Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[Kimax]

I have sorted this list alphabetical:

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Claymore8.0_card_speeds


for better reading!

 

I was actually thinking of sorting it with GPU.
Oldest to Newest.

BTW. it was me who splitted the column "Card Name" and added the 2 columns "Brand" and "GPU" instead.

[Athelas7]

I have sorted this list alphabetical:

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Claymore8.0_card_speeds


for better reading!

 

  Good work!

[ByteKingz]

I have sorted this list alphabetical:

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Claymore8.0_card_speeds


for better reading!

 

I was actually thinking of sorting it with GPU.
Oldest to Newest.

BTW. it was me who splitted the column "Card Name" and added the 2 columns "Brand" and "GPU" instead.

actualy i sorted to alphabetical and models yet

[maxmad_x]

Definitely ETC + Sia better than Zec currently 

is SIA worth mining anymore? The electricity cost due to each card pulling 15W more is almost equal to the price of SIA

Depends on your cards, cost of power (varies wildly), and if you can use the heat (in winter), vs cost of say heating with gas or wood.

yeah.. I was using my rigs as heat source in Houston .. it has been hot as hell winter. I was so hoping to use it. but still I get drop of a 1MH/s each card and get lbry 25MH per card on 4x480. Power consumption goes up by 15-20W and heat goes through the roof. . 

And I see some level of instability after mining with cards moving from ETH to Zcash and back.. its just weird that miner works perfectly. but the moment I close the miner the whole system hangs. .

[adaseb]

Basically with a 470/480, if you dual mine you will only make $0.10/day extra per card. Back in the day it was more like $0.30-0.40/day.

[Kimax]

I have sorted this list alphabetical:

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Claymore8.0_card_speeds


for better reading!

 

I was actually thinking of sorting it with GPU.
Oldest to Newest.

BTW. it was me who splitted the column "Card Name" and added the 2 columns "Brand" and "GPU" instead.

actualy i sorted to alphabetical and models yet

Its allways possible to sort by using the header in the table.

[forzendiablo]

v9 280x cards gonna be at 250 sols

[JJ12880]

I have sorted this list alphabetical:

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Claymore8.0_card_speeds


for better reading!

 

I was actually thinking of sorting it with GPU.
Oldest to Newest.

BTW. it was me who splitted the column "Card Name" and added the 2 columns "Brand" and "GPU" instead.

actualy i sorted to alphabetical and models yet

Its allways possible to sort by using the header in the table.

Excellent work! Great idea on adding the columns.

[Marvell1]

Definitely ETC + Sia better than Zec currently 

Not if you are paying power eth + SIA is power hungery by like 30% , Eth alone uses a bit more power than ZEC alone so its a no brainer to mine ZEC if you have power over .10

[Ragnarokdel]

Definitely ETC + Sia better than Zec currently 

Not if you are paying power eth + SIA is power hungery by like 30% , Eth alone uses a bit more power than ZEC alone so its a no brainer to mine ZEC if you have power over .10

Personally, I still mine ZEC over ETH and my power is at $0.06/kwh. The temperatures difference means the fans run slower and therefore significantly quieter.

[ZeroGee]

I'm having issues getting Visiontek 7950s to run for more than a minute. It gets to a temp of 62C with 100% fan, stops mining, and crashes. I've tried varying powlims, speeds above and blow stock, and a handful of other things. I used to mine with these a year and a half ago, and know how to tinker with the settings and have made custom BIOS for them, i 4-6, but currently they're using their stock BIOSes. I'm running Crimson 15.12 with them. Should I try 16.11.x or something? Any other words of advice? This happens on both cards.

I want to add to the 295x2. And another datapoint for the wikipage since I can't add it my self:

XFX R9 295x2 550Sol/s 1150MHz core 1575MHz mem -i 6 Crimson 16.9.2, not sure of watts, Stock BIOS(A detail I think should be added).

Been running it like this for a few days. Sits at 62-69C depending on room temperature. If anyone else has any words of advice on this too, feel free to let me know!



EDIT: This killed my 295x2 after a 4 days of mining days... Into the oven it goes!

[gennadiv]

on r9 380 is stable, the speed rate increased well - no crashes - works consistently on all parameters to 141 s
ZEC - Total Speed: 408.367 H/s, Total Shares: 5592, Rejected: 4, Time: 10:22
ZEC: GPU0 137.135 H/s, GPU1 137.585 H/s, GPU2 133.646 H/s
GPU0 t=65C fan=70%, GPU1 t=65C fan=58%, GPU2 t=65C fan=82%
ZEC: 11/29/16-10:19:11 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (187 ms)!
ZEC: 11/29/16-10:19:18 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: 11/29/16-10:19:18 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (171 ms)!
ZEC: Share accepted (171 ms)!
GPU0 t=65C fan=70%, GPU1 t=65C fan=58%, GPU2 t=65C fan=82%
ZEC: 11/29/16-10:19:35 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (172 ms)!

[QuintLeo]

Please share your speeds of  
R9 280X (R7970) 3GB 384 BIT GDDR5

 2 in one rig, 172 at -i5 for one, 157 at -i3 on the other (second card runs a lot hotter due to spacing issues).

 Both Gigabyte Windforce OC models running at stock clocks on stock BIOS.

 I did a bit of playing with the clocks on them, but it didn't seem to make a noticeable difference on the cool card and made the hot card VERY unstable.

[QuintLeo]

[Is this your pro duo or are you speculating,I was under the impression pro duo was 2 furys so that would give us around 600 s/s max with Claymore!

 Nope. The Fury Pro is 2x a Nano less a little 'cause the clocks have to be down a bit due to heat dissipation limitations.

 Or 2x a FuryX less somewhat more 'cause the clocks have to be down quite a bit.

 If it's running something that is PCI-E bandwidth intensive it loses a LOT more due to having to split the bandwidth between the 2 seperate GPU chips.


 GPU on the Fury is 3584 shader units or some such (I forget the exact number), the FuryX Nano and one GPU on the Pro are 4096.

[koshol]

I have sorted this list alphabetical:

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Claymore8.0_card_speeds


for better reading!

 

I was actually thinking of sorting it with GPU.
Oldest to Newest.

BTW. it was me who splitted the column "Card Name" and added the 2 columns "Brand" and "GPU" instead.

actualy i sorted to alphabetical and models yet

v.9 caming soon)

[naeme18720]

This is weird... one of my 290's is kicking ass today and I don't know why..

Yeah, I've noticed something like that, one of my 480's was getting 40H/s faster then the other, then the next day they where both at 200, and now one is at 180 and the other is at 170.

Hashrate very what are you doing???

http://zcash.flypool.org/miners/t1YdKS8sstWxxdNs8Vz5TMtEAogSfAaXg4s

Perhaps your internet? Or connection to the pool?

Internet what??  My Internet 1gb/s download bad???
Connection is eu in flypoll

Download doesn't really matter, mining uses no bandwidth basically. How is your ping?

Im used that riser usb 3...my problam today solved with restart computer and restart claymore

[BenCodie]

Hey Claymore, ever since I've started to use the new v8, I've been facing many crashes while using Photoshop or any other such software. It's really annoying and I've tried all the possible intensities as well as other overclocking stuff, but unable to fix it. One thing I've done along the usage of your new version is the driver update. Do you think that it could be happening because of the new driver version of Crimson or is it any known issue of your new miner's version?

Using RX 480's by the way...

You cannot use your rig while mining.
Just let your Machine to Mine only thats it  

[Altcoining]

Hey Claymore, ever since I've started to use the new v8, I've been facing many crashes while using Photoshop or any other such software. It's really annoying and I've tried all the possible intensities as well as other overclocking stuff, but unable to fix it. One thing I've done along the usage of your new version is the driver update. Do you think that it could be happening because of the new driver version of Crimson or is it any known issue of your new miner's version?

Using RX 480's by the way...

You cannot use your rig while mining.
Just let your Machine to Mine only thats it  

Uhh, this couldn't be farther from the truth. I use my rig with 2 480's in it all day while mining 24/7.  I don't have any issues, other then things that require GPU acceleration, for that i can just stop mining until I'm done.

[jimmy_007vn]

My MSI rx 480 gaming 4g is under performing big time. I have it at stock set up with ~150H/s. please help

[rampaige]

Hello
I have an issue around claymore zcash miner.After 10-60 min of the starting mine I get following error .I have tried win7-8.1 with various AMD drivers such as 15.12 and 16 series even several risers but this error still remains.Core clock and voltage are default values moreover I have created reboot.bat file but after auto restarting of miner, GPU 1 won't work and it gives me 0 hash but GPU 0 still works properly.
I have 2 ASUS r9390x dc2 on each mainboard and all of mainboards have this error.Moreover, I set the virtual memory 20GB (I have 4gb physical memory) even tried GPU downclock but got that error each time!!
Please fix this bug in next version or give me a solution.

error:
ZEC - Total Speed: 577.981 H/s, Total Shares: 11, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:04
ZEC: GPU0 290.528 H/s, GPU1 287.453 H/s

watchdog - thread 0, hb time 47
watchdog - thread 1, hb time 93
watchdog - thread 2, hb time 15
watchdog - thread 3, hb time 78
watchdog - thread 4, hb time 68172
WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
watchdog - thread 5, hb time 68125
WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
watchdog - thread 6, hb time 68094
WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
watchdog - thread 7, hb time 68157
WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
Rebooting

ZEC: GPU0 288.255 H/s, GPU1 0.000 H/s