zer0k
|
|
May 25, 2017, 11:44:05 AM |
|
So I have one 1070 ming well 437sol/s. How does everyone power SIX 1070 that require both a 6pin and 8pin power. My EVGA 1200w only comes with two of those cables. I tried to only plug in the 8pin and it wouldn't boot. Said plug in 6pin power on the screen.
Thanks,
You could try the Rosewill HERCULES-1600S with 16 x 6+2-Pin https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA0723W13844
|
|
|
|
miner417
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
May 25, 2017, 01:27:26 PM |
|
So I have one 1070 ming well 437sol/s. How does everyone power SIX 1070 that require both a 6pin and 8pin power. My EVGA 1200w only comes with two of those cables. I tried to only plug in the 8pin and it wouldn't boot. Said plug in 6pin power on the screen.
Thanks,
Most people either use a server PSU, or use 2 PSU's with an Add2PSU to start them both.
|
|
|
|
fatdracula
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2017, 01:49:59 PM |
|
Hi, I tried to run EWBF's miner in my Linux box which is running a modified version of Slackware 14.2. I'm a total Linux noob but I managed to compile and install Nvidia kernel and drivers 375.39. Nvidia-smi was showing my card (GTX 1070) and correct driver version. I launched EWBF's miner and my power supply blew up right after the line ( http://imgur.com/a/yeopU): CUDA: Device: 0 Selected solver: 0 PSU was a Seasonic G-450. 450W should be enough for a single 1070 and a few idle HDD. I replaced the PSU with another 450W unit, removed the GTX 1070 and the computer booted normally. Now before I try again with the new PSU, my question is: is it just bad luck I blew my PSU the moment I launched the miner, or did I miss something important?
|
|
|
|
vince212
|
|
May 25, 2017, 02:39:47 PM |
|
hi i just bought a 1060 3gb i just wrote this at my config
miner --server zec.suprnova.cc --user vince232.1 --pass 1234 --port 2142
right now im getting 270 sol/s per card @120w per card
is there like a bios mod or can i undervolt it just like the rx cards to get lower power and better hashrate?
|
|
|
|
fatdracula
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2017, 02:54:21 PM |
|
hi i just bought a 1060 3gb i just wrote this at my config
miner --server zec.suprnova.cc --user vince232.1 --pass 1234 --port 2142
right now im getting 270 sol/s per card @120w per card
is there like a bios mod or can i undervolt it just like the rx cards to get lower power and better hashrate?
I don't know about bios mods but you can reduce power draw and overclock easily with MSI Afterburner.
|
|
|
|
Kejvu
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 25, 2017, 02:55:58 PM |
|
hi i just bought a 1060 3gb i just wrote this at my config
miner --server zec.suprnova.cc --user vince232.1 --pass 1234 --port 2142
right now im getting 270 sol/s per card @120w per card
is there like a bios mod or can i undervolt it just like the rx cards to get lower power and better hashrate?
Nope. I don't get it. On CMD ~320Sol/s and on pool its say average hashrate is ~220 on flypool and from moment to moment on suprnova i have 400-500, wtf? How long do you guys wait for 0.01zec to mine with 1 card?
|
|
|
|
xenomorph113
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2017, 03:19:11 PM |
|
Hello All, Just thought I'd Share some of my hashrates using EWBF's miner (I have some older hardware as well as some newer)[also as a side note I dont currently pay for electricity {included in rent} so that's partially why I run old cards] Ran to test: Galaxy Geforce 570 1280mb - 15-20sol/s (stock settings) Currently Running: PNY Geforce 680 2Gb - 60-70 sol/s (about 95% power) {1228mhz core, 6008mhz ram} 2x Zotac Geforce 970 4Gb - 260-285 sol/s each (165w-170w each, ~1.6-1.7 sol/w [@110% power]) {1404mhz core, 7000mhz ram} Zotac Geforce 1060 Mini 6Gb - 300-335 sol/s (110w-125w, ~2.5-2.6 sol/w [@101% power] {2012mhz core, 9000mhz ram}
|
|
|
|
|
Aexcu
|
|
May 25, 2017, 04:37:43 PM Last edit: May 25, 2017, 05:07:36 PM by Aexcu |
|
Dear EWBF_, I've been trying to get your lovable Zec miner 0.3.3b Windows 64-bit version to work with the Radix42 ( https://github.com/radix42) Windows port of Zcashd version 1.0.8-1 (running it as zcashd -daemon). My zcash.conf (in %appdata%\Zcash) addnode=mainnet.z.cash rpcuser=aaxa rpcpassword=axaa rpcport=8232
I'm running miner as: miner --server localhost --port 8232 --user aaxa --pass axaa --pec
Result: +-------------------------------------------------+ | EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.3b | +-------------------------------------------------+ INFO: Server: localhost:8232 INFO: Solver Auto. INFO: Devices: All. INFO: Temperature limit: 90 INFO: Api: Disabled --------------------------------------------------- ERROR: Cannot connect to the server. 7
Debugging: - I have a 100% synched blockchain and can connect to Zcashd with the Zcash Desktop GUI wallet 0.69 Beta from https://github.com/vaklinov/zcash-swing-wallet-ui/blob/master/docs/Readme-Windows.md
- I can telnet to port 8232 on localhost (from a Linux VM), so I know something is responding there
- I can mine on pools such as Luckpool with "miner --server luckpool.org --port 3357 --user t<address>.m1 --pass x --pec
- I can mine with the local Zcashd and CPUs, but as you can figure this is not the method I want to use
Unless I'm doing something wrong here, please enable solo mining for your miner. I'm more than happy to e.g. have it connect to a pool for the devfees.
|
|
|
|
Gurion
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2017, 05:18:40 PM |
|
Looks like EWBF_ left us.... Wait 10 minutes? ====================== MINER STARTED ========================= ERROR: Cannot connect to the server. 9 INFO: Target: 00083126e978d4fd... CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1080 Not selected. CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Not selected. CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Not selected. CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Not selected. CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Not selected. CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB PCI: 0000:08:00.0 CUDA: Device: 6 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Not selected. CUDA: Device: 5 Selected solver: 0 Temp: GPU5 52C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 50C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 49C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 48C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 48C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 48C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 48C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 48C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 48C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s ERROR: Lost connection with the server. Attempt reconnect... ERROR: Cannot start work 7 Temp: GPU5 48C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 48C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 48C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 48C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 49C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 49C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 49C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 49C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 49C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 49C GPU5: 0 Sol/s Total speed: 0 Sol/s ERROR: Lost connection with the server. Attempt reconnect... INFO: Target: 00083126e978d4fd... INFO: Detected new work: 4379c8f2e2dfac3f14c3 INFO 00:53:28: GPU5 Accepted share 1333ms [A:1, R:0] Temp: GPU5 61C GPU5: 287 Sol/s Total speed: 287 Sol/s Temp: GPU5 66C GPU5: 292 Sol/s Total speed: 292 Sol/s INFO 00:54:11: GPU5 Accepted share 13800ms [A:2, R:0] Temp: GPU5 68C GPU5: 298 Sol/s Total speed: 298 Sol/s ============================== ......
|
|
|
|
Kejvu
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 25, 2017, 05:25:11 PM |
|
hi i just bought a 1060 3gb i just wrote this at my config
miner --server zec.suprnova.cc --user vince232.1 --pass 1234 --port 2142
right now im getting 270 sol/s per card @120w per card
is there like a bios mod or can i undervolt it just like the rx cards to get lower power and better hashrate?
Nope. I don't get it. On CMD ~320Sol/s and on pool its say average hashrate is ~220 on flypool and from moment to moment on suprnova i have 400-500, wtf? How long do you guys wait for 0.01zec to mine with 1 card? Hello Kejvu, if you're mining at 320sol/s you should make about 0.018 - 0.02 zec a day, at least according to this calculator: https://www.cryptocompare.com/mining/calculator/zec?HashingPower=320&HashingUnit=H%2Fs&PowerConsumption=120&CostPerkWh=.13Hello xenomorph113, thanks for your reply. I wan't to ask you what pool you use for mining zcash?
|
|
|
|
xenomorph113
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2017, 05:52:51 PM |
|
Hello xenomorph113, thanks for your reply. I wan't to ask you what pool you use for mining zcash? Hello Kejvu, Currently I am mining to Slushpool.com, at present time the pool is only a couple hundred kh/s (250kh/s-400kh/s average, historically a BTC pool, they only started mining zec this year and only started to see decent {+100Kh/s} speeds in late April 2017)
|
|
|
|
Sequoia93
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
May 25, 2017, 06:06:14 PM |
|
I just recently fired up a rig of 1070s using this program, and the miner is great. I am just having trouble getting my cards to hash over 400sol/s. Changing the memory clock has very little/no effect on speed. The best I can do right now is ~390 with TDP set at 80%, but I've read others here achieving over 450 Does anyone have any insight? My nvidia mining experience is pretty much nil.
|
|
|
|
mr.hump
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2017, 07:24:17 PM |
|
I just recently fired up a rig of 1070s using this program, and the miner is great. I am just having trouble getting my cards to hash over 400sol/s. Changing the memory clock has very little/no effect on speed. The best I can do right now is ~390 with TDP set at 80%, but I've read others here achieving over 450 Does anyone have any insight? My nvidia mining experience is pretty much nil. I can't imagine some1 get less then 430 even on stock 1070. What cards do u using? I have Gigabyte windforce OC and msi armor, 5 with micron and 1 with Samsung memory. Cores +80, mem + 550 and that is results http://imgur.com/a/4aIZZ
|
|
|
|
sublimus
|
|
May 25, 2017, 08:01:11 PM |
|
hi i just bought a 1060 3gb i just wrote this at my config
miner --server zec.suprnova.cc --user vince232.1 --pass 1234 --port 2142
From Suprnova: You can define your own diff through password field, for example: d=8192 as password gives you 8192 as diff Try --pass x and --user should be your wallet address
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
May 25, 2017, 08:24:52 PM |
|
I just recently fired up a rig of 1070s using this program, and the miner is great. I am just having trouble getting my cards to hash over 400sol/s. Changing the memory clock has very little/no effect on speed. The best I can do right now is ~390 with TDP set at 80%, but I've read others here achieving over 450 Does anyone have any insight? My nvidia mining experience is pretty much nil. ZEC is not particularly impressed with memory speed - it wants raw CPU quite a bit more, so bump core clocks up and memory clocks flat or DOWN a little for best results IME. It also depends a LOT on the specific card model, especially when you look at cards like my Gigabytes that have a FACTORY TDP of 180 watts (vs 154 or 155 for "1070 standard") and a high factory overclock. TDP as a percentage is MEANINGLESS unless you specify the actual card.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
fullzero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1009
|
|
May 25, 2017, 08:37:34 PM |
|
I just recently fired up a rig of 1070s using this program, and the miner is great. I am just having trouble getting my cards to hash over 400sol/s. Changing the memory clock has very little/no effect on speed. The best I can do right now is ~390 with TDP set at 80%, but I've read others here achieving over 450 Does anyone have any insight? My nvidia mining experience is pretty much nil. ZEC is not particularly impressed with memory speed - it wants raw CPU quite a bit more, so bump core clocks up and memory clocks flat or DOWN a little for best results IME. It also depends a LOT on the specific card model, especially when you look at cards like my Gigabytes that have a FACTORY TDP of 180 watts (vs 154 or 155 for "1070 standard") and a high factory overclock. TDP as a percentage is MEANINGLESS unless you specify the actual card. This why MSI uses percent in afterburner instead of actual wattage. I agree that: TDP as a percentage is MEANINGLESS unless you specify the actual card.
|
|
|
|
Sequoia93
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
May 25, 2017, 09:11:47 PM |
|
I just recently fired up a rig of 1070s using this program, and the miner is great. I am just having trouble getting my cards to hash over 400sol/s. Changing the memory clock has very little/no effect on speed. The best I can do right now is ~390 with TDP set at 80%, but I've read others here achieving over 450 Does anyone have any insight? My nvidia mining experience is pretty much nil. I can't imagine some1 get less then 430 even on stock 1070. What cards do u using? I have Gigabyte windforce OC and msi armor, 5 with micron and 1 with Samsung memory. Cores +80, mem + 550 and that is results http://imgur.com/a/4aIZZThe cards are all Zotac Minis with Micron Memory. Right now I'm running them at +75% voltage, 80% TDP, +200 core, -250 mem and getting about 385. If I push the mem a lot, I can squeeze out ~395, With TDP set to 100%, The highest I can get is ~415. I'm running win10, and using afterburner to clock, and GPU-Z to verify the clocks.
|
|
|
|
fullzero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1009
|
|
May 25, 2017, 09:15:57 PM |
|
I just recently fired up a rig of 1070s using this program, and the miner is great. I am just having trouble getting my cards to hash over 400sol/s. Changing the memory clock has very little/no effect on speed. The best I can do right now is ~390 with TDP set at 80%, but I've read others here achieving over 450 Does anyone have any insight? My nvidia mining experience is pretty much nil. I can't imagine some1 get less then 430 even on stock 1070. What cards do u using? I have Gigabyte windforce OC and msi armor, 5 with micron and 1 with Samsung memory. Cores +80, mem + 550 and that is results http://imgur.com/a/4aIZZThe cards are all Zotac Minis with Micron Memory. Right now I'm running them at +75% voltage, 80% TDP, +200 core, -250 mem and getting about 385. If I push the mem a lot, I can squeeze out ~395, With TDP set to 100%, The highest I can get is ~415. I'm running win10, and using afterburner to clock, and GPU-Z to verify the clocks. Default clocks on Zotac 1070s are lower than most; so you want to use a positive memory clock OC. Start with +450 then walk up to +900 if they can handle it.
|
|
|
|
Sequoia93
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
May 25, 2017, 09:30:02 PM |
|
I just recently fired up a rig of 1070s using this program, and the miner is great. I am just having trouble getting my cards to hash over 400sol/s. Changing the memory clock has very little/no effect on speed. The best I can do right now is ~390 with TDP set at 80%, but I've read others here achieving over 450 Does anyone have any insight? My nvidia mining experience is pretty much nil. I can't imagine some1 get less then 430 even on stock 1070. What cards do u using? I have Gigabyte windforce OC and msi armor, 5 with micron and 1 with Samsung memory. Cores +80, mem + 550 and that is results http://imgur.com/a/4aIZZThe cards are all Zotac Minis with Micron Memory. Right now I'm running them at +75% voltage, 80% TDP, +200 core, -250 mem and getting about 385. If I push the mem a lot, I can squeeze out ~395, With TDP set to 100%, The highest I can get is ~415. I'm running win10, and using afterburner to clock, and GPU-Z to verify the clocks. Default clocks on Zotac 1070s are lower than most; so you want to use a positive memory clock OC. Start with +450 then walk up to +900 if they can handle it. I got the memory clock as high as +700 before I started to have issues. The difference between -200 and +700 was only about 10sol/s at best, so I just left it low to lower power draw.
|
|
|
|
|