fact Claymore has a hard time packing his binary to avoid it from being reversed).
|
Bitfarms.io - Powering Blockchains with Sustainable Energy
|
|
|
ReFLex001
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2016, 06:52:09 AM Last edit: November 10, 2016, 07:10:45 AM by ReFLex001 |
|
Any advice on which port to use for 330 sol/s rigs? PORT (VARDIFF): 7007 HIGH DIFF PORT (VARDIFF): 7077 STATIC PORT (DIFF20): 8008 STATIC PORT (DIFF500): 8088
HIGH DIFF PORT (VARDIFF): 7077 - the best in my opinion http://image.prntscr.com/image/4a37eba5c01f4938966aad14df849032.png
|
|
|
|
|