Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[1714506333]

1714506333

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[d_eddie]

This is why they're going after cattle as well. 
We're going to have to tap those cattle next for bitcoin mining.

Eating CO2?
Mining? What we need: ...cattle!
So says the rancher.




#haiku

[Xian01]

Date Registered:   May 19, 2012, 12:46:29 AM

Can't believe it's been almost a decade since I registered this account on the forums.

Crazy times. Don't post much any more on this account since getting out of mining, but, like, yeah. Mostly hang on Twitter nowadays. Crazy place.

So, wen moon? Still HODLing.

Are we gonna break $69,420 USD/BTC, or nuke ourselves to death first?

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[suchmoon]

Are we gonna break $69,420 USD/BTC, or nuke ourselves to death first?

Good to see you again. Sounds like a trick question. Most of us won't get nuked to death but will rather die slowly after we run out of neighbors to eat, so at that point 1 BTC might well be worth a trillion USD but will buy only one pack of smokes. Also carving blocks on cave walls will be a real bitch.

[Toxic2040]

Date Registered:   May 19, 2012, 12:46:29 AM

Can't believe it's been almost a decade since I registered this account on the forums.

Crazy times. Don't post much any more on this account since getting out of mining, but, like, yeah. Mostly hang on Twitter nowadays. Crazy place.

So, wen moon? Still HODLing.

Are we gonna break $69,420 USD/BTC, or nuke ourselves to death first?

as to the first..

+1 WOsMerit    /wave  wb

as to the second

im sorry   I think there is almost a standard around here...and thats to be better than twitter...  overachievers the lot of us

as to the third..

yes

as to the forth..

[Arriemoller]

Are we gonna break $69,420 USD/BTC, or nuke ourselves to death first?

Good to see you again. Sounds like a trick question. Most of us won't get nuked to death but will rather die slowly after we run out of neighbors to eat, so at that point 1 BTC might well be worth a trillion USD but will buy only one pack of smokes. Also carving blocks on cave walls will be a real bitch.

If they use nukes it's just gonna be small tactical nukes, thats just like a really super big grenade with some local radioactvity, not even close to a Mad Max event, just calm down a bit will you.

Something like this, but delivered with missiles insted of cannons, apparently the cannons couldn't shoot them far enough.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XT5jo7aZzTw

[d_eddie]

I kind of get it but I also do not.  If you are the survivor of a post-nuclear world, then what are the actual chances you get to meet another survivor?  In that kind of world, not even seeds, banknotes or coffee is helpful anymore.

I suggest coffee still is, while admittedly more enjoyable in good company. But whatever, I see your point.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[suchmoon]

If they use nukes it's just gonna be small tactical nukes, thats just like a really super big grenade with some local radioactvity, not even close to a Mad Max event, just calm down a bit will you.

I'm calm. It's not 1945 though, there's more than 2 tiny nukes in the world, many in the hands of utter idiots too.

[JayJuanGee]

CDBCs vs Bitcoin is a very interesting discussion to have.  There are pros and cons to both.  And to different sorts of users.

[...]

Pros and cons to both..

fuck that nonsense...

[...]

You are, as you tend to do, inferring things I do not mean.

[...]

Well, don't say it then.

[...]

Jay, cAPSLOCK does not like CDBCs, he's just being realistic...

Every now and then I tangle with a JJG autism flare up.  

It is what it is.

Hahahahaha

That's one way of phrasing the matter.. Mr.. doesn't like CBDCs (aka cAPSLOCK)  but wants to talk about the purported (in theory) pros and cons of them.... kind of a long name that you got there...#justsaying

 

Great.. .I am glad that you are planning to know your enemy.. Hopefully, you do not lose sight of what is bitcoin in the process.

Exactly.  This will be a powerful enemy.  And even though they have exactly ZERO chance of stopping bitcoin, they actually DO have the power to harm people all the way to the point of death.  And even as hyperbolic as I can be... that is not an exaggeration.

Knowing their tactics, and preparing for them, as well as trying to see things from their perspective will be one of the ways I protect myself from their shenanigans.  And I hope some of my thoughts on that matter might help some of my brethren (and mythical sistren) here as well.

But I do tend to over-inflate my own importance in my own estimation from time to time.  Not as much as you, but we can't all be THAT good. 

Emphasis added above helps to justify the following responsive action:

[cAPSLOCK]

Ok, in the totally random-out-of-nowhere-negro-gypsy-premonition dept, I fear I may have been too bullish on a short term recovery.

I am suddenly filled with fear...

I like the tingling balls better...

[Xian01]

as to the forth..

                                       

[JayJuanGee]

How many forum users contributed to this? At least one, as far as I can see..

Think i was just tax-raped

Any legal contract requires at least two willing partys otherwise its a clear case of extortion.
The only legal tax is sales tax because the business owner has a legal working contract with the town/council and the fee (tax) he then adds to the sale price. Most tax money is used for war anyway.

Australia one party policy
https://australiaoneparty.com/policies-summary/

I am having some troubles with your way of framing this matter, Tash...

One central issue seems to be that governments do not even feel that they need to tax in order to spend for war.. they will spend for war with printed money.. if they actually had to tax the people to pay for war, they would have to actually deal with disagreement from the plebs.. so an easier (and sneakier) way around actually taxing us is to just print money.. because even though printing money is a kind of tax.. it is much harder to identify as such.. and less likely that there is even going to be any kind of attempt, whatsoever, to seek consent.

Why are you showing us the shitcoin ethereum versus BTC charts?  Is there some kind of relevance to anything that is meaningful and important in this world?

Weakened ETH/BTC = BTC dominance about to run hard = volatility and multiple Barts on BTC

I think it's relevant.

Doesn't seem too relevant, unless this is your way of saying that either you are getting back into BTC or that you are not necessarily waiting for the BTC spot price to meet the 200-week moving average before you get back into BTC.

There may be a way to make the BTC/ETH pair seem relevant to BTC without getting too caught up on baloney-talk that relates to how shitcoins are performing, even if you are comparing them to BTC... in a seemingly lame attempt to suggest that they are relevant merely because you paired one or more of them up with BTC.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[sirazimuth]

.....
I just blame it on the dude next to me...

<air biscuit>

......

Wasn't me, that was marcus....

... your stalking is getting beyond creepy you freak

... I couldn't help you understand my equation but the issue was on your end ... now this continued obsession with me is not healthy

Sorry bro, I forgot you don't have a sense of humor... Carry on with your paranoid commie obsession.


You are in the lead now. YW

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[JayJuanGee]

sabre dance...or Danse Macabre? I kid, i kid.

In other news: if a token wants to be Santa's little helper, is it still a 'shitcoin'?
For some slower pokes here (guess who)..Santa=Bitcoin in my analogy.

Witness Stacks (STX), developing smart contracts on BITCOIN.
Now, they got a $165 mil fund going.
https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/03/10/okcoin-stacks-launch-165m-pledge-to-support-bitcoin-related-projects/

I smell money in this one, but will not press the subject much.

I doubt that the coins/projects that are pegged to bitcoin are going to be as criticized as some other projects/coins... Surely one of the problems will be if the project has its own coin/token, then there will be a question about whether it really is supporting bitcoin or just wanting to print its own money.  I don't claim to be an expert so there might be ways that projects might end up having their own token..l but they are not printing money but instead tied/pegged to bitcoin...  Is it BIP300 that attempts to create sidechains that would cause various shitcoins to end up getting pegged to bitcoin as a second layer.. but some people still do not like that because it seems to still facilitate or enable the proliferation of shitcoins - even though pegged to bitcoin.

Please CB Sthap.

One block every 10 minutes
One CB autopost every 60 minutes

 

That's right.

Tick tock the next CB post.

An interesting question I've seen on twitter. I'm asking it here, for the crowd of pundits and observers and long time bitcoin followers.

Q: What is the shortest WMA that results in BTC never going down?

Seen here:
https://twitter.com/cryptoartists1/status/1501559160684662789

I experimented a little bit, and the answer is 169 weeks (3.25 years).





It's at $22780 right now, and rising about $30 a day.

I wonder from where you are getting your data Phil_S.... especially regarding the current 200-Week moving average.

This website shows the 200-week moving average at about $20,304.50 currently (and moving up about $10 per day), which is not inconsistent with bitcoin wisdom showing about the same.

In other words, why is your current 200-week moving average nearly $2,500 larger and purportedly moving up 3x per day higher than $10 per day, when you say it's moving up $30 per day?

[edited out]

Good work, Phil_S.

Pretty close to the 200-Week MA, which has always been monotonically increasing and is currently at $20,283.

Ok.. so it is ONLY me who does not know what Phil_S is referring to and how it differs from the 200-week moving average?

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation