captgnh
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 05:31:38 PM |
|
I see some posts that V8 reached hardware limits and there is no way to improve speed anymore. It's not true. I'm working on new version with another good speedup, though it takes more time and efforts.
And whats the point?? High temperatures, more electricity and same profit, cuz all are with the new miner. Your new versions are not helpful, do you know that? My miner does not support Linux, Nvidia, CPUs. They will not get any speedups from my miner. Though I'm ready to stop development if most of people think so. It's not a problem for me at all. Make a vote somewhere to see results. Claymore, there are plenty like myself that appreciate your efforts. I stopped mining a couple of years ago and started in again with your miner for eth-sia. I then switched to the ZecMiner ver 1 and now using v.8. My cards are RX 270s now with new life. I'm not a big player but am enjoying the game. You deserve your dev fee, period. Keep up the outstanding work, it is a pleasure to use your miner.
|
|
|
|
xeridea
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 05:35:05 PM |
|
And whats the point?? High temperatures, more electricity and same profit, cuz all are with the new miner. Your new versions are not helpful, do you know that? Also some cards have really bad speed ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I hope Claymore is strong enough to not get demotivated by such constant attacks from imbeciles and trolls. I know BCT is a cesspool of disconnected snowflakes, but this is getting too much. You can't stop a tsunami by telling it to stop. If Claymore or anyone else won't make anymore public miners and improve their speeds, they will sell it privately only to big farms. This means whining teens like you will see their profits go to zero. You either keep on improving or you get the fuck out of here. Progress and evolution won't stop because a bunch of little control freaks want it. Reminds me of the moronic Linux trolls who spammed this thread and mocked Claymore and its users a few weeks ago when that crappy Linux miner Optiminer or what it is called came out. Since they are greedy imbecile kids who always want free lunch Linux-style, guess what, they fucked up by stealing the dev's fee and now Optiminer is private and sold to big farms only. Go to their thread to see them whining and to laugh about them. You get what you pay for! This. Farms already have good miners, so sitting still is stupid. Also, claims of money lost due to power usage are asinine. The last like 3 versions, power usage is virtually the same, but have seen huge speedups. Also, I make about 8 times more than I pay in power, so if power went up like 10% that's only 1.25% less profit, but if it gives say 20% faster hash, it's no-brainer.
|
Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/chartsBTC: bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC: LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth: 0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
|
|
|
yatta
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 05:41:45 PM |
|
I've made some notes on hashrate and watt.
R390 eats 200W with 270 sols R7970 eats 165W with 184 sols R7950 eats 110W with 170 sols
Every card is undervolted.
Most efficient is 7950 1.54H/W.
R7950 eats 110W with 170 sols <-- That is more efficient than the 400 series... ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fs13.postimg.org%2Fip0zvahiv%2FCapture.png&t=665&c=cRk9VQo6Uuh4Ng) Sapphire nitro+ rx470 8gb Samsung : 70W -> 160H/s = 2.28H/W What the application is telling you isn't accurate. Please provide measurements at the wall. i think rx 480 more efficient around 50watt on gpuz hashing 180h/s , 100 watt from the wall r9 nano 235 hs , 80 watt from wall (880mv , 800 core, 350 memory) best buck is TAHITI best buck for future is RX the most efficient is NANO sory guys TRUE KING IS NANO on ETH tahiti have same watt with RX in heavy undervolted R9 Nano price is killer. I'm doing 172 h/s, 124w with 7950 - measured on 2 meters. With actual $100 price it rocks.
|
ETH 0xe3c8d2587e03ac3bdcb86794b8227c000db54d25
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 05:43:22 PM |
|
I've made some notes on hashrate and watt.
R390 eats 200W with 270 sols R7970 eats 165W with 184 sols R7950 eats 110W with 170 sols
Every card is undervolted.
Most efficient is 7950 1.54H/W.
R7950 eats 110W with 170 sols <-- That is more efficient than the 400 series... Sapphire nitro+ rx470 8gb Samsung : 70W -> 160H/s = 2.28H/W What the application is telling you isn't accurate. Please provide measurements at the wall. i think rx 480 more efficient around 50watt on gpuz hashing 180h/s , 100 watt from the wall r9 nano 235 hs , 80 watt from wall (880mv , 800 core, 350 memory) best buck is TAHITI best buck for future is RX the most efficient is NANO sory guys TRUE KING IS NANO on ETH tahiti have same watt with RX in heavy undervolted Do you know of the resualt of 7990? 420+ sol with 275watt. Who is the best?
|
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
ivomm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1881
Merit: 3057
All good things to those who wait
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 05:49:43 PM |
|
I see some posts that V8 reached hardware limits and there is no way to improve speed anymore. It's not true. I'm working on new version with another good speedup, though it takes more time and efforts.
And whats the point?? High temperatures, more electricity and same profit, cuz all are with the new miner. Your new versions are not helpful, do you know that? My miner does not support Linux, Nvidia, CPUs. They will not get any speedups from my miner. Though I'm ready to stop development if most of people think so. It's not a problem for me at all. Make a vote somewhere to see results. If Claymore didn't release his miner we all would have been using other public miners for linux or their windows ports. They are not that far from Claymore v8 speeds, but are very unstable under windows at least. Besides, I know for at least 1 private miner sold to the biggest farms which I suppose is really fast. I think the difficulty and hence the earnings are not affected so much by Claymore's miner. We should be thankful to Claymore for his perfect job. Trolling and negativity is only in the favour of the big farms, imo.
|
|
|
|
|
ghostfaceuk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:02:21 PM |
|
I like the look of his speeds. Wish mine ran that well. ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif)
|
|
|
|
Simon_Grape
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:05:00 PM |
|
I like the look of his speeds. Wish mine ran that well. ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) Crazy and look at those temps - this can't be legit.
|
|
|
|
ivomm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1881
Merit: 3057
All good things to those who wait
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:12:02 PM |
|
I like the look of his speeds. Wish mine ran that well. ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) Crazy and look at those temps - this can't be legit. May be GTX Titan Z can achieve this? Either way, not worth the 3000$ investment lol
|
|
|
|
Jinx99
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:13:05 PM |
|
And whats the point?? High temperatures, more electricity and same profit, cuz all are with the new miner. Your new versions are not helpful, do you know that? Also some cards have really bad speed ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Big farmers and cloud mining services can pay to dev's to have more efficient soft. Most of small miners with farms up to 100 GPU's - not. But small miners generate most of network hashrate. If they stop mining - network becomes centralised by big gamers.
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:16:18 PM |
|
looks like a Claymore miner build -- assuming v8..... what GPU from space can reach that high H/s.... the fastest card on earth on v8 may likely be the R9-Fury 8GB HBM memory at most 300 H/s per GPU... 1000 H/s is just too good to be true
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:19:47 PM |
|
I like the look of his speeds. Wish mine ran that well. ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) Crazy and look at those temps - this can't be legit. May be GTX Titan Z can achieve this? Either way, not worth the 3000$ investment lol Claymore's ZCash miner does not not support NVIDIA GPUs .... all AMD cards only.
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
jonid
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:28:54 PM |
|
I like the look of his speeds. Wish mine ran that well. ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) The speed is unbelieavable.. could be a fake/edited picture... but it could be true as well.. who knows..
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 1732
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:32:44 PM |
|
The picture could be real but its very easy to adjust your memory timings and get speeds like that, however it will produce mostly rejected shares.
|
|
|
|
yatta
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:33:20 PM |
|
I've made some notes on hashrate and watt.
R390 eats 200W with 270 sols R7970 eats 165W with 184 sols R7950 eats 110W with 170 sols
Every card is undervolted.
Most efficient is 7950 1.54H/W.
R7950 eats 110W with 170 sols <-- That is more efficient than the 400 series... Sapphire nitro+ rx470 8gb Samsung : 70W -> 160H/s = 2.28H/W What the application is telling you isn't accurate. Please provide measurements at the wall. i think rx 480 more efficient around 50watt on gpuz hashing 180h/s , 100 watt from the wall r9 nano 235 hs , 80 watt from wall (880mv , 800 core, 350 memory) best buck is TAHITI best buck for future is RX the most efficient is NANO sory guys TRUE KING IS NANO on ETH tahiti have same watt with RX in heavy undervolted Do you know of the resualt of 7990? 420+ sol with 275watt. Who is the best? Count hash per watt.
|
ETH 0xe3c8d2587e03ac3bdcb86794b8227c000db54d25
|
|
|
samasas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:36:39 PM |
|
The picture could be real but its very easy to adjust your memory timings and get speeds like that, however it will produce mostly rejected shares.
For the AMD R89 390, with the 1500 MHz, the limiting factor is already the core speed. So adjusting the memory does not help.
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 1732
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:45:10 PM |
|
The picture could be real but its very easy to adjust your memory timings and get speeds like that, however it will produce mostly rejected shares.
For the AMD R89 390, with the 1500 MHz, the limiting factor is already the core speed. So adjusting the memory does not help. I am not talking about memory clock, I am talking about memory timings. You can adjust them and get it to show like 1000-2000H/s however it will produce nothing but rejected shares or crash.
|
|
|
|
Yusif
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:47:07 PM |
|
The picture could be real but its very easy to adjust your memory timings and get speeds like that, however it will produce mostly rejected shares.
For the AMD R89 390, with the 1500 MHz, the limiting factor is already the core speed. So adjusting the memory does not help. I am not talking about memory clock, I am talking about memory timings. You can adjust them and get it to show like 1000-2000H/s however it will produce nothing but rejected shares or crash. According to the screen shot, the green part means the shares are accepted. But that is not the Claymore miner.
|
|
|
|
sorry2xs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:56:15 PM |
|
or it could be just a proxy for five rigs.
|
Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
|
|
|
IncludeBeer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1164
Merit: 1010
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 27, 2016, 06:59:50 PM |
|
I see some posts that V8 reached hardware limits and there is no way to improve speed anymore. It's not true. I'm working on new version with another good speedup, though it takes more time and efforts.
And whats the point?? High temperatures, more electricity and same profit, cuz all are with the new miner. Your new versions are not helpful, do you know that? Also some cards have really bad speed ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) That is totally wrong ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Wrong because?? My cards were at 60C, now are at 75C. The profit is same! Tell us your point! @ioginx Your bad math cant make me a troll ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) What you're failing to describe is a product of the market of miners, not specifically Claymore's miner. How exactly do you expect a publicly released miner to make you more profit in mining than the rest of the public (public == windows amd miners)?? Please, explain that math to me. How do you expect Claymore to accomplish this? Only release next version to you? If your cards are hotter and using more electricity, then by all means, switch to an earlier version of the miner! ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
|
|
|
|
|