Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 08:21:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 [411] 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426872 times)
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 07:13:47 PM
 #8201

hmm, it seems the forum hasn't been updating me when new replies are put on, i've missed a lot

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
1714551682
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714551682

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714551682
Reply with quote  #2

1714551682
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714551682
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714551682

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714551682
Reply with quote  #2

1714551682
Report to moderator
1714551682
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714551682

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714551682
Reply with quote  #2

1714551682
Report to moderator
1714551682
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714551682

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714551682
Reply with quote  #2

1714551682
Report to moderator
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 07:21:07 PM
 #8202

I see, and what cudaminer version are you running?
The latest one Christian posted, x64 for scrypt-jane (seems a bit faster than x86 for me).

hmm, it seems the forum hasn't been updating me when new replies are put on, i've missed a lot
Ouch! Sad
I have this topic bookmarked in a way that always shows me the first unread post:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.new#new

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 07:24:21 PM
 #8203

keeps doing it for some reason. ooo well quick read through and im up to date.

on another note, im converting the amd miners to the nvidia side ;-)
gtx 750 has opened up some real door ways.

even to the point of having a single pci-e go to 8 gpu's using a riser bank
and as stated a few pages back, 270khash/s on pci-express 1 at x16 speed

a pci-express 3 x16 should be able to run stupid amounts of gpus on proper riser boards, aslong as the risers are powered

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 07:33:35 PM
 #8204

keeps doing it for some reason. ooo well quick read through and im up to date.

on another note, im converting the amd miners to the nvidia side ;-)
gtx 750 has opened up some real door ways.

even to the point of having a single pci-e go to 8 gpu's using a riser bank
and as stated a few pages back, 270khash/s on pci-express 1 at x16 speed

a pci-express 3 x16 should be able to run stupid amounts of gpus on proper riser boards, aslong as the risers are powered
Yes, as soon as the bandwidth usage by cudaminer is reduced this will work very well Smiley

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 07:41:06 PM
 #8205

Yep.

One issue people gave was the need for such long riser cables. The one solution I gave was that usb3 will run up to 650MB/s

Pci-Express x16 runs at about 250MB/s
So a usb3 cable should be able to run more then 2 cards to a main riser block. And if anyone could figure out how to get a thunderbolt cable running the link, it will run 1.25GB/s which should be fine to run 5 gpus from a single block at the same speed as paid express x16

When the bandwidth issue is fixed, in theory you should be able to run lots of cards from a single slot. Maybe an external gpus box with its own psu?  Hmm be a good idea

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
AliMan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988
Merit: 502


Vave.com - Crypto Casino


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 08:11:42 PM
Last edit: March 06, 2014, 08:53:48 PM by AliMan
 #8206

I see, and what cudaminer version are you running?
The latest one Christian posted, x64 for scrypt-jane (seems a bit faster than x86 for me).

hmm, it seems the forum hasn't been updating me when new replies are put on, i've missed a lot
Ouch! Sad
I have this topic bookmarked in a way that always shows me the first unread post:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.new#new
What was your bat when you autotuned it?

bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 08:33:43 PM
 #8207

Who's bat?

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 06, 2014, 08:41:07 PM
 #8208

keeps doing it for some reason. ooo well quick read through and im up to date.

on another note, im converting the amd miners to the nvidia side ;-)
gtx 750 has opened up some real door ways.

even to the point of having a single pci-e go to 8 gpu's using a riser bank
and as stated a few pages back, 270khash/s on pci-express 1 at x16 speed

a pci-express 3 x16 should be able to run stupid amounts of gpus on proper riser boards, aslong as the risers are powered

WHAT???

Clarify that part with the 8 gpus per riser bank plz...
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 08:44:20 PM
 #8209

Their making a riser bank.
It's a single pci-express that slots onto the motherboard. It then has 8 riser cables coming off it to gpu sockets

Similar to the old pci-x server risers, but separated by riser cables

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 06, 2014, 09:14:30 PM
 #8210

Their making a riser bank.
It's a single pci-express that slots onto the motherboard. It then has 8 riser cables coming off it to gpu sockets

Similar to the old pci-x server risers, but separated by riser cables

Who is and how much for it? Cheesy

I want one :p
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 09:17:14 PM
 #8211

the guy setting up GPUcoin apparently has a supplier selling them, wont say who or how much.

my idea is you have a case that stores like 8 gpu's
sit it next to your pc

ribbon cable from pc to gpu case.
so in tern you have a gpu box and your pc. plug the gpu riser in to the pc and the gpu's would be usable on the pc :-)

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 09:21:42 PM
 #8212

What was your bat when you autotuned it?
The exact same, without -l t128x2

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 06, 2014, 09:30:18 PM
 #8213

the guy setting up GPUcoin apparently has a supplier selling them, wont say who or how much.

my idea is you have a case that stores like 8 gpu's
sit it next to your pc

ribbon cable from pc to gpu case.
so in tern you have a gpu box and your pc. plug the gpu riser in to the pc and the gpu's would be usable on the pc :-)

Stop teasing, already super excited lol
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 09:31:29 PM
 #8214

:p your not the only one, i will buy one just for an excuse to by a new pc case ;-) i already have 4 E-ATX cases haha

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 09:43:06 PM
 #8215

committing an experimental --algo=blake feature, please run with with same kernel configurations as for keccak.

Only 56 MHash/s on GTX 750 Ti, but from here on out things can only improve... At least CPU and GPU agree on
the results.

I am not sure about the difficulty to target mapping. I am currently using the same code as for Keccak. I will
have to inspect the blake cpuminer to see how they do it.

what hash rates are AMD miners getting for blake256?

Christian
roy7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 09:46:34 PM
 #8216

Will the CUDA 6 release have any impact on mining?
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 06, 2014, 09:46:48 PM
 #8217

committing an experimental --algo=blake feature, please run with with same kernel configurations as for keccak.

Only 56 MHash/s on GTX 750 Ti, but from here on out things can only improve... At least CPU and GPU agree on
the results.

I am not sure about the difficulty to target mapping. I am currently using the same code as for Keccak. I will
have to inspect the blake cpuminer to see how they do it.

Christian


Excellent news! man never rests...major props Christian.
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 09:48:24 PM
 #8218

Will the CUDA 6 release have any impact on mining?

so far it's a negative impact. So CUDA 6 RC is a no-go. There are serious
performance regressions for some kernels, and no additional gain for code
compiled specifically for the 750 Ti (Maxwell).

Christian
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
March 06, 2014, 10:05:51 PM
 #8219

committing an experimental --algo=blake feature, please run with with same kernel configurations as for keccak.

Only 56 MHash/s on GTX 750 Ti, but from here on out things can only improve... At least CPU and GPU agree on
the results.

I am not sure about the difficulty to target mapping. I am currently using the same code as for Keccak. I will
have to inspect the blake cpuminer to see how they do it.

what hash rates are AMD miners getting for blake256?

Christian

I just tried on one pool Blakecoin EU1 pool, I get only boo's.
the hashrate would be max 130Mhash, I just checked with the big amd electron's sucker (which doesn't seem to use that much on it),
 ouch 3.25GHash/s

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 06, 2014, 10:13:28 PM
Last edit: March 06, 2014, 10:24:29 PM by cbuchner1
 #8220


I just tried on one pool Blakecoin EU1 pool, I get only boo's.
the hashrate would be max 130Mhash, I just checked with the big amd electron's sucker (which doesn't seem to use that much on it),
 ouch 3.25GHash/s

this is the code from the blakecoin CPU miner... so the line on the bottom applies to Blake256.
I fixed this in cudaminer now.

Code:
	if (opt_algo == ALGO_SCRYPT)
diff_to_target(work->target, sctx->job.diff / 65536.0);
else
diff_to_target(work->target, sctx->job.diff);

About the hashing speed: This is a straight port of the CPU code running mostly unoptimized in CUDA.  Bad speed is kind of
expected, although 50 MHash/s is a start...

If hashes are still getting rejected now, there must be another reason (maybe endianness problems....)

Christian

Pages: « 1 ... 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 [411] 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!