Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Out of mind]

^Okay, with all the discussion around AI generated content, I want to conduct a little test to see if you guys can discern AI from reality.  Obviously, this is an informal test but here goes.  (feel free to use one of those detection tools on it as well).  It's not necessary for everyone to respond to this post - I'll update this post with an edit at  ~2100 UST to let you know.  Oh, regardless of what comes after this, I still love you JJG

I just wanted to bring up a point about JJG's forum postings. Don't get me wrong, the guy knows his stuff and has some really useful insights. But seriously, he uses way too many words to make a simple point! I mean, come on, who has the time to read through a novel every time he posts something? It's like he's trying to show off how smart he is by using a million unnecessary words. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate a well-thought-out argument, but sometimes brevity is key.

#nohomo

Seems like the detector has got its job in the right fashion. It's detected the content as 100% AI generation.

Some detectors identify it as 100% AI generation. Some detectors identify it as 100% human text. I think there are many AI detectors that often misidentify.
Difficult to confirm  


considered correct.

[1714496389]

1714496389

[1714496389]

1714496389

[1714496389]

1714496389

[1714496389]

1714496389

[1714496389]

1714496389

[1714496389]

1714496389

[bitebits]

^Okay, with all the discussion around AI generated content, I want to conduct a little test to see if you guys can discern AI from reality.  Obviously, this is an informal test but here goes.  (feel free to use one of those detection tools on it as well).  It's not necessary for everyone to respond to this post - I'll update this post with an edit at  ~2100 UST to let you know.  Oh, regardless of what comes after this, I still love you JJG

I just wanted to bring up a point about JJG's forum postings. Don't get me wrong, the guy knows his stuff and has some really useful insights. But seriously, he uses way too many words to make a simple point! I mean, come on, who has the time to read through a novel every time he posts something? It's like he's trying to show off how smart he is by using a million unnecessary words. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate a well-thought-out argument, but sometimes brevity is key.

#nohomo

To me it is more interesting why we think it is written by an AI or human, instead of using some detection tool. This would be an interesting school assignment @Homer . Why I think it is AI-generated:

- It uses "don't get me wrong" twice in the same alinea, something humans get taught to avoid (re-using the same words).

- "the guy knows his stuff and has some really useful insights" says exactly nothing, it attempts to disguise knowing any specifics about JJG. Except for the prompt it has been given that JJG uses lots of words trying to get a point across.

[Volgastallion]

Most of AI detectors are pure crap, and its fine its in that way. Because we are in front of a paradorx, if the AI are so good and so alike the humans, its normal to see the AI writing like a human and canot disguise who is who.

Bitcoin can be stored literally as colors.

Read that again.

Developers found a way to convert bitcoin "private keys" or "seed phrases" into a sequence of colors linked to their hex codes. Imagine using a colorful painting on your wall as your secretly encoded bitcoin password.

source

Click for details: https://github.com/enteropositivo/bip39colors

good idea but remembering six-digit hex codes is not really easy compaired to seed phrases. is there a way to read the hex code from a painting? I know that there is a tool in photoshop.

Good but i dont rely full on that, why if you read bad the colour by mistake of an aplication or by bad adjustmet of the colors in the camera who took the pic?

[eXPHorizon]

[Paashaas]

New research puts age of universe at 26.7 billion years, nearly twice as old as previously believed.

Our universe could be twice as old as current estimates, according to a new study that challenges the dominant cosmological model and sheds new light on the so-called "impossible early galaxy problem."

The work is published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

"Our newly-devised model stretches the galaxy formation time by a several billion years, making the universe 26.7 billion years old, and not 13.7 as previously estimated," says author Rajendra Gupta, adjunct professor of physics in the Faculty of Science at the University of Ottawa.

For years, astronomers and physicists have calculated the age of our universe by measuring the time elapsed since the Big Bang and by studying the oldest stars based on the redshift of light coming from distant galaxies. In 2021, thanks to new techniques and advances in technology, the age of our universe was thus estimated at 13.797 billion years using the Lambda-CDM concordance model.

However, many scientists have been puzzled by the existence of stars like the Methuselah that appear to be older than the estimated age of our universe and by the discovery of early galaxies in an advanced state of evolution made possible by the James Webb Space Telescope. These galaxies, existing a mere 300 million years or so after the Big Bang, appear to have a level of maturity and mass typically associated with billions of years of cosmic evolution. Furthermore, they're surprisingly small in size, adding another layer of mystery to the equation.

[Who is John Galt?]

70% of all bitcoin have not moved in over 1 year
30% of bitcoin have not moved in over 5 years

You don't really read the thread, do you? On the same page, half an hour before you quoted someone else's tweet, someone quoted a tweet with the same message.

29.1% of Bitcoin hasn't moved in 5+ years.

And what are your own thoughts on this? What did you want to say when you shared this tweet? I haven't ignored anyone on the forum yet, but it looks like you will be the first. Sorry.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[Volgastallion]

New research puts age of universe at 26.7 billion years, nearly twice as old as previously believed.

Our universe could be twice as old as current estimates, according to a new study that challenges the dominant cosmological model and sheds new light on the so-called "impossible early galaxy problem."

The work is published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

"Our newly-devised model stretches the galaxy formation time by a several billion years, making the universe 26.7 billion years old, and not 13.7 as previously estimated," says author Rajendra Gupta, adjunct professor of physics in the Faculty of Science at the University of Ottawa.

For years, astronomers and physicists have calculated the age of our universe by measuring the time elapsed since the Big Bang and by studying the oldest stars based on the redshift of light coming from distant galaxies. In 2021, thanks to new techniques and advances in technology, the age of our universe was thus estimated at 13.797 billion years using the Lambda-CDM concordance model.

However, many scientists have been puzzled by the existence of stars like the Methuselah that appear to be older than the estimated age of our universe and by the discovery of early galaxies in an advanced state of evolution made possible by the James Webb Space Telescope. These galaxies, existing a mere 300 million years or so after the Big Bang, appear to have a level of maturity and mass typically associated with billions of years of cosmic evolution. Furthermore, they're surprisingly small in size, adding another layer of mystery to the equation.

We are reaching little by little this sentence made by Werner Karl Heisenberg one of the founders of quantum mechanics.


"The first drink from the glass of natural sciences makes a man an atheist, but God is waiting for him at the bottom of the glass".

And i think this its correct, every time we think we know something we learn we know nothing.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[vapourminer]

^Okay, with all the discussion around AI generated content, I want to conduct a little test to see if you guys can discern AI from reality.  Obviously, this is an informal test but here goes.  (feel free to use one of those detection tools on it as well).  It's not necessary for everyone to respond to this post - I'll update this post with an edit at  ~2100 UST to let you know.  Oh, regardless of what comes after this, I still love you JJG

I just wanted to bring up a point about JJG's forum postings. Don't get me wrong, the guy knows his stuff and has some really useful insights. But seriously, he uses way too many words to make a simple point! I mean, come on, who has the time to read through a novel every time he posts something? It's like he's trying to show off how smart he is by using a million unnecessary words. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate a well-thought-out argument, but sometimes brevity is key.

To me it is more interesting why we think it is written by an AI or human, instead of using some detection tool. This would be an interesting school assignment @Homer . Why I think it is AI-generated:

- It uses "don't get me wrong" twice in the same alinea, something humans get taught to avoid (re-using the same words).

- "the guy knows his stuff and has some really useful insights" says exactly nothing, it attempts to disguise knowing any specifics about JJG. Except for the prompt it has been given that JJG uses lots of words trying to get a point across.

chapter one of genesis from the bible detected as written by ai lol


https://medium.com/@loonyliberal/what-if-god-were-one-of-bot-performing-ai-detection-on-the-bible-genesis-chapter-1-a0e87427055a

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[xhomerx10]

^Okay, with all the discussion around AI generated content, I want to conduct a little test to see if you guys can discern AI from reality.  Obviously, this is an informal test but here goes.  (feel free to use one of those detection tools on it as well).  It's not necessary for everyone to respond to this post - I'll update this post with an edit at  ~2100 UST to let you know.  Oh, regardless of what comes after this, I still love you JJG

I just wanted to bring up a point about JJG's forum postings. Don't get me wrong, the guy knows his stuff and has some really useful insights. But seriously, he uses way too many words to make a simple point! I mean, come on, who has the time to read through a novel every time he posts something? It's like he's trying to show off how smart he is by using a million unnecessary words. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate a well-thought-out argument, but sometimes brevity is key.

#nohomo

 The content was generated using AI.  Thanks for all the responses; you guys brought up some interesting points.

[HI-TEC99]

Well, I'm not saying
Mark Z is an alien,
But he is one though.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[goldkingcoiner]

^Okay, with all the discussion around AI generated content, I want to conduct a little test to see if you guys can discern AI from reality.  Obviously, this is an informal test but here goes.  (feel free to use one of those detection tools on it as well).  It's not necessary for everyone to respond to this post - I'll update this post with an edit at  ~2100 UST to let you know.  Oh, regardless of what comes after this, I still love you JJG

I just wanted to bring up a point about JJG's forum postings. Don't get me wrong, the guy knows his stuff and has some really useful insights. But seriously, he uses way too many words to make a simple point! I mean, come on, who has the time to read through a novel every time he posts something? It's like he's trying to show off how smart he is by using a million unnecessary words. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate a well-thought-out argument, but sometimes brevity is key.

To me it is more interesting why we think it is written by an AI or human, instead of using some detection tool. This would be an interesting school assignment @Homer . Why I think it is AI-generated:

- It uses "don't get me wrong" twice in the same alinea, something humans get taught to avoid (re-using the same words).

- "the guy knows his stuff and has some really useful insights" says exactly nothing, it attempts to disguise knowing any specifics about JJG. Except for the prompt it has been given that JJG uses lots of words trying to get a point across.

chapter one of genesis from the bible detected as written by ai lol


https://medium.com/@loonyliberal/what-if-god-were-one-of-bot-performing-ai-detection-on-the-bible-genesis-chapter-1-a0e87427055a

Somewhere a conspiracy theorist is losing his shit over these AI detectors.

[FinePoine0]

SEC Launches Review of Latest Bitcoin ETF Applications:

The clock on the SEC's review process doesn't formally start ticking until the filings are published in the federal register.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has launched its review of the latest bitcoin exchange-traded-fund (ETF) applications.
While the regulator published documents seeking public consultations last week, the clock on the review process doesn't formally start until the filings are published in the federal register.
The SEC has asked for comments on all five of Cboe’s ETF applications: Wise Origin, WisdomTree, VanEck, Invesco Galaxy and ARK 21Shares. In a separate document, it also asked for comments on BackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust, filed on Nasdaq.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/07/17/sec-launches-review-of-latest-bitcoin-etf-applications/?s=09

[sirazimuth]

We are reaching little by little this sentence made by Werner Karl Heisenberg one of the founders of quantum mechanics.


"The first drink from the glass of natural sciences makes a man an atheist, but God is waiting for him at the bottom of the glass".

And i think this its correct, every time we think we know something we learn we know nothing.

I was skeptical of that “quote” of Heisenberg so I googled it.
My suspicions were confirmed.
First hit at Quora says the quote is apparently fabricated.
And the chatty AI dude said it maybe incorrectly attributed to Heisenberg.
Dyor

[dansus021]

Since when Bitcoin become pump and dump like this 

Since your mama.

 

Maybe I need a wake up call