Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 12:23:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 [373] 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426872 times)
BlueDragon747
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030


Solutions Architect


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2014, 08:57:12 PM
 #7441

Would be awesome to see support for Blake-256

more coins are using this efficient algo  Cheesy

Info: GithubBlakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone  Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1
Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb 
UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714566210
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714566210

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714566210
Reply with quote  #2

1714566210
Report to moderator
1714566210
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714566210

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714566210
Reply with quote  #2

1714566210
Report to moderator
1714566210
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714566210

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714566210
Reply with quote  #2

1714566210
Report to moderator
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 24, 2014, 09:03:27 PM
 #7442

Gonna try this cool winpe 64 with the cudaminer 64bit binaries...

http://windowsmatters.com/

thoughts?
chapmanjw
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2014, 09:17:12 PM
 #7443

@cbuchner1: Is it possible to set the "intensity" for CudaMiner like cgminer and other GPU miners?  When I am doing other things on my machine, it would be nice to have a way to lower its resource utilization.

-i 1 = useable pc
-i 0 = somewhat useable pc

Yea, that's only slightly better for me with -i 1.  Still slows things down quite a bit and can't really do work while its mining. 
Banin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 09:26:33 PM
 #7444

@cbuchner1: Is it possible to set the "intensity" for CudaMiner like cgminer and other GPU miners?  When I am doing other things on my machine, it would be nice to have a way to lower its resource utilization.

-i 1 = useable pc
-i 0 = somewhat useable pc

Yea, that's only slightly better for me with -i 1.  Still slows things down quite a bit and can't really do work while its mining. 


its what interactive mean ...
UNOE
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 791
Merit: 271


This is personal


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 10:02:02 PM
 #7445

@cbuchner1: Is it possible to set the "intensity" for CudaMiner like cgminer and other GPU miners?  When I am doing other things on my machine, it would be nice to have a way to lower its resource utilization.

-i 1 = useable pc
-i 0 = somewhat useable pc

Yea, that's only slightly better for me with -i 1.  Still slows things down quite a bit and can't really do work while its mining. 

Try changing -H 2 as well with -i 1

see360
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 10:44:09 PM
 #7446

Try to rerun the autotune, I did that when the UTC moved to Nfactor 10 last week, it works okay.
You should also use -L2, you should gain some khash/s compared to the default setting (-L1)

Ran autotune for L=1, 2 & 3 for each card individually. It did find a faster config, thanks. Didn't try changing the -C -H or others, but here are the results.

780 Ti, Nfactor is 10 (N=2048)

cudaminer -d 0 -i 0 --algo=scrypt-jane:MRC -L 1 --benchmark
Maximum total warps (BxW): 321
T57x4  364793 hash/s
266 khash/s after running  <---------------- FASTEST

cudaminer -d 0 -i 0 --algo=scrypt-jane:MRC -L 2 --benchmark
Maximum total warps (BxW): 642
T15x23  276000 hash/s
221 khash/s after running

2nd attempt
T14x23  257600 hash/s
206 Khash/s after running

cudaminer -d 0 -i 0 --algo=scrypt-jane:MRC -L 3 --benchmark
Maximum total warps (BxW): 964
T29x23  194034.6 hash/s
166 khash/s after running

The best configs for the 660 Ti s end up with the same hash rate as before, but I've gone from 428 to about 485 khash/s.
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 24, 2014, 11:25:27 PM
 #7447

Nice, I'll play some more with autotune...I always go manual.  Undecided
Takes too long otherwise :p
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2014, 11:29:19 PM
 #7448

Try to rerun the autotune, I did that when the UTC moved to Nfactor 10 last week, it works okay.
You should also use -L2, you should gain some khash/s compared to the default setting (-L1)

Ran autotune for L=1, 2 & 3 for each card individually. It did find a faster config, thanks. Didn't try changing the -C -H or others, but here are the results.

780 Ti, Nfactor is 10 (N=2048)

cudaminer -d 0 -i 0 --algo=scrypt-jane:MRC -L 1 --benchmark
Maximum total warps (BxW): 321
T57x4  364793 hash/s
266 khash/s after running  <---------------- FASTEST

cudaminer -d 0 -i 0 --algo=scrypt-jane:MRC -L 2 --benchmark
Maximum total warps (BxW): 642
T15x23  276000 hash/s
221 khash/s after running

2nd attempt
T14x23  257600 hash/s
206 Khash/s after running

cudaminer -d 0 -i 0 --algo=scrypt-jane:MRC -L 3 --benchmark
Maximum total warps (BxW): 964
T29x23  194034.6 hash/s
166 khash/s after running

The best configs for the 660 Ti s end up with the same hash rate as before, but I've gone from 428 to about 485 khash/s.
Can you try this -L2 T30x16 on the gtx780ti. In principle the best configs are dividers of the cuda core number.

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
see360
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 25, 2014, 12:04:03 AM
 #7449

Can you try this -L2 T30x16 on the gtx780ti. In principle the best configs are dividers of the cuda core number.

Thanks for the suggestion. I'm always looking to better understand the way CUDA sends threads in warps through the pipes.

-d 0 -scrypt-jane:MRC -L2 T30x16 --benchmark
225 khash/s, gets thermally throttled to 205.

I'm beginning to think my 780ti performance might be hampered by airflow between the card next to it. But it does give 650 khash/s with scrypt while all three are running (1205 total).
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 25, 2014, 12:21:01 AM
 #7450

Can you try this -L2 T30x16 on the gtx780ti. In principle the best configs are dividers of the cuda core number.

Thanks for the suggestion. I'm always looking to better understand the way CUDA sends threads in warps through the pipes.

-d 0 -scrypt-jane:MRC -L2 T30x16 --benchmark
225 khash/s, gets thermally throttled to 205.

I'm beginning to think my 780ti performance might be hampered by airflow between the card next to it. But it does give 650 khash/s with scrypt while all three are running (1205 total).

You need water cooling Cheesy
3 780ti's on air?

I only have one regular 780 and it does get hot mining scrypt (I don't like mining scrypt though) 716kh/s at 1267mhz core Cheesy
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
February 25, 2014, 12:33:14 AM
 #7451

I have the same problem since I added the R9290x, the gtx780ti gets hot and clocks down...
When I saw those saturday on the forum those riser with usb3.0 cable, I bought one with a cable 60cm so I can put the radeon far away from the rest of the computer

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 25, 2014, 01:20:21 AM
 #7452

I have the same problem since I added the R9290x, the gtx780ti gets hot and clocks down...
When I saw those saturday on the forum those riser with usb3.0 cable, I bought one with a cable 60cm so I can put the radeon far away from the rest of the computer

They are pretty cool, and way tougher than the ide ribbon ones (broke a few of them)
SUGO
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 25, 2014, 01:32:04 AM
 #7453

Sorry, but I  searched last pages but I did'nt find it:  how I can raise the clock gpu over the limit 1310 (100% in evga or afterburner)
I think about flash with kepler, but what parameter I should change?
poohbah
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 25, 2014, 01:54:10 AM
 #7454

Sorry, but I  searched last pages but I did'nt find it:  how I can raise the clock gpu over the limit 1310 (100% in evga or afterburner)
I think about flash with kepler, but what parameter I should change?
This one?  http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/gtx-750-ti-cudaminer/
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 25, 2014, 02:24:27 AM
 #7455

Sorry, but I  searched last pages but I did'nt find it:  how I can raise the clock gpu over the limit 1310 (100% in evga or afterburner)
I think about flash with kepler, but what parameter I should change?

Afterburner sucks for nvidia, use EVGA Precision X.
69charger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 25, 2014, 02:28:48 AM
 #7456

Well, time for a more capable MoBo  Sad

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131819

Asus P8Z77-V Pro does not like to play well with 3 graphics cards...

The third slot is bandwidth limited and in order to use it at 4X the board disables a bunch of other onboard stuff including sound and the other pci-e1x slots.

Ghey....
cvax
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 25, 2014, 04:18:01 AM
 #7457

Hi guys, I am trying to mine Yac with my GTX 590, but it isn't liking my configuration. It works with autotune, but when I use the exact same -l setting that was found in autotune it just completely blows up as in this screenshot. Any ideas? Thanks.


Here is my command line.
cudaminer.exe --algo=scrypt-jane -H 1 -i 0 -l f8x8 -C 2 -o stratum+tcp://yac.coinmine.pl:9088

BTC: 15HAePieDjYge6LTG2HFRZEJseRYJJqmta    |     YAC: YMvBp1SpY2sZ8nUZgKFLTEx7neuUZ7APuM
8x 750Ti's, AsRock 970 Extreme 4, Athlon II 170u
sub-80
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 25, 2014, 05:02:58 AM
 #7458

Gonna try this cool winpe 64 with the cudaminer 64bit binaries...

http://windowsmatters.com/

thoughts?

That your awesome
sub-80
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 25, 2014, 05:06:59 AM
 #7459

Hi guys, I am trying to mine Yac with my GTX 590, but it isn't liking my configuration. It works with autotune, but when I use the exact same -l setting that was found in autotune it just completely blows up as in this screenshot. Any ideas? Thanks.


Here is my command line.
cudaminer.exe --algo=scrypt-jane -H 1 -i 0 -l f8x8 -C 2 -o stratum+tcp://yac.coinmine.pl:9088

--algo=scrypt-jane:YAC
DeltaQuebec
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
February 25, 2014, 05:10:20 AM
 #7460

May need help, or an answer with 2014.2.18 cudaminer mining CACHE coin.

I believe now Cache is now N-Factor 2048 but im really shocked at the slow hash rate I am getting
59-60 kh/s .. usually these N-scrypt coins I get near 100 kh/s, but this is 1/2 of that, is this normal?

Bat: cudaminer.exe  --algo=scrypt-jane:CACH -H 1 -i 0 -C 0 -m 1 -L 1 -l k4x28 -o
stratum+tcp://east1.us.stratum.dedicatedpool.com:3364......

Card is a GTX 650 Ti 8GB system ram ( 1GB on card )



I just want to be sure im doing things right.. but pretty shocked at the slow rate.

Thanks in advance!
Pages: « 1 ... 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 [373] 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!