Bitcoin Forum
November 17, 2024, 09:27:51 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 [419] 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426936 times)
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
March 09, 2014, 11:13:06 AM
Last edit: March 09, 2014, 11:38:24 AM by djm34
 #8361

Any suggestions on a vertcoin pool for someone only doing 90Kh? I don't recognize any of the names on the vertcoin.com pool page but dedicatedpool, and that's a 2% fee. I picked a P2P node with low latency at random, I don't know that going P2P is going to be the right path for me.  Tongue

EDIT: I let cudaminer autotune, and it picked K4x32 for my 650ti boost, but I"m running about 2% rejection rate at 64*C and gettng occassional "result did not validate on CPU" errors.

okay just realised, I missed your point in my previous message.
You need to chose a p2pool close to where you leave for latency reason.
Other alternative is to install a private node on your computer and run on it.

edit: realised, I missed (again) your point... choose a pool which gets a lot of blocks.
But to be honest at 90kh, vertcoin won't be profitable at all.

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
March 09, 2014, 11:25:41 AM
 #8362

Got y-day 2x 750ti to put with my gtx770 and the damn 770 is getting way too hot along-side those two (90C +) and I have nicely vented chassis.
It was hovering around 82C full load OC-ed before. Sad

Anyone can recommend good store with USB risers that delivers to EU? Thanks.
some local dealer (or mining enthusiast) on ebay... That's where I find them... the delivery was pretty fast.
ordered one old model from amazon, it took a month to get delivered from china (things they don't tell you when you buy it...)

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Aurosonic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 11:45:25 AM
 #8363

Okay guys, here is my setup for 1800 khs with 6xMSi 750Ti TF:

- ASRock H81 pro btc with 1.50 bios update
- PSU Corsair CS750M 750W
- DDR-III 8GB Corsair 9-9-9-24 1333Mhz
- SSD Sandisk 60GB
- 6x MSI 750Ti Twin Frozer with following settings:

all cards bios modded to 66.5W Powerlimit
All cards overclocked to +135/+520 except 1 card ( it lacks with just +135/+300 )
Each card plugged to mb with powered usb 3.0 risers 1m lenght.
Overall power consumption is 555-565W.
All the temps are less than 60.

my cudaminer setting: -i 0 -H 2 -l T10x24 -m 1 -b 4096

you have to use x86 cudaminer + google chrome with some flash animation for best results.

https://i.imgur.com/MHZxZsA.png
https://i.imgur.com/J8edxuB.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/nHboH4p.jpg
Decagrog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 289
Merit: 251



View Profile
March 09, 2014, 12:17:09 PM
 #8364

After a full day of test I'm really out of ideas  Undecided  pheraps is better to look for a new motherboard ( maybe the gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 )
Get a better CPU (AMD is known to suck Tongue)
Or, indeed, the motherboard...


I give up.
I've updated mobo bios, changed the cpu with a quad-core and uninstalled also the wifi usb dongle ( as 69charger suggested )... no luck. Same shitty problem.

Tomorrow I'll probably change the mobo on the rig and switch to intel for the first time in 12 years  Grin

ghur
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 12:23:04 PM
 #8365

Tomorrow I'll probably change the mobo on the rig and switch to intel for the first time in 12 years  Grin

Welcome to the light side Smiley

doge: D8q8dR6tEAcaJ7U65jP6AAkiiL2CFJaHah
Automated faucet, pays daily: Qoinpro
overcurrent
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 01:06:32 PM
 #8366

Is there any news on a cudaminer which works with Darkcoin?

sgminer won't work with nvidia.
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
March 09, 2014, 01:19:46 PM
 #8367

Is there any news on a cudaminer which works with Darkcoin?

sgminer won't work with nvidia.
same as on the previous page

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
bacon_wrangler
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 02:22:55 PM
 #8368

Any suggestions on a vertcoin pool for someone only doing 90Kh? I don't recognize any of the names on the vertcoin.com pool page but dedicatedpool, and that's a 2% fee. I picked a P2P node with low latency at random, I don't know that going P2P is going to be the right path for me.  Tongue

EDIT: I let cudaminer autotune, and it picked K4x32 for my 650ti boost, but I"m running about 2% rejection rate at 64*C and gettng occassional "result did not validate on CPU" errors.

okay just realised, I missed your point in my previous message.
You need to chose a p2pool close to where you leave for latency reason.
Other alternative is to install a private node on your computer and run on it.

edit: realised, I missed (again) your point... choose a pool which gets a lot of blocks.
But to be honest at 90kh, vertcoin won't be profitable at all.

Yeah, 1.2 vertcoin in 12 hours so far. Heck, I'd have to look it up, but it still may be more profitable than doge. Tongue
chaser
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 02:29:44 PM
 #8369

Hi,

Is there a tutorial on how to compile a 32bit version of cudaminer on a 64bit machine (running 64bit ubuntu 12.04). The usual "./configure -m32" whines about openssl.
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
March 09, 2014, 02:37:03 PM
 #8370

Any suggestions on a vertcoin pool for someone only doing 90Kh? I don't recognize any of the names on the vertcoin.com pool page but dedicatedpool, and that's a 2% fee. I picked a P2P node with low latency at random, I don't know that going P2P is going to be the right path for me.  Tongue

EDIT: I let cudaminer autotune, and it picked K4x32 for my 650ti boost, but I"m running about 2% rejection rate at 64*C and gettng occassional "result did not validate on CPU" errors.

okay just realised, I missed your point in my previous message.
You need to chose a p2pool close to where you leave for latency reason.
Other alternative is to install a private node on your computer and run on it.

edit: realised, I missed (again) your point... choose a pool which gets a lot of blocks.
But to be honest at 90kh, vertcoin won't be profitable at all.

Yeah, 1.2 vertcoin in 12 hours so far. Heck, I'd have to look it up, but it still may be more profitable than doge. Tongue
You should check the "new vertcoin" execoin which may-be one day will reach the profitability of vertcoin (or not... lol ).
I mean it is easier to mine at the moment (but less profitable too...)

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 03:52:10 PM
 #8371

Hi,

Is there a tutorial on how to compile a 32bit version of cudaminer on a 64bit machine (running 64bit ubuntu 12.04). The usual "./configure -m32" whines about openssl.

you need all dependencies as 32 bit versions as well. Install the corresponding :i386 packages

for a few packages the 64 bit developer packages and the 32 bit developer packages may collide,
so you have to pick one.

Christian
I_M
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 135
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 09, 2014, 04:07:55 PM
 #8372

Any progress or updates on the riser issue?
rahrahrah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 04:27:29 PM
 #8373

Whenever I close Cudaminer (2012-02-28), my system becomes extremely sluggish (Win 7 x64). I was going to say that it seems to be MSI Afterburner that is the culprit but that might not be true. Before running Cudaminer it doesn't take up much CPU resource but after quitting Cudaminer, it fluctuates between 10 and 99%. Beforehand it's no more than 4-6%.

Here is the CPU usage after a fresh boot. It settles very quickly and stays low:



And this is minutes after I've closed Cudaminer *and* MSI Afterburner. Lots of spiking to 99% but it doesn't appear visible in the process list from what I can see.



The CPU is a single core AMD 2.8GHz Sempron but they run perfectly well with cgminer/sgminer/vertminer and AMD cards.

Any ideas? Sad

VTC: VxNWL9jDRvEcCT48vqQkLxckREUafYowVu
SMC: SYLjkCM63iJyYpoz14dJcq27tEfw6r9w6m
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 04:30:38 PM
 #8374

What's your launch config?

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
rahrahrah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 04:45:44 PM
 #8375

What's your launch config?
--no-autotune -l T5x24 -m 1 -i 0

VTC: VxNWL9jDRvEcCT48vqQkLxckREUafYowVu
SMC: SYLjkCM63iJyYpoz14dJcq27tEfw6r9w6m
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 04:47:06 PM
 #8376

What's your launch config?
--no-autotune -l T5x24 -m 1 -i 0

Pass -H 2 aswell

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
rahrahrah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 04:50:05 PM
 #8377

What's your launch config?
--no-autotune -l T5x24 -m 1 -i 0

Pass -H 2 aswell

Cbuchner1 has confirmed this doesn't need passing now and is default (http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoinmining/comments/1ymph4/issues_optimizing_4x_gtx_750ti_cudaminer/cfnwzgt).

VTC: VxNWL9jDRvEcCT48vqQkLxckREUafYowVu
SMC: SYLjkCM63iJyYpoz14dJcq27tEfw6r9w6m
69charger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 05:06:41 PM
 #8378

Tomorrow I'll probably change the mobo on the rig and switch to intel for the first time in 12 years  Grin

Welcome to the light side Smiley

Yes welcome! Intel is just soooooo much more capable. I've owned both and have not tried to fanboy either side, but there is a night and day difference between Intel and AMD.
cvax
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 05:33:41 PM
 #8379

Okay guys, here is my setup for 1800 khs with 6xMSi 750Ti TF:

- ASRock H81 pro btc with 1.50 bios update
- PSU Corsair CS750M 750W
- DDR-III 8GB Corsair 9-9-9-24 1333Mhz
- SSD Sandisk 60GB
- 6x MSI 750Ti Twin Frozer with following settings:

all cards bios modded to 66.5W Powerlimit
All cards overclocked to +135/+520 except 1 card ( it lacks with just +135/+300 )
Each card plugged to mb with powered usb 3.0 risers 1m lenght.
Overall power consumption is 555-565W.
All the temps are less than 60.

my cudaminer setting: -i 0 -H 2 -l T10x24 -m 1 -b 4096

you have to use x86 cudaminer + google chrome with some flash animation for best results.




Interesting you achieved this with risers. Have you ever tried to see what kind of hashrate you get without risers on those cards?

BTC: 15HAePieDjYge6LTG2HFRZEJseRYJJqmta    |     YAC: YMvBp1SpY2sZ8nUZgKFLTEx7neuUZ7APuM
8x 750Ti's, AsRock 970 Extreme 4, Athlon II 170u
rahrahrah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 05:55:19 PM
 #8380

Whenever I close Cudaminer (2012-02-28), my system becomes extremely sluggish (Win 7 x64). I was going to say that it seems to be MSI Afterburner that is the culprit but that might not be true. Before running Cudaminer it doesn't take up much CPU resource but after quitting Cudaminer, it fluctuates between 10 and 99%. Beforehand it's no more than 4-6%.

Here is the CPU usage after a fresh boot. It settles very quickly and stays low:



And this is minutes after I've closed Cudaminer *and* MSI Afterburner. Lots of spiking to 99% but it doesn't appear visible in the process list from what I can see.



The CPU is a single core AMD 2.8GHz Sempron but they run perfectly well with cgminer/sgminer/vertminer and AMD cards.

Any ideas? Sad

Whilst mining (4 card rig) responsiveness is terrible too actually (this still doesn't explain why it remains so after finishing mining). Between cudaminer, cudamanager and either MSI Afterburner or EVGA Precision X (tried both) it hogs the CPU - almost 100%.



Connecting to the sytem takes a long time (sometimes times out). Testing / tweaking settings becomes far slower. When it crashes, the only solution seems to be a system reboot (often taking a very long time as the system is unresponsive).

This doesn't happen with AMD cards/drivers/mining software and it's making the switch from those to these cards extremely difficult (I want to convert! really!). System usage on the same configuration but admittedly with 1 x 7990 (hashing far faster than 4 x 750 Ti):


VTC: VxNWL9jDRvEcCT48vqQkLxckREUafYowVu
SMC: SYLjkCM63iJyYpoz14dJcq27tEfw6r9w6m
Pages: « 1 ... 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 [419] 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!